Prevalence of spondyloarthropathies in France: 2001

A Saraux, F Guillemin, P Guggenbuhl, C H Roux, P Fardellone, E Le Bihan, A Cantagrel, I Chary-Valckenaere, L Euller-Ziegler, R-M Flipo, R Juvin, J-M Behier, B Fautrel, C Masson, J Coste, A Saraux, F Guillemin, P Guggenbuhl, C H Roux, P Fardellone, E Le Bihan, A Cantagrel, I Chary-Valckenaere, L Euller-Ziegler, R-M Flipo, R Juvin, J-M Behier, B Fautrel, C Masson, J Coste

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the prevalence of spondyloarthropathies (SpAs) in France in a multiregional representative sample in the year 2001.

Methods: A two stage random sample was constituted in seven areas from the national telephone directory and the next birthday method in each household. Interviewers were patient-members of self help groups trained to administer telephone surveys using a validated questionnaire for detecting inflammatory joint disease. Quality of data collection was controlled periodically. SpA was confirmed by the patient's rheumatologist or by clinical examination. Prevalence estimates after probability sampling correction were standardised for age and sex (1999 national census).

Results: Among the 15 219 anonymous telephone numbers selected, 3.6% were places of work or secondary residences and were excluded. The phone interview participation rate ranged across regions from 55.1 to 69.9%. 3554 men and 5841 women were included in the study. Twenty nine cases of SpA were confirmed. All but one fulfilled ESSG criteria. Mean age was 47 years (range 21-78). The overall prevalence standardised for age and sex was 0.30% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17 to 0.46). Prevalence was similar in women (0.29% (95% CI 0.14 to 0.49)) and men (0.31 % (95% CI 0.12 to 0.60)). Geographical analysis by department clustering found no significant differences. The prevalence of SpA was as high as that of rheumatoid arthritis.

Conclusion: Prevalence of SpA in France was 0.30% in 2001, with no difference between women and men. Ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis were the most common SpA subsets.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Process of sampling (random selection of telephone numbers and random selection of one adult from each household) and case ascertainment (case detection and case confirmation).

References

    1. J Rheumatol. 1999 Dec;26(12):2622-7
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Apr 15;145(8):762-9
    1. J Rheumatol. 2003 Dec;30(12):2641-4
    1. Joint Bone Spine. 2004 Jan;71(1):44-50
    1. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004 May;43(5):615-8
    1. Am J Public Health. 1979 Mar;69(3):238-45
    1. Am J Public Health. 1982 Sep;72(9):1017-21
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Aug;120(2):291-301
    1. Med Care. 1986 Feb;24(2):97-112
    1. J Rheumatol. 1988 Apr;15(4):678-83
    1. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic. 1990 Feb;57(2):85-9
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 1992 Feb;51(2):186-94
    1. J Rheumatol. 1992 Feb;19(2):195-7
    1. J Rheumatol. 1994 Aug;21(8):1484-90
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1998 Jan;41(1):58-67
    1. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1997 Dec;45(6):454-64
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1998 May;41(5):778-99
    1. Br J Rheumatol. 1998 Sep;37(9):985-7
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Oct;64(10):1427-30
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Dec;75(12):1287-96
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Oct;62(10):957-63

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj