Digital Health Interventions for Weight Management in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Matina Kouvari, Melina Karipidou, Thomas Tsiampalis, Eirini Mamalaki, Dimitrios Poulimeneas, Eirini Bathrellou, Demosthenes Panagiotakos, Mary Yannakoulia, Matina Kouvari, Melina Karipidou, Thomas Tsiampalis, Eirini Mamalaki, Dimitrios Poulimeneas, Eirini Bathrellou, Demosthenes Panagiotakos, Mary Yannakoulia

Abstract

Background: Recent meta-analyses suggest the use of technology-based interventions as a treatment option for obesity in adulthood. Similar meta-analytic approaches for children are scarce.

Objective: The aim of this meta-analysis is to examine the effect of technology-based interventions on overweight and obesity treatment in children and adolescents.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, and Cochrane Library for randomized clinical trials to identify interventional studies published between January 2000 and February 2021.

Results: In total, 9 manuscripts from 8 clinical trials of 582 children or adolescents were considered eligible. BMI, BMI z-score, and other BMI-related baseline metrics during and after intervention were considered as primary outcomes. In 7 of 8 studies, a technology-based intervention was applied in addition to conventional care. Of the 8 studies, 6 studies were conducted in the United States, 1 in Australia, and 1 in northwestern Europe. In total, 5 studies included adolescents, whereas the rest addressed children aged 9 to 12 years. Intervention duration ranged from 3 to 24 months. Significant differences between groups in BMI metric changes were reported by 5 of the 8 studies. Pooled analysis revealed an overall significant decrease in BMI metrics in the intervention group (standardized mean difference -0.61, 95% CI -1.10 to -0.13; P=.01). Subgroup analysis revealed that significance was lost in case of no parental involvement (standardized mean difference -0.36, 95% CI -0.83 to 0.11; P=.14). The small number of clinical trials found, the varying study quality, and the study heterogeneity are some limitations of this review.

Conclusions: The studies reported herein describe functional and acceptable technology-based approaches, in addition to conventional treatments, to enhance weight loss in young populations.

Keywords: childhood obesity; digital health; eHealth; mHealth; mobile phone; youth.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Matina Kouvari, Melina Karipidou, Thomas Tsiampalis, Eirini Mamalaki, Dimitrios Poulimeneas, Eirini Bathrellou, Demosthenes Panagiotakos, Mary Yannakoulia. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 14.02.2022.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram describing the literature review process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Results from the random effects meta-analysis concerning the effect of the technology-based interventions on BMI-related metrics according to the study follow-ups. In case of studies with multiple follow-ups, only the last follow-up time was considered for the estimation of the overall effect size.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Results from the subgroup analysis according to the parental involvement of the technology-based intervention concerning its effect on BMI-related metrics. In case of studies with multiple follow-ups, only the last follow-up time was considered for the estimation of the overall effect size.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Results from the subgroup analysis according to the type of the intervention concerning its effect on BMI-related metrics. In case of studies with multiple follow-ups, only the last follow-up time was considered for the estimation of the overall effect size.

References

    1. Lobstein T, Jackson-Leach R, Moodie ML, Hall KD, Gortmaker SL, Swinburn BA, James WP, Wang Y, McPherson K. Child and adolescent obesity: part of a bigger picture. Lancet. 2015 Jun;385(9986):2510–20. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61746-3.
    1. Di Cesare M, Sorić M, Bovet P, Miranda JJ, Bhutta Z, Stevens GA, Laxmaiah A, Kengne A, Bentham J. The epidemiological burden of obesity in childhood: a worldwide epidemic requiring urgent action. BMC Med. 2019 Nov 25;17(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1449-8. 10.1186/s12916-019-1449-8
    1. Scott-Sheldon LA, Hedges LV, Cyr C, Young-Hyman D, Khan LK, Magnus M, King H, Arteaga S, Cawley J, Economos CD, Haire-Joshu D, Hunter CM, Lee BY, Kumanyika SK, Ritchie LD, Robinson TN, Schwartz MB. Childhood obesity evidence base project: a systematic review and meta-analysis of a new taxonomy of intervention components to improve weight status in children 2-5 years of age, 2005-2019. Child Obes. 2020 Sep 01;16(S2):221–48. doi: 10.1089/chi.2020.0139.
    1. Wang Y, Cai L, Wu Y, Wilson RF, Weston C, Fawole O, Bleich SN, Cheskin LJ, Showell NN, Lau BD, Chiu DT, Zhang A, Segal J. What childhood obesity prevention programmes work? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015 Jul;16(7):547–65. doi: 10.1111/obr.12277.
    1. Lau PW, Lau EY, Wong DP, Ransdell L. A systematic review of information and communication technology-based interventions for promoting physical activity behavior change in children and adolescents. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(3):e48. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1533. v13i3e48
    1. Tate EB, Spruijt-Metz D, O'Reilly G, Jordan-Marsh M, Gotsis M, Pentz MA, Dunton GF. mHealth approaches to child obesity prevention: successes, unique challenges, and next directions. Transl Behav Med. 2013 Dec;3(4):406–15. doi: 10.1007/s13142-013-0222-3. 222
    1. Smith AJ, Skow A, Bodurtha J, Kinra S. Health information technology in screening and treatment of child obesity: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2013 Mar;131(3):894–902. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2011.peds.2012-2011
    1. Hutchesson MJ, Rollo ME, Krukowski R, Ells L, Harvey J, Morgan PJ, Callister R, Plotnikoff R, Collins CE. eHealth interventions for the prevention and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015 May;16(5):376–92. doi: 10.1111/obr.12268.
    1. Hammersley ML, Jones RA, Okely AD. Parent-focused childhood and adolescent overweight and obesity eHealth interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jul 21;18(7):e203. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5893. v18i7e203
    1. Shin Y, Kim SK, Lee M. Mobile phone interventions to improve adolescents' physical health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Public Health Nurs. 2019 Nov;36(6):787–99. doi: 10.1111/phn.12655.
    1. Champion KE, Parmenter B, McGowan C, Spring B, Wafford QE, Gardner LA, Thornton L, McBride N, Barrett EL, Teesson M, Newton NC, Health4Life team Effectiveness of school-based eHealth interventions to prevent multiple lifestyle risk behaviours among adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Digit Health. 2019 Sep;1(5):206–21. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30088-3. S2589-7500(19)30088-3
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jun 01;152(11):726–32. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232. 0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232
    1. Cumpston M, Li T, Page M, Chandler J, Welch V, Higgins J, Thomas J. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 03;10:ED000142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142.
    1. Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Schmid CH. Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Nov 01;127(9):820–6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-9-199711010-00008.
    1. Irwig L, Macaskill P, Berry G, Glasziou P. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Graphical test is itself biased. Br Med J. 1998 Feb 07;316(7129):470–1.
    1. Chen J, Guedes CM, Lung AE. Smartphone-based healthy weight management intervention for Chinese American adolescents: short-term efficacy and factors associated with decreased weight. J Adolesc Health. 2019 Apr;64(4):443–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.08.022.S1054-139X(18)30406-3
    1. Vidmar AP, Pretlow R, Borzutzky C, Wee CP, Fox DS, Fink C, Mittelman SD. An addiction model-based mobile health weight loss intervention in adolescents with obesity. Pediatr Obes. 2019 Feb;14(2):e12464. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12464.
    1. Staiano AE, Beyl RA, Guan W, Hendrick CA, Hsia DS, Newton RL. Home-based exergaming among children with overweight and obesity: a randomized clinical trial. Pediatr Obes. 2018 Nov;13(11):724–33. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12438.
    1. Wright JA, Phillips BD, Watson BL, Newby PK, Norman GJ, Adams WG. Randomized trial of a family-based, automated, conversational obesity treatment program for underserved populations. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2013 Sep;21(9):369–78. doi: 10.1002/oby.20388. doi: 10.1002/oby.20388.
    1. Doyle AC, Goldschmidt A, Huang C, Winzelberg AJ, Taylor CB, Wilfley DE. Reduction of overweight and eating disorder symptoms via the internet in adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. J Adolesc Health. 2008 Aug;43(2):172–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.01.011. S1054-139X(08)00110-9
    1. Williamson DA, Martin PD, White MA, Newton R, Walden H, York-Crowe E, Alfonso A, Gordon S, Ryan D. Efficacy of an internet-based behavioral weight loss program for overweight adolescent African-American girls. Eat Weight Disord. 2005 Sep;10(3):193–203. doi: 10.1007/BF03327547.3066
    1. Williamson DA, Walden HM, White MA, York-Crowe E, Newton RL, Alfonso A, Gordon S, Ryan D. Two-year internet-based randomized controlled trial for weight loss in African-American girls. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2006 Jul;14(7):1231–43. doi: 10.1038/oby.2006.140.14/7/1231
    1. Nguyen B, Shrewsbury VA, O'Connor J, Steinbeck KS, Hill AJ, Shah S, Kohn MR, Torvaldsen S, Baur LA. Two-year outcomes of an adjunctive telephone coaching and electronic contact intervention for adolescent weight-loss maintenance: the Loozit randomized controlled trial. Int J Obes (Lond) 2013 Mar;37(3):468–72. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2012.74.ijo201274
    1. de NJ, Timman R, Bauer S, van den Akker E, Buijks H, de KC, Kordy H, Passchier J. The effect of a short message service maintenance treatment on body mass index and psychological well-being in overweight and obese children: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Obes. 2012 Jun;7(3):205–19. doi: 10.1111/j.2047-6310.2012.00048.x.
    1. Tully L, Burls A, Sorensen J, El-Moslemany R, O'Malley G. Mobile health for pediatric weight management: systematic scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jun 03;8(6):e16214. doi: 10.2196/16214. v8i6e16214
    1. Turner T, Spruijt-Metz D, Wen CK, Hingle MD. Prevention and treatment of pediatric obesity using mobile and wireless technologies: a systematic review. Pediatr Obes. 2015 Dec;10(6):403–9. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12002.
    1. Lee J, Piao M, Byun A, Kim J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention for pediatric obesity using mobile technology. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;225:491–4.
    1. Partridge SR, Redfern J. Strategies to engage adolescents in digital health interventions for obesity prevention and management. Healthcare (Basel) 2018 Jun 21;6(3):70. doi: 10.3390/healthcare6030070. healthcare6030070
    1. Chaplais E, Naughton G, Thivel D, Courteix D, Greene D. Smartphone interventions for weight treatment and behavioral change in pediatric obesity: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health. 2015 Oct;21(10):822–30. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0197.
    1. Golley R, Hendrie G, Slater A, Corsini N. Interventions that involve parents to improve children's weight-related nutrition intake and activity patterns - what nutrition and activity targets and behaviour change techniques are associated with intervention effectiveness? Obes Rev. 2011 Feb;12(2):114–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00745.x.OBR745
    1. Yavuz HM, van Ijzendoorn MH, Mesman J, van der Veek S. Interventions aimed at reducing obesity in early childhood: a meta-analysis of programs that involve parents. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 Jun 08;56(6):677–92. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12330.
    1. Young KM, Northern JJ, Lister KM, Drummond JA, O'Brien WH. A meta-analysis of family-behavioral weight-loss treatments for children. Clin Psychol Rev. 2007 Mar;27(2):240–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2006.08.003.S0272-7358(06)00097-3
    1. Niemeier BS, Hektner JM, Enger KB. Parent participation in weight-related health interventions for children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2012 Jul;55(1):3–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.04.021.S0091-7435(12)00165-X
    1. Nyström CD, Sandin S, Henriksson P, Henriksson H, Trolle-Lagerros Y, Larsson C, Maddison R, Ortega FB, Pomeroy J, Ruiz JR, Silfvernagel K, Timpka T, Löf M. Mobile-based intervention intended to stop obesity in preschool-aged children: the MINISTOP randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Jun;105(6):1327–35. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.150995.ajcn.116.150995
    1. Leung MM, Mateo KF, Verdaguer S, Wyka K. Testing a web-based interactive comic tool to decrease obesity risk among minority preadolescents: protocol for a pilot randomized control trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Nov 09;7(11):e10682. doi: 10.2196/10682. v7i11e10682
    1. Dias JD, Domingues AN, Tibes CM, Zem-Mascarenhas SH, Fonseca LM. Serious games as an educational strategy to control childhood obesity: a systematic literature review. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018 Sep 03;26:e3036. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2509.3036. S0104-11692018000100608
    1. Nguyen B, Kornman KP, Baur LA. A review of electronic interventions for prevention and treatment of overweight and obesity in young people. Obes Rev. 2011 May;12(5):298–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00830.x.
    1. Del Río NG, González-González CS, Martín-González R, Navarro-Adelantado V, Toledo-Delgado P, García-Peñalvo F. Effects of a gamified educational program in the nutrition of children with obesity. J Med Syst. 2019 May 22;43(7):198. doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1293-6.10.1007/s10916-019-1293-6
    1. van der Aa DA, Altenburg TM, van Randeraad-van der Zee CH, Chinapaw MJ. The effectiveness and promising strategies of obesity prevention and treatment programmes among adolescents from disadvantaged backgrounds: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2017 May;18(5):581–93. doi: 10.1111/obr.12519.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj