Gut microbiota steroid sexual dimorphism and its impact on gonadal steroids: influences of obesity and menopausal status

Jordi Mayneris-Perxachs, María Arnoriaga-Rodríguez, Diego Luque-Córdoba, Feliciano Priego-Capote, Vicente Pérez-Brocal, Andrés Moya, Aurelijus Burokas, Rafael Maldonado, José-Manuel Fernández-Real, Jordi Mayneris-Perxachs, María Arnoriaga-Rodríguez, Diego Luque-Córdoba, Feliciano Priego-Capote, Vicente Pérez-Brocal, Andrés Moya, Aurelijus Burokas, Rafael Maldonado, José-Manuel Fernández-Real

Abstract

Background: Gonadal steroid hormones have been suggested as the underlying mechanism responsible for the sexual dimorphism observed in metabolic diseases. Animal studies have also evidenced a causal role of the gut microbiome and metabolic health. However, the role of sexual dimorphism in the gut microbiota and the potential role of the microbiome in influencing sex steroid hormones and shaping sexually dimorphic susceptibility to disease have been largely overlooked. Although there is some evidence of sex-specific differences in the gut microbiota diversity, composition, and functionality, the results are inconsistent. Importantly, most of these studies have not taken into account the gonadal steroid status. Therefore, we investigated the gut microbiome composition and functionality in relation to sex, menopausal status, and circulating sex steroids.

Results: No significant differences were found in alpha diversity indices among pre- and post-menopausal women and men, but beta diversity differed among groups. The gut microbiota from post-menopausal women was more similar to men than to pre-menopausal women. Metagenome functional analyses revealed no significant differences between post-menopausal women and men. Gonadal steroids were specifically associated with these differences. Hence, the gut microbiota of pre-menopausal women was more enriched in genes from the steroid biosynthesis and degradation pathways, with the former having the strongest fold change among all associated pathways. Microbial steroid pathways also had significant associations with the plasma levels of testosterone and progesterone. In addition, a specific microbiome signature was able to predict the circulating testosterone levels at baseline and after 1-year follow-up. In addition, this microbiome signature could be transmitted from humans to antibiotic-induced microbiome-depleted male mice, being able to predict donor's testosterone levels 4 weeks later, implying that the microbiota profile of the recipient mouse was influenced by the donor's gender. Finally, obesity eliminated most of the differences observed among non-obese pre-menopausal women, post-menopausal women, and men in the gut microbiota composition (Bray-Curtis and weighted unifrac beta diversity), functionality, and the gonadal steroid status.

Conclusions: The present findings evidence clear differences in the gut microbial composition and functionality between men and women, which is eliminated by both menopausal and obesity status. We also reveal a tight link between the gut microbiota composition and the circulating levels of gonadal steroids, particularly testosterone. Video Abstract.

Keywords: Gender; Gonadal steroids; Microbiome; Progesterone; Sex; Sexual dimorphism; Testosterone.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Associations of gut microbiota composition with gender and menopause status. (a) Alpha diversity indices (n = 131). (b) Beta diversity measured by Bray Curtis and weighted unifrac. Overall differences in the microbiome composition among groups were assessed by PERMANOVA using 1000 permutations and pairwise differences between groups were assessed using the pairwise.adonis function adjusted for Bonferroni correction. *p < 0.05. (c) Volcano plot of differential bacterial abundance analysis between pre-menopausal women and men, (d) post-menopausal women and men, and (e) pre- and post-menopausal women, as calculated by DESeq2 from shotgun metagenomic sequencing, adjusting for age and obesity status. For each taxa, the fold change and the p values corrected for multiple comparisons by the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure (pFDR) are plotted. Significantly different taxa (FC > 1.5 and pFDR < 0.05) are colored according to phylum
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Associations of gut microbiota functionality with gender and menopause status. (a) Fold change for the significant differential KEGG pathways between pre-menopausal women and men, and (b) pre- and post-menopausal women, identified by DESeq2 adjusting for age and obesity status. Bars are colored according to the Benjamini-Hochberg corrected p values (pFDR). (c) Spearman correlation heatmap among the abundance of identified KEGG pathways and plasma concentrations of gonadal steroids. Clustering was based on Euclidean distances and Ward linkage. Significance: +, < 0.05; ++, < 0.01; +++,< 0.001. Significant associations after adjusting for age, obesity, and sex are highlighted with a black box
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Gender and menopausal status differences in gonadal steroids. (a) Goodnessoffit (R2Y), goodness of prediction (Q2Y), and permutation tests for the O-PLS-DA model predicting the sex and menopause status from the circulating gonadal steroid levels. (b, c) Principal component analysis score plots for the plasma levels of gonadal steroids colored according to the gender group. (d) Boxplots for the concentrations of progestin, (e) androgens, and (f) estrogens converted to base 10 logarithmic values. Differences among groups were analyzed by a Kruskal-Wallis test, and pair-wise comparisons were assessed by Wilcoxon test. Significant differences are highlighted in bold
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Gut microbial associations with circulating testosterone concentrations. (a) Significant gut bacterial families predicting plasma testosterone levels in humans identified by O-PLS modeling. (b) Permutation tests for the goodness-of-fit (R2Y) and goodness of prediction (Q2Y) for the O-PLS model between bacterial families and circulating testosterone concentrations in humans. (c) Volcano plot of gut bacterial families associated with testosterone levels identified by DESeq2, adjusting for age and obesity status. For each family, the fold change and the Benjamini-Hochberg corrected p values (pFDR) are plotted. Significant families (gray dashed line: pFDR < 0.05; red dashed line: pFDR < 0.1) are colored according to phylum. (d) Experimental design for the fecal microbiota transplantation study in mice. Fecal samples from 22 human donors (11 men and 11 women) were transplanted to 22 mice after 2 weeks of antibiotic treatment. After 28 days of colonization gavage, mice fecal samples were collected and analyzed by shotgun metagenomic sequencing. (e) Principal component analysis score plot based on recipient’s mice bacterial families colored according to human donor sex and menopause status. Overall differences in the microbiome composition were assessed by PERMANOVA using 1000 permutations and Euclidean distances. Pairwise differences between groups were assessed using the pairwise.adonis function adjusted for Bonferroni correction. **p < 0.01. (f) Significant recipient’s mice bacterial families predicting human donor circulating testosterone levels identified by partial Spearman correlation adjusted by age and obesity status

References

    1. Lay C, Rigottier-Gois L, Holmstrøm K, Rajilic M, Vaughan EE, De Vos WM, et al. Colonic microbiota signatures across five northern European countries. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:4153–4155. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.7.4153-4155.2005.
    1. Mueller S, Saunier K, Hanisch C, Norin E, Alm L, Midtvedt T, et al. Differences in fecal microbiota in different European study populations in relation to age, gender, and country: a cross-sectional study. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:1027–1033. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.2.1027-1033.2006.
    1. Li M, Wang B, Zhang M, Rantalainen M, Wang S, Zhou H, et al. Symbiotic gut microbes modulate human metabolic phenotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:2117–2122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0712038105.
    1. Human Microbiome Project Consortium T. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome the human microbiome project consortium*. Nature. 2012;486:207–14.
    1. Odamaki T, Kato K, Sugahara H, Hashikura N, Takahashi S, Xiao J-Z, et al. Age-related changes in gut microbiota composition from newborn to centenarian: a cross-sectional study. BMC Microbiol. 2016;16:90. doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0708-5.
    1. Yatsunenko T, Rey FE, Manary MJ, Trehan I, Dominguez-Bello MG, Contreras M, et al. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature. 2012;486:222–7.
    1. Falony G, Joossens M, Vieira-Silva S, Wang J, Darzi Y, Faust K, et al. Population-level analysis of gut microbiome variation. Science (80-) 2016;352:560–564. doi: 10.1126/science.aad3503.
    1. Sinha T, Vich Vila A, Garmaeva S, Jankipersadsing SA, Imhann F, Collij V, et al. Analysis of 1135 gut metagenomes identifies sex-specific resistome profiles. Gut Microbes. 2019;10:358–366. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2018.1528822.
    1. Dominianni C, Sinha R, Goedert JJ, Pei Z, Yang L, Hayes RB, et al. Sex, body mass index, and dietary fiber intake influence the human gut microbiome. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0124599.
    1. Ding T, Schloss PD. Dynamics and associations of microbial community types across the human body. Nature. 2014;509:357–360. doi: 10.1038/nature13178.
    1. Takagi T, Naito Y, Inoue R, Kashiwagi S, Uchiyama K, Mizushima K, et al. Differences in gut microbiota associated with age, sex, and stool consistency in healthy Japanese subjects. J Gastroenterol. 2019;54:53–63. doi: 10.1007/s00535-018-1488-5.
    1. Gao X, Zhang M, Xue J, Huang J, Zhuang R, Zhou X, et al. Body mass index differences in the gut microbiota are gender specific. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1250. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01250.
    1. Santos-Marcos JA, Rangel-Zuñiga OA, Jimenez-Lucena R, Quintana-Navarro GM, Garcia-Carpintero S, Malagon MM, et al. Influence of gender and menopausal status on gut microbiota. Maturitas. 2018;116:43–53. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.07.008.
    1. Santos-Marcos JA, Haro C, Vega-Rojas A, Alcala-Diaz JF, Molina-Abril H, Leon-Acuña A, et al. Sex differences in the gut microbiota as potential determinants of gender predisposition to disease. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2019;63:e1800870. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201800870.
    1. de la Cuesta-Zuluaga J, Kelley ST, Chen Y, Escobar JS, Mueller NT, Ley RE, et al. Age- and sex-dependent patterns of gut microbial diversity in human adults. mSystems; 2019;4.
    1. Haro C, Rangel-Zúñiga OA, Alcalá-Díaz JF, Gómez-Delgado F, Pérez-Martínez P, Delgado-Lista J, et al. Intestinal microbiota is influenced by gender and body mass index. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0154090.
    1. Jung HK, Kim DY, Moon IH. Effects of gender and menstrual cycle on colonic transit time in healthy subjects. Korean J Intern Med. 2003;18:181–186. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2003.18.3.181.
    1. Wald A, Van Thiel DH, Hoechstetter L, Gavaler JS, Egler KM, Verm R, et al. Gastrointestinal transit: the effect of the menstrual cycle. Gastroenterology. 1981;80:1497–1500. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(81)90263-8.
    1. Yurkovetskiy L, Burrows M, Khan AA, Graham L, Volchkov P, Becker L, et al. Gender bias in autoimmunity is influenced by microbiota. Immunity. 2013;39:400–412. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.08.013.
    1. Gerdts E, Regitz-Zagrosek V. Sex differences in cardiometabolic disorders. Nat. Med. 2019;25:1657–66.
    1. Virani SS, Alonso A, Benjamin EJ, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2020 update. Circulation. 2020;141:e139–e596.
    1. Cross TWL, Kasahara K, Rey FE. Sexual dimorphism of cardiometabolic dysfunction: gut microbiome in the play? Mol Metab. 2018;15:70–81.
    1. Beale AL, Kaye DM, Marques FZ. The role of the gut microbiome in sex differences in arterial pressure. Biol Sex Differ. 2019;10:22. doi: 10.1186/s13293-019-0236-8.
    1. Razavi AC, Potts KS, Kelly TN, Bazzano LA. Sex, gut microbiome, and cardiovascular disease risk. Biol. Sex Differ. 2019;10:29.
    1. Forte P, Kneale BJ, Milne E, Chowienczyk PJ, Johnston A, Benjamin N, et al. Evidence for a difference in nitric oxide biosynthesis between healthy women and men. Hypertension. 1998;32:730–734. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.32.4.730.
    1. Mao B, Yi Y, Mo Q, Yang C, Zhong Q. Metabolic profiling reveals the heterogeneity of vascular endothelial function phenotypes in individuals at extreme cardiovascular risk. RSC Adv. Royal Society of Chemistry. 2019;9:30033–30044. doi: 10.1039/C9RA05526F.
    1. Wang H, Wang X, Qi D, Sun M, Hou Q, Li Y, et al. Establishment of the circadian metabolic phenotype strategy in spontaneously hypertensive rats: a dynamic metabolomics study. J Transl Med. 2020;18:38. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02222-1.
    1. Wald DS, Morris JK, Law M, Wald NJ. Folic acid, homocysteine, and cardiovascular disease: judging causality in the face of inconclusive trial evidence. Br Med J. 2006;333:1114–1117. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39000.486701.68.
    1. Henry OR, Benghuzzi H, Taylor HA, Tucci M, Butler K, Jones L. Suppression of homocysteine levels by vitamin B12 and folates: age and gender dependency in the Jackson heart study. Am J Med Sci. 2012;344:110–115. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31823782a5.
    1. Gambacciani M, Mannella P. Homocysteine, menopause and cardiovascular disease. Menopause Int. 2007;13:23–6.
    1. Sybesma W, Starrenburg M, Tijsseling L, Hoefnagel MHN, Hugenholtz J. Effects of cultivation conditions on folate production by lactic acid bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:4542–4548. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.8.4542-4548.2003.
    1. He Z, Rankinen T, Leon AS, Skinner JS, Tchernof A, Bouchard C. Plasma steroids, body composition, and fat distribution: effects of age, sex, and exercise training. Int J Obes. 2018;42:1366–1377. doi: 10.1038/s41366-018-0033-1.
    1. Kwa M, Plottel CS, Blaser MJ, Adams S. The intestinal microbiome and estrogen receptor-positive female breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016;108:djw029.
    1. Ridlon JM, Ikegawa S, Alves JMP, Zhou B, Kobayashi A, Iida T, et al. Clostridium scindens: a human gut microbe with a high potential to convert glucocorticoids into androgens. J Lipid Res. 2013;54:2437–2449. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M038869.
    1. Lombardi P, Goldin B, Boutin E, Gorbach SL. Metabolism of androgens and estrogens by human fecal microorganisms. J Steroid Biochem. 1978;9:795–801. doi: 10.1016/0022-4731(78)90203-0.
    1. Nuriel-Ohayon M, Neuman H, Ziv O, Belogolovski A, Barsheshet Y, Bloch N, et al. Progesterone increases Bifidobacterium relative abundance during late pregnancy. Cell Rep. 2019;27:730–736. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.03.075.
    1. Kisiela M, Skarka A, Ebert B, Maser E. Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases (HSDs) in bacteria - a bioinformatic perspective. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2012;129:31–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.08.002.
    1. JGM M, Frank DN, Mortin-Toth S, Robertson CE, Feazel LM, Rolle-Kampczyk U, et al. Sex differences in the gut microbiome drive hormone-dependent regulation of autoimmunity. Science (80- ) 2013;339:1084–1088. doi: 10.1126/science.1233521.
    1. Flores R, Shi J, Fuhrman B, Xu X, Veenstra TD, Gail MH, et al. Fecal microbial determinants of fecal and systemic estrogens and estrogen metabolites: a cross-sectional study. J Transl Med. 2012;10:253. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-253.
    1. Menon R, Watson SE, Thomas LN, Allred CD, Dabney A, Azcarate-Peril MA, et al. Diet complexity and estrogen receptor β status affect the composition of the murine intestinal microbiota. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:5763–5773. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01182-13.
    1. Fuhrman BJ, Feigelson HS, Flores R, Gail MH, Xu X, Ravel J, et al. Associations of the fecal microbiome with urinary estrogens and estrogen metabolites in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:4632–4640. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-2222.
    1. Baker JM, Al-Nakkash L, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. Estrogen-gut microbiome axis: physiological and clinical implications. Maturitas. 2017;103:45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.06.025.
    1. Lindheim L, Bashir M, Münzker J, Trummer C, Zachhuber V, Leber B, et al. Alterations in gut microbiome composition and barrier function are associated with reproductive and metabolic defects in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): a pilot study. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0168390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168390.
    1. Park S, Kim DS, Kang ES, Bin KD, Kang S. Low-dose brain estrogen prevents menopausal syndrome while maintaining the diversity of the gut microbiomes in estrogen-deficient rats. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2018;315:E99–109. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00005.2018.
    1. Kaliannan K, Robertson RC, Murphy K, Stanton C, Kang C, Wang B, et al. Estrogen-mediated gut microbiome alterations influence sexual dimorphism in metabolic syndrome in mice. Microbiome. 2018;6:205. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0587-0.
    1. Cox-York KA, Sheflin AM, Foster MT, Gentile CL, Kahl A, Koch LG, et al. Ovariectomy results in differential shifts in gut microbiota in low versus high aerobic capacity rats. Physiol Rep. 2015;3:e12488.
    1. Sovijit WN, Sovijit WE, Pu S, Usuda K, Inoue R, Watanabe G, et al. Ovarian progesterone suppresses depression and anxiety-like behaviors by increasing the Lactobacillus population of gut microbiota in ovariectomized mice. Neurosci Res. 2019;S0168-0102(19)30142–7.
    1. Sherman SB, Sarsour N, Salehi M, Schroering A, Mell B, Joe B, et al. Prenatal androgen exposure causes hypertension and gut microbiota dysbiosis. Gut Microbes. 2018;9:400–421.
    1. Org E, Mehrabian M, Parks BW, Shipkova P, Liu X, Drake TA, et al. Sex differences and hormonal effects on gut microbiota composition in mice. Gut Microbes. 2016;7:313–322. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2016.1203502.
    1. Shin J-H, Park Y-H, Sim M, Kim S-A, Joung H, Shin D-M. Serum level of sex steroid hormone is associated with diversity and profiles of human gut microbiome. Res Microbiol. 2019;170:192–201. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2019.03.003.
    1. Guo Y, Qi Y, Yang X, Zhao L, Wen S, Liu Y, et al. Association between polycystic ovary syndrome and gut microbiota. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0153196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153196.
    1. Torres PJ, Skarra DV, Ho BS, Sau L, Anvar AR, Kelley ST, et al. Letrozole treatment of adult female mice results in a similar reproductive phenotype but distinct changes in metabolism and the gut microbiome compared to pubertal mice. BMC Microbiol. 2019;19:57. doi: 10.1186/s12866-019-1425-7.
    1. Liang Y, Ming Q, Liang J, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Shen T. Gut microbiota dysbiosis in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): association with obesity - a preliminary report. Can J Physiol Pharmacol.; 2020;cjpp-2019-0413.
    1. Schmieder R, Edwards R. prinseq. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:863–864. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr026.
    1. Magoč T, Salzberg SL. FLASH: Fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2957–2963. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507.
    1. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923.
    1. Li D, Liu CM, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam TW. MEGAHIT: An ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:1674–1676. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033.
    1. Hyatt D, Chen GL, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: Prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:119.
    1. Durbin R, Eddy SR, Krogh A, Mitchison G. Biological sequence analysis: probabilistic models of proteins and nucleic acids. Press CU, editor. Cambridge, UK; 1998.
    1. Kanehisa M. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:27–30. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.27.
    1. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Computing RF for S, editor. Vienna, Austria.; 2013.
    1. Menzel P, Ng KL, Krogh A. Fast and sensitive taxonomic classification for metagenomics with Kaiju. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11257. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11257.
    1. Kelly JR, Borre Y, O’ Brien C, Patterson E, El Aidy S, Deane J, et al. Transferring the blues: depression-associated gut microbiota induces neurobehavioural changes in the rat. J Psychiatr Res; 2016;82:109–118.
    1. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol; 2014;15:550.
    1. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodological). 1995;57:289–300.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj