Low-energy multistage atrial defibrillation therapy terminates atrial fibrillation with less energy than a single shock
Wenwen Li, Ajit H Janardhan, Vadim V Fedorov, Qun Sha, Richard B Schuessler, Igor R Efimov, Wenwen Li, Ajit H Janardhan, Vadim V Fedorov, Qun Sha, Richard B Schuessler, Igor R Efimov
Abstract
Background: Implantable device therapy of atrial fibrillation (AF) is limited by pain from high-energy shocks. We developed a low-energy multistage defibrillation therapy and tested it in a canine model of AF.
Methods and results: AF was induced by burst pacing during vagus nerve stimulation. Our novel defibrillation therapy consisted of 3 stages: stage (ST) 1 (1-4 low-energy biphasic [BP] shocks), ST2 (6-10 ultralow-energy monophasic [MP] shocks), and ST3 (antitachycardia pacing). First, ST1 testing compared single or multiple MP and BP shocks. Second, several multistage therapies were tested: ST1 versus ST1+ST3 versus ST1+ST2+ST3. Third, 3 shock vectors were compared: superior vena cava to distal coronary sinus, proximal coronary sinus to left atrial appendage, and right atrial appendage to left atrial appendage. The atrial defibrillation threshold (DFT) of 1 BP shock was <1 MP shock (0.55 ± 0.1 versus 1.38 ± 0.31 J, P=0.003). Two to 3 BP shocks terminated AF with lower peak voltage than 1 BP or 1 MP shock and with lower atrial DFT than 4 BP shocks. Compared with ST1 therapy alone, ST1+ST3 lowered the atrial DFT moderately (0.51 ± 0.46 versus 0.95 ± 0.32 J, P=0.036), whereas 3-stage therapy (ST1+ST2+ST3) dramatically lowered the atrial DFT (0.19 ± 0.12 versus 0.95 ± 0.32 J for ST1 alone, P=0.0012). Finally, the 3-stage therapy was equally effective for all studied vectors.
Conclusions: Three-stage electrotherapy significantly reduces the AF DFT and opens the door to low-energy atrial defibrillation at or below the pain threshold.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr. Efimov is a chairman of the scientific advisory board, a member of the board of directors, and owns stock in CardiaLen, Inc.
Figures
Source: PubMed