Use of otoacoustic emissions to improve outcomes and reduce disparities in a community preschool hearing screening program
Elizabeth Cedars, Hayley Kriss, Ann A Lazar, Curtis Chan, Dylan K Chan, Elizabeth Cedars, Hayley Kriss, Ann A Lazar, Curtis Chan, Dylan K Chan
Abstract
Introduction: Hearing loss substantially impacts pediatric development, and early identification improves outcomes. While intervening before school-entry is critical to optimize learning, early-childhood hearing screening practices are highly variable. Conditioned play audiometry (CPA) is the gold standard for preschool hearing screening, but otoacoustic emission (OAE) testing provides objective data that may improve screening outcomes.
Objectives: To compare outcomes of a community-based low-income preschool hearing program before and after implementation of OAE in a single-visit, two-tiered paradigm. We hypothesized that this intervention would reduce referral rates and improve follow-up while maintaining stable rates of diagnosed sensorineural hearing loss.
Methods: We performed a cohort study of 3257 children screened from July 2014-June 2016. Department of Public Health data were analyzed pre- and post-implementation of second-line OAE testing for children referred on CPA screening with targeted follow-up by DPH staff. Primary outcomes included referral rates, follow-up rates, and diagnosis of sensorineural hearing loss.
Results: Demographics, pure-tone pass rates, and incidence of newly-diagnosed permanent hearing loss were similar across years. After intervention, overall pass rates increased from 92% to 95% (P = 0.0014), while only 0.7% remained unable to be tested (P<0.0001). 5% of children were unable to be tested by CPA screening but passed OAE testing, obviating further evaluation. Referral rate decreased from 8% to 5% (P = 0.0014), and follow-up improved from 36% to 91% (P<0.0001). Identification of pathology in children with follow-up increased from 19% to over 50%. Further, disparities in pass rates and ability to test seen in Year 1 were eliminated in Year 2.
Conclusion and relevance: In a community setting, implementation of second-line OAE screening for CPA referrals reduced referral rates, increased identification of hearing loss, reduced outcome disparities, and improved follow-up rates. This study provides lessons in how to improve outcomes and reduce disparities in early-childhood hearing screening.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
References
- Bess FH, Dodd-Murphy J, Parker RA. Children with minimal sensorineural hearing loss: prevalence, educational performance, and functional status. Ear Hear. 1998. October;19(5):339–54.
- Bright K, Eichwald J, Tanner G. American Academy of Audiology Childhood Hearing Screening Guidelines. September 2011. Downloaded April 17, 2016
- Yoshinaga-Itano C. Benefits of early intervention for children with hearing loss. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1999. December;32(6):1089–102.
- Nelson HD, Bougatsos C, Nygren P. Universal Newborn Hearing Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2001 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Evidence Synthesis No. 62. AHRQ Publication No. 08-05117-EF-1. Rockville, Maryland: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; July 2008
- Williams TR, Alam S, Gaffney M; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Progress in identifying infants with hearing loss—United States, 2006–2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015. April 10;64(13):351–6.
- Mehra S, Eavey RD, Keamy DG Jr. The epidemiology of hearing impairment in the United States: newborns, children, and adolescents. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009. April;140(4):461–72.
- Watkin PM, Baldwin M. Identifying deafness in early childhood: requirements after the newborn hearing screen. Arch Dis Child. 2011. January;96(1):62–6.
- Niskar AS, Kieszak SM, Holmes A, et al. Prevalence of hearing loss among children 6 to 19 years of age: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA. 1998. April 8;279(14):1071–5.
- Shargorodsky J, Curhan SG, Curhan GC, Eavey R. Change in prevalence of hearing loss in US adolescents. JAMA. 2010. August 18;304(7):772–8.
- American Academy of Pediatrics. Recommendations for Preventive Pediatric Health Care Updated 10/2015. Downloaded November 4, 2016.
- Barnett WS, & Friedman-Krauss AH (2016). State(s) of Head Start New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research. Downloaded December 15, 2016
- Bamford J, Fortnum H, Bristow K, et al. Current practice, accuracy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the school entry hearing screen. Health Technol Assess. 2007. August;11(32):1–168, iii-iv.
- Prieve BA, Schooling T, Venediktov R, et al. An Evidence-Based Systematic Review on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Hearing Screening Instruments for Preschool- and School-Age Children. Am J Audiol. 2015. June;24(2):250–67.
- Sideris I, Glattke TJ. A comparison of two methods of hearing screening in the preschool population. J Commun Disord. 2006. Nov-Dec;39(6):391–401.
- Eiserman WD, Hartel DM, Shisler L, Buhrmann J, White KR, Foust T. Using Otoacoustic emissions to screen for hearing loss in early childhood care settings. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008. April;72(4):475–82.
- Eiserman WD, Shisler L, Foust T, et al. Screening for hearing loss in early childhood programs. Early Child. Res. Quart. 22 (1) (2007) 105–117.
- American Academy of Pediatrics, Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics. 2007. October;120(4):898–921.
- Argeseanu Cunningham S, Ruben JD, Narayan KM. Health of foreign-born people in the United States: a review. Health Place. 2008. December;14(4):623–35.
Source: PubMed