The long-term fate of mesenchymal stem cells labeled with magnetic resonance imaging-visible polymersomes in cerebral ischemia

Xiaohui Duan, Liejing Lu, Yong Wang, Fang Zhang, Jiaji Mao, Minghui Cao, Bingling Lin, Xiang Zhang, Xintao Shuai, Jun Shen, Xiaohui Duan, Liejing Lu, Yong Wang, Fang Zhang, Jiaji Mao, Minghui Cao, Bingling Lin, Xiang Zhang, Xintao Shuai, Jun Shen

Abstract

Understanding the long-term fate and potential mechanisms of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) after transplantation is essential for improving functional benefits of stem cell-based stroke treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered an attractive and clinically translatable tool for longitudinal tracking of stem cells, but certain controversies have arisen in this regard. In this study, we used SPION-loaded cationic polymersomes to label green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing MSCs to determine whether MRI can accurately reflect survival, long-term fate, and potential mechanisms of MSCs in ischemic stroke therapy. Our results showed that MSCs could improve the functional outcome and reduce the infarct volume of stroke in the brain. In vivo MRI can verify the biodistribution and migration of grafted cells when pre-labeled with SPION-loaded polymersome. The dynamic change of low signal volume on MRI can reflect the tendency of cell survival and apoptosis, but may overestimate long-term survival owing to the presence of iron-laden macrophages around cell graft. Only a small fraction of grafted cells survived up to 8 weeks after transplantation. A minority of these surviving cells were differentiated into astrocytes, but not into neurons. MSCs might exert their therapeutic effect via secreting paracrine factors rather than directing cell replacement through differentiation into neuronal and/or glial phenotypes.

Keywords: green fluorescence protein; ischemic stroke; magnetic resonance imaging; mesenchymal stem cells; polymersome; superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic diagram of the synthesis of polymersomes, cell labeling, cell transplantation, MRI tracking, and long-term fate of grafted GFP-MSCs. Abbreviations: IL, interleukin; MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PEI, poly(-etherimide); PDLLA, poly(d,l-lactide); SPIO, superparamagnetic iron oxide.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Efficacy of cell labeling. Notes: In vitro MRI shows that GFP-MSCs labeled with SPION-loaded polymersomes have an obvious hypointense signal on T1WI, T2WI, and T2*WI, and decreased T2 value compared with unlabeled GFP-MSCs (A). Prussian blue staining shows abundant blue-stained particles inside GFP-MSCs labeled with SPION-loaded polymersomes (B), but no blue-stained particles in unlabeled GFP-MSCs (C) (Bar =100 µm). TEM shows numerous, dense, iron particles in the cytosol (arrows) of GFP-MSCs labeled with SPION-loaded polymersomes (D), whereas no such iron particles are found in unlabeled GFP-MSCs (E) (Bar =200 nm). Abbreviations: MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; SPION, superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle.
Figure 3
Figure 3
In vitro cytotoxicity of cell labeling. Notes: Graphs show no significant differences in the cell viability (A, n=6), apoptosis rate (B, n=3) and intracellular ROS level (C, n=6) at 24 h after GFP-MSCs labeling with SPION-loaded polymersomes compared with unlabeled GFP-MSCs. Confocal laser microscopy shows that a few GFP-MSCs labeled with SPION-loaded polymersomes (D) and unlabeled GFP-MSCs (E) are ROS positive (arrows). Bar =100 µm. Abbreviations: MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SPION, superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Therapeutic effects of transplanted MSCs. Notes: Longitudinal coronal T2WI shows that the infarcted hemisphere in animals grafted with polymersome-labeled GFP-MSCs (A), unlabeled GFP-MSCs (B), and PBS (C) exhibited hyperintense signals. Graphs show the measured infarct volume (D) and modified neurologic severity scores (E) among the three groups. *p<0.05 between labeled GFP-MSCs and PBS; #p<0.05 between unlabeled GFP-MSCs and PBS. Abbreviations: mNSS, modified neurological severity score; MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.
Figure 5
Figure 5
In vivo MRI of the grafted MSCs. Notes: Longitudinal coronal T2*WI show a persistent hypointense area (arrows) in the striatum of animals grafted with polymersome-labeled GFP-MSCs (A). These hypointense signal areas were obviously reduced at 2 weeks, and then gradually reduced but remained until 8 weeks after transplantation. At 2 weeks after transplantation, a spotty hypointense area was found in the ipsilateral corpus callosum (arrow head). No obvious hypointense signal was observed in animals grafted with unlabeled GFP-MSCs (B) and PBS (C). Graphs show the hypointense signal volume (D) and signal–contrast ratio (E) on T2WI and T2*WI in animals grafted with polymersome-labeled GFP-MSCs. #p<0.05. Abbreviations: MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Apoptosis and survival of GFP-MSCs at implantation site. Notes: TUNEL analysis shows that apoptotic cells peaked at 1 week, and then decreased over time in animals grafted with labeled GFP-MSCs (A), unlabeled GFP-MSCs (B), and PBS (C). Graph show the percentages of TUNEL-positive cells in animals grafted with labeled and unlabeled GFP-MSCs (D). Graph shows the number of apoptotic GFP-MSCs in animals grafted with labeled and unlabeled GFP-MSCs (E). Graph shows the percentage of viable GFP-positive cells in animals grafted with labeled and unlabeled GFP-MSCs (F). *p<0.05 between labeled GFP-MSCs and PBS; #p<0.05 between unlabeled GFP-MSCs and PBS; Bar =15 µm. Abbreviations: MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Relationship between SPIONs and macrophages. Notes: Representative photomicrographs of iron and CD11b co-staining show that many iron+/CD11b+ cells (dark blue cells) are present in the injection site (A) and in the corpus callosum (B) in animals grafted with polymersome-labeled GFP-MSCs. Graphs show the percentages of iron+/CD11b+ cells in the injection site (C) and corpus callosum (D). *p<0.05. Bar =25 µm. Abbreviations: MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; SPIONs, superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Histology of the grafted cells in the injection site. Notes: Fluorescence immunostaining micrographs show that GFP-MSCs remained in the injection site in animals grafted with polymersome-labeled GFP-MSCs and unlabeled GFP-MSCs. Only a few surviving GFP-MSCs differentiated into GFAP-positive astrocytes (arrows), but not into NeuN-positive neurons. A large number of cells were phagocytized by macrophages (arrows) (A). Graphs show the numbers of GFAP+GFP+ (B), CD11b+GFP+ (C), and the percentage of GFP-MSCs (D) in animals grafted with polymersome-labeled GFP-MSCs and unlabeled GFP-MSCs. Bar =15 µm. Abbreviation: MSC, mesenchymal stem cell.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Histology of migrating cells in the corpus callosum. Notes: Fluorescence immunostaining micrographs show that a small amount of GFP-MSCs migrated to the corpus callosum in animals treated with polymersome-labeled cells and unlabeled cells. Only a few surviving GFP-MSCs were differentiated into GFAP-positive astrocytes (arrows) and were phagocytized by macrophages (arrows), but no cells differentiated into NeuN-positive neurons (A). Graphs show the numbers of GFAP+GFP+ (B), CD11b+GFP+ (C), and GFP-MSCs (D) in animals grafted with polymersome-labeled GFP-MSCs and unlabeled GFP-MSCs. Bar =15 µm. Abbreviation: MSC, mesenchymal stem cell.
Figure 10
Figure 10
ELISA of grafted MSCs. Notes: Graphs show the concentration levels of BDNF (A), GDNF (B), VEGF (C), and IL-6 (D) in animals grafted with polymersome-labeled GFP-MSCs, unlabeled GFP-MSCs, and PBS. *p<0.05 between labeled GFP-MSCs and PBS; #p<0.05 between unlabeled GFP-MSCs and PBS. Abbreviations: IL, interleukin; MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.

References

    1. Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Krishnamurthi R, et al. Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2010 (GBD 2010) and the GBD Stroke Experts Group Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2014;383(9913):245–254.
    1. Steinberg GK, Kondziolka D, Wechsler LR, et al. Clinical outcomes of transplanted modified bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in stroke: a phase 1/2a study. Stroke. 2016;47(7):1817–1824.
    1. Vu Q, Xie K, Eckert M, Zhao W, Cramer SC. Meta-analysis of preclinical studies of mesenchymal stromal cells for ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2014;82(14):1277–1286.
    1. Prasad K, Sharma A, Garg A, et al. InveST Study Group Intravenous autologous bone marrow mononuclear stem cell therapy for ischemic stroke: a multicentric, randomized trial. Stroke. 2014;45(12):3618–3624.
    1. Bang OY, Lee JS, Lee PH, Lee G. Autologous mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in stroke patients. Ann Neurol. 2005;57(6):874–882.
    1. Ikegame Y, Yamashita K, Nakashima S, et al. Fate of graft cells: what should be clarified for development of mesenchymal stem cell therapy for ischemic stroke? Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;8:322.
    1. Hyun JS, Tran MC, Wong VW, et al. Enhancing stem cell survival in vivo for tissue repair. Biotechnol Adv. 2013;31(5):736–743.
    1. Shafiq M, Jung Y, Kim SH. Insight on stem cell preconditioning and instructive biomaterials to enhance cell adhesion, retention, and engraftment for tissue repair. Biomaterials. 2016;90:85–115.
    1. Kircher MF, Gambhir SS, Grimm J. Noninvasive cell-tracking methods. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8(11):677–688.
    1. Li L, Jiang W, Luo K, et al. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as MRI contrast agents for non-invasive stem cell labeling and tracking. Theranostics. 2013;3(8):595–615.
    1. Hoehn M, Küstermann E, Blunk J, et al. Monitoring of implanted stem cell migration in vivo: a highly resolved in vivo magnetic resonance imaging investigation of experimental stroke in rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(25):16267–16272.
    1. Janowski M, Walczak P, Kropiwnicki T, et al. Long-term MRI cell tracking after intraventricular delivery in a patient with global cerebral ischemia and prospects for magnetic navigation of stem cells within the CSF. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e97631.
    1. Terrovitis J, Stuber M, Youssef A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging overestimates ferumoxide-labeled stem cell survival after transplantation in the heart. Circulation. 2008;117(12):1555–1562.
    1. Amsalem Y, Mardor Y, Feinberg MS, et al. Iron-oxide labeling and outcome of transplanted mesenchymal stem cells in the infarcted myocardium. Circulation. 2007;116(Suppl 11):I38–I45.
    1. Winter EM, Hogers B, van der Graaf LM, Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Poelmann RE, van der Weerd L. Cell tracking using iron oxide fails to distinguish dead from living transplanted cells in the infarcted heart. Magn Reson Med. 2010;63(3):817–821.
    1. Ma N, Cheng H, Lu M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging with superparamagnetic iron oxide fails to track the long-term fate of mesenchymal stem cells transplanted into heart. Sci Rep. 2015;5:9058.
    1. Huang Z, Li C, Yang S, et al. Magnetic resonance hypointensive signal primarily originates from extracellular iron particles in the long-term tracking of mesenchymal stem cells transplanted in the infarcted myocardium. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015;10:1679–1690.
    1. Eckert MA, Vu Q, Xie K, et al. Evidence for high translational potential of mesenchymal stromal cell therapy to improve recovery from ischemic stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013;33(9):1322–1334.
    1. Drago D, Cossetti C, Iraci N, et al. The stem cell secretome and its role in brain repair. Biochimie. 2013;95(12):2271–2285.
    1. Salgado AJ, Sousa JC, Costa BM, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells secretome as a modulator of the neurogenic niche: basic insights and therapeutic opportunities. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015;9:249.
    1. Duan X, Wang Y, Zhang F, et al. Superparamagnetic iron oxide-loaded cationic polymersomes for cellular MR imaging of therapeutic stem cells in stroke. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2016;12(12):2112–2124.
    1. Li K, Qin J, Wang X, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging monitoring dual-labeled stem cells for treatment of mouse nerve injury. Cytotherapy. 2013;15(10):1275–1285.
    1. Wen X, Wang Y, Zhang F, et al. In vivo monitoring of neural stem cells after transplantation in acute cerebral infarction with dual-modal MR imaging and optical imaging. Biomaterials. 2014;35(16):4627–4635.
    1. Li Y, Chen J, Chen XG, et al. Human marrow stromal cell therapy for stroke in rat: neurotrophins and functional recovery. Neurology. 2002;59(4):514–523.
    1. Zhang M, Methot D, Poppa V, Fujio Y, Walsh K, Murry CE. Cardiomyocyte grafting for cardiac repair: graft cell death and anti-death strategies. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2001;33(5):907–921.
    1. Modo M, Stroemer RP, Tang E, Patel S, Hodges H. Effects of implantation site of stem cell grafts on behavioral recovery from stroke damage. Stroke. 2002;33(9):2270–2278.
    1. Gu E, Chen WY, Gu J, Burridge P, Wu JC. Molecular imaging of stem cells: tracking survival, biodistribution, tumorigenicity, and immunogenicity. Theranostics. 2012;2(4):335–345.
    1. Moniche F, Gonzalez A, Gonzalez-Marcos JR, et al. Intra-arterial bone marrow mononuclear cells in ischemic stroke: a pilot clinical trial. Stroke. 2012;43(8):2242–2244.
    1. Rustad KC, Wong VW, Sorkin M, et al. Enhancement of mesenchymal stem cell angiogenic capacity and stemness by a biomimetic hydrogel scaffold. Biomaterials. 2012;33(1):80–90.
    1. Coyne TM, Marcus AJ, Woodbury D, Black IB. Marrow stromal cells transplanted to the adult brain are rejected by an inflammatory response and transfer donor labels to host neurons and glia. Stem Cells. 2006;24(11):2483–2492.
    1. Björklund A, Lindvall O. Cell replacement therapies for central nervous system disorders. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3(6):537–544.
    1. Zhu W, Chen J, Cong X, Hu S, Chen X. Hypoxia and serum deprivation-induced apoptosis in mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2006;24(2):416–425.
    1. Tambuyzer BR, Bergwerf I, De Vocht N, et al. Allogeneic stromal cell implantation in brain tissue leads to robust microglial activation. Immunol Cell Biol. 2009;87(4):267–273.
    1. Le Blanc K. Immunomodulatory effects of fetal and adult mesenchymal stem cells. Cytotherapy. 2003;5(6):485–489.
    1. Hao L, Zou Z, Tian H, Zhang Y, Zhou H, Liu L. Stem cell-based therapies for ischemic stroke. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:468748.
    1. Zacharek A, Chen J, Cui X, et al. Angiopoietin1/Tie2 and VEGF/Flk1 induced by MSC treatment amplifies angiogenesis and vascular stabilization after stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27(10):1684–1691.
    1. Ma S, Xie N, Li W, Yuan B, Shi Y, Wang Y. Immunobiology of mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Death Differ. 2014;21(2):216–225.
    1. Djouad F, Charbonnier LM, Bouffi C, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit the differentiation of dendritic cells through an interleukin-6-dependent mechanism. Stem Cells. 2007;25(8):2025–2032.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj