Using a novel assessment of procedural proficiency provides medical educators insight into blood pressure measurement
Michael Holmstrup, Brock Jensen, Rebecca Burkart, Malorie Levis, Michael Holmstrup, Brock Jensen, Rebecca Burkart, Malorie Levis
Abstract
Objective: This investigation was performed to determine how students in a health sciences program utilize and explain techniques within blood pressure measurement using a novel assessment, and changes associated with greater curricular exposure.
Methods: An exploratory, qualitative and quantitative study was conducted using a 'Think Aloud' design with protocol analysis. Following familiarization, participants performed the task of measuring blood pressure on a reference subject while stating their thought processes. A trained practitioner recorded each participant's procedural proficiency using a standardized rubric. There were 112 participants in the study with varying levels of curricular exposure to blood pressure measurement.
Results: Four trends are noted. Specifically, a trend was observed wherein a marked increase in procedural proficiency with a plateau occurred (e.g. released cuff pressure 2-4 mmHg, 10%, 60%, 83%, 82%). Secondly, a trend was observed with improvement across groups (e.g. cuff placed snugly/smoothly on upper arm, 20%, 60%, 81%, and 91%). Other trends included a marked improvement with subsequent decrease, and an improvement without achieving proficiency (e.g. palpation of the brachial pulse, 5%, 90%, 81%, 68%, appropriate size cuff, 17%, 40%, 33%, 41%, respectively). Qualitatively, transcript interpretation resulted in a need for clarification in the way blood pressure procedure is instructed in the curriculum.
Conclusions: The current investigation provides a snapshot of proficiency in blood pressure assessment across a curriculum and highlights considerations for best instructional practices, including the use of Think Aloud. Consequently, medical educators should use qualitative and quantitative assessments concurrently to determine achievement of blood pressure skill proficiency.
Keywords: instructional methods; interdisciplinary medical education; qualitative research methods; think aloud.
References
- Williams JS, Brown SM, Conlin PR. Videos in clinical medicine. Blood-pressure measurement. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMvcm0800157.
- Poulter NR, Prabhakaran D, Caulfield M. Hypertension. Lancet. 2015;386:801–812. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61468-9.
- Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, Hill MN, Jones DW, Kurtz T, Sheps SG, Roccella EJ. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Circulation. 2005;111:697–716. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000154900.76284.F6.
- Pescatello, LS. American College of Sports Medicine guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 9th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, (USA); 2014.
- Smith L. New AHA recommendations for blood pressure measurement. Am Fam Physician. 2005;72:1391-8.
- Holmstrup ME, Stearns-Bruening K, Rozelle J. Quantifying accurate calorie estimation using the "think aloud" method. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013;45:77–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2012.04.007.
- Holmstrup ME, Verba SD, Lynn JS. Developing best practices teaching procedures for skinfold assessment: observational examination using the Think Aloud method. Adv Physiol Educ. 2015;39:283–287. doi: 10.1152/advan.00044.2015.
- Ohio Nurses Association. Developing a Nursing IQ: The Expertise of Nursing Process. [Cited 2015 Dec 11]; Available from: .
- Ericsson KA, Simon HA. Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1993.
- Pinnock R, Young L, Spence F, Henning M, Hazell W. Can Think Aloud Be Used to Teach and Assess Clinical Reasoning in Graduate Medical Education? J Grad Med Educ. 2015;7:334–337. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-14-00601.1.
- Johnsen HM, Slettebø Å, Fossum M. Registered nurses' clinical reasoning in home healthcare clinical practice: A think-aloud study with protocol analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2016;40:95–100. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.02.023.
Source: PubMed