Absolute Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Hand Held Dynamometry and Isokinetic Dynamometry in the Hip, Knee and Ankle Joint: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Claudio Chamorro, Susan Armijo-Olivo, Carlos De la Fuente, Javiera Fuentes, Luis Javier Chirosa, Claudio Chamorro, Susan Armijo-Olivo, Carlos De la Fuente, Javiera Fuentes, Luis Javier Chirosa

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to establish absolute reliability and concurrent validity between hand-held dynamometers (HHDs) and isokinetic dynamometers (IDs) in lower extremity peak torque assessment. Medline, Embase, CINAHL databases were searched for studies related to psychometric properties in muscle dynamometry. Studies considering standard error of measurement SEM (%) or limit of agreement LOA (%) expressed as percentage of the mean, were considered to establish absolute reliability while studies using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were considered to establish concurrent validity between dynamometers. In total, 17 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The COSMIN checklist classified them between fair and poor. Using HHDs, knee extension LOA (%) was 33.59%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 23.91 to 43.26 and ankle plantar flexion LOA (%) was 48.87%, CI 35.19 to 62.56. Using IDs, hip adduction and extension; knee flexion and extension; and ankle dorsiflexion showed LOA (%) under 15%. Lower hip, knee, and ankle LOA (%) were obtained using an ID compared to HHD. ICC between devices ranged between 0.62, CI (0.37 to 0.87) for ankle dorsiflexion to 0.94, IC (0.91to 0.98) for hip adduction. Very high correlation were found for hip adductors and hip flexors and moderate correlations for knee flexors/extensors and ankle plantar/dorsiflexors.

Keywords: Lower extremitie; Muscle strength; Reproducibility of results.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: Authors state no conflict of interest

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow-chart representation of selection process for manuscripts to be considered within this systematic review

References

    1. Deones V.L., Wiley S.C., Worrell T.. Assessment of quadriceps muscle performance by a hand-held dynamometer and an isokinetic dynamometer. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 1994;20:296–301.
    1. Trudelle-Jackson E., Jackson A.W., Frankowski C.M., Long K.M., Meske N.B.. Interdevice reliability and validity assessment of the Nicholas Hand-Held Dynamometer. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 1994;20:302–306.
    1. Li R.C., Jasiewicz J.M., Middleton J., Condie P., Barriskill A.. The development, validity, and reliability of a manual muscle testing device with integrated limb position sensors. Arch. of Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2006;87:411–417.
    1. Mayer F., Horstmann T., Kranenberg U., Röcker K., Dickhuth H.. Reproducibility of isokinetic peak torque and angle at peak torque in the shoulder joint. Int. J. Sports Med. 1994;15:S26–31.
    1. Kimura I.F., Gulick D.T., Alexander D.M., Takao S.H.. Reliability of peak torque values for concentric and eccentric shoulder internal and external rotation on the Biodex, Kinetic Communicator, and Lido dynamometers. Isokinet. Exerc. Sci. 1996;6:95–99.
    1. Soderberg G.J., Blaschak M.. Shoulder internal and external rotation peak torque production through a velocity spectrum in differing positions. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 1987;8:518–524.
    1. Walmsley R.P., Szybbo C.. A comparative study of the torque generated by the shoulder internal and external rotator muscles in different positions and at varying speeds. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 1987;9:217–222.
    1. Stark T., Walker B., Phillips J.K., Fejer R., Beck R.. Hand-held dynamometry correlation with the gold standard isokinetic dynamometry: a systematic review. Pm & R. 2011;3:472–479.
    1. Kelln B.M., McKeon P.O., Gontkof L.M., Hertel J.. Hand-held dynamometry: reliability of lower extremity muscle testing in healthy, physically active, young adults. J. Sport Rehabil. 2008;17:160–170.
    1. Lu T., Hsu H., Chang L., Chen H.. Enhancing the examiner’s resisting force improves the reliability of manual muscle strength measurements: comparison of a new device with hand-held dynamometry. J. Rehabil. Med. 2007;39:679–684.
    1. Arnold C.M., Warkentin K.D., Chilibeck P.D., Magnus C.R.. The reliability and validity of handheld dynamometry for the measurement of lower-extremity muscle strength in older adults. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2010;24:815–824.
    1. Campos Jara C.A., Bautista González I.J., Chirosa Ríos L.J., Martin Tamayo I., Lopez Fuenzalida A.E., Chirosa Rios I.J.. Validación y fiabilidad del dispositivo Haefni Health System 1.0 en la medición de la velocidad en el rango isocinético. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte. 2014;14:91–98.
    1. Martin H., Yule V., Syddall H., Dennison E., Cooper C.. Is hand-held dynamometry useful for the measurement of quadriceps strength in older people? A comparison with the gold standard Biodex dynamometry, Gerontology. 2006;52:154–159.
    1. Meyer C., Corten K., Wesseling M., Peers K., Simon J.P.. Test-retest reliability of innovated strength tests for hip muscles. PLoS ONE [Electronic Resource] 2013;8:e81149.
    1. Drouin J.M., Valovich-mcLeod T.C., Shultz S.J., Gansneder B.M., Perrin D.H.. Reliability and validity of the Biodex system 3 pro isokinetic dynamometer velocity, torque and position measurements. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2004;91:22–29.
    1. Holmbäck A.M., Lexell J.. Reproducibility of isokinetic ankle dorsiflexor strength and fatigue measurements in healthy older subjects. Isokinet. Exerc. Sci. 2007;15:263–270.
    1. Morrison K.E., Kaminski T.W.. The reproducibility of an isokinetic testing technique at the ankle joint. Isokinet. Exerc. Sci. 2007;15:245–251.
    1. Liberati A., Altman D.G., Tetzlaff J., Mulrow C., Gotzsche P.C.. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann. Intern. Med. 2009;151:W-65–W-94.
    1. Stratford P.W.. Getting more from the literature: estimating the standard error of measurement from reliability studies. Physiother. Can. 2004;56:27–30.
    1. Stratford P.W., Goldsmith C.H.. Use of the standard error as a reliability index of interest: an applied example using elbow flexor strength data. Phys. Ther. 199;77:745–750.
    1. Golriz S., Hebert J.J., Foreman K.B., Walker B.F.. The validity of a portable clinical force plate in assessment of static postural control: concurrent validity study. Chiropr. Manual Ther. 2012;20:1–8.
    1. Terwee C.B., Mokkink L.B., Knol D.L., Ostelo R.W., Bouter L.M.. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual. Life Res. 2012;21:651–657.
    1. Munro B.H. Statistical methods for health care research. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
    1. Kim W.K., Kim D.K., Seo K.M., Kang S.H.. Reliability and validity of isometric knee extensor strength test with hand-held dynamometer depending on its fixation: a pilot study. Ann. Rehabil. Med. 2014;38:84–93.
    1. Kawaguchi J.K., Babcock G.. Validity and reliability of handheld dynamometric strength assessment of hip extensor and abductor muscles. Athletic Training and Sports Health Care. 2010;2:11–17.
    1. Mentiplay B.F., Perraton L.G., Bower K.J., Adair B., Pua Y.H.. Assessment of lower limb muscle strength and power using hand-held and fixed dynamometry: A reliability and validity study. PloS one. 2015;10:e0140822.
    1. Tung-Wu L., Hui-Lien C., Ling-Ying C., Horng-Chaung H.. Enhancing the examiner’s resisting force improves the validity of manual muscle strength measurements: application to knee extensors and flexors. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2012;26:2364–2371.
    1. Claiborne T.L., Timmons M.K., Pincivero D.M.. Test-retest reliability of cardinal plane isokinetic hip torque and EMG. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 2009;19:e345–352.
    1. Dauty M., Rochcongar P.. Reproducibility of concentric and eccentric isokinetic strength of the knee flexors in elite volleyball players. Isokinet. Exerc. Sci. 2001;9:129–132.
    1. Hartmann A., Knols R., Murer K., de Bruin E.D.. Reproducibility of an isokinetic strength-testing protocol of the knee and ankle in older adults. Gerontology. 2009;55:259–268.
    1. de Carvalho F., Andrade A, C, Caserotti P, de Carvalho C, M, de Azevedo Abade E, A, da Eira Sampaio A, J.. Reliability of concentric, eccentric and isometric Knee extension and flexion when using the REV9000 isokinetic dynamometer. J. Hum. Kinet. 2013;37:47–53.
    1. Ferri-Morales A., Alegre L., Basco A., Aguado X.. Test-retest relative and absolute reliability of knee extensor strength measures and minimal detectable change. Isokinet. Exerc. Sci. 2014;22:17–26.
    1. Dervisevic E., Hadzic V., Karpljuk D, Radjo I.. The influence of different ranges of motion testing on the isokinetic strength of the quadriceps and hamstrings. Isokinet. Exerc. Sci. 2006;14:269–278.
    1. Larsson B., Karlsson S., Eriksson A., Gerdle B.. Test-retest reliability of EMG and peak torque during repetitive maximum concentric knee extensions. J. Electromyogr. Kines. 2003;13:281–287.
    1. Wang Y-C., Bohannon R.W., Magasi S.R., Hrynkiewicz B., Morales A.. Testing of knee extension muscle strength: A comparison of two portable alternatives for the NIH toolbox study. Isokinet. Exerc. Sci. 2011;19:163–168.
    1. Neil S.E., Myring A., Peeters M.J., Pirie I., Jacobs R.. Reliability and validity of the Performance Recorder 1 for measuring isometric knee flexor and extensor strength. Physiother. Theory & Pract. 2003;29:639–647.
    1. Terwee C.B., Bot S.D., de Boer M.R., van der Windt D.A., Knol D.L.. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.
    1. Holmback A.M., Porter M.M., Downham D., Lexell J.. Reliability of isokinetic ankle dorsiflexor strength measurements in healthy young men and women. Scan J. Rehabil. Med. 1999;31:229–239.
    1. Prentice W.E., Kaminski T.W. Rehabilitation techniques for sports medicine and athletic training. McGraw-hill; New York: 2004.
    1. Hopkins W.G.. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports medicine. 2000;30:1–15.
    1. Edouard P., Codine P., Samozino P., Bernard P.L., Hérisson C.. Reliability of shoulder rotators isokinetic strength imbalance measured using the Biodex dynamometer. J. Sci. Med. Sport. 2013;16:162–165.
    1. Hislop H., Avers D., Brown M.. Daniels and Worthingham’s muscle testing: Techniques of manual examination and performance testing. Elsevier Health Sciences. 2013
    1. Reese N.B. Muscle and sensory testing. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013.
    1. Frese E., Brown M., Norton B.J.. Clinical reliability of manual muscle testing. Phys.Ther. 1987;67:1072–1076.
    1. Brandsma J.W., Schreuders T.A., Birke J.A., Piefer A., Oostendorp R.. Manual muscle strength testing: intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities for the intrinsic muscles of the hand. J. Hand Ther. 1995;8:185–190.
    1. Bohannon R.W.. Hand-held compared with isokinetic dynamometry for measurement of static knee extension torque (parallel reliability of dynamometers) Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. 1990;11:217–222.
    1. de Araujo Ribeiro Alvares J.B., Rodrigues R., de Azevedo Franke R., da Silva B.G., Pinto R.S.. Inter-machine reliability of the Biodex and Cybex isokinetic dynamometers for knee flexor/ extensor isometric, concentric and eccentric tests. Phys. Ther. Sport. 2015;16:59–65.
    1. Burnham R.S., Bell G., Olenik L., Reid D.C.. Shoulder abduction strength measurement in football players: reliability and validity of two field tests. Clin. J. Sport Med. 1995;5:90–94.
    1. Alfuth M., Hahm M.M.. Reliability, comparability, and validity of foot inversion and eversion strength measurements using a hand-held dynamometer. Int. J. Sports Phys. Ther. 2016;11:72–79.
    1. Thompson M.C., Shingleton L.G., Kegerreis S.T.. Comparison of values generated during testing of the knee using the Cybex II Plus® and Biodex Model B-2000® isokinetic dynamometers. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 1989;11:108–115.
    1. Gross M.T., Huffman G.M., Phillips C.N., Wray J.A.. Intramachine and intermachine reliability of the Biodex and Cybex® II for knee flexion and extension peak torque and angular work. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 1991;13:329–335.
    1. Nevill A.M., Atkinson G.. Assessing agreement between measurements recorded on a ratio scale in sports medicine and sports science. Br. J. Sports Med. 1997:3.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj