Enhanced VWF clearance in low VWF pathogenesis: limitations of the VWFpp/VWF:Ag ratio and clinical significance

Dearbhla Doherty, Michelle Lavin, Mary Byrne, Margaret Nolan, Jamie M O'Sullivan, Kevin Ryan, Niamh M O'Connell, Sandra L Haberichter, Pamela A Christopherson, Jorge Di Paola, Paula D James, James S O'Donnell, Dearbhla Doherty, Michelle Lavin, Mary Byrne, Margaret Nolan, Jamie M O'Sullivan, Kevin Ryan, Niamh M O'Connell, Sandra L Haberichter, Pamela A Christopherson, Jorge Di Paola, Paula D James, James S O'Donnell

Abstract

Increased von Willebrand factor (VWF) clearance plays a key role in the pathogenesis of type 1 and type 2 von Willebrand disease (VWD). However, the pathological mechanisms involved in patients with mild to moderate reductions in plasma VWF:Ag (range, 30-50 IU/dL; low VWF) remain poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the hypothesis that enhanced VWF clearance may contribute to the pathobiology of low VWF. Patients with low VWF were recruited to the LoVIC study after ethics approval and receipt of informed consent. Desmopressin was administered IV in 75 patients, and blood samples were drawn at baseline and at the 1-hour and 4-hour time points. As defined by recent ASH/ISTH/NHF/WFH guidelines, 20% of our low-VWF cohort demonstrated significantly enhanced VWF clearance. Importantly, from a clinical perspective, this enhanced VWF clearance was seen after desmopressin infusion, but did not affect the steady-state VWF propeptide (VWFpp)-to-VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) ratio (VWFpp/VWF:Ag) in most cases. The discrepancy between the VWFpp/VWF:Ag ratio and desmopressin fall-off rates in patients with mild quantitative VWD may have reflected alteration in VWFpp clearance kinetics. Finally, bleeding scores were significantly lower in patients with low VWF with enhanced VWF clearance, compared with those in whom reduced VWF biosynthesis represented the principle pathogenic mechanism. This trial was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03167320.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: J.S.O. has served on the speaker’s bureau for Baxter, Bayer, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, Leo Pharma, Takeda, and Octapharma and on the advisory boards of Baxter, Bayer, Octapharma CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda, and Pfizer; and has received research grants from Baxter, Bayer, Pfizer, Shire, Takeda, and Novo Nordisk. M.L has served as a consultant for Sobi and CSL Behring and has received indirect funding for development of educational content from Takeda. J.M.O. has received research grant funding from LEO Pharma and Grifols. P.J. has received research funding from CSL Behring, Takeda, and Bayer. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.

A complete list of the members of the Zimmerman Program Investigators appears in the “Appendix.”

© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Enhanced clearance plays an important role in the pathogenesis of low VWF. (A) VWF:Ag fall-off (decrease in VWF:Ag from T+1 to T+4 hours after desmopressin infusion, as a percentage of T+1) is illustrated on the y-axis. The red dotted line and shaded area illustrate the ASH/ISTH/NHF/WFH guideline threshold of >30% for enhanced clearance. (B) Plasma VWF:Ag levels at 1 hour and 4 hours after desmopressin treatment in patients with low VWF with FC compared with patients with low VWF with NC rates. (C) Patients with low VWF with FC had a significantly greater increment in plasma VWF:Ag levels at 1 hour after desmopressin (median, 3.84-fold vs 2.89-fold; P < .0001). The increment is expressed as fold change (T+1/T0). Similarly, patients with low VWF with FC demonstrated significantly greater increments in plasma VWF:RCo (D) (median, 4.66-fold vs 3.60-fold; P < .0001) and plasma FVIII:C levels (E) (median, 3.40-fold vs 2.81-fold; P < .01) at 1 hour after desmopressin infusion. (F-H) Conversely, patients with low VWF with FC demonstrated greater fall-offs in plasma VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, and FVIII:C levels between 1 hour and 4 hours after desmopressin. All fall-off values are expressed as fold change between the 1-hour and 4-hour time points. (I-J) In patients with low VWF, fall-off rates in plasma VWF:Ag levels after desmopressin treatment correlated significantly with fall-off rates in both VWF:RCo and FVIII:C (Pearson’s r), consistent with faster clearance of the VWF-FVIII complex from the circulation. Median values are illustrated by black lines. ∗P < .05; ∗∗P < .01; ∗∗∗P < .001; ∗∗∗∗P < .0001. ns, not significant.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Limitations of VWFpp/VWF:Ag ratio in detection of fast VWF clearance in patients with low VWF and the impact of clearance on bleeding phenotype. (A) Only 8% (6 of 75) of patients with low VWF had VWFpp/VWF:Ag ratios >3 (above the dashed blue line). In contrast, 20% (15 of 75) of the patients with low VWF had enhanced clearance based on fall-off rates after desmopressin (to the right of the dashed red line: shaded area with >30% fall-off in VWF:Ag levels at 4 hours, per ASH/ISTH/NHF/WFH guidelines). The blue line illustrates VWFpp/VWF:Ag ratio >3. Patients with low VWF with suspected enhanced clearance, as defined by VWFpp/VWF:Ag >3 only are shown in the blue box. Patients with low VWF with confirmed enhanced clearance after desmopressin trial only are shown in the light red box. Finally, patients with low VWF with both positive VWFpp/VWF:Ag and enhanced clearance after desmopressin are in the purple box. (B) Because the majority of patients with low VWF were of blood group O (64 of 75; 85.3%), the VWFpp/VWF:Ag vs desmopressin fall-off comparison was repeated with a blood group O–specific VWFpp/VWF:Ag cutoff of >2.15 (corresponds to lower 97.5% CI for normal subjects in blood group O). Even with this lower cutoff, only 12% (9 of 75) of patients with low VWF had an elevated VWFpp/VWF:Ag ratio. (C) In patients with low VWF, 24 hour fall-off in plasma VWF:Ag levels (n = 24) strongly correlated with 4-hour fall-off of VWF:Ag levels (Spearman’s r). The 24-hour fall-off is expressed as fold change (T+24/T+1−1). (D) Conversely, there was no correlation between the 24-hour fall-off in VWF:Ag and steady-state plasma VWFpp/VWF:Ag ratios (Spearman’s r). (E-F) Elimination half-lives (t1/2el in hours) in patients with low VWF correlated inversely with the 4-hour fall-off plasma VWF:Ag levels after desmopressin (Pearson’s r) but did not correlate with VWFpp/VWF:Ag ratios (Spearman’s r). (G) Patients with low VWF with a threefold or higher increment in plasma VWF:Ag levels after desmopressin (illustrated as fold change, T+1/T+0) had significantly lower bleeding scores than patients with low VWF with attenuated desmopressin responses (median, 4 vs 6; P < .01). The upper limit of the normal condensed MCMDM-1 VWD score range is illustrated by the black dotted line (<3 for both males and females). (H) Increment in plasma VWF:Ag levels after desmopressin was significantly associated with the condensed MCMDM-1 VWD bleeding score. (C-H) Fast clearance, red dots; normal clearance, blue dots.

References

    1. Casonato A, Pontara E, Sartorello F, et al. Reduced von Willebrand factor survival in type Vicenza von Willebrand disease. Blood. 2002;99(1):180–184.
    1. Haberichter SL, Balistreri M, Christopherson P, et al. Assay of the von Willebrand factor (VWF) propeptide to identify patients with type 1 von Willebrand disease with decreased VWF survival. Blood. 2006;108(10):3344–3351.
    1. Haberichter SL, Castaman G, Budde U, et al. Identification of type 1 von Willebrand disease patients with reduced von Willebrand factor survival by assay of the VWF propeptide in the European study: molecular and clinical markers for the diagnosis and management of type 1 VWD (MCMDM-1VWD) Blood. 2008;111(10):4979–4985.
    1. Flood VH, Gill JC, Morateck PA, et al. Gain-of-function GPIb ELISA assay for VWF activity in the Zimmerman Program for the Molecular and Clinical Biology of VWD. Blood. 2011;117(6):e67–e74.
    1. Sanders YV, Groeneveld D, Meijer K, et al. WiN study group. von Willebrand factor propeptide and the phenotypic classification of von Willebrand disease. Blood. 2015;125(19):3006–3013.
    1. Eikenboom J, Federici AB, Dirven RJ, et al. MCMDM-1VWD Study Group VWF propeptide and ratios between VWF, VWF propeptide, and FVIII in the characterization of type 1 von Willebrand disease. Blood. 2013;121(12):2336–2339.
    1. James PD, Connell NT, Ameer B, et al. ASH ISTH NHF WFH 2021 guidelines on the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease. Blood Adv. 2021;5(1):280–300.
    1. O’Donnell JS. Low VWF: insights into pathogenesis, diagnosis, and clinical management. Blood Adv. 2020;4(13):3191–3199.
    1. Aguila S, Lavin M, Dalton N, et al. Increased galactose expression and enhanced clearance in patients with low von Willebrand factor. Blood. 2019;133(14):1585–1596.
    1. Flood VH, Christopherson PA, Gill JC, et al. Clinical and laboratory variability in a cohort of patients diagnosed with type 1 VWD in the United States. Blood. 2016;127(20):2481–2488.
    1. Lavin M, Aguila S, Schneppenheim S, et al. Novel insights into the clinical phenotype and pathophysiology underlying low VWF levels. Blood. 2017;130(21):2344–2353.
    1. James PD, Paterson AD, Notley C, et al. ASSOCIATION OF HEMOPHILIA CLINIC DIRECTORS OF CANADA Genetic linkage and association analysis in type 1 von Willebrand disease: results from the Canadian type 1 VWD study. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4(4):783–792.
    1. Eikenboom J, Van Marion V, Putter H, et al. Linkage analysis in families diagnosed with type 1 von Willebrand disease in the European study, molecular and clinical markers for the diagnosis and management of type 1 VWD. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4(4):774–782.
    1. Lavin M, Aguila S, Dalton N, et al. Significant gynecological bleeding in women with low von Willebrand factor levels. Blood Adv. 2018;2(14):1784–1791.
    1. Doherty D, Lavin M, O’Sullivan JM, et al. Management of elective procedures in low von Willebrand factor patients in the LoVIC study. J Thromb Haemost. 2021;19(3):701–710.
    1. Brown SA, Eldridge A, Collins PW, Bowen DJ. Increased clearance of von Willebrand factor antigen post-DDAVP in Type 1 von Willebrand disease: is it a potential pathogenic process? J Thromb Haemost. 2003;1(8):1714–1717.
    1. Haberichter SL. von Willebrand factor propeptide: biology and clinical utility. Blood. 2015;126(15):1753–1761.
    1. Ward SE, O’Sullivan JM, O’Donnell JS. The relationship between ABO blood group, von Willebrand factor, and primary hemostasis. Blood. 2020;136(25):2864–2874.
    1. O’Sullivan JM, Ward S, Lavin M, O’Donnell JS. von Willebrand factor clearance - biological mechanisms and clinical significance. Br J Haematol. 2018;183(2):185–195.
    1. Atiq F, Schütte LM, Looijen AEM, et al. von Willebrand factor and factor VIII levels after desmopressin are associated with bleeding phenotype in type 1 VWD. Blood Adv. 2019;3(24):4147–4154.
    1. Candy V, Whitworth H, Grabell J, et al. A decreased and less sustained desmopressin response in hemophilia A carriers contributes to bleeding. Blood Adv. 2018;2(20):2629–2636.
    1. Castaman G, Lethagen S, Federici AB, et al. Response to desmopressin is influenced by the genotype and phenotype in type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD): results from the European Study MCMDM-1VWD. Blood. 2008;111(7):3531–3539.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj