Effectiveness of a parenting programme to reduce violence in a cash transfer system in the Philippines: RCT with follow-up

Jamie M Lachman, Liane Peña Alampay, Rosanne M Jocson, Cecilia Alinea, Bernadette Madrid, Catherine Ward, Judy Hutchings, Bernice Landoy Mamauag, Maria Ana Victoria Felize V Garilao, Frances Gardner, Jamie M Lachman, Liane Peña Alampay, Rosanne M Jocson, Cecilia Alinea, Bernadette Madrid, Catherine Ward, Judy Hutchings, Bernice Landoy Mamauag, Maria Ana Victoria Felize V Garilao, Frances Gardner

Abstract

Background: Parenting interventions and conditional cash transfer (CCT) programmes are promising strategies to reduce the risk of violence against children, but evidence of the effectiveness of combining such programmes is lacking for families in low- and middle-income countries with children over two years of age. This study examined the effectiveness of a locally adapted parenting programme delivered as part of a government CCT system to low-income families with children aged two to six years in Metro Manila, Philippines.

Methods: Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either a 12-session group-based parenting programme or treatment-as-usual services (N = 120). Participation in either service was required among the conditions for receiving cash grants. Baseline assessments were conducted in July 2017 with one-month post-intervention assessments in January-February 2018 and 12-month follow-up in January-February 2019. All assessments were parent-report (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03205449).

Findings: One-month post-intervention assessments indicated moderate intervention effects for primary outcomes of reduced overall child maltreatment (d = -0.50 [-0.86, -0.13]), emotional abuse (d = -0.59 [-0.95; -0.22]), physical abuse (IRR = 0.51 [0.27; 0.74]), and neglect (IRR = 0.52 [0.18; 0.85]). There were also significant effects for reduced dysfunctional parenting, child behaviour problems, and intimate partner violence, and increased parental efficacy and positive parenting. Reduced overall maltreatment, emotional abuse, and neglect effects were sustained at one-year follow-up.

Interpretation: Findings suggest that a culturally adapted parenting intervention delivered as part of a CCT programme may be effective in sustaining reductions in violence against children in low- and middle-income countries.

Funding: This research was supported by UBS Optimus Foundation and UNICEF Philippines, and by the Complexity and Relationships in Health Improvement Programmes of the Medical Research Council MRC UK and Chief Scientist Office (Grant: MC_UU_00022/1 and CSO SPHSU16, MC_UU_00022/3 and CSO SPHSU18).

Keywords: Philippines; RCT; conditional cash transfer; parenting; violence against children.

Conflict of interest statement

BM, CA, and MG declare that they have no competing interests. JML, JH, FG and CW are co-developers of PLH for Young Children, which is licensed under a Creative Commons 4.0 Non-commercial No Derivatives license, and, with colleagues, co-founders of the Parenting for Lifelong Health initiative. JH is the Director of the Children's Early Intervention Trust, a non-profit institution responsible for the dissemination of the programme in Europe. JML and JH receive occasional fees for providing training and supervision to facilitators and coaches. JML, JH, FG LPA, RJ, BVLM, and CW have participated (and are participating) in several research studies involving the programme as investigators, and the University of Oxford, University of Cape Town, Bangor University, and Ateneo de Manila University, and receive research funding for these. Conflict is avoided by declaring this potential conflict of interests; and by conducting and disseminating rigorous, transparent, and impartial evaluation research on both this and other similar parenting programmes.

© 2021 The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Conceptual Model of the Masayang Pamilya Programme.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Study Flow Diagram.

References

    1. Hillis S., Mercy J., Amobi A., Kress H. Global prevalence of past-year violence against children: A systematic review and minimum estimates. Pediatrics. 2016;137(3)
    1. UNICEF . October 2016. Council for the Welfare of Children. National Baseline Survey on Violence against Children: Philippines. Council for the Welfare of Children and UNICEF Philippines.
    1. Hughes K., Bellis M.A., Hardcastle K.A., Sethi D., Butchart A., Mikton C. The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2017;2(e356-e366)
    1. Fang X., Fry D.A., Brown D.S., Mercy J.A., Dunne M.P., Butchart A.R. The burden of child maltreatment in the East Asia and Pacific region. Child Abuse and Neglect. 2015;42:146–162.
    1. World Health Organization. INSPIRE: Seven strategies for ending violence against children. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016
    1. Knerr W., Gardner F., Cluver L. Improving positive parenting skills and reducing harsh and abusive parenting in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Prevention Science. 2013;14(4):352–363.
    1. McCoy A., Melendez-Torres G., Gardner F. Parenting interventions to prevent violence against children in low-and middle-income countries in East and Southeast Asia: a systematic review and multi-level meta-analysis. Child Abuse and Neglect. 2020:103.
    1. Kaehler L.A., Jacobs M., Jones D.J. Distilling common history and practice elements to inform dissemination: Hanf-model BPT programs as an example. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. 2016;19(3):236–258.
    1. Gardner F., Montgomery P., Knerr W. Transporting evidence-based parenting programs for child problem behavior (age 3-10) between countries: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. 2015;45(6):749–762.
    1. Chaffin J. Mortenson Ellis C. Outcomes for children from household economic strengthening interventions: A research synthesis. London: Save the Children. 2015
    1. Arriagada A.M., Perry J., Rawlings L., Trias J., Zumaeta M. Promoting early childhood development through combining cash transfers and parenting programs. The World Bank. 2018
    1. Rawlings L.B., Rubio G.M. Evaluating the impact of conditional cash transfer programs. The World Bank Research Observer. 2005;20(1):29–55.
    1. Dizon J.T., Albor R.G.Z., Serrano E.P., Reyes K.M. UP Los Baños; 2016. Assessment of Family Development Session of the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps): Assessment of FDS modules (Final Report). Department of Human and Family Development Studies, College of Human Ecology.
    1. Lachman J.M., Sherr L., Cluver L., Ward C.L., Hutchings J., Gardner F. Integrating evidence and context to develop a parenting program for low-income families in South Africa. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2016;25(7):2337–2352.
    1. Lachman J.M., Cluver L., Ward C.L., Hutchings J., Wessels I., Mlotshwa S. Randomized controlled trial of a parenting program to reduce the risk of child maltreatment in South Africa. Child Abuse and Neglect. 2017;72:338–351.
    1. Mamauag B.L., Alampay L.P., Lachman J.M., Madrid B.J., Hutchings J., Ward C.L. A South-to-South adaptation of an evidence-based parenting program for families in the Philippines. Family Process. 2020
    1. Alampay L.P., Lachman J.M., Landoy B.V., Madrid B.J., Ward C.L., Hutchings J. In: Sustainable Development Goals: Using Developmental Science to Improve Young Lives Globally. Verma S, Petersen A, editors. Springer; 2018. Preventing child maltreatment in low and middle-income countries: Parenting for Lifelong Health in the Philippines; pp. 277–293. editors.
    1. Meinck F., Boyes M.E., Cluver L., Schmidt P., DeStone S., Dunne M.P. Adaptation and psychometric properties of the ISPCAN Child Abuse Screening Tool for use in trials (ICAST-Trial) among South African adolescents and their primary caregivers. Child Abuse and Neglect. 2018;82:45–58.
    1. Mejia A., Leijten P., Lachman J.M., Parra-Cardona J.R. Different strokes for different folks? Contrasting approaches to cultural adaptation of parenting interventions. Prevention Science. 2017;18(6):630–639.
    1. Lachman J.M., Wamoyi J., Spreckelsen T., Wight D., Maganga J., Gardner F. Combining parenting and economic strengthening programmes to reduce violence against children in rural Tanzania: A cluster randomised controlled trial with predominantly male caregivers. BMJ Global Health. 2020
    1. van der Put C.E., Assink M., Gubbels J., van Solinge N.F.B. Identifying effective components of child maltreatment interventions: a meta-analysis. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. 2018;21(2):171–202.
    1. Fulu E., Miedema S., Roselli T., McCook S., Chan K.L., Haardörfer R. Pathways between childhood trauma, intimate partner violence, and harsh parenting: Findings from the UN Multi-country Study on Men and Violence in Asia and the Pacific. The Lancet Global Health. 2017;5(5):e512–ee22.
    1. Guedes A., Bott S., Garcia-Moreno C., Colombini M. Bridging the gaps: a global review of intersections of violence against women and violence against children. Global health action. 2016;9(1):31516.
    1. Lachman J.M., Cluver L., Ward C.L., Hutchings J., Mlotshwa S., Wessels I. Randomized controlled trial of a parenting program to reduce the risk of child maltreatment in South Africa. Child Abuse Negl. 2017;72:338–351.
    1. Bennett C., Barlow J., Huband N., Smailagic N., Roloff V. Group-based parenting programs for improving parenting and psychosocial functioning: A systematic review. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research. 2013;4(4):300–332.
    1. Leijten P., Scott S., Landau S., Harris V., Mann J., Hutchings J. Individual participant data meta-analysis: Impact of conduct problem severity, comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and emotional problems, and maternal depression on parenting program effects. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2020
    1. van Aar J., Leijten P., de Castro B.O., Overbeek G. Sustained, fade-out or sleeper effects? A systematic review and meta-analysis of parenting interventions for disruptive child behavior. Clinical psychology review. 2017;51:153–163.
    1. Wong J.J., Roubinov D.S., Gonzales N.A., Dumka L.E., Millsap R.E. Father enrollment and participation in a parenting intervention: Personal and contextual predictors. Family Process. 2013;52(3):440–454.
    1. Panter-Brick C., Burgess A., Eggerman M., McAllister F., Pruett K., Leckman J.F. Practitioner review: Engaging fathers: Recommendations for a game change in parenting interventions based on a systematic review of the global evidence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2014;55(11):1187–1212.
    1. Treweek S., Zwarenstein M. Making trials matter: Pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability. Trials. 2009;10(1):1–9.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj