Trauma Registry of the Pan-American Trauma Society: One year of experience in two hospitals in southwest Colombia

Carlos A Ordoñez, Mónica Morales, Johanna Carolina Rojas-Mirquez, Francisco Javier Bonilla-Escobar, Marisol Badiel, Fernando Miñán Arana, Adolfo González, Luis Fernando Pino, Amadeus Uribe-Gómez, Mario Alain Herrera, Maria Isabel Gutiérrez-Martínez, Juan Carlos Puyana, Michael Abutanos, Rao R Ivatury, Carlos A Ordoñez, Mónica Morales, Johanna Carolina Rojas-Mirquez, Francisco Javier Bonilla-Escobar, Marisol Badiel, Fernando Miñán Arana, Adolfo González, Luis Fernando Pino, Amadeus Uribe-Gómez, Mario Alain Herrera, Maria Isabel Gutiérrez-Martínez, Juan Carlos Puyana, Michael Abutanos, Rao R Ivatury

Abstract

Background: Trauma information systems are needed to improve decision making and to identify potential areas of intervention.

Objective: To describe the first year of experience with a trauma registry in two referral centers in southwest Colombia.

Methods: The study was performed in two referral centers in Cali. Patients with traumatic injuries seen between January 1 and December 31, 2012, were included. The collected information included demographics, mechanism of trauma, injury severity score (ISS), and mortality. A descriptive analysis was carried out.

Results: A total of 17,431 patients were registered, of which 67.8% were male with an average age of 30 (±20) years. Workplace injuries were the cause of emergency consultations in 28.2% of cases, and falls were the most common mechanism of trauma (37.3%). Patients with an ISS ≥15 were mostly found in the 18-35-year age range (6.4%). Most patients who suffered a gunshot wound presented an ISS ≥15. A total of 2.5% of all patients died, whereas the mortality rate was 54% among patients with an ISS ≥15 and a gunshot wound.

Conclusion: Once the trauma registry was successfully implemented in two institutions in Cali, the primary causes of admission were identified as falls and workplace injuries. The most severely compromised patients were in the population range between 18 and 35 years of age. The highest mortality was caused by gunshot wounds.

Introducción: Los sistemas de información en trauma son requeridos para mejorar la toma de decisiones e identificar potenciales áreas de intervención.

Objetivo: Describir el primer año de experiencia del registro de trauma en dos centros de referencia de trauma del suroccidente Colombiano.

Métodos: Estudio realizado en dos centros de referencia de Cali. Se incluyeron pacientes con trauma o lesiones externas entre el 1-Ene y el 31-Dic-2012. Se recolectó información demográfica, relacionada con mecanismos de trauma, severidad (ISS) y mortalidad. Se presenta un análisis descriptivo.

Resultados: Se registraron 17,431 pacientes. El 67.8% de los pacientes eran de género masculino con edad promedio de 30 (±20) años. Las lesiones laborales fueron causa de consulta a urgencias en un 28.2%, y las caídas el mecanismo de trauma más frecuente (37.3%). Los pacientes con ISS ≥15 en su mayoría se encontraban en el rango de edad de 18-35 años (6.4%). El 28% de los pacientes que sufrieron lesión por arma de fuego presentaron un ISS ≥15. El 2.5% de los pacientes murieron y aquellos pacientes con ISS ≥15 y lesión por arma de fuego presentaron mortalidad del 54%.

Conclusión: una vez se logró implementar el registro de trauma en dos instituciones en Cali, se identificó que la principal causa de ingreso fue secundaria a caídas y las lesiones laborales. Los pacientes más severamente comprometidos están en el rango de población entre 18 a 35 años. La mayor mortalidad se presentó secundario a lesiones de causa externa por arma de fuego.

Keywords: Emergency care information systems; cause of death; data systems; occupational injuries; registries; trauma; trauma severity indices; wounds and injuries.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicto de interés: None

References

    1. OPS/OMS . Informe mundial sobre la violencia y la salud. Washington, D.C.: Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Oficina Regional para las Américas de la Organización Mundial de la Salud; 2002.
    1. Zargaran E, Schuurman N, Nicol AJ, Matzopoulos R, Cinnamon J, Taulu T, et al. The electronic Trauma Health Record: design and usability of a novel tablet-based tool for trauma care and injury surveillance in low resource settings. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(1):41–50.
    1. Consorcio de Comunicación para el Cambio Social . 2003.
    1. Dastres C, Muzzopappa E. La Comunicación como estrategia para orientar a la ciudadania frente a la violencia y a la criminalidad. Universidad de Chile, Instituto de Asuntos Publicos; 2003.
    1. Trauma Register DGU 20 years Trauma Register DGU(R)Development, aims and structure. Injury. 2014;45(Suppl 3):S6–S13.
    1. Haider AH, Saleem T, Leow JJ, Villegas CV, Kisat M, Schneider EB, et al. Influence of the National Trauma Data Bank on the study of trauma outcomes: is it time to set research best practices to further enhance its impact? J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214(5):756–768.
    1. Barreto SM, Miranda JJ, Figueroa JP, Schmidt MI, Muñoz S, Kuri-Morales PP, et al. Epidemiology in Latin America and the Caribbean: current situation and challenges. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(2):557–571.
    1. Ramroop S, Turner MC, Bynoe R, Garner MJ, Clarke R, Krewski D, et al. Injury surveillance in Trinidad: an accident and emergency based injury surveillance system at the San Fernando General Hospital. West Indian Med J. 2009;58(2):118–123.
    1. Bejarano M, Rendon LF. Lesiones de causa externa en menores y mayores de 18 años en un hospital colombiano. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2009;25(3):234–241.
    1. Pino Sanchez FI, Ballesteros Sanz MA, Cordero Lorenzana L, Guerrero Lopez F. Quality of trauma care and trauma registries. Med Intensiva. 2015;39(2):114–123.
    1. Forensis,Instituto Nacional de medicina Legal . Principales cifras sobre lesiones de causa externa 2013. Boletín de Prensa-Forensis; 2013.
    1. Observatorio Social . Análisis estadístico de violencia homicida en Cali 2008-2011.
    1. Alberdi F, Garcia I, Atutxa L, Zabarte M. Epidemiology of severe trauma. Med Intensiva. 2014;38(9):580–588.
    1. Butcher NE, D'Este C, Balogh ZJ. The quest for a universal definition of polytrauma: A trauma registry-based validation study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;77(4):620–623.
    1. Observatorio Social . Análisis Estadístico. Muertes Violentas.
    1. Ordoñez CA, Pino LF, Tejada JW, Badiel M, Loaiza JH, Mata LV, et al. Experience of two first level hospitals in the southwest region of Colombia on the implementation of the Panamerican Trauma Society International Trauma Registry. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2012;39(4):255–262.
    1. O'Reilly GM, Joshipura M, Cameron PA, Gruen R. Trauma registries in developing countries: a review of the published experience. Injury. 2013;44(6):713–721.
    1. Palmer CS, Davey TM, Mok MT, McClure RJ, Farrow NC, Gruen RL, et al. Standardising trauma monitoring: the development of a minimum dataset for trauma registries in Australia and New Zealand. Injury. 2013;44(6):834–841.
    1. Ogilvie R, Curtis K, Lam M, McCloughen A, Foster K. The burden of youth: major traumatic injury in adolescents and young adults managed in the Australian Capital Territory. J Trauma Nurs. 2014;21(5):218–227.
    1. Nicol A, Knowlton LM, Schuurman N, Matzopoulos R, Zargaran E, Cinnamon J, et al. Trauma Surveillance in Cape Town, South Africa: An Analysis of 9236 Consecutive Trauma Center Admissions. JAMA Surgery. 2014;149(6):549–556.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj