Fimasartan-Based Blood Pressure Control after Acute Cerebral Ischemia: The Fimasartan-Based Blood Pressure Control after Acute Cerebral Ischemia Study

Keun Sik Hong, Sun Uck Kwon, Jong Ho Park, Jae Kwan Cha, Jin Man Jung, Yong Jae Kim, Kyung Bok Lee, Sung Il Sohn, Yong Seok Lee, Joung Ho Rha, Jee Hyun Kwon, Sang Won Han, Bum Joon Kim, Jaseong Koo, Jay Chol Choi, Sang Min Sung, Soo Joo Lee, Man Seok Park, Seong Hwan Ahn, Oh Young Bang, Yang Ha Hwang, Hyo Suk Nam, Jong Moo Park, Hee Joon Bae, Eung Gyu Kim, Kyung Yul Lee, Mi Sun Oh, Keun Sik Hong, Sun Uck Kwon, Jong Ho Park, Jae Kwan Cha, Jin Man Jung, Yong Jae Kim, Kyung Bok Lee, Sung Il Sohn, Yong Seok Lee, Joung Ho Rha, Jee Hyun Kwon, Sang Won Han, Bum Joon Kim, Jaseong Koo, Jay Chol Choi, Sang Min Sung, Soo Joo Lee, Man Seok Park, Seong Hwan Ahn, Oh Young Bang, Yang Ha Hwang, Hyo Suk Nam, Jong Moo Park, Hee Joon Bae, Eung Gyu Kim, Kyung Yul Lee, Mi Sun Oh

Abstract

Background and purpose: Blood pressure (BP) control is strongly recommended, but BP control rate has not been well studied in patients with stroke. We evaluated the BP control rate with fimasartan-based antihypertensive therapy initiated in patients with recent cerebral ischemia.

Methods: This multicenter, prospective, single-arm trial involved 27 centers in South Korea. Key inclusion criteria were recent cerebral ischemia within 90 days and high BP [systolic blood pressure (SBP) >140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >90 mm Hg]. BP lowering was initiated with fimasartan. BP management during the follow-up was at the discretion of the responsible investigators. The primary endpoint was the target BP goal achievement rate (<140/90 mm Hg) at 24 weeks. Key secondary endpoints included achieved BP and BP changes at each visit, and clinical events (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03231293).

Results: Of 1,035 patients enrolled, 1,026 were included in the safety analysis, and 951 in the efficacy analysis. Their mean age was 64.1 years, 33% were female, the median time interval from onset to enrollment was 10 days, and the baseline SBP and DBP were 162.3±16.0 and 92.2±12.4 mm Hg (mean±SD). During the study period, 55.5% of patients were maintained on fimasartan monotherapy, and 44.5% received antihypertensive therapies other than fimasartan monotherapy at at least one visit. The target BP goal achievement rate at 24-week was 67.3% (48.6% at 4-week and 61.4% at 12-week). The mean BP was 139.0/81.8±18.3/11.7, 133.8/79.2±16.4/11.0, and 132.8/78.5±15.6/10.9 mm Hg at 4-, 12-, and 24-week. The treatment-emergent adverse event rate was 5.4%, including one serious adverse event.

Conclusions: Fimasartan-based BP lowering achieved the target BP in two-thirds of patients at 24 weeks, and was generally well tolerated.

Keywords: blood pressure; fimasartan; prevention and control; stroke.

Conflict of interest statement

All the investigators received research grant based on the study contracts for the number of subjects enrolled and/or for the conduct of the study from Boryung Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea.

Copyright © 2021 Korean Neurological Association.

Figures

Fig. 1. Enrollment, withdrawal, safety population, and…
Fig. 1. Enrollment, withdrawal, safety population, and efficacy population.
Fig. 2. Comparison of BP parameters at…
Fig. 2. Comparison of BP parameters at each visit between patients who did and those who did not achieve the target BP at 24 weeks: mean SBP and DBP (A), SBP category (B), and DBP category (C). BP: blood pressure, DBP: diastolic blood pressure, SBP: systolic blood pressure.

References

    1. Grau AJ, Weimar C, Buggle F, Heinrich A, Goertler M, Neumaier S, et al. Risk factors, outcome, and treatment in subtypes of ischemic stroke: the German stroke data bank. Stroke. 2001;32:2559–2566.
    1. Kimura K, Kazui S, Minematsu K, Yamaguchi T. Analysis of 16,922 patients with acute ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack in Japan. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;18:47–56.
    1. Fonarow GC, Reeves MJ, Smith EE, Saver JL, Zhao X, Olson DW, et al. Characteristics, performance measures, and in-hospital outcomes of the first one million stroke and transient ischemic attack admissions in get with the guidelines-stroke. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3:291–302.
    1. Kim BJ, Park JM, Kang K, Lee SJ, Ko Y, Kim JG, et al. Case characteristics, hyperacute treatment, and outcome information from the Clinical Research Center for stroke-fifth division registry in South Korea. J Stroke. 2015;17:38–53.
    1. PROGRESS Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of a perindoprilbased blood-pressure-lowering regimen among 6,105 individuals with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Lancet. 2001;358:1033–1041.
    1. Liu L, Wang Z, Gong L, Zhang Y, Thijs L, Staessen JA, et al. Blood pressure reduction for the secondary prevention of stroke: a Chinese trial and a systematic review of the literature. Hypertens Res. 2009;32:1032–1040.
    1. Rashid P, Leonardi-Bee J, Bath P. Blood pressure reduction and secondary prevention of stroke and other vascular events: a systematic review. Stroke. 2003;34:2741–2748.
    1. Katsanos AH, Filippatou A, Manios E, Deftereos S, Parissis J, Frogoudaki A, et al. Blood pressure reduction and secondary stroke prevention: a systematic review and metaregression analysis of randomized clinical trials. Hypertension. 2017;69:171–179.
    1. Towfighi A, Markovic D, Ovbiagele B. Consistency of blood pressure control after ischemic stroke: prevalence and prognosis. Stroke. 2014;45:1313–1317.
    1. Ovbiagele B, Diener HC, Yusuf S, Martin RH, Cotton D, Vinisko R, et al. Level of systolic blood pressure within the normal range and risk of recurrent stroke. JAMA. 2011;306:2137–2144.
    1. SPS3 Study Group. Benavente OR, Coffey CS, Conwit R, Hart RG, McClure LA, et al. Blood-pressure targets in patients with recent lacunar stroke: the SPS3 randomised trial. Lancet. 2013;382:507–515.
    1. Kitagawa K, Yamamoto Y, Arima H, Maeda T, Sunami N, Kanzawa T, et al. Effect of standard vs intensive blood pressure control on the risk of recurrent stroke: a randomized clinical trial and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76:1309–1318.
    1. Kim JH, Lee JH, Paik SH, Kim JH, Chi YH. Fimasartan, a novel angiotensin II receptor antagonist. Arch Pharm Res. 2012;35:1123–1126.
    1. Lee SE, Kim YJ, Lee HY, Yang HM, Park CG, Kim JJ, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of fimasartan, a new angiotensin receptor blocker, compared with losartan (50/100 mg): a 12-week, phase III, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, dose escalation clinical trial with an optional 12-week extension phase in adult Korean patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Clin Ther. 2012;34:552–568.
    1. Park JB, Sung KC, Kang SM, Cho EJ. Safety and efficacy of fimasartan in patients with arterial hypertension (Safe-KanArb study): an openlabel observational study. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2013;13:47–56.
    1. Arima H, Chalmers J, Woodward M, Anderson C, Rodgers A, Davis S, et al. Lower target blood pressures are safe and effective for the prevention of recurrent stroke: the PROGRESS trial. J Hypertens. 2006;24:1201–1208.
    1. Odden MC, McClure LA, Sawaya BP, White CL, Peralta CA, Field TS, et al. Achieved blood pressure and outcomes in the Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes trial. Hypertension. 2016;67:63–69.
    1. Cho EJ, Sung KC, Kang SM, Shin MS, Joo SJ, Park JB. Fimasartan reduces clinic and home pulse pressure in elderly hypertensive patients: a K-MetS study. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0214293.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj