Better survival of patients with oligo- compared with polymetastatic cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 173 studies

Fausto Petrelli, Antonio Ghidini, Michele Ghidini, Roberta Bukovec, Francesca Trevisan, Luca Turati, Alice Indini, Silvia Seghezzi, Veronica Lonati, Giovanna Moleri, Gianluca Tomasello, Alberto Zaniboni, Fausto Petrelli, Antonio Ghidini, Michele Ghidini, Roberta Bukovec, Francesca Trevisan, Luca Turati, Alice Indini, Silvia Seghezzi, Veronica Lonati, Giovanna Moleri, Gianluca Tomasello, Alberto Zaniboni

Abstract

Background: The modern concept of oligometastatic (OM) state has been initially developed to describe patients with a low burden of disease and with a potential for cure with local ablative treatments. We systematically assessed the risk of death and relapse of oligometastatic (OM) cancers compared to cancers with more diffuse metastatic spread, through a meta-analysis of published data. Methods: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched for studies reporting prognosis of patients with OM solid tumors. Risk of death and relapse were extracted and pooled to provide an adjusted hazard ratio with a 95% confidence interval (HR 95%CI). The primary outcome of the study refers to overall mortality in OM vs. polymetastatic (PM) patients. Results. Mortality and relapse associated with OM state in patients with cancer were evaluated among 104,234 participants (n=173 studies). Progression-free survival was better in patients with OM disease (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.62, 95% CI 0.57-0.68; P <.001; n=69 studies). Also, OM cancers were associated with a better overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.62-0.68; P<.01; n=161 studies). In colorectal (CRC), breast, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) the reduction in the risk of death for OM patients were 35, 38, 30 and 42%, respectively. Biliary tract and cervical cancer do not significantly better in OM stage likely for paucity of data. Conclusions. Patients with OM cancers have a significantly better prognosis than those with more widespread stage IV tumors. In OM cancer patients a personalized approach should be pursued.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02364557 NCT04115007 NCT04248452.

Keywords: cancer; meta-analysis; oligometastases; review; survival; tumours.

Conflict of interest statement

No competing interests were disclosed.

Copyright: © 2022 Petrelli F et al.

Figures

Figure 1.. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic…
Figure 1.. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 flow diagram showing the process of study inclusion.
Figure 2.. Progression-free survival of oligo- compared…
Figure 2.. Progression-free survival of oligo- compared to non-oligometastatic cancers.
Figure 3.. Overall survival of oligo- compared…
Figure 3.. Overall survival of oligo- compared to non-oligometastatic cancers.
Figure 4.. Funnel plot of publication bias…
Figure 4.. Funnel plot of publication bias for overall survival analysis showing standard error by log hazard ratio.

References

    1. Hellman S, Weichselbaum RR: Oligometastases. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13(1):8–10. 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.1.8
    1. Weichselbaum RR, Hellman S: Oligometastases revisited. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8(6):378–382. 10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.44
    1. Chalkidou A, Macmillan T, Grzeda MT, et al. : Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy in patients with oligometastatic cancers: a prospective, registry-based, single-arm, observational, evaluation study. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jan;22(1):98–106. 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30537-4
    1. Donini M, Buti S, Massari F, et al. : Management of oligometastatic and oligoprogressive renal cell carcinoma: state of the art and future directions. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2020 Jun;20(6):491–501. Epub 2020 Jun 1. 10.1080/14737140.2020.1770601
    1. Glicksman RM, Metser U, Vines D, et al. : Curative-intent Metastasis-directed Therapies for Molecularly-defined Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Phase II Trial Testing the Oligometastasis Hypothesis. Eur Urol. 2021 Mar 5:S0302–2838(21)00151-2. Epub ahead of print. 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.02.031
    1. Palma DA, Olson R, Harrow S, et al. : Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus standard of care palliative treatment in patients with oligometastatic cancers (SABR-COMET): a randomised, phase 2, open-label trial. Lancet. 2019 May 18;393(10185):2051–2058. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32487-5
    1. Begg CB, Mazumdar M: Operating Characteristics of A Bank Correlation Test for Publication Bias. Biometrics. 1994;50(4):1088–1101.
    1. Shi L, Lin L, Omboni S: The trim-and-fill method for publication bias: Practical guidelines and recommendations based on a large database of meta-analyses. Med (United States). 2019. 10.1097/MD.0000000000015987
    1. Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]: Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration;2014.
    1. Petrelli F, et al. : Better survival of patients with oligo- compared with polymetastatic cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 173 studies. Mendeley Data. 2021. 10.17632/8kycvdnp6v.1
    1. Gerstung M, Jolly C, Leshchiner I, et al. : The evolutionary history of 2,658 cancers. Nature. 2020 Feb;578(7793):122–128. Epub 2020 Feb 6. 10.1038/s41586-019-1907-7
    1. Franko J, Shi Q, Meyers JP, et al. : Prognosis of patients with peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer given systemic therapy: an analysis of individual patient data from prospective randomised trials from the Analysis and Research in Cancers of the Digestive System (ARCAD) database. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Dec;17(12):1709–1719.
    1. Fong Y, Fortner J, Sun RL, et al. : Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 1999;230(3):309–321. 10.1097/00000658-199909000-00004
    1. Gomez DR, Tang C, Zhang J, et al. : Local Consolidative Therapy Vs. Maintenance Therapy or Observation for Patients With Oligometastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Long-Term Results of a Multi-Institutional, Phase II, Randomized Study. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jun 20;37(18):1558–1565. Epub 2019 May 8. 10.1200/JCO.19.00201
    1. Zhang Y, Schoenhals J, Christie A, et al. : Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy (SAbR) Used to Defer Systemic Therapy in Oligometastatic Renal Cell Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Oct 1;105(2):367–375. Epub 2019 Aug 1. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.07.023
    1. Kroeze SGC, Schaule J, Fritz C, et al. : Metastasis directed stereotactic radiotherapy in NSCLC patients progressing under targeted- or immunotherapy: efficacy and safety reporting from the 'TOaSTT' database. Radiat Oncol. 2021 Jan 6;16(1):4. 10.1186/s13014-020-01730-0
    1. Deek MP, Taparra K, Phillips R, et al. : Metastasis-directed Therapy Prolongs Efficacy of Systemic Therapy and Improves Clinical Outcomes in Oligoprogressive Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Jun 11:S2588–9311(20)30058-4. Epub ahead of print. 10.1016/j.euo.2020.05.004
    1. Mole RJ: Whole body irradiation – Radiology or medicine? Br J Radiol. 1953;26:234–241. 10.1259/0007-1285-26-305-234
    1. Chicas-Sett R, Morales-Orue I, Castilla-Martinez J, et al. : Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Combined with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Reboots the Immune Response Assisted by Immunotherapy in Metastatic Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 May 2;20(9):2173. 10.3390/ijms20092173
    1. De Simoni O, Scarpa M, Tonello M, et al. : Oligometastatic Pancreatic Cancer to the Liver in the Era of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Which Role for Conversion Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Nov 17;12(11):3402. 10.3390/cancers12113402
    1. Zhang F, Huang X, Song Y, et al. : Conversion Surgery for Stage IV Gastric Cancer. Front Oncol. 2019 Nov 7;9:1158. 10.3389/fonc.2019.01158
    1. Guckenberger M, Lievens Y, Bouma AB, et al. : Characterisation and classification of oligometastatic disease: a European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer consensus recommendation. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jan;21(1):e18–e28. 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30718-1

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj