Gemcitabine plus Nab-paclitaxel as a second-line treatment following FOLFIRINOX failure in advanced pancreatic cancer: a multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial

Gunn Huh, Hee Seung Lee, Jin Ho Choi, Sang Hyub Lee, Woo Hyun Paik, Ji Kon Ryu, Yong-Tae Kim, Seungmin Bang, Eaum Seok Lee, Gunn Huh, Hee Seung Lee, Jin Ho Choi, Sang Hyub Lee, Woo Hyun Paik, Ji Kon Ryu, Yong-Tae Kim, Seungmin Bang, Eaum Seok Lee

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) as second-line chemotherapy following first-line FOLFIRINOX treatment failure in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Methods: This was a multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial done at three tertiary centers in South Korea from May 2018 to December 2019. Eligible patients were aged 20 years or older, had histologically confirmed advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and disease progression after receiving first-line FOLFIRINOX. Patients received a second-line GnP regimen as intravenous nab-paclitaxel at a dose of 125 mg/m2 and gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2, on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary outcome was survival rate at 6 months and the secondary outcomes were median progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events. This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov. (NCT03401827).

Results: Forty patients were enrolled in the study. The survival rate at 6 months was 72.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 59.9-87.7], achieving superiority over prespecified assumed 6-month OS rate of 20% for best supportive care only (p < 0.001). The median PFS and OS were 5.8 months (95% CI, 4.3-8.7) and 9.9 months (95% CI, 7.5-12.4), respectively. DCR was 87.5% with six partial responses and 29 stable diseases. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 25 (62.5%) patients with the most common being thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, peripheral neuropathy, and peripheral edema.

Conclusion: GnP demonstrated favorable efficacy with acceptable toxicity in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after FOLFIRINOX failure.

Keywords: gemcitabine; nab-paclitaxel; pancreatic cancer; second-line chemotherapy.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: S.H.L. report personal fees from Boryung Pharmaceutical and Celgene, outside the submitted work. Other authors declare no competing interests.

© The Author(s), 2021.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Trial profile.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan–Meier estimates for progression-free survival (a) and the overall survival (b) in the intention-to-treat population, progression-free survival (c) and the overall survival (d) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (post hoc analysis).

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 2020; 70: 7–30.
    1. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, et al.. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer 2019; 144: 1941–1953.
    1. Mizrahi JD, Surana R, Valle JW, et al.. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet 2020; 395: 2008–2020.
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: pancreatic adenocarcinoma, Version 2. 2021,
    1. Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, et al.. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1691–1703.
    1. Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al.. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 1817–1825.
    1. Pusceddu S, Ghidini M, Torchio M, et al.. Comparative effectiveness of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and FOLFIRINOX in the first-line setting of metastatic pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11: 484.
    1. Yoo C, Hwang JY, Kim JE, et al.. A randomised phase II study of modified FOLFIRI.3 vs modified FOLFOX as second-line therapy in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 2009; 101: 1658–1663.
    1. Zaniboni A, Aitini E, Barni S, et al.. FOLFIRI as second-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: a GISCAD multicenter phase II study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2012; 69: 1641–1645.
    1. Oettle H, Riess H, Stieler JM, et al.. Second-line oxaliplatin, folinic acid, and fluorouracil versus folinic acid and fluorouracil alone for gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer: outcomes from the CONKO-003 trial. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32: 2423–2429.
    1. Zaanan A, Trouilloud I, Markoutsaki T, et al.. FOLFOX as second-line chemotherapy in patients with pretreated metastatic pancreatic cancer from the FIRGEM study. BMC Cancer 2014; 14: 441.
    1. Gill S, Ko YJ, Cripps C, et al.. PANCREOX: a randomized phase III study of fluorouracil/leucovorin with or without oxaliplatin for second-line advanced pancreatic cancer in patients who have received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34: 3914–3920.
    1. Wang-Gillam A, Li CP, Bodoky G, et al.. Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid in metastatic pancreatic cancer after previous gemcitabine-based therapy (NAPOLI-1): a global, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2016; 387: 545–557.
    1. Chung V, McDonough S, Philip PA, et al.. Effect of selumetinib and MK-2206 vs oxaliplatin and fluorouracil in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer after prior therapy: SWOG S1115 study randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2017; 3: 516–522.
    1. Portal A, Pernot S, Tougeron D, et al.. Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma after Folfirinox failure: an AGEO prospective multicentre cohort. Br J Cancer 2015; 113: 989–995.
    1. Mita N, Iwashita T, Uemura S, et al.. Second-line gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for patients with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer after first-line FOLFIRINOX failure. J Clin Med 2019; 8: 761.
    1. Sohal DPS, Kennedy EB, Cinar P, et al.. Metastatic pancreatic cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. Epub ahead of print 5 August 2020. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.20.01364.
    1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al.. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009; 45: 228–247.
    1. Rahma OE, Duffy A, Liewehr DJ, et al.. Second-line treatment in advanced pancreatic cancer: a comprehensive analysis of published clinical trials. Ann Oncol 2013; 24: 1972–1979.
    1. Lawless JF. Statistical models and methods for lifetime data. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2003.
    1. Clopper CJ, Pearson ES. The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika 1934; 26: 404–413.
    1. de Jesus VHF, Camandaroba MPG, Calsavara VF, et al.. Systematic review and meta-analysis of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy after FOLFIRINOX in advanced pancreatic cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2020; 12: 1758835920905408.
    1. Zaibet S, Hautefeuille V, Auclin E, et al.. PD-6 Gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel or gemcitabine alone after FOLFIRINOX failure in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a population-based, multicenter AGEO study. Ann Oncol 2020; 31: S213–S214.
    1. de la, Fouchardiere C, Hammel P, Launay S, et al.. 1566TiP PRODIGE 65—UCGI 36—GEMPAX: a unicancer phase III randomized study evaluating gemcitabine and paclitaxel versus gemcitabine alone after FOLFIRINOX failure or intolerance in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Oncol 2020; 31: S954–S955.
    1. Chae H, Jeong H, Cheon J, et al.. Efficacy and safety of second-line nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine after progression on FOLFIRINOX for unresectable or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: multicenter retrospective analysis. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2020; 12: 1758835920923424.
    1. Cho IR, Kang H, Jo JH, et al.. FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel for treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer: single-center cohort study. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12: 182–194.
    1. Loprinzi CL, Lacchetti C, Bleeker J, et al.. Prevention and management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in survivors of adult cancers: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38: 3325–3348.
    1. Flatters SJL, Dougherty PM, Colvin LA. Clinical and preclinical perspectives on Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN): a narrative review. Br J Anaesth 2017; 119: 737–749.
    1. Staff NP, Grisold A, Grisold W, et al.. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a current review. Ann Neurol 2017; 81: 772–781.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj