Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with interpregnancy interval: cross sectional study

A Conde-Agudelo, J M Belizán, A Conde-Agudelo, J M Belizán

Abstract

Objective: To study the impact of interpregnancy interval on maternal morbidity and mortality.

Design: Retrospective cross sectional study with data from the Perinatal Information System database of the Latin American Centre for Perinatology and Human Development, Montevideo, Uruguay.

Setting: Latin America and the Caribbean, 1985-97.

Participants: 456 889 parous women delivering singleton infants.

Main outcome measures: Crude and adjusted odds ratios of the effects of short and long interpregnancy intervals on maternal death, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, third trimester bleeding, premature rupture of membranes, postpartum haemorrhage, puerperal endometritis, and anaemia.

Results: Short (<6 months) and long (>59 months) interpregnancy intervals were observed for 2.8% and 19.5% of women, respectively. After adjustment for major confounding factors, compared with those conceiving at 18 to 23 months after a previous birth, women with interpregnancy intervals of 5 months or less had higher risks for maternal death (odds ratio 2.54; 95% confidence interval 1.22 to 5.38), third trimester bleeding (1.73; 1.42 to 2.24), premature rupture of membranes (1.72; 1.53 to 1.93), puerperal endometritis (1.33; 1.22 to 1.45), and anaemia (1.30; 1.18 to 1.43). Compared with women with interpregnancy intervals of 18 to 23 months, women with interpregnancy intervals longer than 59 months had significantly increased risks of pre-eclampsia (1.83; 1.72 to 1.94) and eclampsia (1.80; 1.38 to 2.32).

Conclusions: Interpregnancy intervals less than 6 months and longer than 59 months are associated with an increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes.

References

    1. Rawlings JS, Rawlings VB, Read JA. Prevalence of low birth weight and preterm delivery in relation to the interval between pregnancies among white and black women. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:69–74.
    1. Klerman LV, Cliver SP, Goldenberg RL. The impact of short interpregnancy intervals on pregnancy outcomes in a low-income population. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:1182–1185.
    1. Khoshnood B, Lee KS, Wall S, Hsieh HL, Mittendorf R. Short interpregnancy intervals and the risk of adverse birth outcomes among five racial/ethnic groups in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148:798–805.
    1. Zhu BP, Rolfs RT, Nangle BE, Horan JM. Effect of the interval between pregnancies on perinatal outcomes. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:589–594.
    1. Shults RA, Arndt V, Olshan AF, Martin CF, Royce RA. Effects of short interpregnancy intervals on small-for-gestational age and preterm births. Epidemiology. 1999;10:250–254.
    1. Eastman NJ. The effect of the interval between births on maternal and fetal outlook. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1944;47:445–466.
    1. Anandalakshmy PN, Talwar PB, Buckshee K, Hingorani V. Demographic, socio-economic and medical factors affecting maternal mortality—an Indian experience. J Fam Welfare. 1993;39:1–4.
    1. Lazovic N, Pocekovac P. The importance of time intervals between childbirth and anemia in pregnancy. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1996;124:307–310. . (In Serbo-Croatian.)
    1. Ronsmans C, Campbell O. Short birth intervals don't kill women: evidence from Matlab, Bangladesh. Stud Fam Plann. 1998;29:282–290.
    1. Schwarcz R, Diaz AG, Fescina R, Diaz JL, Martell M, Simini F. The perinatal information system. I: The simplified perinatal clinical record. J Perinat Med. 1987;15(suppl 1):9.
    1. Diaz-Rosello JL. Health services research, outcomes, and perinatal information systems. Curr Opin Pediatr. 1998;10:117–122.
    1. Simini F. Perinatal information system (SIP): a clinical database in Latin America and the Caribbean. Lancet. 1999;354:75.
    1. Institute of Medicine; National Academy of Sciences. Nutrition during pregnancy and lactation. An implementation guide. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1992.
    1. Mahfouz AA, el-Said MM, Alakija W, Badawi IA, al-Erian RA, Moneim MA. Anemia among pregnant women in the Asir region, Saudi Arabia: an epidemiologic study. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1994;25:84–87.
    1. Ananth CV, Wilcox AJ, Savitz DA, Bowes WA, Jr, Luther ER. Effect of maternal age and parity on the risk of uteroplacental bleeding disorders in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:511–516.
    1. Miller JE. Birth intervals and perinatal health: an investigation of three hypotheses. Fam Plann Perspect. 1991;23:62–70.
    1. Winkvist A, Rasmussen KM, Habicht JP. A new definition of maternal depletion syndrome. Am J Public Health. 1992;82:691–694.
    1. Khan KS, Chien PF, Khan NB. Nutritional stress of reproduction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;77:395–401.
    1. Alger LS, Pupkin MJ. Etiology of preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1986;29:758–770.
    1. Libombo A, Folgosa E, Bergstrom S. Risk factors in puerperal endometritis-myometritis. An incident case-referent study. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1994;38:198–205.
    1. Naeye RL. Maternal age, obstetric complications, and the outcome of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1983;61:210–216.
    1. Trupin LS, Simon LP, Eskenazi B. Change in paternity: a risk factor for preeclampsia in multiparas. Epidemiology. 1996;7:240–244.
    1. Cobo E. Aplicación de un modelo de historia clínica perinatal. Rev Col Obstet Ginecol. 1985;36:79–94.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj