"The results are encouragements to make positive changes to be healthier:" qualitative evaluation of Marshallese participants' perceptions when receiving study results in a randomized control trial

Pearl A McElfish, Rachel S Purvis, Aaron J Scott, Lauren K Haggard-Duff, Sheldon Riklon, Christopher R Long, Pearl A McElfish, Rachel S Purvis, Aaron J Scott, Lauren K Haggard-Duff, Sheldon Riklon, Christopher R Long

Abstract

Background: Study participants express a desire to receive the results of studies in which they have participated even when the results are not what researchers expected. Sharing results with participants is a core principle of community-based participatory research (CBPR), however, many researchers using a community-based participatory approach report that they encounter barriers to sharing results with study participants. Researchers at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences established a CBPR partnership with Marshallese community stakeholders in an effort to reduce the health disparities of this vulnerable population. Marshallese are a Pacific Islander population that faces significant health disparities and have a high prevalence of diabetes, obesity, obesity-related cancers, and other chronic diseases compared to the general US population.

Methods: A qualitative descriptive design was used to evaluate Marshallese participants' perceptions related to receiving results of a culturally adapted Diabetes Self-Management Education randomized control trial in which they participated. Participants were provided with a summary of their individual results as well as preliminary, overall aggregate study results. Interviews were conducted with half of (N = 111) of the 221 enrolled participants that provided them with the opportunity to share in-depth responses related to their perceptions of the study results they received.

Results: There was no statistically significant differences between study arms in participant desire to receive overall study results, desire to receive personal study results, or willingness to participate in future research. Participants described their desire for results and the effect of these results on their future behavior. Within the a priori theme of participants' desire for results, three subthemes emerged: 1) results showed current health status, 2) results showed improvement, and 3) demonstrated the overall results of the study. Within the a priori theme of effects of results on future behavior, two sub-themes emerged: 1) encourage future healthy behavior, and 2) encourage future research participation.

Conclusions: Participants overwhelmingly stated they wanted to receive personal and aggregate study results. This finding is consistent with previous qualitative studies that documented that participants want results. Marshallese participants also reported that receiving study results would affect their future health behavior. This study documents specifically how participants anticipate using the results of studies in which they participated.

Clinical trials registration information: The study is registered in clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT02407132).

Keywords: Diabetes; Health disparities; Pacific islanders; Randomized control trial; Returning results.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflicts of interest.

© 2020 The Authors.

References

    1. International Diabetes Federation . eighth ed. International Diabetes Federation; Brussels, Belguim: 2017. IDF Diabetes Atlas.
    1. McElfish P., Rowland B., Long C. Diabetes and hypertension in Marshallese adults: results from faith-based health screenings. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2017;4(6):1042–1050.
    1. McElfish P., Long C., Kohler P. Comparative effectiveness and maintenance of diabetes self-management education interventions for Marshallese type 2 diabetes patients: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2019;42:1–9.
    1. McElfish P.A., Purvis R.S., Esquivel M.K. Diabetes disparities and promising interventions to address diabetes in native Hawaiian and pacific islander populations. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2019;19(5):19.
    1. Yamada S., Dodd A., Soe T., Chen T., Bauman K. Diabetes mellitus prevalence in out-patient Marshallese adults on Ebeye Island, Republic of the Marshall Islands. Hawaii Med. J. 2004;63(2):45–51.
    1. Palafox N., Yamada S., Ou A., Minami J., Johnson D., Katz A. Cancer in Micronesia. Pac. Health Dialog. 2004;11(2):78–83.
    1. Hixson L., Hepler B., Kim M. United States Census Bureau; Washington, DC: 2012. The Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Population 2010.
    1. McElfish P., Kohler P., Smith C. Community-driven research agenda to reduce health disparities. Clin Transl Sci. 2015;8(6):690–695.
    1. McElfish P., Bridges M., Hudson J. Family model of diabetes education with a Pacific Islander community. Diabetes Educat. 2015;41(6):706–715.
    1. McElfish P., Post J., Rowland B. A social ecological and community-engaged perspective for addressing health disparities among Marshallese in Arkansas. Int J Nurs Clin Pract. 2016;3(191):1–6.
    1. McElfish P., Hudson J., Schultz T. Developing an interprofessional student-led clinic to address health disparities in a Pacific Islander Migrant Community. Journal of Student-Run Clinics. 2017;3(1):1–7.
    1. McElfish P.A., Goulden P.A., Bursac Z. Engagement practices that join scientific methods with community wisdom: designing a patient-centered, randomized control trial with a Pacific Islander community. Nurs. Inq. 2017;24(2):1–11.
    1. McElfish P., Long C., Rowland B., Moore S., Wilmoth R., Ayers B. Improving culturally appropriate care using a community-based participatory approach: evaluation of a multi-component cultural competency training program, Arkansas, 2015-2016. Prev. Chronic Dis. 2017;14(E26)
    1. McElfish P.A., Long C.R., Kaholokula J.K. Design of a comparative effectiveness randomized controlled trial testing a faith-based Diabetes Prevention Program (WORD DPP) vs. a Pacific culturally-adapted Diabetes Prevention Program (PILI DPP) for Marshallese in the United States. Medicine. 2018;97(19)
    1. McElfish P.A., Moore R., Laelan M., Ayers B.L. Using CBPR to address health disparities with the Marshallese community in Arkansas. Ann. Hum. Biol. 2018;45(3):264–271.
    1. Barker H. Post-colonial World. Cengage Learning; Belmont, CA: 2012. Bravo for the Marshallese: Regaining Control in a Post-Nuclear.
    1. Yamada S., Palafox N. On the biopsychosocial model: the example of political economic causes of diabetes in the Marshall Islands. Fam. Med. 2001;33(9):702–704.
    1. Yeary K.H.K., Long C.R., Bursac Z., McElfish P.A. Design of a randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial testing a Family Model of Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) vs. standard DSME for Marshallese in the United States. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2017;6:97–104.
    1. Yeary K.H., Aitaoto N., Sparks K. Cultural adaptation of diabetes self-management education for Marshallese residing in the United States: lessons learned in curriculum development. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2017;11(3):253–261.
    1. Dixon-Woods M., Jackson C., Windridge K.C., Kenyon S. Receiving a summary of the results of a trial: qualitative study of participants' views. BMJ. 2006;332(7535):206–210.
    1. Partridge A.H., Burstein H.J., Gelman R.S., Marcom P.K., Winer E.P. Do patients participating in clinical trials want to know study results? J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2003;95(6):491–492.
    1. Partridge A.H., Wong J.S., Knudsen K. Offering participants results of a clinical trial: sharing results of a negative study. Lancet. 2005;365(9463):963–964.
    1. Fernandez C.V., Gao J., Strahlendorf C. Providing research results to participants: attitudes and needs of adolescents and parents of children with cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009;27(6):878–883.
    1. Baylor A., Muzoora C., Bwana M. Dissemination of research findings to research participants living with HIV in rural Uganda: challenges and rewards. PLoS Med. 2013;10(3):4.
    1. Trinidad S.B., Ludman E.J., Hopkins S. Community dissemination and genetic research: moving beyond results reporting. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2015;167(7):1542–1550.
    1. Purvis R., Abraham T., Long C., Stewart M., Warmack T., McElfish P. Qualitative study of participants' perceptions and preferences regarding research dissemination. Am. J. Bioeth. 2017;8(2):69–74.
    1. Long C.R., Stewart M.K., Cunningham T.V., Warmack T.S., McElfish P.A. Health research participants' preferences for receiving research results. Clin. Trials. 2016;13(6):582–591.
    1. Chen P.G., Diaz N., Lucas G., Rosenthal M.S. Dissemination of results in community-based participatory research. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2010;39(4):372–378.
    1. Partridge A.H., Hackett N., Blood E. Oncology physician and nurse practices and attitudes regarding offering clinical trial results to study participants. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2004;96(8):629–632.
    1. Rigby H., Fernandez C.V. Providing research results to study participants: support versus practice of researchers presenting at the American Society of Hematology annual meeting. Blood. 2005;106(4):1199–1202.
    1. Long C., Purvis R., Flood-Grady E. Health researchers' experiences, perceptions, and barriers related to sharing study results with participants. Health Res. Pol. Syst. 2019;17(25)
    1. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute What we mean by engagement. 2018. Accessed October 15, 2018.
    1. Carpenter D., Nieva V., Albaghal T., Sorra J. Development of a planning tool to guide research dissemination. In: Henriksen K., Battles J.B., Marks E.S., Lewin D.I., editors. Advances in Patient Safety: from Research to Implementation (Volume 4: Programs, Tools, and Products) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Rockville, MD: 2005. pp. 83–91.
    1. McElfish P., Purvis R., Stewart M., James L., Yeary K., Long C. Health research funding agencies' policies, recommendations, and tools for dissemination. Prog. Commun. Health Partnerships: Res. Edu. Action. 2018;12(4):473–482.
    1. Minkler M., Salvatore A. Participatory approaches for study design and analysis in dissemination and implementation research. In: Brownson R., Colditz G., Proctor E., editors. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice. Oxford University Press; New York, NY: 2012. pp. 192–212.
    1. Long C.R., Stewart M.K., McElfish P.A. Health research participants are not receiving research results: a collaborative solution is needed. Trials. 2017;18(1):449.
    1. McElfish P.A., Purvis R.S., Long C.R. Researchers' experiences with and perceptions of returning results to participants: study protocol. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018;11:95–98.
    1. Neergaard M.A., Olesen F., Andersen R.S., Sondergaard J. Qualitative description - the poor cousin of health research? BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2009;9:52.
    1. Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res. Nurs. Health. 2000;23(4):334–340.
    1. Sandelowski M. What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res. Nurs. Health. 2010;33(1):77–84.
    1. Cox K., Moghaddam N., Bird L., Elkan R. Feedback of trial results to participants: a survey of clinicians' and patients' attitudes and experiences. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2011;15(2):124–129.
    1. Sarradon-Eck A., Sakoyan J., Desclaux A., Mancini J., Genre D., Julian-Reyniey C. They should take time": disclosure of clinical trial results as part of a social relationship. Soc. Sci. Med. 2012;75:873–882.
    1. Clift K., Halverson C., Fiksdal A., Kumbamu A., Sharp R., McCormick J. Patients' views on incidental findings from clinical exome sequencing. App. Trans. Genomics. 2015;4:38–43.
    1. Shalowitz D.I., Miller F.G. Disclosing individual results of clinical research: implications of respect for participants. Jama. 2005;294(6):737–740.
    1. Partridge A.H., Winer E.P. Informing clinical trial participants about study results. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2002;288(3):363–365.
    1. Shalowitz D.I., Miller F.G. Communicating the results of clinical research to participants: attitudes, practices, and future directions. PLoS Med. 2008;5(5)

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj