Metabolic signatures of osteoarthritis in urine using liquid chromatography-high resolution tandem mass spectrometry

Salah Abdelrazig, Catharine A Ortori, Michael Doherty, Ana M Valdes, Victoria Chapman, David A Barrett, Salah Abdelrazig, Catharine A Ortori, Michael Doherty, Ana M Valdes, Victoria Chapman, David A Barrett

Abstract

Introduction: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of disability in older people, but its aetiology is not yet fully understood. Biomarkers of OA from metabolomics studies have shown potential use in understanding the progression and pathophysiology of OA.

Objectives: To investigate possible surrogate biomarkers of knee OA in urine using metabolomics to contribute towards a better understanding of OA progression and possible targeted treatment.

Method: Liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) was applied in a case-control approach to explore the possible metabolic differences between the urinary profiles of symptomatic knee OA patients (n = 74) (subclassified into inflammatory OA, n = 22 and non-inflammatory OA, n = 52) and non-OA controls (n = 68). Univariate, multivariate and pathway analyses were performed with a rigorous validation including cross-validation, permutation test, prediction and receiver operating characteristic curve to identify significantly altered metabolites and pathways in OA.

Results: OA datasets generated 7405 variables and multivariate analysis showed clear separation of inflammatory OA, but not non-inflammatory OA, from non-OA controls. Adequate cross-validation (R2Y = 0.874, Q2 = 0.465) was obtained. The prediction model and the ROC curve showed satisfactory results with a sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 71% and accuracy of 77%. 26 metabolites were identified as potential biomarkers of inflammatory OA using HMDB, authentic standards and/or MS/MS database.

Conclusion: Urinary metabolic profiles were altered in inflammatory knee OA subjects compared to those with non-inflammatory OA and non-OA controls. These altered profiles associated with perturbed activity of the TCA cycle, pyruvate and amino acid metabolism linked to inflammation, oxidative stress and collagen destruction. Of note, 2-keto-glutaramic acid level was > eightfold higher in the inflammatory OA patients compared to non-OA control, signalling a possible perturbation in glutamine metabolism related to OA progression.

Keywords: Biomarkers; HILIC; LC-HRMS; Osteoarthritis; Untargeted metabolomics.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PCA and OPLS-DA score plots obtained from all OA participants and non-OA controls. a PCA of non-OA controls (n = 68), inflammatory OA (n = 22), non-inflammatory OA (n = 52) participants and pooled QCs (n = 15), whereas b OPLS-DA of inflammatory OA participants and non-OA controls and c OPLS-DA of non-inflammatory OA participants and non-OA controls analysed by LC-HRMS. d The Significantly altered metabolites were selected using VIP vs p(corr) of OPLS-DA of inflammatory OA participants and non-OA controls
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
PCA-class analysis score plots obtained from a non-OA controls (n = 68, R2X = 0.39, Q2 = − 0.001), b inflammatory OA (n = 22, R2X = 0.35, Q2 = − 0.014) and c non-inflammatory OA (n = 52, R2X = 0.42, Q2 = − 0.006) participants’ urine samples analysed by LC-HRMS
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Workflow for balancing class size of non-OA control with inflammatory OA for biomarker analysis. a Non-OA control (n = 68) were sub-divided into 3 subsets using multivariate design based on PCA single class analysis. 3 OPLS-DA models were generated from each dataset against inflammatory OA patients’ dataset. SUS plot was used to monitor the similarity of the generated OPLS-DA models. SUS plots were generated for 2 models at a time. This procedure was repeated until the selected subsets of the healthy controls generated adequately similar OPLS-DA models with inflammatory OA patients. b OPLS-DA score plot obtained from inflammatory OA patients (OA active) and the balanced non-OA controls urine samples
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Pathway analysis of the significantly altered metabolites in inflammatory OA participants compared to non-OA controls. a Pathway analysis, b pathway enrichment analysis and c pathway network map highlighting significantly changed pathways and interactions between the significantly altered metabolites in inflammatory OA participants compared to non-OA controls

References

    1. Begou O, Gika HG, Theodoridis GA, Wilson ID. Quality control and validation issues in LC-MS metabolomics. In: Theodoridis GA, Gika HG, Wilson ID, editors. Metabolic profiling: Methods and protocols. New York: Springer; 2018. pp. 15–26.
    1. Blanco FJ, López-Armada MJ, Maneiro E. Mitochondrial dysfunction in osteoarthritis. Mitochondrion. 2004;4(5–6):715–728. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2004.07.022.
    1. Bouatra S, Aziat F, Mandal R, Guo AC, Wilson MR, Knox C, et al. The human urine metabolome. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(9):e73076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073076.
    1. Buszewski B, Noga S. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC)—A powerful separation technique. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2012;402(1):231–247. doi: 10.1007/s00216-011-5308-5.
    1. Carlson AK, Rawle RA, Wallace CW, Brooks EG, Adams E, Greenwood MC, et al. Characterization of synovial fluid metabolomic phenotypes of cartilage morphological changes associated with osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2019;27(8):1174–1184. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.04.007.
    1. Chen D, Shen J, Zhao W, Wang T, Han L, Hamilton JL, et al. Osteoarthritis: Toward a comprehensive understanding of pathological mechanism. Bone Research. 2017;5:16044–16044. doi: 10.1038/boneres.2016.44.
    1. Chong J, Wishart DS, Xia J. Using MetaboAnalyst 4.0 for comprehensive and integrative metabolomics data analysis. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics. 2019;68(1):e86. doi: 10.1002/cpbi.86.
    1. De Ceuninck F, Sabatini M, Pastoureau P. Recent progress toward biomarker identification in osteoarthritis. Drug Discovery Today. 2011;16(9–10):443–449. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2011.01.004.
    1. Eriksson, L., Johansson, E., Kettaneh-Wold, N., Trygg, C. W. J., & Wold, S. (2006a). Multi- and megavariate data analysis: Advanced applications and method extensions (Second edn., Vol. II). Umea: Umetrics AB.
    1. Eriksson, L., Johansson, E., Kettaneh-Wold, N., Trygg, C. W. J., & Wold, S. (2006b). Multi- and megavariate data analysis: Basic principles and applications (Second edn., Vol. I). Umea: Umetrics AB.
    1. Gaut JP, Byun J, Tran HD, Heinecke JW. Artifact-free quantification of free 3-chlorotyrosine, 3-bromotyrosine, and 3-nitrotyrosine in human plasma by electron capture-negative chemical ionization gas chromatography mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Analytical Biochemistry. 2002;300(2):252–259. doi: 10.1006/abio.2001.5469.
    1. Gavriilidis C, Miwa S, von Zglinicki T, Taylor RW, Young DA. Mitochondrial dysfunction in osteoarthritis is associated with down-regulation of superoxide dismutase 2. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 2013;65(2):378–387. doi: 10.1002/art.37782.
    1. Hunter DJ, Nicolson PJA, Little CB, Robbins SR, Wang X, Bennell KL. Developing strategic priorities in osteoarthritis research: Proceedings and recommendations arising from the 2017 Australian Osteoarthritis Summit. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2019;20(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2455-x.
    1. Jones MC. The family and their close and distant relations. Journal of the Korean Statistical Society. 2008;37(4):293–302. doi: 10.1016/j.jkss.2008.06.002.
    1. Kirwan GM, Johansson E, Kleemann R, Verheij ER, Wheelock ÅM, Goto S, et al. Building multivariate systems biology models. Analytical Chemistry. 2012;84(16):7064–7071. doi: 10.1021/ac301269r.
    1. Lamers R-JAN, DeGroot J, Spies-Faber EJ, Jellema RH, Kraus VB, Verzijl N, et al. Identification of disease- and nutrient-related metabolic fingerprints in osteoarthritic guinea pigs. The Journal of Nutrition. 2003;133(6):1776–1780. doi: 10.1093/jn/133.6.1776.
    1. Lamers R-JAN, van Nesselrooij JHJ, Kraus VB, Jordan JM, Renner JB, Dragomir AD, et al. Identification of an urinary metabolite profile associated with osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2005;13(9):762–768. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2005.04.005.
    1. Li X, Yang S, Qiu Y, Zhao T, Chen T, Su M, et al. Urinary metabolomics as a potentially novel diagnostic and stratification tool for knee osteoarthritis. Metabolomics. 2010;6(1):109–118. doi: 10.1007/s11306-009-0184-0.
    1. Loeuille D. When should MRI for knee or hip osteoarthritis should be performed? Rev Prat. 2012;62(5):625–629.
    1. Menashe L, Hirko K, Losina E, Kloppenburg M, Zhang W, Li L, et al. The diagnostic performance of MRI in osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012;20(1):13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.10.003.
    1. Mora JC, Przkora R, Cruz-Almeida Y. Knee osteoarthritis: Pathophysiology and current treatment modalities. Journal of pain research. 2018;11:2189–2196. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S154002.
    1. Nepple J, Thomason K, An T, Harris-Hayes M, Clohisy J. What is the utility of biomarkers for assessing the pathophysiology of hip osteoarthritis? A systematic review. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2015;473(5):1683–1701. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4148-6.
    1. Pacher P, Beckman JS, Liaudet L. Nitric oxide and peroxynitrite in health and disease. Journal Article. 2007;87(1):315–424. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00029.2006.
    1. Shockcor JP, Unger SE, Wilson ID, Foxall PJD, Nicholson JK, Lindon JC. Combined HPLC, NMR spectroscopy, and ion-trap mass spectrometry with application to the detection and characterization of xenobiotic and endogenous metabolites in human urine. Analytical Chemistry. 1996;68(24):4431–4435. doi: 10.1021/ac9606463.
    1. Showiheen SAA, Sun AR, Wu X, Crawford R, Xiao Y, Wellard RM, et al. Application of metabolomics to osteoarthritis: From basic science to the clinical approach. Current rheumatology reports. 2019;21(6):26. doi: 10.1007/s11926-019-0827-8.
    1. Sumner LW, Amberg A, Barrett D, Beale MH, Beger R, Daykin CA, et al. Proposed minimum reporting standards for chemical analysis. Metabolomics. 2007;3(3):211–221. doi: 10.1007/s11306-007-0082-2.
    1. Surapaneni KM, Venkataramana G. Status of lipid peroxidation, glutathione, ascorbic acid, vitamin E and antioxidant enzymes in patients with osteoarthritis. Indian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2007;61(1):9–14. doi: 10.4103/0019-5359.29592.
    1. Szabo C, Ischiropoulos H, Radi R. Peroxynitrite: biochemistry, pathophysiology and development of therapeutics. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2007;6(8):662–680. doi: 10.1038/nrd2222.
    1. Tsikas D, Mitschke A, Gutzki F-M. Measurement of 3-nitro-tyrosine in human plasma and urine by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Amino Acid Analysis. 2012;828:255–270. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-445-2_20.
    1. Want EJ, Wilson ID, Gika H, Theodoridis G, Plumb RS, Shockcor J, et al. Global metabolic profiling procedures for urine using UPLC-MS. Nature Protocols. 2010;5(6):1005–1018. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2010.50.
    1. Warrack BM, Hnatyshyn S, Ott K-H, Reily MD, Sanders M, Zhang H, et al. Normalization strategies for metabonomic analysis of urine samples. Journal of Chromatography B. 2009;877(5–6):547–552. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.01.007.
    1. WHO. (2020). Chronic rheumatic conditions. Retrieved May 21, 2020, from .
    1. Wishart DS, Feunang YD, Marcu A, Guo AC, Liang K, Vázquez-Fresno R, et al. HMDB 4.0: the human metabolome database for 2018. Nucleic Acids Research. 2018;46(D1):D608–D617. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1089.
    1. Xia J, Broadhurst D, Wilson M, Wishart D. Translational biomarker discovery in clinical metabolomics: An introductory tutorial. Metabolomics. 2013;9(2):280–299. doi: 10.1007/s11306-012-0482-9.
    1. Zhai G, Randell EW, Rahman P. Metabolomics of osteoarthritis: Emerging novel markers and their potential clinical utility. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2018;57(12):2087–2095. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex497.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj