Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with interpregnancy interval: cross sectional study
A Conde-Agudelo, J M Belizán, A Conde-Agudelo, J M Belizán
Abstract
Objective: To study the impact of interpregnancy interval on maternal morbidity and mortality.
Design: Retrospective cross sectional study with data from the Perinatal Information System database of the Latin American Centre for Perinatology and Human Development, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Setting: Latin America and the Caribbean, 1985-97.
Participants: 456 889 parous women delivering singleton infants.
Main outcome measures: Crude and adjusted odds ratios of the effects of short and long interpregnancy intervals on maternal death, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, third trimester bleeding, premature rupture of membranes, postpartum haemorrhage, puerperal endometritis, and anaemia.
Results: Short (<6 months) and long (>59 months) interpregnancy intervals were observed for 2.8% and 19.5% of women, respectively. After adjustment for major confounding factors, compared with those conceiving at 18 to 23 months after a previous birth, women with interpregnancy intervals of 5 months or less had higher risks for maternal death (odds ratio 2.54; 95% confidence interval 1.22 to 5.38), third trimester bleeding (1.73; 1.42 to 2.24), premature rupture of membranes (1.72; 1.53 to 1.93), puerperal endometritis (1.33; 1.22 to 1.45), and anaemia (1.30; 1.18 to 1.43). Compared with women with interpregnancy intervals of 18 to 23 months, women with interpregnancy intervals longer than 59 months had significantly increased risks of pre-eclampsia (1.83; 1.72 to 1.94) and eclampsia (1.80; 1.38 to 2.32).
Conclusions: Interpregnancy intervals less than 6 months and longer than 59 months are associated with an increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes.
References
- Rawlings JS, Rawlings VB, Read JA. Prevalence of low birth weight and preterm delivery in relation to the interval between pregnancies among white and black women. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:69–74.
- Klerman LV, Cliver SP, Goldenberg RL. The impact of short interpregnancy intervals on pregnancy outcomes in a low-income population. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:1182–1185.
- Khoshnood B, Lee KS, Wall S, Hsieh HL, Mittendorf R. Short interpregnancy intervals and the risk of adverse birth outcomes among five racial/ethnic groups in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148:798–805.
- Zhu BP, Rolfs RT, Nangle BE, Horan JM. Effect of the interval between pregnancies on perinatal outcomes. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:589–594.
- Shults RA, Arndt V, Olshan AF, Martin CF, Royce RA. Effects of short interpregnancy intervals on small-for-gestational age and preterm births. Epidemiology. 1999;10:250–254.
- Eastman NJ. The effect of the interval between births on maternal and fetal outlook. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1944;47:445–466.
- Anandalakshmy PN, Talwar PB, Buckshee K, Hingorani V. Demographic, socio-economic and medical factors affecting maternal mortality—an Indian experience. J Fam Welfare. 1993;39:1–4.
- Lazovic N, Pocekovac P. The importance of time intervals between childbirth and anemia in pregnancy. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1996;124:307–310. . (In Serbo-Croatian.)
- Ronsmans C, Campbell O. Short birth intervals don't kill women: evidence from Matlab, Bangladesh. Stud Fam Plann. 1998;29:282–290.
- Schwarcz R, Diaz AG, Fescina R, Diaz JL, Martell M, Simini F. The perinatal information system. I: The simplified perinatal clinical record. J Perinat Med. 1987;15(suppl 1):9.
- Diaz-Rosello JL. Health services research, outcomes, and perinatal information systems. Curr Opin Pediatr. 1998;10:117–122.
- Simini F. Perinatal information system (SIP): a clinical database in Latin America and the Caribbean. Lancet. 1999;354:75.
- Institute of Medicine; National Academy of Sciences. Nutrition during pregnancy and lactation. An implementation guide. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1992.
- Mahfouz AA, el-Said MM, Alakija W, Badawi IA, al-Erian RA, Moneim MA. Anemia among pregnant women in the Asir region, Saudi Arabia: an epidemiologic study. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1994;25:84–87.
- Ananth CV, Wilcox AJ, Savitz DA, Bowes WA, Jr, Luther ER. Effect of maternal age and parity on the risk of uteroplacental bleeding disorders in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:511–516.
- Miller JE. Birth intervals and perinatal health: an investigation of three hypotheses. Fam Plann Perspect. 1991;23:62–70.
- Winkvist A, Rasmussen KM, Habicht JP. A new definition of maternal depletion syndrome. Am J Public Health. 1992;82:691–694.
- Khan KS, Chien PF, Khan NB. Nutritional stress of reproduction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;77:395–401.
- Alger LS, Pupkin MJ. Etiology of preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1986;29:758–770.
- Libombo A, Folgosa E, Bergstrom S. Risk factors in puerperal endometritis-myometritis. An incident case-referent study. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1994;38:198–205.
- Naeye RL. Maternal age, obstetric complications, and the outcome of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1983;61:210–216.
- Trupin LS, Simon LP, Eskenazi B. Change in paternity: a risk factor for preeclampsia in multiparas. Epidemiology. 1996;7:240–244.
- Cobo E. Aplicación de un modelo de historia clínica perinatal. Rev Col Obstet Ginecol. 1985;36:79–94.
Source: PubMed