A randomized study of lubiprostone for opioid-induced constipation in patients with chronic noncancer pain

Byron Cryer, Seymour Katz, Ricardo Vallejo, Anca Popescu, Ryuji Ueno, Byron Cryer, Seymour Katz, Ricardo Vallejo, Anca Popescu, Ryuji Ueno

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral lubiprostone for relieving symptoms of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in patients with chronic noncancer pain.

Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Setting: Seventy-nine US and Canadian centers.

Subjects: Patients aged ≥ 18 years with OIC, defined as <3 spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) per week.

Methods: Patients received lubiprostone 24 mcg or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in SBM frequency at week 8.

Results: Among randomized patients (N=418; lubiprostone, N=210; placebo, N=208), most completed the study (lubiprostone, 67.1%; placebo, 69.7%). The safety and efficacy (intent-to-treat) populations included 414 (lubiprostone, N=208; placebo, N=206) and 413 (lubiprostone, N=209; placebo, N=204) patients, respectively. The mean (standard deviation) age was 50.4 (10.9) years; most patients were female (64.4%) and white (77.7%). Changes from baseline in SBM frequency rates were significantly higher at week 8 (P=0.005) and overall (P=0.004) in patients treated with lubiprostone compared with placebo. Pairwise comparisons showed significantly greater overall improvement for abdominal discomfort (P=0.047), straining (P<0.001), constipation severity (P=0.007), and stool consistency (P<0.001) with lubiprostone compared with placebo. Moreover, patients rated the effectiveness of lubiprostone as significantly (P<0.05) better than placebo for 11 of 12 weeks. The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) with lubiprostone and placebo were nausea (16.8% vs 5.8%, respectively), diarrhea (9.6% vs 2.9%), and abdominal distention (8.2% vs 2.4%). No lubiprostone-related serious AEs occurred.

Conclusion: Lubiprostone effectively relieved OIC and associated signs and symptoms and was well tolerated in patients with chronic noncancer pain (https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT00595946).

Keywords: Bowel Movement; ClC-2; Opioid; Opioid-Induced Constipation; Placebo-Controlled Trial; Prostone.

© 2014 The Authors. Pain Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Academy of Pain Medicine.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Change from baseline in frequency of spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) in patients treated with lubiprostone 24 mcg twice daily compared with placebo (intent-to-treat population). P values from van Elteren tests stratified by pooled center. (B) Percentage of patients with first SBM within 24 and 48 hours of initial dose of lubiprostone 24 mcg twice daily compared with placebo. P values are from χ2 tests. No imputation of missing data was performed.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overall change from baseline in constipation-associated symptoms in patients treated with lubiprostone 24 mcg twice daily compared with placebo (intent-to-treat population). P values are from the van Elteren test. Hommel's stagewise rejective method was used to adjust P values for the following: *stool consistency, for straining; †straining, for stool consistency; ‡abdominal discomfort, for abdominal bloating; and §abdominal bloating, for abdominal discomfort. The scale ranged from 0 (very loose) to 4 (very hard; little balls) for stool consistency, from 0 (absent) to 4 (very severe) for severity of associated symptoms, and from 1 (very regular) to 7 (very irregular) for bowel habit regularity. No imputation of missing data was performed.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Overall effectiveness of lubiprostone 24 mcg twice daily compared with placebo in the intent-to-treat population. *P < 0.05 by van Elteren test stratified by pooled site. Missing data were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Results from non-LOCF analysis were similar at almost all treatment weeks. The scale ranged from 0 (not at all effective) to 4 (extremely effective).

References

    1. Johannes CB, Le TK, Zhou X, Johnston JA, Dworkin RH. The prevalence of chronic pain in United States adults: Results of an internet-based survey. J Pain. 2010;11:1230–1239.
    1. Loyland B, Miaskowski C, Wahl AK, Rustoen T. Prevalence and characteristics of chronic pain among long-term social assistance recipients compared to the general population in Norway. Clin J Pain. 2010;26:624–630.
    1. Ohayon MM, Stingl JC. Prevalence and comorbidity of chronic pain in the German general population. J Psychiatr Res. 2012;46:444–450.
    1. IOM (Institute of Medicine) Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.
    1. Fine PG, Mahajan G, McPherson ML. Long-acting opioids and short-acting opioids: Appropriate use in chronic pain management. Pain Med. 2009;10:S79–88.
    1. Kurz A, Sessler DI. Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction: Pathophysiology and potential new therapies. Drugs. 2003;63:649–671.
    1. Holzer P. Opioid receptors in the gastrointestinal tract. Regul Pept. 2009;155:11–17.
    1. Kalso E, Edwards JE, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Opioids in chronic non-cancer pain: Systematic review of efficacy and safety. Pain. 2004;112:372–380.
    1. Bell TJ, Panchal SJ, Miaskowski C, et al. The prevalence, severity, and impact of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction: Results of a US and European Patient Survey (PROBE 1) Pain Med. 2009;10:35–42.
    1. Amitiza®. 2013. (lubiprostone) Full Prescribing Information, Sucampo Pharma Americas, LLC, Bethesda, MD, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., Deerfield, IL, USA.
    1. Lacy BE, Levy LC. Lubiprostone: A chloride channel activator. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;41:345–351.
    1. Fei G, Raehal K, Liu S, et al. Lubiprostone reverses the inhibitory action of morphine on intestinal secretion in guinea pig and mouse. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2010;334:333–340.
    1. Ueno R, Hiroyoshi O, Engelke K. Lubiprostone effects on morphine-induced constipation and analgesia. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:A373.
    1. Johanson JF, Morton D, Geenen J, Ueno R. Multicenter, 4-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of lubiprostone, a locally-acting type-2 chloride channel activator, in patients with chronic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:170–177.
    1. Barish CF, Drossman D, Johanson JF, Ueno R. Efficacy and safety of lubiprostone in patients with chronic constipation. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:1090–1097.
    1. Johanson JF, Ueno R. Lubiprostone, a locally acting chloride channel activator, in adult patients with chronic constipation: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study to evaluate efficacy and safety. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;25:1351–1361.
    1. Quigley C. The role of opioids in cancer pain. BMJ. 2005;331:825–829.
    1. Camilleri M. Opioid-induced constipation: Challenges and therapeutic opportunities. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:835–842. quiz 43.
    1. Relistor®. 2010. (methylnaltrexone bromide) Full Prescribing Information, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA.
    1. Lowenstein O, Leyendecker P, Lux EA, et al. Efficacy and safety of combined prolonged-release oxycodone and naloxone in the management of moderate/severe chronic non-malignant pain: Results of a prospectively designed pooled analysis of two randomised, double-blind clinical trials. BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2010;10:12.
    1. Paulson DM, Kennedy DT, Donovick RA, et al. Alvimopan: An oral, peripherally acting, mu-opioid receptor antagonist for the treatment of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction—A 21-day treatment-randomized clinical trial. J Pain. 2005;6:184–192.
    1. Webster L, Jansen JP, Peppin J, et al. Alvimopan, a peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor (PAM-OR) antagonist for the treatment of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction: Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study in subjects taking opioids for chronic non-cancer pain. Pain. 2008;137:428–440.
    1. Jansen JP, Lorch D, Langan J, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial (Study SB-767905/012) of alvimopan for opioid-induced bowel dysfunction in patients with non-cancer pain. J Pain. 2011;12:185–193.
    1. Irving G, Penzes J, Ramjattan B, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial (Study SB-767905/013) of alvimopan for opioid-induced bowel dysfunction in patients with non-cancer pain. J Pain. 2011;12:175–184.
    1. Entereg®. 2013. (alvimopan) Full Prescribing Information, Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Lexington, MA, USA.
    1. Joswick T, Spierings ELH, Lindner E, Woldegeorgis F, Ueno R. Analgesia during long-term lubiprostone therapy in patients with opioid-induced constipation and chronic, non-cancer pain: Results from a phase 3, open-label clinical trial. J Pain. 2013;14(suppl):s79. American Pain Society 32nd Annual Meeting; May 8–11, 2013; New Orleans, LA.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj