Third-trimester ultrasound for antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum in women with placenta previa: results from the ADoPAD study

N Fratelli, F Prefumo, C Maggi, C Cavalli, A Sciarrone, A Garofalo, E Viora, P Vergani, S Ornaghi, M Betti, I Vaglio Tessitore, A F Cavaliere, S Buongiorno, A Vidiri, E Fabbri, E Ferrazzi, V Maggi, I Cetin, T Frusca, T Ghi, C Kaihura, E Di Pasquo, T Stampalija, C Belcaro, M Quadrifoglio, M Veneziano, F Mecacci, S Simeone, A Locatelli, S Consonni, N Chianchiano, F Labate, A Cromi, E Bertucci, F Facchinetti, A Fichera, D Granata, F D'Antonio, F Foti, L Avagliano, G P Bulfamante, G Calì, ADoPAD (Antenatal Diagnosis of Placental Adhesion Disorders) Working Group, N Fratelli, F Prefumo, C Maggi, C Cavalli, A Sciarrone, A Garofalo, E Viora, P Vergani, S Ornaghi, M Betti, I Vaglio Tessitore, A F Cavaliere, S Buongiorno, A Vidiri, E Fabbri, E Ferrazzi, V Maggi, I Cetin, T Frusca, T Ghi, C Kaihura, E Di Pasquo, T Stampalija, C Belcaro, M Quadrifoglio, M Veneziano, F Mecacci, S Simeone, A Locatelli, S Consonni, N Chianchiano, F Labate, A Cromi, E Bertucci, F Facchinetti, A Fichera, D Granata, F D'Antonio, F Foti, L Avagliano, G P Bulfamante, G Calì, ADoPAD (Antenatal Diagnosis of Placental Adhesion Disorders) Working Group

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the performance of third-trimester ultrasound for the diagnosis of clinically significant placenta accreta spectrum disorder (PAS) in women with low-lying placenta or placenta previa.

Methods: This was a prospective multicenter study of pregnant women aged ≥ 18 years who were diagnosed with low-lying placenta (< 20 mm from the internal cervical os) or placenta previa (covering the internal cervical os) on ultrasound at ≥ 26 + 0 weeks' gestation, between October 2014 and January 2019. Ultrasound suspicion of PAS was raised in the presence of at least one of these signs on grayscale ultrasound: (1) obliteration of the hypoechogenic space between the uterus and the placenta; (2) interruption of the hyperechogenic interface between the uterine serosa and the bladder wall; (3) abnormal placental lacunae. Histopathological examinations were performed according to a predefined protocol, with pathologists blinded to the ultrasound findings. To assess the ability of ultrasound to detect clinically significant PAS, a composite outcome comprising the need for active management at delivery and histopathological confirmation of PAS was considered the reference standard. PAS was considered to be clinically significant if, in addition to histological confirmation, at least one of these procedures was carried out after delivery: use of hemostatic intrauterine balloon, compressive uterine suture, peripartum hysterectomy, uterine/hypogastric artery ligation or uterine artery embolization. The diagnostic performance of each ultrasound sign for clinically significant PAS was evaluated in all women and in the subgroup who had at least one previous Cesarean section and anterior placenta. Post-test probability was assessed using Fagan nomograms.

Results: A total of 568 women underwent transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound examinations during the study period. Of these, 95 delivered in local hospitals, and placental pathology according to the study protocol was therefore not available. Among the 473 women for whom placental pathology was available, clinically significant PAS was diagnosed in 99 (21%), comprising 36 cases of placenta accreta, 19 of placenta increta and 44 of placenta percreta. The median gestational age at the time of ultrasound assessment was 31.4 (interquartile range, 28.6-34.4) weeks. A normal hypoechogenic space between the uterus and the placenta reduced the post-test probability of clinically significant PAS from 21% to 5% in women with low-lying placenta or placenta previa in the third trimester of pregnancy and from 62% to 9% in the subgroup with previous Cesarean section and anterior placenta. The absence of placental lacunae reduced the post-test probability of clinically significant PAS from 21% to 9% in women with low-lying placenta or placenta previa in the third trimester of pregnancy and from 62% to 36% in the subgroup with previous Cesarean section and anterior placenta. When abnormal placental lacunae were seen on ultrasound, the post-test probability of clinically significant PAS increased from 21% to 59% in the whole cohort and from 62% to 78% in the subgroup with previous Cesarean section and anterior placenta. An interrupted hyperechogenic interface between the uterine serosa and bladder wall increased the post-test probability for clinically significant PAS from 21% to 85% in women with low-lying placenta or placenta previa and from 62% to 88% in the subgroup with previous Cesarean section and anterior placenta. When all three sonographic markers were present, the post-test probability for clinically significant PAS increased from 21% to 89% in the whole cohort and from 62% to 92% in the subgroup with previous Cesarean section and anterior placenta.

Conclusions: Grayscale ultrasound has good diagnostic performance to identify pregnancies at low risk of PAS in a high-risk population of women with low-lying placenta or placenta previa. Ultrasound may be safely used to guide management decisions and concentrate resources on patients with higher risk of clinically significant PAS. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Keywords: Cesarean section; diagnosis; low-lying placenta; placenta accreta spectrum; placenta previa; ultrasound.

© 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Grayscale ultrasound images obtained at 30–32 weeks' gestation, showing presence (a,c,e) and absence (b,d,f) of sonographic signs of placenta accreta spectrum disorder. (a,b) Obliterated (a) and normal (b) hypoechogenic space between uterus and placenta; (c,d) interrupted (c) and normal (d) hyperechogenic interface between uterine serosa and bladder wall; (e,f) presence (e) and absence (f) of abnormal placental lacunae.
Figure 2
Figure 2
STARD flowchart showing inclusion in study of women with low‐lying placenta or placenta previa, ultrasound findings related to placenta accreta spectrum disorder (PAS) and final diagnosis of clinically significant PAS, which was defined as histological confirmation of PAS in addition to need for active management at delivery.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Fagan nomograms showing post‐test probability of clinically significant placenta accreta spectrum disorder for interrupted hypoechogenic retroplacental space (a), interrupted hyperechogenic uterus–bladder interface (b), presence of abnormal placental lacunae (c), interrupted hypoechogenic retroplacental space in addition to abnormal placental lacunae (d) and presence of all three markers (e) in 473 women with low‐lying placenta or placenta previa. In four cases, the operator was not able to assess the retroplacental hypoechogenic space. LR+, positive likelihood ratio; LR−, negative likelihood ratio; prob, probability.

References

    1. Hecht JL, Baergen R, Ernst LM, Katzman PJ, Jacques SM, Jauniaux E, Khong TY, Metlay LA, Poder L, Qureshi F, Rabban JT, Roberts DJ, Shainker S, Heller DS. Classification and reporting guidelines for the pathology diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders: recommendations from an expert panel. Mod Pathol 2020; 33: 2382–2396.
    1. Eller AG, Bennett MA, Sharshiner M, Masheter C, Soisson AP, Dodson M, Silver RM. Maternal morbidity in cases of placenta accreta managed by a multidisciplinary care team compared with standard obstetric care. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 331–337.
    1. Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Thom EA, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, Carpenter M, Peaceman AM, O'Sullivan MJ, Sibai B, Langer O, Thorp JM, Ramin SM, Mercer BM, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network . Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 1226–1232.
    1. D'Antonio F, Iacovella C, Bhide A. Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using ultrasound: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 509–517.
    1. Jauniaux E, Bhide A. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and outcome of placenta previa accreta after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 217: 27–36.
    1. Jauniaux E, Bhide A, Kennedy A, Woodward P, Hubinont C, Collins S, FIGO Placenta Accreta Diagnosis and Management Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: prenatal diagnosis and screening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2018; 140: 274–280.
    1. Buca D, Liberati M, Calì G, Forlani F, Caisutti C, Flacco ME, Manzoli L, Familiari A, Scambia G, D'Antonio F. Influence of prenatal diagnosis of abnormally invasive placenta on maternal outcome: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 52: 304–309.
    1. Bhide A, Sebire N, Abuhamad A, Acharya G, Silver R. Morbidly adherent placenta: the need for standardization. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 49: 559–563.
    1. Ghourab S. Third‐trimester transvaginal ultrasonography in placenta previa: does the shape of the lower placental edge predict clinical outcome? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18: 103–108.
    1. Collins SL, Ashcroft A, Braun T, Calda P, Langhoff‐Roos J, Morel O, Stefanovic V, Tutschek B, Chantraine F. Proposal for standardized ultrasound descriptors of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 47:271–275.
    1. Fagan TJ. Letter: Nomogram for Bayes theorem. N Engl J Med 1975; 293: 257.
    1. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig L, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HCW, Kressel HY, Rifai N, Golub RM, Altman DG, Hooft L, Korevaar DA, Cohen JF, STARD Group . STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ 2015; 351: h5527.
    1. Hamada S, Hasegawa J, Nakamura M, Matsuoka R, Ichizuka K, Sekizawa A, Okai T. Ultrasonographic findings of placenta lacunae and a lack of a clear zone in cases with placenta previa and normal placenta. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 1062–1065.
    1. Pilloni E, Alemanno MG, Gaglioti P, Sciarrone A, Garofalo A, Biolcati M, Botta G, Viora E, Todros T. Accuracy of ultrasound in antenatal diagnosis of placental attachment disorders. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 47: 302–307.
    1. Calì G, Giambanco L, Puccio G, Forlani F. Morbidly adherent placenta: evaluation of ultrasound diagnostic criteria and differentiation of placenta accreta from percreta. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 406–412.
    1. Jauniaux E, Grønbeck L, Bunce C, Langhoff‐Roos J, Collins SL. Epidemiology of placenta previa accreta: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. BMJ Open 2019; 9: e031193.
    1. Collins SL, Stevenson GN, Al‐Khan A, Illsley NP, Impey L, Pappas L, Zamudio S. Three‐dimensional power doppler ultrasonography for diagnosing abnormally invasive placenta and quantifying the risk. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126: 645–653.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj