Are exergames promoting mobility an attractive alternative to conventional self-regulated exercises for elderly people in a rehabilitation setting? Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial

Viviane Hasselmann, Peter Oesch, Luis Fernandez-Luque, Stefan Bachmann, Viviane Hasselmann, Peter Oesch, Luis Fernandez-Luque, Stefan Bachmann

Abstract

Background: Maintaining mobility in elderly persons has become a primary goal within healthcare services. In older adults, exercise programs significantly reduce the risk of falling and death. Long-lasting and high-intensive multi-component exercises are most effective. In a rehabilitation setting, self-regulated exercises are conventionally taught by physiotherapists, using handouts. However, the adherence of elderly persons to executing these self-administered programs varies considerably. They are often considered tedious and boring, and thus prematurely stopped. The primary aim of this clinical trial is to determine whether elderly persons in a rehabilitation setting show higher adherence to self-regulated training when using exergames than when performing conventional exercises. The second objective is to explore which mode of exercise leads to greater improvement in balance performance.

Methods/design: The study consists of a single blind, stratified, randomized control trial with two parallel groups. Once included, study participants will be stratified according to their balance and computer skills and randomly allocated to self-regulated training with conventional exercise programs or with exergames played with the Windows Kinect® sensor and FitBit® pedometer. In both groups, self-administered exercise programs will be taught by experienced physiotherapists and performed at the patient's own discretion during the ten days of intervention. The primary outcome is the performed daily training volume, collected by the participants in a logbook. Secondary outcomes are objective and subjective balance skills measured by an activity tracker and the Fall Efficacy Scale self-administered questionnaire. Both assessments will be performed at pre- and post-intervention.

Discussion: According to the available literature, this study is the first to compare conventional self-regulated exercises with exergames among older patients in a rehabilitation setting. Results of this study will contribute to our understanding of its motivational potential on exercise adherence in elderly persons and provide more insight into the potential effectiveness of exergames promoting mobility.

Trial registration: The present clinical study has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier number: NCT02077049. The detailed trial protocol can be accessed online on: NCT02077049.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design. All patients referred to Walenstadtberg Rehabilitation Clinic are eligible for study inclusion. After medical screening by the doctor in charge, the interdisciplinary team composed of the doctor, the physiotherapist and the nurse in charged, considers the study eligibility of the patient. Whereupon the study examiner checks the patient for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Once the consent form is signed, participants are stratified into four groups according to their computer skills and their balance skills. An independent and blinded body (therapy secretariat) performs concealed randomization and allocation to either intervention or control group
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Study time flow. The researcher performs the subjective and objective balance tests (BBS, ActiGraph and FES-I) at the time point T1 (see Fig. 2) and grades the patient’s computer skills. Participants are then stratified into four groups and allocated randomly in the intervention group or the control group. During the two days preceding the start of the self-regulated training program (i.e., time points I1 and I2 in Fig. 2), the patient is instructed on how to perform the self-regulated exercise program according to his allocated group. The intervention period for the self-regulated training program lasts two weeks, namely 10 working days (from Monday to Friday each). On day 11 at the end of the intervention phase (time point T2), the subjective and objective balance skills are again tested by the researcher
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Pictures of GameUp exergames. The exergames consist of 7 mini-games, including balance, mobility, and strengthening exercises. Exercise 1 called “plucking game” is a strengthening exercise for abductor muscles. The patient has to spread apart one leg on the side. Exercise 2 “apple-picking game”, exercise 4 “chicken-picking game” and exercise 7 “star-picking game” are balance exercises where the patient has to catch the falling objects and put them in the correct receptacle. These three balance exercises are based on the same training principle where the patient has to move sideways. Exercise 3 called “growing game” is a strengthening exercise for the calf muscles. The patient has to stand on his toes to water the flower. Exercise 5 called “harvesting game” is a strengthening and mobility exercise for the trunk. It trains the torso rotation. The patient has to rotate his trunk in order to cut the corn with the scythe. Exercise 6 called “pumping game” is a strengthening exercise for quadriceps muscles where the patient has to perform squats in order to pump water into a glass

References

    1. Vienna Institute of Demography. European Demographic Data Sheet 2012_Re-evaluating population ageing in European countries [Online]. 2012 [Accessed on 2014 July 23]. Available from: .
    1. European Commision. Eurostat_Life expectancy at age 65 [Online]. 2014 [Accessed on 2014 July 15]. Available from: .
    1. Billis A, Konstantinidis E, Mouzakidis C, Tsolaki M, Pappas C, Bamidis P, editors. A game-like interface for training seniors’ dynamic balance and coordination. XII Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2010. Heidelberg: Springer; 2010.
    1. de Bruin PDE, Schoene D, Pichierri G, Smith S. Use of virtual reality technique for the training of motor control in the elderly. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie. 2010;43(4):229–234. doi: 10.1007/s00391-010-0124-7.
    1. Bachmann S, Finger C, Huss A, Egger M, Stuck AE, Clough-Gorr KM. Inpatient rehabilitation specifically designed for geriatric patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c1718. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1718.
    1. WHO. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. World Health Organization. Geneva: 2010 [Online]. [Accessed on 28.07.2014]. Available from: .
    1. National Institutes of Health. Go4Life Program [Online]. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; [Accessed on 2014 November 16]. Available from: .
    1. Phillips EM, Schneider JC, Mercer GR. Motivating elders to initiate and maintain exercise. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2004;85:52-–57. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.03.012.
    1. Burdea G. Keynote address: Virtual rehabilitation-benefits and challenges. 1st International Workshop on Virtual Reality Rehabilitation (Mental Health, Neurological, Physical, Vocational) VRMHR; 2002.
    1. Cameron ID, Murray GR, Gillespie LD, Robertson M, Hill KD, Cumming RG, et al. Interventions for preventing falls in older people in nursing care facilities and hospitals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;1:1.
    1. Rego P, Moreira PM, Reis LP, editors. Serious games for rehabilitation: A survey and a classification towards a taxonomy. Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 2010 5th Iberian Conference on. New Jersey: IEEE; 2010.
    1. Brox E, Luque LF, Evertsen GJ, Hernández JEG, editors. Exergames for elderly: Social exergames to persuade seniors to increase physical activity. Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), 2011 5th International Conference on; 2011. New Jersey: IEEE; 2011.
    1. Brox E, Fernandez-Luque L, Tøllefsen T. Healthy Gaming–Video Game Design to promote Health. Appl Clin Inf. 2011;2:128–142. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2010-10-R-0060.
    1. Gil-Gómez J-A, Lloréns R, Alcañiz M, Colomer C. Effectiveness of a Wii balance board-based system (eBaViR) for balance rehabilitation: a pilot randomized clinical trial in patients with acquired brain injury. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation. 2011;8(1):30. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-8-30.
    1. Marston HR, Smith ST. Interactive videogame technologies to support independence in the elderly: A narrative review. GAMES FOR HEALTH: Research Development, and Clinical Applications. 2012;1(2):139–152. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2011.0008.
    1. Rendon AA, Lohman EB, Thorpe D, Johnson EG, Medina E, Bradley B. The effect of virtual reality gaming on dynamic balance in older adults. Age and Ageing. 2012;41(4):549–552. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afs053.
    1. Wollersheim D, Merkes M, Shields N, Liamputtong P, Wallis L, Reynolds F. Physical and psychosocial effects of Wii video game use among older women. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society. 2010;8(2):85–98.
    1. Anderson F, Annett M, Bischof WF. Lean on Wii: physical rehabilitation with virtual reality Wii peripherals. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;154:229–234.
    1. Theng Y-L, Dahlan AB, Akmal ML, Myint TZ, editors. An exploratory study on senior citizens' perceptions of the Nintendo Wii: the case of Singapore. Proceedings of the 3rd International Convention on Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology. New York: ACM; 2009.
    1. Chao Y-Y, Scherer YK, Wu Y-W, Lucke KT, Montgomery CA. The feasibility of an intervention combining self-efficacy theory and Wii Fit exergames in assisted living residents: A pilot study. Geriatric Nursing. 2013;34(5):377–382. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2013.05.006.
    1. Gerling K, Livingston I, Nacke L, Mandryk R, editors. Full-body motion-based game interaction for older adults. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM; 2012.
    1. Burmeister OK. Websites for Seniors: Cognitive Accessibility. International Journal of Emerging Technologies & Society. 2010;8:2.
    1. Fogg BJ. Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Ubiquity. 2002;2002:5. doi: 10.1145/764008.763957.
    1. Chatterjee S, Price A. Healthy living with persuasive technologies: framework, issues, and challenges. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2009;16(2):171–178. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2859.
    1. GameUp Project. Game-based mobility training and motivation of senior citizen [Online]. 2012 [Accessed on 2014 August 8]. Available from: .
    1. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2010;63(8):e1–e37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.004.
    1. Kukull W, Larson E, Teri L, Bowen J, McCormick W, Pfanschmidt M. The Mini-Mental State Examination score and the clinical diagnosis of dementia. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1994;47(9):1061–1067. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90122-8.
    1. O’Bryant SE, Humphreys JD, Smith GE, Ivnik RJ, Graff-Radford NR, Petersen RC, et al. Detecting dementia with the mini-mental state examination in highly educated individuals. Archives of Neurology. 2008;65(7):963–7.
    1. Schädler S, Kool J, Lüthi H, Marks D, Oesch P, Pfeffer A, et al. Assessments in der Neurorehabilitation. Bern: Huber; 2006.
    1. Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JI, Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health. 1992;83(Suppl 2):S7–11.
    1. Schnurr B, Oesch P. Are Nintendo Wii® balance games a feasible alternative to conventional independent balance training after stroke? Ergoscience. 2012;7(4):147–156.
    1. ActiGraph. [Online]. 2014 [Accessed on 2014 November 16]. Available from: .
    1. Hilfiker R, Vaney C, Gattlen B, Meichtry A, Deriaz O, Luqon-Moulin V, et al. Local dynamic stability as a responsive index for the evaluation of rehabilitation effect on fall risk in patients with multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study. BMC research notes. 2013;6:260.
    1. Delbaere K, Close JC, Mikolaizak AS, Sachdev PS, Brodaty H, Lord SR. The falls efficacy scale international (FES-I). A comprehensive longitudinal validation study. Age and Ageing. 2010;39(2):210–216. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afp225.
    1. Dias N, Kempen GI, Todd CJ, Beyer N, Freiberg E, Piot-Ziegler C, et al. The German version of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International Version (FES-I). Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie. 2006;39(4):297–300.
    1. AAL. Ambient Assisted Living Joint Programme [Online]. 2012 [Accessed on 2014 November 16]. Available from: .
    1. Kinect for Windows. [Online]. [Accessed on 2014 November 16]. Available from: .
    1. FitBit One. [Online]. FitBit Inc., San Francisco, CA; [Accessed on 2014 November 16]. Available from: .
    1. Strath SJ, Swartz AM, Parker SJ, Miller NE, Grimm EK, Cashin SE. A pilot randomized controlled trial evaluating motivationally matched pedometer feedback to increase physical activity behavior in older adults. Journal of physical activity & health. 2011;8(0 2):S267.
    1. Bravata DM, Smith-Spangler C, Sundaram V, Gienger AL, Lin N, Lewis R, et al. Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007;298(19):2296–304.
    1. Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. Journal of medical Internet research. 2005;7(1):e11. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj