Efavirenz decreases etonogestrel exposure: a pharmacokinetic evaluation of implantable contraception with antiretroviral therapy

Catherine A Chappell, Mohammed Lamorde, Shadia Nakalema, Beatrice A Chen, Hope Mackline, Sharon A Riddler, Susan E Cohn, Kristin M Darin, Sharon L Achilles, Kimberly K Scarsi, Catherine A Chappell, Mohammed Lamorde, Shadia Nakalema, Beatrice A Chen, Hope Mackline, Sharon A Riddler, Susan E Cohn, Kristin M Darin, Sharon L Achilles, Kimberly K Scarsi

Abstract

Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of etonogestrel (ENG) released from a contraceptive implant in Ugandan women living with HIV who were receiving efavirenz (EFV) or nevirapine (NVP)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART), compared with ART-naive women over 24 weeks.

Design: Nonrandomized, parallel-group study with three arms: ART-naive, NVP, or EFV-based ART (N = 20/group).

Methods: Sparse pharmacokinetic sampling of ENG, NVP, or EFV were performed at screening, entry, and then 1, 4, 12, and 24-week postimplant insertion. The primary endpoint was ENG concentrations at week 24, compared between the ART-naive group and each ART group, using geometric mean ratio (GMR) with 90% confidence intervals.

Results: Sixty participants competed the 24-week study and data from 58 participants are included; one participant each was excluded from the NVP group and EFV group because of a sample processing error and ART nonadherence, respectively. At week 24, geometric mean ENG was 362, 341, and 66 pg/ml in the ART-naive, NVP, and EFV groups, respectively [GMR: NVP : ART-naive 0.94 (0.90-1.01); EFV : ART-naive 0.18 (0.17-0.20)]. NVP and EFV concentrations were lower at week 24 compared to preimplant [NVP: geometric mean 5.7 versus 6.8 mg/l, respectively, GMR 0.84 (0.83-0.85); EFV: geometric mean 3.6 versus 4.9 mg/l, respectively, GMR 0.73 (0.69-0.80)].

Conclusion: After 24 weeks of combined use, ENG exposure was 82% lower in women using EFV-based ART compared with ART-naive women. In contrast, NVP did not significantly impact ENG exposure. These results raise concerns about reduced effectiveness of implantable contraception for women taking EFV-based ART.

Conflict of interest statement

POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study Flow Chart
Figure 2
Figure 2
Etonogestrel (ENG) geometric mean concentrations (pg/mL) with 90% confidence intervals over 24 weeks

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj