Efficacy of robot-assisted fingers training in chronic stroke survivors: a pilot randomized-controlled trial

Evan A Susanto, Raymond Ky Tong, Corinna Ockenfeld, Newmen Sk Ho, Evan A Susanto, Raymond Ky Tong, Corinna Ockenfeld, Newmen Sk Ho

Abstract

Background: While constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) is one of the most promising techniques for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke, it requires high residual function to start with. Robotic device, on the other hand, can provide intention-driven assistance and is proven capable to complement conventional therapy. However, with many robotic devices focus on more proximal joints like shoulder and elbow, recovery of hand and fingers functions have become a challenge. Here we propose the use of robotic device to assist hand and fingers functions training and we aim to evaluate the potential efficacy of intention-driven robot-assisted fingers training.

Methods: Participants (6 to 24 months post-stroke) were randomly assigned into two groups: robot-assisted (robot) and non-assisted (control) fingers training groups. Each participant underwent 20-session training. Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) was used as the primary outcome measure, while, Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) score, its functional tasks (WMFT-FT) sub-score, Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), its shoulder and elbow (FMA-SE) sub-score, and finger individuation index (FII) served as secondary outcome measures.

Results: Nineteen patients completed the 20-session training (

Trial registration: HKClinicalTrials.com HKCTR-1554); eighteen of them came back for a 6-month follow-up. Significant improvements (p < 0.05) were found in the clinical scores for both robot and control group after training. However, only robot group maintained the significant difference in the ARAT and FMA-SE six months after the training. The WMFT-FT score and time post-training improvements of robot group were significantly better than those of the control group.

Conclusions: This study showed the potential efficacy of robot-assisted fingers training for hand and fingers rehabilitation and its feasibility to facilitate early rehabilitation for a wider population of stroke survivors; and hence, can be used to complement CIMT.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The modified hand exoskeleton robot. This is a picture of the hand exoskeleton robot after modification. Highlighted in black squares are the strain gauges mounted to the device for joint moments measurement, while highlighted in white squares are the linear potentiometers.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CONSORT patient flow throughout the study.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The change in FII throughout the 20-session training. The black solid line indicates the more obvious FII improvement of the robot group as compared to that of the control group indicated by the green dashed line.

References

    1. Mackay J, Mensah GA. The Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2004.
    1. WHO . The World Health Report 2003: Shaping The Future. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2003.
    1. Dobkin BH. Strategies for stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3:528–36. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00851-8.
    1. Lang CE, Wagner JM, Bastian AJ, Hu Q, Edwards DF, Sahrmann SA, Dromerick AW. Deficits in grasp versus reach during acute hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res. 2005;166:126–36. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-2350-6.
    1. Nowak D, Grefkes C, Dafotakis M, Küst J, Karbe H, Fink GR. Dexterity is impaired at both hands following unilateral subcortical middle cerebral artery stroke. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;25:3173–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05551.x.
    1. Hermsdörfer J, Hagl E, Nowak D, Marquardt C. Grip force control during object manipulation in cerebral stroke. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114:915–29. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00042-7.
    1. Cirstea MC, Mitnitski AB, Feldman AG, Levin MF. Interjoint coordination dynamics during reaching in stroke. Exp Brain Res. 2003;151:289–300. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1438-0.
    1. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;354:191–6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09477-X.
    1. Nakayama H, Jørgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:394–8. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90161-9.
    1. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Blaha MJ, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American heart association. Circulation. 2014;129:e28–e292. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000441139.02102.80.
    1. Kelly-Hayes M, Beiser A, Kase CS, Scaramucci A, D’Agostino RB, Wolf PA. The influence of gender and age on disability following ischemic stroke: the Framingham study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;12:119–26. doi: 10.1016/S1052-3057(03)00042-9.
    1. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJH. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34:2181–6. doi: 10.1161/.
    1. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:111–21. doi: 10.1177/1545968307305457.
    1. Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:741–54. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70150-4.
    1. Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;377:1693–702. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60325-5.
    1. Taub E. Movement in nonhuman primates deprived of somatosensory feedback. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1976;4:335–74.
    1. Taub E, Crago JE, Burgio LD, Groomes TE, Cook EW, DeLuca SC, Miller NE. An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: overcoming learned nonuse by shaping. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994;61:281–93. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-281.
    1. Taub E, Crago JE, Uswatte G. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new approach to treatment in physical rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol. 1998;43:152–70. doi: 10.1037/0090-5550.43.2.152.
    1. Taub E, Uswatte G, Elbert T. New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:228–36. doi: 10.1038/nrn754.
    1. Wolf SL, Thompson P, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Blanton SR, Nichols-Larsen DS, Morris DM, Uswatte G, Taub E, Light KE, Sawaki L. The EXCITE Stroke Trial. Comparing Early and Delayed Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy. Stroke. 2010;41:2309–15. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.588723.
    1. McIntyre A, Viana R, Janzen S, Mehta S, Pereira S, Teasell R. Systematic review and meta-analysis of constraint-induced movement therapy in the hemiparetic upper extremity more than six months post stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012;19:499–513. doi: 10.1310/tsr1906-499.
    1. Ren Y, Kang SH, Park H-S, Wu Y-N, Zhang L-Q. Developing a multi-joint upper limb exoskeleton robot for diagnosis, therapy, and outcome evaluation in neurorehabilitation. In IEEE Trans neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013;21:490–9. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2225073.
    1. Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Williams D, Celestino J, Charles SK, Lynch D, Hogan N. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation: a robot for wrist rehabilitation. In IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2007;15:327–35. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2007.903899.
    1. Nef T, Quinter G, Müller R, Riener R. Effects of arm training with the robotic device ARMin I in chronic stroke: three single cases. Neurodegener Dis. 2009;6:240–51. doi: 10.1159/000262444.
    1. Tong KY, Ho SK, Pang PK, Hu XL, Tam WK, Fung KL, Wei XJ, Chen PN, Chen M. An intention driven hand functions task training robotic system. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:3406–9.
    1. Ho NSK, Tong KY, Hu XL, Fung KL, Wei XJ, Rong W, et al. An EMG-driven exoskeleton hand robotic training device on chronic stroke subjects: task training system for stroke rehabilitation. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2011;2011:1–5.
    1. Hu XL, Tong KY, Wei XJ, Rong W, Susanto EA, Ho SK. The effects of post-stroke upper-limb training with an electromyography (EMG)-driven hand robot. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013;23:1065–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.07.007.
    1. Susanto EA, Tong RKY, Ho NSK, Hu XL. 9th IASTED Int Conf Biomed Eng. Innsbruck, Austria: ACTAPRESS; 2012. Hand Exoskeleton Robot as a Force Measurement Tool.
    1. Maciejasz P, Eschweiler J, Gerlach-Hahn K, Jansen-Troy A, Leonhardt S. A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11:3. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-3.
    1. Heo P, Gu GM, Lee SJ, Rhee K, Kim J. Current hand exoskeleton technologies for rehabilitation and assistive engineering. Int J Precis Eng Manuf. 2012;13:807–24. doi: 10.1007/s12541-012-0107-2.
    1. Li S, Latash ML, Yue GH, Siemionow V, Sahgal V. The effects of stroke and age on finger interaction in multi-finger force production tasks. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114:1646–55. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00164-0.
    1. Velozo C, Woodbury ML. Translating measurement findings into rehabilitation practice: an example using Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity with patients following stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48:1211. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2010.10.0203.
    1. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1.a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13–31.
    1. Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F, Kim I-H, di Bella P, Johnson G. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:404–11. doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr832oa.
    1. Hsueh IP, Lee MM, Hsieh CL. The Action Research Arm Test: is it necessary for patients being tested to sit at a standardized table? Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:382–8. doi: 10.1191/0269215502cr509oa.
    1. Van der Lee JH, De Groot V, Beckerman H, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:14–9. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.18668.
    1. Koh CL, Hsueh IP, Wang WC, Sheu CF, Yu TY, Wang CH, Hsieh CL. Validation of the action research arm test using item response theory in patients after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2006;38:375–80. doi: 10.1080/16501970600803252.
    1. Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32:1635–9. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.32.7.1635.
    1. Page SJ, Fulk GD, Boyne P. Clinically important differences for the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke. Phys Ther. 2012;92:791–8. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110009.
    1. Lin KC, Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Chen CL, Jang Y, Liu JS. Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the wolf motor function test in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:429–34. doi: 10.1177/1545968308331144.
    1. Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, Cook EW, Taub E. The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:750–5. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.23183.
    1. Page SJ, Levine P, Hade E. Psychometric properties and administration of the wrist/hand subscales of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment in minimally impaired upper extremity hemiparesis in stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:2373–6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.06.017.
    1. Beebe JA, Lang CE. Absence of a proximal to distal gradient of motor deficits in the upper extremity early after stroke. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119:2074–85. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.04.293.
    1. Oujamaa L, Relave I, Froger J, Mottet D, Pelissier J-Y. Rehabilitation of arm function after stroke. Literature review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2009;52:269–93. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2008.10.003.
    1. Hsieh Y-W, Lin K-C, Horng Y-S, Wu C-Y, Wu T-C, Ku F-L. Sequential combination of robot-assisted therapy and constraint-induced therapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. J Neurol. 2014;261:1037–45. doi: 10.1007/s00415-014-7345-4.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

3
Subskrybuj