A community-based trial of educational interventions with fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening uptake among blacks in community settings
Shannon M Christy, Stacy N Davis, Kimberly R Williams, Xiuhua Zhao, Swapomthi K Govindaraju, Gwendolyn P Quinn, Susan T Vadaparampil, Hui-Yi Lin, Steven K Sutton, Richard R Roethzeim, David Shibata, Cathy D Meade, Clement K Gwede, Shannon M Christy, Stacy N Davis, Kimberly R Williams, Xiuhua Zhao, Swapomthi K Govindaraju, Gwendolyn P Quinn, Susan T Vadaparampil, Hui-Yi Lin, Steven K Sutton, Richard R Roethzeim, David Shibata, Cathy D Meade, Clement K Gwede
Abstract
Background: Intervention studies among individuals in diverse community settings are needed to reduce health disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and mortality rates. The current study compared the efficacy of 2 intervention conditions promoting CRC screening among black individuals.
Methods: Black individuals ages 50 to 75 years (N = 330) were recruited in community settings in 4 Tampa Bay counties. After obtaining consent and conducting a baseline interview to assess sociodemographic and health-related variables, participants received either a culturally targeted CRC photonovella booklet plus a fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kit or a standard CRC screening brochure plus an FIT kit. The primary outcome was FIT kit screening uptake.
Results: FIT screening uptake at 6 months was 86.7% overall (90.3% in the brochure group and 81.9% in the photonovella group). Controlling for baseline between-group differences, there was no influence of intervention on FIT kit uptake (P = .756). Significant predictors of not returning an FIT kit included being unable to work (P = .010), having higher religious belief scores (P = .015), and living farther from the cancer center (P = .015).
Conclusions: Providing FIT kits and educational print materials to black individuals in community settings resulted in high rates of CRC screening. The study also identified subgroups of participants who were less likely to return an FIT kit and provides insight for future interventions. Cancer 2016;122:3288-3296. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Keywords: cancer screening; colorectal cancer; culturally targeted; intervention trial; minority health.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.
© 2016 American Cancer Society.
Figures
Source: PubMed