Limited relationships between reactive oxygen species levels in culture media and zygote and embryo development

Kuo-Chung Lan, Yi-Chi Lin, Yung-Chiao Chang, Hsin-Jung Lin, Yi-Ru Tsai, Hong-Yo Kang, Kuo-Chung Lan, Yi-Chi Lin, Yung-Chiao Chang, Hsin-Jung Lin, Yi-Ru Tsai, Hong-Yo Kang

Abstract

Purpose: Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are thought to play a critical role in the success of IVF. The relationships between oxidative stress parameters in culture media and IVF outcomes have not been extensively investigated. The objective of this study is to examine the relationships between early human embryonic parameters and levels of ROS in culture media.

Methods: This prospective study was conducted with 2633 spent culture media collected from patients undergoing conventional IVF (n = 101) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) (n = 60). Both fertilization and early culture were performed in universal IVF medium and G series medium. ROS levels were measured by chemiluminescence assays using luminol as the probe on days 1, 3, and 5 and determined the relationships of ROS levels with zygote condition, embryo quality, and clinical pregnancy rate.

Results: ROS levels per embryo in culture media on the corresponding days 1, 3, and 5 showed significant correlations between each pair in the total cohort. Similar results were observed in the IVF and ICSI groups, but day 1 and day 3 ROS levels were significantly higher in culture media of IVF than of ICSI embryos. ROS levels in culture medium were not significantly associated with embryo quality, blastocyst formation, or arrest. ROS levels on day 1 were similar in media of normally fertilized zygotes, unfertilized oocytes, and polyspermic zygotes and were not associated with delayed embryonic development, high fragmentation, blastocyst formation, or arrest after prolonged culture. ROS levels in media were not associated with the likelihood of conception.

Conclusions: ROS levels in culture media may not be an effective indicator of embryo selection for IVF.

Keywords: Culture media; Embryo development; Embryo morphology; Fertilization; Reactive oxygen species.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Correlations between ROS levels in spent culture media on days 1 (n = 1033), 3 (n = 963), and 5 (n = 637). a Day 1 vs. day 3 (regression coefficient: 0.336, P < 0.001). b Day 1 vs. day 5 (regression coefficient: 0.093, P = 0.02). c Day 3 vs. day 5 (regression coefficient: 0.196, P < 0.001). Straight lines represent the linear regression lines. ROS reactive oxygen species, n number
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relationship of ROS in culture media with zygote and embryo development. a Relationships between ROS levels in culture media on days 1, 3, and 5 with zygote quality, day 3 embryo class, and day 5 blastocyst class. b Relationship between ROS levels in culture media on day 1 with day 3 embryo class and day 5 blastocyst class
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relationship of ROS in culture media with zygote and embryo development. a Relationships between ROS levels in culture media on days 1, 3, and 5 with zygote quality, day 3 embryo class, and day 5 blastocyst class. b Relationship between ROS levels in culture media on day 1 with day 3 embryo class and day 5 blastocyst class

References

    1. Gardner DKSW. In-vitro culture of human blastocysts. In: Jansen MD, Mortimer D, editors. Towards reproductive certainty: fertility and genetics beyond 1999. Carnforth: Parthenon Publishing; 1999. pp. 378–388.
    1. Van Royen E, Mangelschots K, De Neubourg D, Valkenburg M, Van de Meerssche M, Ryckaert G, et al. Characterization of a top quality embryo, a step towards single-embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(9):2345–2349. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.9.2345.
    1. Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, Garcia-Velasco JA. Comprehensive chromosome screening improves embryo selection: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(6):1503–1512. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.08.038.
    1. Sanchez T, Seidler EA, Gardner DK, Needleman D, Sakkas D. Will noninvasive methods surpass invasive for assessing gametes and embryos? Fertil Steril. 2017;108(5):730–737. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.004.
    1. Agarwal A, Said TM, Bedaiwy MA, Banerjee J, Alvarez JG. Oxidative stress in an assisted reproductive techniques setting. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(3):503–512. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.02.088.
    1. Agarwal A, Saleh RA, Bedaiwy MA. Role of reactive oxygen species in the pathophysiology of human reproduction. Fertil Steril. 2003;79(4):829–843. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04948-8.
    1. Guerin P, El Mouatassim S, Menezo Y. Oxidative stress and protection against reactive oxygen species in the pre-implantation embryo and its surroundings. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7(2):175–189. doi: 10.1093/humupd/7.2.175.
    1. Lee TH, Lee MS, Liu CH, Tsao HM, Huang CC, Yang YS. The association between microenvironmental reactive oxygen species and embryo development in assisted reproduction technology cycles. Reprod Sci. 2012;19(7):725–732. doi: 10.1177/1933719111432858.
    1. Bedaiwy MA, Mahfouz RZ, Goldberg JM, Sharma R, Falcone T, Abdel Hafez MF, Agarwal A. Relationship of reactive oxygen species levels in day 3 culture media to the outcome of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):2037–2042. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.020.
    1. Martin-Romero FJ, Miguel-Lasobras EM, Dominguez-Arroyo JA, Gonzalez-Carrera E, Alvarez IS. Contribution of culture media to oxidative stress and its effect on human oocytes. Reprod BioMed Online. 2008;17(5):652–661. doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60312-4.
    1. Bedaiwy MA, Falcone T, Mohamed MS, Aleem AA, Sharma RK, Worley SE, et al. Differential growth of human embryos in vitro: role of reactive oxygen species. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(3):593–600. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.02.121.
    1. Shih YF, Lee TH, Liu CH, Tsao HM, Huang CC, Lee MS. Effects of reactive oxygen species levels in prepared culture media on embryo development: a comparison of two media. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;53(4):504–508. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2013.12.009.
    1. Lan KC, Huang FJ, Lin YC, Kung FT, Lan TH, Chang SY. Significantly superior response in the right ovary compared with the left ovary after stimulation with follicle-stimulating hormone in a pituitary down-regulation regimen. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(7):2269–2273. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.123.
    1. Lan KC, Huang FJ, Lin YC, Kung FT, Hsieh CH, Huang HW, Tan PH, Chang SY. The predictive value of using a combined Z-score and day 3 embryo morphology score in the assessment of embryo survival on day 5. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(6):1299–1306. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg239.
    1. Veeck L. An atlas of human gametes and conceptuses. Carnforth: Parthenon Publishing; 1999.
    1. Su YT, Lin PY, Huang FJ, Kung FT, Lin YJ, Tsai YR, Lan KC. Age is a major prognosticator in extremely low oocyte retrieval cycles. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;56(2):175–180. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2016.04.039.
    1. Paszkowski T, Clarke RN. Antioxidative capacity of preimplantation embryo culture medium declines following the incubation of poor quality embryos. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(11):2493–2495. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019146.
    1. Ermilov A, Diamond MP, Sacco AG, Dozortsev DD. Culture media and their components differ in their ability to scavenge reactive oxygen species in the plasmid relaxation assay. Fertil Steril. 1999;72(1):154–157. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00204-6.
    1. Guyader-Joly C, Guerin P, Renard JP, Guillaud J, Ponchon S, Menezo Y. Precursors of taurine in female genital tract: effects on developmental capacity of bovine embryo produced in vitro. Amino Acids. 1998;15(1–2):27–42. doi: 10.1007/BF01345278.
    1. Harvey AJ, Kind KL, Thompson JG. REDOX regulation of early embryo development. Reproduction. 2002;123(4):479–486. doi: 10.1530/rep.0.1230479.
    1. Tsai MY, Huang FJ, Kung FT, Lin YC, Chang SY, Wu JF, Chang HW. Influence of polyvinylpyrrolidone on the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Reprod Med. 2000;45(2):115–120.
    1. Sallam HN, Sallam NH, Sallam SH. Non-invasive methods for embryo selection. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2016;8(2):87–100.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj