Focus on Function - a randomized controlled trial comparing two rehabilitation interventions for young children with cerebral palsy

Mary Law, Johanna Darrah, Nancy Pollock, Peter Rosenbaum, Dianne Russell, Stephen D Walter, Theresa Petrenchik, Brenda Wilson, Virginia Wright, Mary Law, Johanna Darrah, Nancy Pollock, Peter Rosenbaum, Dianne Russell, Stephen D Walter, Theresa Petrenchik, Brenda Wilson, Virginia Wright

Abstract

Background: Children with cerebral palsy receive a variety of long-term physical and occupational therapy interventions to facilitate development and to enhance functional independence in movement, self-care, play, school activities and leisure. Considerable human and financial resources are directed at the "intervention" of the problems of cerebral palsy, although the available evidence supporting current interventions is inconclusive. A considerable degree of uncertainty remains about the appropriate therapeutic approaches to manage the habilitation of children with cerebral palsy. The primary objective of this project is to conduct a multi-site randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of a task/context-focused approach compared to a child-focused remediation approach in improving performance of functional tasks and mobility, increasing participation in everyday activities, and improving quality of life in children 12 months to 5 years of age who have cerebral palsy.

Method/design: A multi-centred randomized controlled trial research design will be used. Children will be recruited from a representative sample of children attending publicly-funded regional children's rehabilitation centers serving children with disabilities in Ontario and Alberta in Canada. Target sample size is 220 children with cerebral palsy aged 12 months to 5 years at recruitment date. Therapists are randomly assigned to deliver either a context-focused approach or a child-focused approach. Children follow their therapist into their treatment arm. Outcomes will be evaluated at baseline, after 6 months of treatment and at a 3-month follow-up period. Outcomes represent the components of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, including body function and structure (range of motion), activities (performance of functional tasks, motor function), participation (involvement in formal and informal activities), and environment (parent perceptions of care, parental empowerment).

Discussion: This paper presents the background information, design and protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing a task/context-focused approach to a child-focused remediation approach in improving functional outcomes for young children with cerebral palsy.

Trial registration: [clinical trial registration #: NCT00469872].

References

    1. Cans C. Surveillance of cerebral palsy in Europe: A collaboration of cerebral palsy surveys and registers. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000;40:796–804.
    1. Missiuna C, Smits C, Rosenbaum P, Woodside J, Law M. Hamilton. ON: CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University; 2001. Incidence and prevalence of childhood disabilities.
    1. U.S Department of Health and Human Services . Research plan for the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1993.
    1. Salkever DS. Parental opportunity costs and other economic costs of children's disabling conditions. In: Hobbs N, Perrin J, editor. Issues in the care of children with chronic illness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1985. pp. 864–879.
    1. Honeycutt AA, Grosse SD, Dunlap LJ, Schendel DE, Chen H, Brann E, Homsi G. Economic costs of mental retardation, cerebral palsy, hearing loss, and vision impairment. In: Altman BM, Barnartt SN, Hendershot GE, Larson SA, editor. Using survey data to study disability: results from the National Health Interview Survey on Disability Research in Social Science and Disability, 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2003. pp. 207–228.
    1. World Health Organization . International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
    1. Dumas H, O'Neil M, Fragala M. Expert consensus on physical therapist intervention after botulinum toxin A injection for children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2001;13:122–32.
    1. Bly L. A historical and current view of the basis of NDT. Pediatr Phys Ther. 1991;3:131–5.
    1. Howle J. Laguna Beach. CA: Neurodevelopmental Treatment Association; 2002. Neurodevelopmental treatment approach: Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice.
    1. Adams M, Chandler L, Schumann K. Gait changes in children with cerebral palsy following a neurodevelopmental treatment course. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2000;12:114–120.
    1. Van Sant AF. Neurodevelopmental treatment and pediatric physical therapy: A commentary. Pediatr Phys Ther. 1991;3:137–41.
    1. Butler C, Darrah J. Effects of neurodevelopmental treatment (NDT) for cerebral palsy: an AACPDM evidence report. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001;43:778–790.
    1. Bottos M, Feliciangeli A, Sciuto L, Gericke C, Vianello A. Functional status of adults with cerebral palsy and implications for treatment of children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001;42:516–528.
    1. Gordon J. Assumptions underlying physical therapy intervention: Theoretical and historical perspectives. In: Carr J, Shepher R, editor. Movement Science, Foundations for Physical Therapy in Rehabilitation. Gaitherburg, MD: Aspen Publishers; 2000. pp. 1–31.
    1. Latash ML, Anson JG. What are "normal movements" in atypical populations? Behav Brain Sci. 1996;19:55–106.
    1. Mahoney G, Robinson C, Perales F. Early motor intervention: The need for new treatment paradigms. Infants Young Child. 2004;17:291–300.
    1. Mathiowietz V, Haugen J. Motor behavior research: Implications for therapeutic approaches to central nervous system dysfunction. Am J Occup Ther. 1994;48:733–45.
    1. Burton AW, Davis WE. Optimizing the involvement and performance of children with physical impairments in movement activities. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 1992;4:236–48.
    1. Darrah J, Barlett D. Dynamic systems theory and management of children with cerebral palsy: unresolved issues. Infants Young Child. 1995;8:52–9.
    1. Fetters L. Measurement and treatment in cerebral palsy: An argument for a new approach. Phys Ther. 1991;71:244–7.
    1. Jette AM. Outcomes research: Shifting the dominant research paradigm in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 1995;75:965–960.
    1. Rothstein JM. Disability and our identity. Phys Ther. 1994;74:375–378.
    1. Rioux MH. New research directions and paradigms: Disability is not Measles. In: Rioux M, Bach M, editor. Disability is not measles, new research paradigms in disability. North York, Ontario: Roeher Institute; 1994. pp. 1–7.
    1. Law M, Dunn W. Perspectives on understanding and changing the environments of children with disabilities. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 1993;13:1–17.
    1. Dowling M, Dolan L. Families with children with disabilities – inequalities and the social model. Disability and Society. 2001;16:21–35.
    1. Colver A. What are we trying to do for disabled children? Current Paediatrics. 2006;16:501–505.
    1. Lawlor K, Mihaylov S, Welsh B, Jarvis S, Colver A. A qualitative study of the physical, social and attitudinal environments influencing the participation of children with cerebral palsy in northeast England. Pediatr Rehabil. 2006;9:219–28.
    1. Rosenbaum P, King S, Law M, King G, Evans J. Family-centred service: A conceptual framework and research review. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 1998;18:1–20.
    1. Elman J. Development: It's about time. Dev Sci. 2003;6:430–433.
    1. Thelen E, Bates E. Connectionism and dynamic systems: Are they really different? Dev Sci. 2003;6:378–391.
    1. Newell KM. Constraints on the development of coordination. In: Wade M, Whiting H, editor. Motor Development in Children: Aspects of Co-ordination and Control. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff; 1986. pp. 341–360.
    1. Holt KG, Obusek JP, Fonseca ST. Constraints on disordered locomotion: A dynamical systems perspective on spastic cerebral palsy. Human Movement Science. 1996;15:177–202.
    1. Ketelaar M, Vermeer A, Hart H, van Petegem-van Beek E, Helders PJM. Effects of a functional therapy program on motor abilities of children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 2001;81:1534–1545.
    1. Burton AW, Davis WE. Ecological task analysis: Utilizing intrinsic measures in research and practice. Human Movement Science. 1996;15:285–314.
    1. Palisano RJ, Tieman BL, Walter SD, Bartlett DJ, Rosenbaum PL, Russell DJ, Hanna SE. Effect of environmental setting on mobility methods of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003;45:113–120.
    1. Trahan J, Malouin F. Intermittent intensive physiotherapy in children with cerebral palsy: A pilot study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002;44:233–239.
    1. King G, Tucker MA, Alambets P, Gritzan J, McDougall J, Ogilvie A, Husted K, O'Grady S, Brine M, Malloy-Miller T. The evaluation of functional, school-based therapy services for children with special needs: a feasibility study. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 1998;18:1–27.
    1. Eliasson A, Ekholm C, Carlstedt T. Hand function in children with cerebral palsy after upper-limb tendon transfer and muscle release. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1998;40:612–621.
    1. McLaughlin J, Bjornson K, Astley S, Graubert C, Hays R, Roberts TS, Price R, Temkin N. Selective dorsal rhizotomy: efficacy and safety in an investigator-masked randomized clinical trial. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1998;40:220–32.
    1. Wright V, Sheil E, Drake J, Wedge J, Naumann S. Evaluation of selective dorsal rhizotomy for the reduction of spasticity in cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1998;40:239–47.
    1. Barry MJ, Albright AL, Shultz BL. Intrathecal baclofen therapy and the role of the physical therapist. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2000;12:77–86.
    1. Fehlings D, Rang M, Glazier J, Steele C. An evaluation of botulinum-A toxin injections to improve upper extremity function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Journal of Pediatrics. 2000;137:331–337.
    1. Cottalorda J, Gauthereon V, Metton G, Charmet E, Cahvier Y. Toe-walking in children younger than six years with cerebral palsy: the contribution of serial corrective casting. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2000;82:541–4.
    1. Hainsworth F, Harrison M, Sheldon T, Roussounis S. A preliminary evaluation of ankle orthoses in the management of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997;39:243–247.
    1. Fowler EG, Ho TW, Nwigwe AI, Dorey FJ. The effect of quadriceps femoris muscle strengthening exercises on spasticity in children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 2001;81:1215–1223.
    1. Haney N. Muscle strengthening in children with cerebral palsy. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 1998;18:149–57.
    1. Ross S, Engsberg J, Olree K, Park T. Quadriceps and hamstring strength changes as a function of selective dorsal rhizotomy surgery and rehabilitation. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2001;13:2–9.
    1. Brown GT, Burns S. The efficacy of neurodevelopmental treatment in paediatrics: a systematic review. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2001;64:235–44.
    1. Farmer S, Butler P, Major R. Targeted training for crouch posture in cerebral palsy: A case report. Physiotherapy. 1999;85:242–7.
    1. Schindl M, Forstner C, Kern H, Hesse S. Treadmill training with partial body weight support in nonambulatory patients with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:301–306.
    1. Carmick J. Effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation during gait in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 1998;10:92.
    1. Sommerfelt K, Markestad T, Berg K, Saetesdal I. Therapeutic electrical stimulation in cerebral palsy: a randomized, controlled, crossover trial. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001;43:609–613.
    1. Bower E, Michell D, Burnett M, Campbell M, McLellan D. Randomized controlled trial of physiotherapy in 56 children with cerebral palsy followed for 18 months. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001;43:4–15.
    1. Delgado M, Combes M, Diamond M, Albright AL, Stout C, McClaugherty L, et al. Positive perspectives for cerebral palsy, part 4. Management of motor impairment: approaches for children with cerebral palsy. Exceptional Parent. 1999;29:42–53.
    1. Lammi B, Law M. The effects of modified family-centred functional therapy on the occupational performance of children with cerebral palsy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2003;70:285–297.
    1. Law M, Darrah J, Pollock N, King G, Rosenbaum P, Russell D, Palisano R, Harris S, Armstrong R, Watt J. Family-centred functional therapy for children with cerebral palsy: An emerging practice model. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 1998;18:83–102.
    1. Green C, Proch C, Gara S. The changing face of cerebral palsy : A review of the disorder and its treatment. J Neurol Rehabil. 1997;11:245–253.
    1. Knox V, Evans AL. Evaluation of the functional effects of a course of Bobath therapy in children with cerebral palsy: a preliminary study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002;44:447–460.
    1. Stanley FJ, Blair E, Alberman E. Cerebral palsies: Epidemiology & causal pathways. London: Mac Keith Press; 2000.
    1. Dodd KJ, Taylor NF, Damiano DL. A systematic review of the effectiveness of strength-training programs for people with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:1157–1164.
    1. Blundell SW, Shephard RB, Dean CM, Adams RD. Functional strength training in cerebral palsy: a pilot study of a group circuit training class for children aged 4–8 years. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17:48–57.
    1. Eagleton M, Iams A, McDowell J, Morrison R, Evans CL. The effects of strength training of gait in adolescents with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2004;16:22–30.
    1. Dodd KJ, Taylor NF, Graham HK. A randomized clinical trial of strength training in young people with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003;45:652–657.
    1. Law M, Baptiste S, McColl M, Carswell A, Polatajko H, Pollock N. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) Manual. 3. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE; 1998.
    1. Haley SM, Coster WJ, Ludlow LH, Haltiwanger JT, Andrellos PJ. Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Development, Standardization and Administration Manual. Boston: PEDI Research Group, New England Medical Center Hospitals; 1992.
    1. Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, Russell D, Wood E, Galuppi B. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997;39:214–223.
    1. Wright V, Boschen K. Responsiveness to change of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory when used with children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1995;37:14–15.
    1. Russell D, Rosenbaum P, Cadman D, Gowland C, Hardy S, Jarvis S. The gross motor function measure: A means to evaluate the effects of physical therapy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1989;31:341–352.
    1. Bjornson KF, Graubert CS, McLaughlin JF, Kerfeld CI, Clark EM. Test-retest reliability of the Gross Motor Function Measure in children with cerebral palsy. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 1998;18:51–61.
    1. Bjornson KF, Graubert CS, McLaughlin JF, Astley SJ. Inter-rater reliability of the Gross Motor Function Measure. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1994;36:27–28.
    1. Nordmark E, Hagglund G, Jarnlo GB. Reliability of the Gross Motor Function Measure in cerebral palsy. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 1997;29:25–28.
    1. Varni JW, Burwinkle TM, Berrin SJ, Sherman SA, Artavia K, Malcarne VL, Chambers HG. The PedsQL in pediatric cerebral palsy: reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Generic Core Scales and Cerebral Palsy Module. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48:442–449.
    1. King G, Law M, King S, Hurley P, Hanna S, Kertoy M, Rosenbaum P, Young N. Children's Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) and Preferences for Activities of Children (PAC) San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment, Inc; 2004.
    1. Koren PE, DeChillo N, Friesen BJ. Measuring empowerment in families whose members have disabilities: A brief questionnaire. Rehab Psychol. 1992;37:305–321.
    1. Singh NN, Curtis WJ, Ellis CR, Nicholson MW, Villani TM, Wechsler HA. Psychometric analysis of the family empowerment scale. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. 1995;3:85–91.
    1. Curtis WJ, Singh NN. Family involvement and empowerment in mental health service provision for children with emotional and behavioral disorders. J Child Fam Stud. 1996;5:503–517.
    1. Scheel MJ, Rieckmann T. An empirically derived description of self-efficacy and empowerment for parents of children identified as psychologically disordered. Am J Fam Ther. 1998;26:15–27.
    1. Koroloff N, Elliot DJ, Koren PE, Friesen BJ. Linking low-income families to children's mental health services: An outcome study. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. 1996;4:2–11.
    1. King S, Rosenbaum P, King G. The measure of processes of care (MPOC): A means to assess family-centred behaviours of health care provider. Hamilton, ON: McMaster University, CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research; 1995.
    1. King G, King S, Rosenbaum P, Goffin R. Family-centered caregiving and well-being of parents of children with disabilities: Linking process with outcome. J Pediatr Psychol. 1999;24:41–53.
    1. King S, Rosenbaum P, King G. Parents' perceptions of caregiving: Development and validation of a measure of processes. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1996;38:757–772.
    1. Donner A, Klar N. Design and analysis of cluster randomization trials in health research. London (England): Arnold Publishers; 2000.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

3
Subskrybuj