The effect of three hemostatic agents on early bone healing in an animal model

Jonathan K Armstrong, Bo Han, Kenrick Kuwahara, Zhi Yang, Clara E Magyar, Sarah M Dry, Elisa Atti, Sotirios Tetradis, Timothy C Fisher, Jonathan K Armstrong, Bo Han, Kenrick Kuwahara, Zhi Yang, Clara E Magyar, Sarah M Dry, Elisa Atti, Sotirios Tetradis, Timothy C Fisher

Abstract

Background: Resorbable bone hemostasis materials, oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC) and microfibrillar collagen (MFC), remain at the site of application for up to 8 weeks and may impair osteogenesis. Our experimental study compared the effect of a water-soluble alkylene oxide copolymer (AOC) to ORC and MFC versus no hemostatic material on early bone healing.

Methods: Two circular 2.7 mm non-critical defects were made in each tibia of 12 rabbits. Sufficient AOC, ORC or MFC was applied to achieve hemostasis, and effectiveness recorded. An autologous blood clot was applied to control defects. Rabbits were sacrificed at 17 days, tibiae excised and fixed. Bone healing was quantitatively measured by micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) expressed as fractional bone volume, and qualitatively assessed by histological examination of decalcified sections.

Results: Hemostasis was immediate after application of MFC and AOC, after 1-2 minutes with ORC, and >5 minutes for control. At 17 days post-surgery, micro-CT analysis showed near-complete healing in control and AOC groups, partial healing in the ORC group and minimal healing in the MFC group. Fractional bone volume was 8 fold greater in the control and AOC groups than in the MFC group (0.42 ± 0.06, 0.40 ± 0.03 vs 0.05 ± 0.01, P < 0.001) and over 1.5-fold greater than in the ORC group (0.25 ± 0.03, P < 0.05). By histology, MFC remained at the application site with minimal healing at the defect margins and early fibrotic tissue within the defect. ORC-treated defects showed partial healing but with early fibrotic tissue in the marrow space. Conversely, control and AOC-treated defects demonstrated newly formed woven bone rich in cellular activity with no evidence of AOC remaining at the application site.

Conclusions: Early healing appeared to be impaired by the presence of MFC and impeded by the presence of ORC. In contrast, AOC did not inhibit bone healing and suggest that AOC may be a better bone hemostatic material for procedures where bony fusion is critical and immediate hemostasis required.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative micro-CT images of excised rabbit tibiae at 17 days post-surgery. Left column: Cross-section views through the center of the defect showing newly formed bone as slightly opaque in untreated (control), alkylene oxide copolymer- and oxidized regenerated cellulose-treated defects, and an absence of opacity in microfibrillar collagen-treated defects (bar = 5.0 mm). Center and right columns: micro-CT generated binarized images of mineralized tissue of the defect area (center) and area analyzed within the defect (right). AOC-treated and untreated (control) defects show substantial, well developed mineralized tissue, ORC-treated defect shows a more diffuse structure of mineralized tissue, and minimal mineralized tissue is observed within the MFC-treated defect.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bone mineralization at 17 days post-surgery. Mean values for micro-CT derived fractional bone volume (BV/TV) showing an 8 fold greater BV/TV value for untreated (control) and alkylene oxide copolymer-versus microfibrillar collagen-treated defects (0.42 ± 0.06, 0.40 ± 0.03 vs 0.05 ± 0.01 respectively, P < 0.001) and over 1.5 fold greater BV/TV value versus oxidized regenerated cellulose-treated defects (0.25 ± 0.03, P < 0.05). Number of defects per group = 12, P values determined from Tukey's Multiple Comparison Test.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Microscopy of control defects at 17 days post-surgery. Untreated (Control) adjacent 5 μm demineralized bone sections stained with H&E (upper) and Trichrome-EVG at ×2 (left) and ×10 magnification. The edge of the defect is identified with black/green arrows, and the area of magnification shown with a dotted box. Defects show good healing with newly formed woven bone (light blue arrows) rich in cellular activity (osteoid shown with dark blue arrows). Blue stars indicate native collagen meshwork throughout the tissue.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Microscopy of alkylene oxide-treated defects at 17 days post-surgery. Alkylene oxide copolymer-treated adjacent 5 μm demineralized bone sections stained with H&E (upper) and Trichrome-EVG at ×2 (left) and ×10 magnification. The edge of the defect is identified with black/green arrows, and the area of magnification shown with a dotted box. Defects show good healing with newly formed woven bone (light blue arrows) rich in cellular activity (osteoid shown with dark blue arrows). Blue stars indicate native collagen meshwork throughout the tissue.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Microscopy of oxidized regenerated cellulose-treated defects at 17 days post-surgery. Oxidized regenerated cellulose-treated adjacent 5 μm demineralized bone sections stained with H&E (upper) and Trichrome-EVG at ×2 (left) and ×10 magnification. The edge of the defect is identified with black/green arrows, and the area of magnification shown with a dotted box. Defects show partial healing with newly formed woven bone (light blue arrows) rich in cellular activity (osteoid shown with dark blue arrows). Early fibrotic tissue is observed within the defect (white stars). Blue stars indicate native collagen meshwork within the marrow and defect.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Microscopy of microfibrillar collagen-treated defects at 17 days post-surgery. Microfibrillar collagen-treated adjacent 5 μm demineralized bone sections stained with H&E (upper) and Trichrome-EVG at ×2 (left) and ×10 magnification. The edge of the defect is identified with black/green arrows, and the area of magnification shown with a dotted box. Defects show minimal healing with no evidence of newly formed woven bone. Dense bundles of residual collagen are observed (yellow arrows) and early fibrotic tissue within the marrow space (white stars). Blue stars indicate native collagen meshwork within the marrow space.

References

    1. Achneck HE, Sileshi B, Jamiolkowski RM, Albala DM, Shapiro ML, Lawson JH. A comprehensive review of topical hemostatic agents: efficacy and recommendations for use. Ann Surg. 2010;251:217–228. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181c3bcca.
    1. Alberius P, Klinge B, Sjogren S. Effects of bone wax on rabbit cranial bone lesions. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1987;15:63–67.
    1. Finn MD, Schow SR, Schneiderman ED. Osseous regeneration in the presence of four common hemostatic agents. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;50:608–612. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(92)90443-4.
    1. Howard TC, Kelley RR. The effect of bone wax on the healing of experimental rat tibial lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1969;63:226–232.
    1. Ibarrola JL, Bjorenson JE, Austin BP, Gerstein H. Osseous reactions to three hemostatic agents. J Endod. 1985;11:75–83. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(85)80123-0.
    1. Magyar CE, Aghaloo TL, Atti E, Tetradis S. Ostene, a new alkylene oxide copolymer bone hemostatic material, does not inhibit bone healing. Neurosurgery. 2008;63(Suppl 2):373–378. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000316859.03788.44.
    1. Wellisz T, An YH, Wen X, Kang Q, Hill CM, Armstrong JK. Infection rates and healing using bone wax and a soluble polymer material. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:481–486. doi: 10.1007/s11999-007-0067-5.
    1. Wellisz T, Armstrong JK, Cambridge J, An YH, Wen X, Kang Q, Hill CM, Fisher TC. The effects of a soluble polymer and bone wax on sternal healing in an animal model. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:1776–1780. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.11.042.
    1. Anfinsen OG, Sudmann B, Rait M, Bang G, Sudmann E. Complications secondary to the use of standard bone wax in seven patients. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1993;32:505–508.
    1. Angelini GD, el-Ghamari FA, Butchart EG. Poststernotomy pseudo-arthrosis due to foreign body reaction to bone wax. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1987;1:129–130. doi: 10.1016/1010-7940(87)90025-X.
    1. Brightmore TG, Hayes P, Humble J, Morgan AD. Hemostasis and healing following median sternotomy. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1975. pp. 39–41.
    1. Kamide T, Nakada M, Hirota Y, Hayashi Y, Hayashi Y, Uchiyama N, Hamada JI. Skull osteohypertrophy as a complication of bone wax. J Clin Neurosci. 2009;16:1658–1660. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2009.03.014.
    1. Sudmann B, Bang G, Sudmann E. Histologically verified bone wax (beeswax) granuloma after median sternotomy in 17 of 18 autopsy cases. Pathology. 2006;38:138–141. doi: 10.1080/00313020600561732.
    1. Wellisz T, Armstrong JK, Cambridge J, Fisher TC. Ostene, a new water-soluble bone hemostasis agent. J Craniofac Surg. 2006;17:420–425. doi: 10.1097/00001665-200605000-00006.
    1. Dias GJ, Peplow PV, Teixeira F. Osseous regeneration in the presence of oxidized cellulose and collagen. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2003;14:739–745. doi: 10.1023/A:1025076002948.
    1. Schonauer C, Tessitore E, Barbagallo G, Albanese V, Moraci A. The use of local agents: bone wax, gelatin, collagen, oxidized cellulose. Eur Spine J. 2004;13(Suppl 1):S89–S96. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0727-z.
    1. Cobden RH, Thrasher EL, Harris WH. Topical hemostatic agents to reduce bleeding from cancellous bone. A comparison of microcrystalline collagen, thrombin, and thrombin-soaked gelatin foam. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:70–73.
    1. Orgill DP, Ehret FW, Regan JF, Glowacki J, Mulliken JB. Polyethylene glycol/microfibrillar collagen composite as a new resorbable hemostatic bone wax. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;39:358–363. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980305)39:3<358::AID-JBM3>;2-I.
    1. Frantz VK. Absorbable cotton, paper and gauze: (oxidized cellulose) Ann Surg. 1943;118:116–126.
    1. Ibrahim MF, Aps C, Young CP. A foreign body reaction to Surgicel mimicking an abscess following cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;22:489–490. doi: 10.1016/S1010-7940(02)00328-7.
    1. Alpaslan C, Alpaslan GH, Oygur T. Tissue reaction to three subcutaneously implanted local hemostatic agents. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;35:129–132. doi: 10.1016/S0266-4356(97)90689-6.
    1. Fowler EB, Cuenin MF, Hokett SD, Peacock ME, McPherson JC III, Dirksen TR, Sharawy M, Billman MA. Evaluation of Pluronic polyols as carriers for grafting materials: study in rat calvaria defects. J Periodontol. 2002;73:191–197. doi: 10.1902/jop.2002.73.2.191.
    1. Schmolka IR. Physical basis for poloxamer interactions. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1994;720:92–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb30437.x.
    1. Wang MY, Armstrong JK, Fisher TC, Meiselman HJ, McComb GJ, Levy ML. A new, Pluronic-based, bone hemostatic agent that does not impair osteogenesis. Neurosurgery. 2001;49:962–967. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200110000-00031.
    1. Jewell RC, Khor SP, Kisor DF, LaCroix KA, Wargin WA. Pharmacokinetics of RheothRx injection in healthy male volunteers. J Pharm Sci. 1997;86:808–812. doi: 10.1021/js960491e.
    1. Grindel JM, Jaworski T, Emanuele RM, Culbreth P. Pharmacokinetics of a novel surface-active agent, purified poloxamer 188, in rat, rabbit, dog and man. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 2002;23:87–103. doi: 10.1002/bdd.297.
    1. Verna C, Bosch C, Dalstra M, Wikesjö UME, Trombelli L. Healing patterns in calvarial bone defects following guided bone regeneration in rats. A micro-CT scan analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29:865–870. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051X.2002.290912.x.
    1. Atti E, Tetradis S, Magyar CE, Armstrong JK. Thermoreversible Pluronic F108 gel as a universal tissue immobilization material for micro-computed tomography analyses [abstract] J Bone and Miner Res. 2008;23:S362.
    1. Morgan EF, Mason ZD, Chien KB, Pfeiffer AJ, Barnes GL, Einhorn TA, Gerstenfeld LC. Micro-computed tomography assessment of fracture healing: relationships among callus structure, composition, and mechanical function. Bone. 2009;44:335–344. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.10.039.
    1. Lee TC, Chang NK, Su FW, Yang YL, Su TM, Lin YJ, Lin WC, Huang HY. Systemic and local reactions of a water-soluble copolymer bone on a bony defect of rabbit model. Surg Neurol. 2009;72(Suppl 2):75–79. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2009.06.007.
    1. Nappi JF, Lehman JA Jr. The effects of Surgicel on bone formation. Cleft Palate J. 1980;17:291–296.
    1. Ereth M, Sibonga J, Oliver W, Nuttall G, Henderson J, Dekutoski M. Microporous polysaccharide hemospheres do not inhibit bone healing compared to bone wax or microfibrillar collagen. Orthopedics. 2008;31:222. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20080301-10.
    1. Haasch GC, Gerstein H, Austin BP. Effects of two hemostatic agents on osseous healing. J Endod. 1989;15:310–314. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(89)80053-6.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj