Recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. Predictors of initial treatment failure and results of salvage therapy

W E Longo, A M Vernava 3rd, T P Wade, M A Coplin, K S Virgo, F E Johnson, W E Longo, A M Vernava 3rd, T P Wade, M A Coplin, K S Virgo, F E Johnson

Abstract

Objective: The outcomes of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal treated by either sphincter-preserving procedures or radical surgery were evaluated, with the goals of identifying factors predicting treatment failure and quantifying results of salvage therapy in patients with recurrent disease.

Basic procedures: A population-based study on all patients in all 159 hospitals of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) from 1987 to 1991 was carried out. Data were compiled from several national computerized VA data sets. Supplementary information from local tumor registrars also was obtained, including demographic information, discharge summaries, operative reports, pathology reports, and medical oncology and radiation oncology summaries. From these sources, information on tumor histology, tumor stage, tumor grade, presence of regional or distant metastases, surgical procedures, use of chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT), toxicity of chemotherapy and RT, development of recurrent disease, treatment of recurrence, survival, and cause of death were obtained.

Main findings: Four hundred five patients with anal cancer were identified by computer search, and 204 (51%) were evaluable; 164 of 204 (80%) had squamous cell carcinoma, 137 of whom (84%) were treated with sphincter-preserving procedures, and 27 of whom (16%) were treated by by radical surgery. One hundred fourteen of 138 (83%) were treated by multimodality therapy, which we defined as local excision followed by chemotherapy and RT. The mean dose of RT among patients treated by multimodality therapy was 4200 +/- 540 cGy and 82% of those treated with multimodality therapy received 5-FU/mitomycin C. Recurrent disease was diagnosed in 43 of all 149 patients (29%) with potentially curable disease. (stages I-III) Multivariate analysis revealed that stage at diagnosis (p = 0.04) and method of treatment (p = 0.03) were the sole predictors of recurrence. Fifty-three percent of patients who underwent salvage abdominoperineal resection (APR) are alive, whereas only 19% who underwent salvage chemotherapy with or without RT are alive.

Principal conclusions: These data indicate that multimodality therapy currently is being employed in the majority of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal in the VA system. Tumor stage and method of treatment appear to affect the likelihood of development of recurrent disease. Salvage APR has curative potential. Results with salvage chemotherapy and RT are disappointing.

References

    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1974 Mar-Apr;17(2):181-7
    1. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991 Mar;20(3):575-80
    1. Ann Surg. 1976 Oct;184(4):422-8
    1. Am Surg. 1977 Jul;43(7):424-9
    1. Surg Clin North Am. 1978 Jun;58(3):591-603
    1. Curr Probl Cancer. 1980 Jun;4(12):1-44
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1981 Mar-Apr;24(2):73-5
    1. Aust N Z J Surg. 1982 Oct;52(5):521-4
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1982 Nov-Dec;25(8):778-82
    1. Cancer. 1983 May 15;51(10):1826-9
    1. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1984 Jun;6(3):257-9
    1. Cancer. 1984 Nov 15;54(10):2062-8
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1984 Dec;27(12):763-6
    1. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1985 Feb;11(2):391-8
    1. Cancer Treat Rep. 1985 Jul-Aug;69(7-8):891-3
    1. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1985;15(3):300-2
    1. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1985 Dec;161(6):509-17
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1986 May;29(5):336-40
    1. Surgery. 1987 Mar;101(3):253-66
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1987 May;30(5):324-33
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1987 Jun;30(6):444-8
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1987 Jul;30(7):495-502
    1. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1988 Jun;3(2):109-18
    1. Am J Surg. 1989 Jun;157(6):582-4
    1. Am J Med. 1989 Aug;87(2):221-4
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1989 Sep;32(9):773-7
    1. Br J Surg. 1989 Aug;76(8):806-10
    1. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989 Dec;17(6):1153-60
    1. Cancer. 1991 May 15;67(10):2462-6
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991 Aug;34(8):675-8
    1. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991 Oct;21(5):1115-25
    1. Ann Surg. 1992 Feb;215(2):150-6
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992 Jun;35(6):574-7; discussion 577-8
    1. Semin Oncol. 1992 Aug;19(4 Suppl 11):102-8
    1. Acta Oncol. 1993;32(1):33-5
    1. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1961 Mar;85:515-20
    1. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1989 Dec;24(10):1243-7
    1. Histopathology. 1990 Jun;16(6):545-55
    1. Oncology (Williston Park). 1988 Feb;2(2):42-8
    1. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1990 Nov;19(5):1221-3
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1974 May-Jun;17(3):354-6

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj