Femilis(®) 60 Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System-A Review of 10 Years of Clinical Experience

Dirk Wildemeersch, Amaury Andrade, Norman Goldstuck, Dirk Wildemeersch, Amaury Andrade, Norman Goldstuck

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to update the clinical experience with the Femilis® 60 levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), now up to 10 years in parous and nulliparous women, particularly with regard to ease and safety of insertion, contraceptive performance, retention, acceptability, continuation of use, impact on menstrual blood loss (MBL), and duration of action.

Study design: Using the Femilis® 60 LNG-IUS releasing 20 µg of levonorgestrel/day, the following studies were conducted: an open, prospective noncomparative contraceptive study, an MBL study, a perimenopausal study, a study for the treatment of endometrial hyperplasia, and early cancer of the uterus, a residue study.

Results: A total of 599 Femilis LNG-IUS were inserted in various clinical trials, the majority for contraceptive purposes. The total exposure in the first and second contraceptive studies, covering 558 parous and nulliparous women, was 32,717 woman-months. Femilis has high contraceptive effectiveness as only one pregnancy occurred. Expulsion of the LNG-IUS was rare with only two total and no partial expulsions (stem protruding through the cervical canal) occurred. Femilis was well tolerated, with continuation rates remaining high. Several MBL studies were conducted, totaling 80 heavy and normal menstrual bleeders, using the pictorial bleeding assessment chart method or the quantitative alkaline hematin technique. Virtually all women responded well with strongly reduced menstrual bleeding. Amenorrhea rates were high, up to 80% after three months, and ferritin levels simultaneously increased significantly. The Femilis LNG-IUS was tested in 104 symptomatic perimenopausal women for seamless transition to and through menopause, adding estrogen therapy when required. Patient tolerability appeared high as >80% requested a second and a third LNG-IUS. Twenty women presenting with nonatypical and atypical hyperplasia and one woman presenting with early endometrial carcinoma were treated with Femilis LNG-IUS. All histology specimens showed full regression, and patients remained in remission without signs of hyperplasia or cancer at yearly and ongoing follow-up examinations up to 10 years. Residual content of LNG was measured in 37 women having the Femilis LNG-IUS for up to 10 years. In 10 of the 102 women who had the Femilis 60 in situ for 10 years between 20% and 30% of the original 60 mg was recovered confirming the long duration of action of the Femilis 60 LNG-IUS.

Conclusion: These studies suggest that the Femilis 60 LNG-IUS releasing 20 µg of LNG/day is an effective, well-tolerated, and well-retained contraceptive both in parous and in nulliparous women. The design of the LNG-IUS, with flexible transverse arm(s) length of 28 mm, allows for a simplification of the insertion technique and training requirements facilitating the use by nonspecialist providers in either developed or developing countries. For nulliparous women, additional evaluation of devices with a 24 mm transverse arm(s), as it relates to tolerability, retention, and continuation of use, still needs to be undertaken.

Keywords: T-shaped intrauterine system; contraception; endometrial cancer; heavy menstrual bleeding; hormone replacement therapy; hyperplasia; levonorgestrel.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Femilis® LNG-IUS with drug delivery rod functioning as the stem of the IUS and horizontal transverse arms.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Simplified push-in insertion procedure of the Femilis LNG-IUS. Step 1: The loaded inserter is applied against the cervix. Step 2: Femilis is pushed into the uterine cavity up to the fundus. Step 3: The inserter tube is removed and the thread is trimmed. The proper positioning of the LNG-IUS in the uterine cavity is easily assessed by means of abdominal or vaginal ultrasound examination.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Fibroplant® LNG-IUS is frameless and anchored in the fundus uteri with a nonbiodegradable surgical knot, which is pushed into the myometrium over a controlled depth using a specially designed inserter. Due to the absence of a frame, Fibroplant fits in the cavities of every size and shape.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) Mirena LNG-IUS uses a different technique than the insertion technique of Femilis. When the LNG-IUS is pushed up against a narrow fundus, the arms may be forced in the fallopian tubes or in the muscular wall. (B) Hysteroscopic example of embedment of both arms in the cornea of the uterus.

References

    1. French RS, Guillebaud J. Mirena®—the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (20 mcg/day) J Drug Delivery. 2003;1:43–70.
    1. Nillson CG, Johansson EDB, Luukkainen TA. A δ-norgestrel releasing IUD. Contraception. 1975;13:503–514.
    1. Sivin I, Shaaban M, Odlind V, et al. A randomized trial of the Gyne T 380 and Gyne T 380 slimline intrauterine copper devices. Contraception. 1990;42:379–389.
    1. Andersson K, Odlind V, Rybo G. Levonorgestrel-releasing and copper-releasing (Nova-T) IUD during five years of use: a randomised comparative trial. Contraception. 1994;49:56–72.
    1. Indian Council of Medical Research Task Force on IUDs Randomized clinical trial with intrauterine devices (levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG), Cu T 380Ag, Cu T 220C and Cu T 200B). A 36-month study. Contraception. 1989;39:37–52.
    1. Paterson H, Ashtin J, Harrison-Woolrych M. A nationwide cohort study of the use of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device in New Zealand adolescents. Contraception. 2009;79:433–438.
    1. Suhonen S, Haukkamaa M, Jakobsson T, Rauramo I. Clinical performance of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and oral contraceptives in young nulliparous women: a comparative study. Contraception. 2004;69:407–412.
    1. Teal SB, Sheeder J. IUD use in adolescent mothers: retention, failure and reasons for discontinuation. Contraception. 2012;85:270–274.
    1. Berenson AB, Tan A, Hirth JM, Wilkinson GS. Complications and continuation of intrauterine device use among commercially insured teenagers. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:951–958.
    1. Wildemeersch D. Intrauterine contraceptives that do not fit well contribute to early discontinuation. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2011;83:186–187.
    1. Hubacher D. Copper intrauterine device used by nulliparous women: review of side effects. Contraception. 2007;75:S8–S11.
    1. Fraser I. Non-contraceptive health benefits of intrauterine hormonal systems. Contraception. 2010;82:396–403.
    1. Fraser I. Added health benefits of the levonorgestrel contraceptive intrauterine system and other hormonal contraceptive delivery systems. Contraception. 2013;87:273–279.
    1. Gemzell-Danielsson K, Inki P, Heikimheimo O. Recent developments in the clinical use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90:1177–1188.
    1. Heikimheimo O, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Emerging indications for the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90:1177–1188.
    1. Nilsson CG, Lahteenmaki PL, Luukkainen T, Robertson DN. Sustained intrauterine release of levonorgestrel over five years. Fertil Steril. 1986;45:805–807.
    1. Andersson JK, Rybo G. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device in the treatment of menorrhagia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97:690–694.
    1. Marjoribanks J, Lethaby A, Farquhar C. Surgery versus medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(2):CD003855.
    1. Kaunitz AM, Meredith S, Inki P, Kubba A, Sanchez-Ramos L. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and endometrial ablation in heavy menstrual bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:1104–1116.
    1. Kaunitz AM, Bissonnette F, Monteiro I, Lukkari-Lax E, Muysers C, Jensen JT. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system or medroxyprogesterone for heavy menstrual bleeding: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:625–632.
    2. Erratum. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:999.
    1. de Souza SS, Camargos AF, de Rezende CP, Pereira FA, Araújo CA, Silva Filho AL. A randomized prospective trial comparing the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system with thermal balloon ablation for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding. Contraception. 2010;81:226–231.
    1. Middleton LJ, Champaneria R, Daniels JP, et al. International Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis Collaborative Group Hysterectomy, endometrial destruction, and levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) for heavy menstrual bleeding:systematic review and meta-analysis of data from individual patients. Br Med J. 2010;341:c3929.
    1. Maia H, Jr, Maltez A, Coelho G, Athayde C, Coutinho EM. Insertion of mirena after endometrial resection in patients with adenomyosis. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003;10:512–516.
    1. Papadakis EP, El-Nashar SA, Laughlin-Tommaso SK, et al. Combined endometrial ablation and levonorgestrel intrauterine system use in women with dysmenorrhea and heavy menstrual bleeding: novel approach for challenging cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22:1203–1207.
    1. Kingman CE, Kadir RA, Lee CA, Economides DL. The use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for treatment of menorrhagia in women with inherited bleeding disorders. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;111:1425–1428.
    1. Lukes AS, Reardon B, Arepally G. Use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in women with hemostatic disorders. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:673–677.
    1. Vilos GA, Tureanu V, Garcia M, Basim AR. The levonorgestrel intrauterine system is an effective treatment in women with abnormal uterine bleeding and anticoagulant therapy. J Minim Invas Gynecol. 2009;16:480–484.
    1. Machado RB, de Souza IM, Beltrame A, Bernardes CR, Spagnuolo Morimoto M, Santana N. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: its effect on the number of hysterectomies performed in perimenopausal women with uterine fibroids. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013;29(5):492–495.
    1. Xiao B, Wu SC, Chong J, Zeng T, Han LH, Luukkainen T. Therapeutic effects of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the treatment of idiopathic menorrhagia. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:963–969.
    1. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Raffaelli R, Portuese A, Dorta M. Treatment of adenomyosis associated menorrhagia with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device. Fertil Steril. 1997;68:426–429.
    1. Bragheto AM, Caserta N, Bahamondes L, Petta CA. Effectiveness of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the treatment of adenomyosis diagnosed and monitored by magnetic resonance imaging. Contraception. 2007;76:195–199.
    1. Cho S, Nam H, Kim D, et al. Clinical effects of the levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine device in patients with adenomyosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:373–377.
    1. Park DS, Kim M-L, Song T, et al. Clinical experiences of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in patients with large symptomatic adenomyosis. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;54:412–415.
    1. Varma R, Soneja H, Bhatia K, et al. The effectiveness of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the treatment of endometrial hyperplasia—a long-term follow-up study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;139:169–175.
    1. Gallos ID, Shehmar M, Thangaratinam S, Papapostolou TK, Coomarasamy A, Gupta JK. Oral progestogens vs levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for endometrial hyperplasia: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:547.e1–547.e10.
    1. Kresowik J, Ryan GL, Van Voorhis BJ. Progression of atypical endometrial hyperplasia to adenocarcinoma despite intrauterine progesterone treatment with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(2 pt 2):547–549.
    1. Petta CA, Ferriani RA, Abrao M, et al. Randomized clinical trial of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and a depot GnRH analogue for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain in women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1993–1998.
    1. Bahamondes L, Petta CA, Fernandes A, Monteiro I. Use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in women with endometriosis, chronic pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea. Contraception. 2007;75(suppl 6):S134–S139.
    1. Lockhat F, Emembolu J, Konje J. Serum and peritoneal fluid levels of levonorgestrel in women with endometriosis who were treated with an intrauterine contraceptive device containing levonorgestrel. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:398–404.
    1. Finoulst M, Amy JJ. Female sterilisation is becoming less popular. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2010;15:385–388.
    1. Reid R, Mukri F. Trends in number of hysterectomies performed in England for menorrhagia: examination of health episode statistics 1989 to 2002–3. Br Med J. 2005;330:938–939.
    1. Toivonen J, Luukkainen T, Allonen H. Protective effects of intrauterine release of levonorgestrel on pelvic infection. Three years of comparative experience of levonorgestrel and copper-releasing intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:261–264.
    1. Danvers AA, Stuart GS, Bryant AG. Lawsuits against Mirena®: potential impact on public health. Contraception. 2014;89:489–492.
    1. Wildemeersch D, Janssens D, Andrade A. The Femilis® LNG-IUS:contraceptive performance-an interim analysis. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2009;14:103–110.
    1. R Development Core Team . R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2013.
    1. Tietze C, Lewit S. Recommended procedures for the statistical evaluation of intrauterine contraception. Stud Fam Plann. 1972;4:35–42.
    1. Farley TMM. Life-table methods for contraceptive research. Stat Med. 1986;5:475–489.
    1. Janssen CA, Scholten PC, Heintz APM. A simple visual assessment technique to discriminate between menorrhagia an normal menstrual blood loss. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85(6):977–982.
    1. Hallberg L, Nilsson L. Determination of menstrual blood loss. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1964;16:244–248.
    1. Shaw ST., Jr On quantifying menstrual blood loss. Contraception. 1977;16:283–285.
    1. Newton J, Barnard G, Collins W. A rapid method for measuring menstrual blood loss using automatic extraction. Contraception. 1977;16:269–282.
    1. Andrade ATL, Souza JP, Shaw ST, Jr, Belsey EM, Rowe PJ. Menstrual blood loss and body iron stores in Brazilian women. Contraception. 1991;43:241–249.
    1. Kurman RJ, editor. Blaustein’s Pathology of the Female Genital Tract. 4th ed. New York, NY: Springer Verlag; 1995.
    1. Wildemeersch D, Andrade A, Hasskamp T, Goldstuck N, Jackers G. Femilis® LNG-IUS-Results of a 5-year contraceptive trial in parous and nulliparous women. 2016 submitted.
    1. Wildemeersch D, Janssens D, Vrijens M, Weyers S. Ease of insertion, contraceptive efficacy and safety of new T-shaped levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems. Contraception. 2005;71:465–469.
    1. Wildemeersch D, Rowe P. Assessment of menstrual blood loss in Belgian users of a new T-shaped levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Contraception. 2005;71:470–473.
    1. Wildemeersch D. Why perimenopausal women should consider to use a levonorgestrel intrauterine system. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016:1–3. Epub ahead of print.
    1. Wildemeersch D, Janssens D, Pylyser K, et al. Management of patients with non-atypical and atypical endometrial hyperplasia with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: long-term follow-up. Maturitas. 2007;57:210–213.
    1. Kaislasuo J, Heikinheimo O, Lähteenmäki P. Predicting painful or difficult intrauterine device insertion in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124:345–353.
    1. Diedrich JT, Madden T, Zhao Q, Peipert JF. Long-term utilization and continuation of intrauterine devices. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:822.e1–822.e6.
    1. Van Schoubroeck D, Van den Bosch T, Ameye L, et al. Pain and bleeding pattern related to levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) insertion. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;171:154–156.
    1. Wildemeersch D, Hasskamp T, Goldstuck N. Side effects of intrauterine devices are often related to disproportion with the endometrial 5 cavity—is there a role for pre-insertion ultrasound? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;201:215–217.
    1. Ferguson CA, Costescu D, Jamieson MA, Jong L. Transmural migration and perforation of a levonorgestrel intrauterine system: a case report and review of the literature. Contraception. 2016;93:81–86. doi: 10.1177/1742271X14532082.
    1. Kerr NK, Dunham R, Wolstenhulme S, Wilson J. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in the visualization of intrauterine devices. Ultrasound. 2014:1–7.
    1. Shipp TD, Bromley B, Benacerraf BR. The width of the uterine cavity is narrower in patients with an embedded intrauterine device compared to a normally positioned IUD. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29:1453–1456.
    1. Liang H, Li L, Yuan W, et al. Dimensions of the endometrial cavity and intrauterine device expulsion or removal for displacement: a nested case-control study. BJOG. 2014;121:997–1004.
    1. Hasson HM. Clinical studies of the Wing Sound II metrology device. In: Zatuchni GI, Goldsmith A, Sciarra JJ, editors. Intrauterine Contraception: Advances and Future Prospects. Philadelphia: Harper & Row; 1984. pp. 126–141.
    1. Coulter A, Bradlow J, Agass M. Outcomes of referrals to gynecology outpatient clinics for menstrual problems: an audit of general practice records. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;98:789–796.
    1. Clarke A, Black N, Rowe P, Mott S, Howie K. Indications for and outcomes of total abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a prospective cohort study. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;102:611–620.
    1. Gupta J, Kai J, Pattison H, Gray R, Daniels J. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of levonorgestrel-containing intrauterine system in primary care against standard treatment for menorrhagia (ECLIPSE) N Engl J Med. 2013;368:128–137.
    1. NICE Guidelines [CG44] Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: Assessment and Management. 2007. [Accessed January 6, 2016]. Available at: .
    1. Rybo G. Population studies of menorrhagia. Res Clin Forums. 1983;5:77–81.
    1. Kmietowicz Z. Hormone releasing intrauterine system should be used more widely in primary care for menorrhagia, study concludes. BMJ. 2013;346:f100.
    1. Wildemeersch D, Jóźwik M, Jóźwik M. Endometrial cancer prevention with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. In: Darwish A, editor. Contemporary Gynecologic Practice. Rijeka: IN TECH; 2016. pp. 183–199. Chap. 8.
    1. Wildemeersch D, Pylyser K, De Wever N, Dhont M. Treatment of non atypical and atypical endometrial hyperplasia with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: long-term follow-up. Maturitas. 2007;57:210–213.
    1. Gallos ID, Krishan P, Shehmar M, Ganesan R, Gupta JK. LNG-IUS versus oral progestin treatment for endometrial hyperplasia: a long-term comparative cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2966–2971.
    1. Wildemeersch D, Anderson E, Lambein K, Pauwels P, Dhont M. Successful treatment of early endometrial carcinoma by local delivery of levonorgestrel: a case report. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2010;2010:431950.
    1. Sheng J, Zhang WY, Zhang JP, Lu D. The LNG-IUS study on adenomyosis: a 3-year follow-up study on the efficacy and side effects of the use of levonorgestrel intrauterine system for the treatment of dysmenorrhea associated with adenomyosis. Contraception. 2009;79:189–193.
    1. Wildemeersch D, Schacht E. The effect on menstrual blood loss in women with uterine fibroids of a novel “frameless” intrauterine levonorgestrel-releasing drug delivery system: a pilot study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;102:74–79.
    1. Wildemeersch D. Potential health benefits of continuous LNG-IUS combined with parenteral ERT for seamless menopausal transition and beyond—a commentary based on clinical experience. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013;29:569–573.
    1. CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Births and Natality) [Accessed December 24, 2015]. Available at: .
    1. Eurostat [Accessed December 24, 2015]. Available at: .
    1. Blumenthal P, Voedisch A, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Strategies to prevent unintended pregnancy: increasing use of long-acting reversible contraception. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:121–137.
    1. Trussell J, Henry N, Hassan F, Prezioso A, Law A, Filonenko A. Burden of unintended pregnancy in the United States: potential savings with increased use of long-acting reversible contraception. Contraception. 2012;87(2):154–161.
    1. Brzechffa PR, Judd HL. Hot flashes. In: Fraser IS, Jansen RPS, Lobo RA, Whitehead MI, editors. Estrogens and Progestogens in Clinical Practice. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1998. pp. 635–645.
    1. Jamieson DJ, Kaufman SC, Costello C, et al. A comparison of women’s regret after vasectomy versus tubal sterilisation. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:1073–1079.
    1. Curtis KM, Mohllajee AP, Peterson HB. Regret following female sterilization at young age: a systematic review. Contraception. 2006;73:205–210.
    1. Santoro N, Teal S, Gavito C, Cano S, Chosich J, Sheder J. Use of a levonorgestrel-containing intrauterine system with supplemental estrogen improves symptoms in perimenopausal women: a pilot study. Menopause. 2015;12:1–7.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj