Regulation of hemichannels and gap junction channels by cytokines in antigen-presenting cells

Pablo J Sáez, Kenji F Shoji, Adam Aguirre, Juan C Sáez, Pablo J Sáez, Kenji F Shoji, Adam Aguirre, Juan C Sáez

Abstract

Autocrine and paracrine signals coordinate responses of several cell types of the immune system that provide efficient protection against different challenges. Antigen-presenting cells (APCs) coordinate activation of this system via homocellular and heterocellular interactions. Cytokines constitute chemical intercellular signals among immune cells and might promote pro- or anti-inflammatory effects. During the last two decades, two membrane pathways for intercellular communication have been demonstrated in cells of the immune system. They are called hemichannels (HCs) and gap junction channels (GJCs) and provide new insights into the mechanisms of the orchestrated response of immune cells. GJCs and HCs are permeable to ions and small molecules, including signaling molecules. The direct intercellular transfer between contacting cells can be mediated by GJCs, whereas the release to or uptake from the extracellular milieu can be mediated by HCs. GJCs and HCs can be constituted by two protein families: connexins (Cxs) or pannexins (Panxs), which are present in almost all APCs, being Cx43 and Panx1 the most ubiquitous members of each protein family. In this review, we focus on the effects of different cytokines on the intercellular communication mediated by HCs and GJCs in APCs and their impact on purinergic signaling.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Connexin 43 and pannexin1 at gene and protein levels. Left: a diagram depicting the genomic regions, mRNA, and membrane topology of human connexin 43 (Cx43, top left) and pannexin 1 (Panx1, bottom left). Genomic loci are represented by black boxes that stand for the corresponding exons. mRNA diagrams representing the exons as coding protein regions (red boxes) and 3′- and 5′-non-coding areas (purple boxes) are shown. The intron lengths are indicated in the schemes of genomic loci, and exon sizes are indicated in the mRNA diagrams. In the membrane topology the white squares indicate extracellular cysteine residues of each protein. Six protein subunits constitute a hemichannel (HC), which has different pore sizes. Right: two adjoining cells forming a gap junction channel (GJC) at the cell interface. Each cell presents HCs formed by Cx43 or Panx1. Arrows denote the bidirectional communication with the intracellular milieu (ICM) for GJCs and the extracellular milieu (ECM) for HCs; some immunorelevant molecules are shown. Dotted line for Ca2+ permeating Panx1 HCs indicates that this phenomenon is not fully demonstrated.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Connexin and pannexin expression in antigen-presenting cells. Summary scheme shows the expression of gap junction channels (GJCs) and hemichannels (HCs) formed by connexins (Cxs) and pannexins (Panxs) in different antigen-presenting cells (APCs). Question marks next to a protein (Cx or Panx) or channel type (GJC or HC) indicate that the expression or function remains unknown or is not fully shown.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Dendritic and B cells of mouse spleen present pannexin1. Immunofluorescence of adult mice spleen cryosections (8 μm thick) fixed in ethanol (70% v/v) at −20°C for 20 min, mounted in Fluoromount-G and observed in a confocal microscope (Olympus, FluoView FV1000). Pannexin1 (Panx1 in green: primary antibody: rabbit anti-Panx1 antibody and secondary antibody goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to FITC) immunoreactivity is shown. Cells were identified by their reactivity to specific antigens as follows: dendritic cells (DCs) by CD11c (blue, monoclonal mouse antibody conjugated to allophycocyanin) and B cells by B220 (red, monoclonal mouse antibody conjugated to phycoerythrin) in a follicle. Arrows denote follicular DCs (arrows). Merge is also shown. Scale bar: 100 μm.
Figure 4
Figure 4
IFN-γ or IL-6 increases dye uptake in dendritic cells. Bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) from balb/c mice were differentiated with 40 ng/mL GM-CSF and IL-4 for 7 days. At day 7, BMDCs were treated for 6 h with IFN-γ (10 ng/mL), IL-6 (10 ng/mL), or both, and ethidium uptake was evaluated in time-lapse experiments (Olympus BX 51W1I). (a) Left: fluorescence images of ethidium after 9 min of uptake. Scale bar: 50 μm. Right: ImageJ surface plot analysis of fluorescence intensity of the region indicated in the field (dotted square). (b) Top: time-lapse ethidium uptake under control conditions (white circles) or after 6 h treatment with IL-6 (yellow triangles) or IFN-γ (blue diamonds). Each point corresponds to the mean of 30 cells. After 10 min of recording, La3+ (200 μM) was added to the bath solution to block connexin hemichannels. Bottom: graph showing the basal dye uptake rate and the effect of La3+ on BMDCs after treatment with IFN-γ (blue bars), IL-6 (yellow bars), or both (green bars). Each bar corresponds to the mean ± SE (% of control condition, dotted line) of 3 independent experiments.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Expression of pannexin1 (Panx1) in Kupffer cells. Immunofluorescence analysis of liver cryosections (8 μm thick) obtained from adult wild-type (WT) and Panx1−/− adult (C57/BL6) mice was performed to analyze reactivity of Panx1 (green, primary antibody: rabbit anti-Panx1 antibody and secondary antibody goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to FITC) in ED2 (red: goat polyclonal antibody and secondary antibody mouse anti-goat conjugated to Cy3) positive cells, which correspond to Kupffer cells. Top panels correspond to a liver section of a WT mouse and bottom panels correspond to a liver section of a Panx1−/− mouse. No specific Panx1 reactivity was detected in Panx1−/− liver, but ED2 positive cells were evident. DAPI stain was used to visualize nuclei (blue), and merge is also shown. Panx1−/− mice were kindly donated by Dr. Hanna Monyer (University of Heidelberg, Germany). Bar: 10 μm.
Figure 6
Figure 6
B cells present pannexin1 at the cell surface. Confocal images (Olympus, FluoView FV1000) of immunofluorescence analysis of freshly isolated B cells fixed in ethanol (70%). B cells were isolated from peripheral lymph nodes by positive selection from balb/c mice. Top left: B cells were identified with IgG (conjugated to FITC, green); the inset shows the bright field. Top right: pannexin1 (Panx1) immunoreactivity (red, primary antibody: rabbit anti-Panx1 antibody and secondary antibody goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to Cy3) is shown. Bar: 20 μm. Middle left: using ImageJ colocalization finder, it can be seen that Panx1 colocalizes with IgG (white) at the cell surface in some B cells (white arrows). B cells with low or no colocalization are indicated (green arrows). Middle right: zoom and merge of IgG and Panx1 labeling in a B cell denoted by a dotted square at middle left panel. The white line denotes the region used for the line scan. Bar: 10 μm. Bottom: ImageJ line scan analysis shows the fluorescence intensity of each channel through the white line in the middle of each cell. The peak coincidence (denoted by dotted squares) is an index of colocalization between the different fluorophores.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Scheme of different stages of classical immune response. The reported role for connexin- and pannexin-based channels is depicted in different immune cells functions as migration, antigen presentation, clonal expansion, and apoptosis.

References

    1. Batista FD, Dustin ML. Cell: cell interactions in the immune system. Immunological Reviews. 2013;251(1):7–12.
    1. Gasteiger G, Rudensky AY. Interactions between innate and adaptive lymphocytes. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2014;14:631–639.
    1. Debets R, Savelkoul HFJ. Cytokines as cellular communicators. Mediators of Inflammation. 1996;5(6):417–423.
    1. Miyajima A, Kitamura T, Harada N, Yokota T, Arai K. Cytokine receptors and signal transduction. Annual Review of Immunology. 1992;10:295–331.
    1. Xie J, Tato CM, Davis MM. How the immune system talks to itself: the varied role of synapses. Immunological Reviews. 2013;251(1):65–79.
    1. Kapsenberg ML. Dendritic-cell control of pathogen-driven T-cell polarization. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2003;3(12):984–993.
    1. Dantzer R, O'Connor JC, Freund GG, Johnson RW, Kelley KW. From inflammation to sickness and depression: when the immune system subjugates the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2008;9(1):46–56.
    1. McInnes IB, Schett G. Cytokines in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2007;7(6):429–442.
    1. Dranoff G. Cytokines in cancer pathogenesis and cancer therapy. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2004;4(1):11–22.
    1. Meager A. Cytokine regulation of cellular adhesion molecule expression in inflammation. Cytokine and Growth Factor Reviews. 1999;10(1):27–39.
    1. Hornung V, Hartamann R, Ablasser A, Hopfner KP. OAS proteins and cGAS: unifying concepts in sensing and responding to cytosolic nucleic acids. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2014;14:521–528.
    1. Bopp T, Becker C, Klein M, et al. Cyclic adenosine monophosphate is a key component of regulatory T cell-mediated suppression. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2007;204(6):1303–1310.
    1. Elgueta R, Tobar JA, Shoji KF, et al. Gap junctions at the dendritic cell-T cell interface are key elements for antigen-dependent T cell activation. The Journal of Immunology. 2009;183(1):277–284.
    1. Neijssen J, Pang B, Neefjes J. Gap junction-mediated intercellular communication in the immune system. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. 2007;94(1-2):207–218.
    1. Ring S, Karakhanova S, Johnson T, Enk AH, Mahnke K. Gap junctions between regulatory T cells and dendritic cells prevent sensitization of CD8+ T cells. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2010;125(1):237.e7–246.e7.
    1. Saccheri F, Pozzi C, Avogadri F, et al. Bacteria-induced gap junctions in tumors favor antigen cross-presentation and antitumor immunity. Science Translational Medicine. 2010;2(44)44ra57
    1. Sáez JC, Araya R, Brañes MC, et al. Chapter 25: gap junctions in inflammatory responses: connexins, regulation and possible functional roles. (Gap Junctions—Molecular Basis of Cell Communication in Health and Disease).Current Topics in Membranes. 2000;49:555–579.
    1. Sáez JC, Berthoud VM, Brañes MC, Martínez AD, Beyer EC. Plasma membrane channels formed by connexins: their regulation and functions. Physiological Reviews. 2003;83:1359–1400.
    1. D'Hondt C, Iyyathurai J, Vinken M, et al. Regulation of connexin- and pannexin-based channels by post-translational modifications. Biology of the Cell. 2013;105(9):373–398.
    1. D’hondt C, Ponsaerts R, de Smedt H, Bultynck G, Himpens B. Pannexins, distant relatives of the connexin family with specific cellular functions? BioEssays. 2009;31(9):953–974.
    1. Ablasser A, Schmid-Burgk JL, Hemmerling I, et al. Cell intrinsic immunity spreads to bystander cells via the intercellular transfer of cGAMP. Nature. 2013;503:530–534.
    1. Harris AL. Connexin channel permeability to cytoplasmic molecules. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. 2007;94(1-2):120–143.
    1. Katakowski M, Buller B, Wang X, Rogers T, Chopp M. Functional microRNA is transferred between glioma cells. Cancer Research. 2010;70(21):8259–8263.
    1. Mendoza-Naranjo A, Saéz PJ, Johansson CC, et al. Functional gap junctions facilitate melanoma antigen transfer and cross-presentation between human dendritic cells. The Journal of Immunology. 2007;178(11):6949–6957.
    1. Neijssen J, Herberts C, Drijfhout JW, Reits E, Janssen L, Neefjes J. Cross-presentation by intercellular peptide transfer through gap junctions. Nature. 2005;434(7029):83–88.
    1. Tour O, Adams SR, Kerr RA, et al. Calcium Green FlAsH as a genetically targeted small-molecule calcium indicator. Nature Chemical Biology. 2007;3(7):423–431.
    1. Bruzzone R, Hormuzdi SG, Barbe MT, Herb A, Monyer H. Pannexins, a family of gap junction proteins expressed in brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2003;100(23):13644–13649.
    1. Vanden Abeele F, Bidaux G, Gordienko D, et al. Functional implications of calcium permeability of the channel formed by pannexin 1. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2006;174(4):535–546.
    1. Ishikawa M, Iwamoto T, Nakamura T, Doyle A, Fukumoto S, Yamada Y. Pannexin 3 functions as an ER Ca2+ channel, hemichannel, and gap junction to promote osteoblast differentiation. Journal of Cell Biology. 2011;193(7):1257–1274.
    1. Sosinsky GE, Boassa D, Dermietzel R, et al. Pannexin channels are not gap junction hemichannels. Channels. 2011;5(3):193–197.
    1. Ambrosi C, Gassmann O, Pranskevich JN, et al. Pannexin1 and pannexin2 channels show quaternary similarities to connexons and different oligomerization numbers from each other. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2010;285(32):24420–24431.
    1. Romanov RA, Bystrova MF, Rogachevskaya OA, Sadovnikov VB, Shestopalov VI, Kolesnikov SS. The ATP permeability of pannexin 1 channels in a heterologous system and in mammalian taste cells is dispensable. Journal of Cell Science. 2012;125(22):5514–5523.
    1. Cea LA, Cisterna BA, Puebla C, Frank M, Figueroa XF. De novo expression of connexin hemichannels in denervated fast skeletal muscles leads to atrophy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013;110:16229–16234.
    1. Junger WG. Immune cell regulation by autocrine purinergic signalling. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2011;11(3):201–212.
    1. Baroja-Mazo A, Barberà-Cremades M, Pelegrín P. The participation of plasma membrane hemichannels to purinergic signaling. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta: Biomembranes. 2013;1828(1):79–93.
    1. Decrock E, Vinken M, Bol M, et al. Calcium and connexin-based intercellular communication, a deadly catch? Cell Calcium. 2011;50(3):310–321.
    1. Pelegrin P, Surprenant A. The P2X7 receptor—pannexin connection to dye uptake and IL-1β release. Purinergic Signalling. 2009;5(2):129–137.
    1. Contreras JE, Sánchez HA, Eugenin EA, et al. Metabolic inhibition induces opening of unapposed connexin 43 gap junction hemichannels and reduces gap junctional communication in cortical astrocytes in culture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2002;99(1):495–500.
    1. Pelegrin P, Surprenant A. Pannexin-1 mediates large pore formation and interleukin-1β release by the ATP-gated P2X7 receptor. EMBO Journal. 2006;25(21):5071–5082.
    1. Schalper KA, Palacios-Prado N, Orellana JA, Sáez JC. Currently used methods for identification and characterization of hemichannels. Cell Communication and Adhesion. 2008;15(1-2):207–218.
    1. Koulakoff A, Mei X, Orellana JA, Sáez JC, Giaume C. Glial connexin expression and function in the context of Alzheimer's disease. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Biomembranes. 2012;1818(8):2048–2057.
    1. Sáez JC, Brañes MC, Corvalán LA, et al. Gap junctions in cells of the immune system: structure, regulation and possible functional roles. Brazilian Journal Of Medical and Biological Research. 2000;33:447–455.
    1. Robertson JD. The occurrence of a subunit pattern in the unit membranes of club endings in mauthner cell synapses in goldfish brains. Journal of Cell Biology. 1963;19:201–221.
    1. Revel JP, Yee AG, Hudspeth AJ. Gap junctions between electrotonically coupled cells in tissue culture and in brown fat. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1971;68(12):2924–2927.
    1. Revel JP, Karnovsky MJ. Hexagonal array of subunits in intercellular junctions of the mouse heart and liver. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1967;33(3):C7–C12.
    1. Pappas GD, Asada Y, Bennett MV. Morphological correlates of increased coupling resistance at an electrotonic synapse. Journal of Cell Biology. 1971;49(1):173–188.
    1. Barr L, Dewey MM, Berger W. Propagation of action potentials and the structure of the nexus in cardiac muscle. The Journal of General Physiology. 1965;48:797–823.
    1. Simpson I, Rose B, Loewenstein WR. Size limit of molecules permeating the junctional membrane channels. Science. 1977;195(4275):294–296.
    1. Sáez JC, Connor JA, Spray DC, Bennett MVL. Hepatocyte gap junctions are permeable to the second messenger, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, and to calcium ions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1989;86(8):2708–2712.
    1. Tsien RW, Weingart R. Inotropic effect of cyclic AMP in calf ventricular muscle studied by a cut end method. Journal of Physiology. 1976;260(1):117–141.
    1. Brand CU, Hunziker T, Schaffner T, Limat A, Gerber HA, Braathen LR. Activated immunocompetent cells in human skin lymph derived from irritant contact dermatitis: an immunomorphological study. The British Journal of Dermatology. 1995;132(1):39–45.
    1. Concha M, Vidal A, Garces G, Figueroa CD, Caorsi I. Physical interaction between Langerhans cells and T-lymphocytes during antigen presentation in vitro . Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 1993;100(4):429–434.
    1. Valiunas V, Polosina YY, Miller H, et al. Connexin-specific cell-to-cell transfer of short interfering RNA by gap junctions. Journal of Physiology. 2005;568(2):459–468.
    1. Tsitsiou E, Lindsay MA. microRNAs and the immune response. Current Opinion in Pharmacology. 2009;9(4):514–520.
    1. Aucher A, Rudnicka D, Davis DM. MicroRNAs transfer from human macrophages to hepato-carcinoma cells and inhibit proliferation. The Journal of Immunology. 2013;191:6250–6260.
    1. Vig M, Kinet J. Calcium signaling in immune cells. Nature Immunology. 2009;10(1):21–27.
    1. Gossman DG, Zhao H-B. Hemichannel-mediated inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) release in the cochlea: a novel mechanism of IP3 intercellular signaling. Cell Communication & Adhesion. 2008;15(4):305–315.
    1. Braet K, Vandamme W, Martin PEM, Evans WH, Leybaert L. Photoliberating inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate triggers ATP release that is blocked by the connexin mimetic peptide gap 26. Cell Calcium. 2003;33(1):37–48.
    1. Miller AT, Chamberlain PP, Cooke MP. Beyond IP3: roles for higher order inositol phosphates in immune cell signaling. Cell Cycle. 2008;7(4):463–467.
    1. Yang W, Nurbaeva MK, Schmid E, et al. Akt2- and ETS1-dependent IP3 receptor 2 expression in dendritic cell migration. Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry. 2014;33:222–236.
    1. Mendoza-Naranjo A, Bouma G, Pereda C, et al. Functional gap junctions accumulate at the immunological synapse and contribute to T cell activation. Journal of Immunology. 2011;187(6):3121–3132.
    1. Sánchez HA, Orellana JA, Verselis VK, Sáez JC. Metabolic inhibition increases activity of connexin-32 hemichannels permeable to Ca2+ in transfected HeLa cells. The American Journal of Physiology—Cell Physiology. 2009;297(3):C665–C678.
    1. Fiori MC, Figueroa V, Zoghbi ME, Saéz JC, Reuss L, Altenberg GA. Permeation of calcium through purified connexin 26 hemichannels. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2012;287(48):40826–40834.
    1. Figueroa V, Sáez PJ, Salas JD, et al. Linoleic acid induces opening of connexin26 hemichannels through a PI3K/Akt/Ca2 +-dependent pathway. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2013;1828(3):1169–1179.
    1. De Bock M, Wang N, Bol M, et al. Connexin 43 hemichannels contribute to cytoplasmic Ca2+ oscillations by providing a bimodal Ca2+-dependent Ca2+ entry pathway. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2012;287(15):12250–12266.
    1. Schalper KA, Sánchez HA, Lee SC, Altenberg GA, Nathanson MH, Sáez JC. Connexin 43 hemichannels mediate the Ca2+ influx induced by extracellular alkalinization. The American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology. 2010;299(6):C1504–C1515.
    1. Sánchez HA, Meşe G, Srinivas M, White TW, Verselis VK. Differentially altered Ca2+ regulation and Ca2+ permeability in Cx26 hemichannels formed by the A40V and G45E mutations that cause keratitis ichthyosis deafness syndrome. Journal of General Physiology. 2010;136(1):47–62.
    1. Malavasi F, Deaglio S, Funaro A, et al. Evolution and function of the ADP ribosyl cyclase/CD38 gene family in physiology and pathology. Physiological Reviews. 2008;88(3):841–886.
    1. Bruzzone S, Franco L, Guida L, et al. A self-restricted CD38-connexin 43 cross-talk affects NAD+ and cyclic ADP-ribose metabolism and regulates intracellular calcium in 3T3 fibroblasts. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2001;276(51):48300–48308.
    1. Bruzzone S, Guida L, Zocchi E, Franco L, de Flora A. Connexin 43 hemi channels mediate Ca2+-regulated transmembrane NAD+ fluxes in intact cells. The FASEB Journal. 2001;15(1):10–12.
    1. Xu XJ, Boumechache M, Robinson LE, et al. Splice variants of the P2X7 receptor reveal differential agonist dependence and functional coupling with pannexin-1. Journal of Cell Science. 2012;125(16):3776–3789.
    1. Song E, Rah S, Lee Y, et al. Connexin-43 hemichannels mediate cyclic ADP-ribose generation and its Ca2+-mobilizing activity by NAD+/cyclic ADP-ribose transport. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2011;286(52):44480–44490.
    1. Ma Y, Cao W, Wang L, et al. Basal CD38/cyclic ADP-ribose-dependent signaling mediates ATP release and survival of microglia by modulating connexin 43 hemichannels. Glia. 2014;62(6):943–955.
    1. Bours MJL, Swennen ELR, di Virgilio F, Cronstein BN, Dagnelie PC. Adenosine 5′-triphosphate and adenosine as endogenous signaling molecules in immunity and inflammation. Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2006;112(2):358–404.
    1. Kono H, Rock KL. How dying cells alert the immune system to danger. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2008;8(4):279–289.
    1. Wang N, de Bock M, Decrock E, et al. Paracrine signaling through plasma membrane hemichannels. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Biomembranes. 2013;1828(1):35–50.
    1. Rodriguez M, Domingo E, Municio C, Alvarez Y, Hugo E. Polarization of the innate immune response by prostaglandin E2: a puzzle of receptors and signals. Molecular Pharmacology. 2014;85:187–197.
    1. Cheng B, Kato Y, Zhao S, et al. PGE2 is essential for gap junction-mediated Intercellular communication between osteocyte-like MLO-Y4 cells in response to mechanical strain. Endocrinology. 2001;142(8):3464–3473.
    1. Jiang JX, Cherian PP. Hemichannels formed by connexin 43 play an important role in the release of protaglandin E2 by osteocytes in response to mechanical strain. Cell Communication and Adhesion. 2003;10(4–6):259–264.
    1. Barbera-Cremades M, Baroja-Mazo A, Gomez AI, Machado F, Di Virgilio F, Pelegriń P. P2X7 receptor-stimulation causes fever via PGE2 and IL-1β release. The FASEB Journal. 2012;26(7):2951–2962.
    1. Hülser DF, Peters JH. Intercellular communication in phytohemagglutinin-induced lymphocyte agglutinates. European Journal of Immunology. 1971;1(6):494–495.
    1. Hülser DF, Peters JH. Contact cooperation in stimulated lymphocytes. II. Electrophysiological investigations on intercellular communication. Experimental Cell Research. 1972;74(2):319–326.
    1. Eugenín EA. Role of Connexin/Pannexin containing channels in infectious diseases. FEBS Letters. 2014;588(8):1389–1395.
    1. Gao D, Wu J, Wu Y, et al. Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase is an innate immune sensor of HIV and other retroviruses. Science. 2013;341(6148):903–906.
    1. Lahaye X, Satoh T, Gentili M, et al. The capsids of HIV-1 and HIV-2 determine immune detection of the viral cDNA by the innate sensor cGAS in dendritic cells. Immunity. 2013;39(6):1132–1142.
    1. Corvalán LA, Araya R, Brañes MC, et al. Injury of skeletal muscle and specific cytokines induce the expression of gap junction channels in mouse dendritic cells. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2007;211:649–660.
    1. Matsue H, Yao J, Matsue K, et al. Gap junction-mediated intercellular communication between dendritic cells (DCs) is required for effective activation of DCs. The Journal of Immunology. 2006;176(1):181–190.
    1. Porvaznik M, MacVittie TJ. Detection of gap junctions between the progeny of a canine macrophage colony-forming cell in vitro. Journal of Cell Biology. 1979;82(2):555–564.
    1. Levy JA, Weiss RM, Dirksen ER, Rosen MR. Possible communication between murine macrophages oriented in linear chains in tissue culture. Experimental Cell Research. 1976;103(2):375–385.
    1. Concha M, Figueroa CD, Caorsi I. Ultrastructural characteristics of the contact zones between Langerhans cells and lymphocytes. Journal of Pathology. 1988;156(1):29–36.
    1. Krenacs T, Rosendaal M. Immunohistological detection of gap junctions in human lymphoid tissue: connexin43 in follicular dendritic and lymphoendothelial cells. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry. 1995;43(11):1125–1137.
    1. Krenacs T, Rosendaal M. Gap-junction communication pathways in germinal center reactions. Developmental Immunology. 1998;6(1-2):111–118.
    1. Krenacs T, Van Dartel M, Lindhout E, Rosendaal M. Direct cell/cell communication in the lymphoid germinal center: connexin43 gap junctions functionally couple follicular dendritic cells to each other and to B lymphocytes. European Journal of Immunology. 1997;27(6):1489–1497.
    1. Alves LA, Coutinho-Silva R, Persechini PM, Spray DC, Savino W, Campos de Carvalho AC. Are there functional gap junctions or junctional hemichannels in macrophages? Blood. 1996;88(1):328–334.
    1. Orellana JA, Sáez PJ, Shoji KF, et al. Modulation of brain hemichannels and gap junction channels by pro-inflammatory agents and their possible role in neurodegeneration. Antioxidants and Redox Signaling. 2009;11(2):369–399.
    1. Sáez PJ, Shoji KF, Retamal MA, et al. ATP is required and advances cytokine-induced gap junction formation in microglia in vitro. Mediators of Inflammation. 2013;2013:16 pages.216402
    1. Steinman RM, Cohn ZA. Identification of a novel cell type in peripheral lymphoid organs of mice. I. Morphology, quantitation, tissue distribution. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 1973;137(5):1142–1162.
    1. Liu K, Nussenzweig MC. Origin and development of dendritic cells. Immunological Reviews. 2010;234(1):45–54.
    1. Sluyter R, Wiley JS. Extracellular adenosine 5′-triphosphate induces a loss of CD23 from human dendritic cells via activation of P2X7 receptors. International Immunology. 2002;14(12):1415–1421.
    1. Nihei OK, de Carvalho ACC, Savino W, Alves LA. Pharmacologic properties of P2Z/P2X7 receptor characterized in murine dendritic cells: role on the induction of apoptosis. Blood. 2000;96(3):996–1005.
    1. Coutinho-Silva R, Persechini PM, Da Cunha Bisaggio R, et al. P(2Z)/P2X7 receptor-dependent apoptosis of dendritic cells. The American Journal of Physiology—Cell Physiology. 1999;276(5):C1139–C1147.
    1. Georgiou JG, Skarratt KK, Fuller SJ, et al. Human epidermal and monocyte-derived langerhans cells express functional P2X7 receptors. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2005;125(3):482–490.
    1. Kurashima Y, Amiya T, Nochi T, et al. Extracellular ATP mediates mast cell-dependent intestinal inflammation through P2X7 purinoceptors. Nature Communications. 2012;3, article 1034
    1. Shestopalov VI, Panchin Y. Pannexins and gap junction protein diversity. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2008;65(3):376–394.
    1. He Y, Franchi L, Núñez G. TLR agonists stimulate Nlrp3-dependent IL-1β production independently of the purinergic P2X7 receptor in dendritic cells and in vivo. Journal of Immunology. 2013;190(1):334–339.
    1. Mazzini E, Massimiliano L, Penna G, Rescigno M. Oral tolerance can be established via gap junction transfer of fed antigens from CX3CR1+ macrophages to CD103+ dendritic cells. Immunity. 2014;40(2):248–261.
    1. Tittarelli A, Mendoza-Naranjo A, Farias M, et al. Gap junction intercellular communications regulate NK cell activation and modulate NK cytotoxic capacity. Journal of Immunology. 2014;192:1313–1319.
    1. Zimmerli SC, Masson F, Cancela J, Meda P, Hauser C. Cutting edge: lack of evidence for connexin-43 expression in human epidermal langerhans cells. The Journal of Immunology. 2007;179(7):4318–4321.
    1. Deluca LS, Gommerman JL. Fine-tuning of dendritic cell biology by the TNF superfamily. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2012;12(5):339–351.
    1. Sims JE, Smith DE. The IL-1 family: regulators of immunity. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2010;10(2):89–102.
    1. Fricke I, Mitchell D, Mittelstädt J, et al. Mycobacteria induce IFN-γ production in human dendritic cells via triggering of TLR2. The Journal of Immunology. 2006;176(9):5173–5182.
    1. Frucht DM, Fukao T, Bogdan C, Schindler H, O'Shea JJ, Koyasu S. IFN-γ production by antigen-presenting cells: mechanisms emerge. Trends in Immunology. 2001;22(10):556–560.
    1. Coccia EM. IFN regulation and functions in myeloid dendritic cells. Cytokine and Growth Factor Reviews. 2008;19(1):21–32.
    1. Platanias LC. Mechanisms of type-I- and type-II-interferon-mediated signalling. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2005;5(5):375–386.
    1. Hirano T, Yasukawa K, Harada H, et al. Complementary DNA for a novel human interleukin (BSF-2) that induces B lymphocytes to produce immunoglobulin. Nature. 1986;324(6092):73–76.
    1. Kimura A, Kishimoto T. IL-6: regulator of Treg/Th17 balance. European Journal of Immunology. 2010;40(7):1830–1835.
    1. Neurath MF, Finotto S. IL-6 signaling in autoimmunity, chronic inflammation and inflammation-associated cancer. Cytokine and Growth Factor Reviews. 2011;22(2):83–89.
    1. Pedersen BK. IL-6 signalling in exercise and disease. Biochemical Society Transactions. 2007;35(5):1295–1297.
    1. Xing Z, Gauldie J, Cox G, et al. IL-6 is an antiinflammatory cytokine required for controlling local or systemic acute inflammatory responses. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1998;101(2):311–320.
    1. Park SJ, Nakagawa T, Kitamura H, et al. IL-6 regulates in vivo dendritic cell differentiation through STAT3 activation. Journal of Immunology. 2004;173(6):3844–3854.
    1. Yoshimura A, Naka T, Kubo M. SOCS proteins, cytokine signalling and immune regulation. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2007;7(6):454–465.
    1. Langerhans P. Ueber die Nerven der menschlichen Haut. Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin. 1868;44(2-3):325–337.
    1. Stingl G, Tamaki K, Katz SI. Origin and function of epidermal Langerhans cells. Immunological Reviews. 1980;53:149–174.
    1. Hieronymus T, Zenke M, Baek JH, Sere K. The clash of Langerhans cell homeostasis in skin: should I stay or should I go? Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. 2014
    1. Ng LG, Hsu A, Mandell MA, et al. Migratory dermal dendritic cells act as rapid sensors of protozoan parasites. PLoS Pathogens. 2008;4(11):p. e1000222.
    1. Banchereau J, Thompson-Snipes L, Zurawski S, et al. The differential production of cytokines by human Langerhans cells and dermal CD14 + DCs controls CTL priming. Blood. 2012;119(24):5742–5749.
    1. Hunger RE, Sieling PA, Ochoa MT, et al. Langerhans cells utilize CD1a and langerin to efficiently present nonpeptide antigens to T cells. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2004;113(5):701–708.
    1. Romani N, Lenz A, Glassel H, et al. Cultured human Langerhans cells resemble lymphoid dendritic cells in phenotype and function. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 1989;93(5):600–609.
    1. Merad M, Ginhoux F, Collin M. Origin, homeostasis and function of Langerhans cells and other langerin-expressing dendritic cells. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2008;8(12):935–947.
    1. Romani N, Brunner PM, Stingl G. Changing views of the role of langerhans cells. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2012;132(3):872–881.
    1. Celetti SJ, Cowan KN, Penuela S, Shao Q, Churko J, Laird DW. Implications of pannexin 1 and pannexin 3 for keratinocyte differentiation. Journal of Cell Science. 2010;123(8):1363–1372.
    1. Tran JNSN, Pupovac A, Taylor RM, Wiley JS, Byrne SN, Sluyter R. Murine epidermal Langerhans cells and keratinocytes express functional P2X7 receptors. Experimental Dermatology. 2010;19(8):e151–e157.
    1. Granstein RD, Ding W, Huang J, et al. Augmentation of cutaneous immune responses by ATPγS: purinergic agonists define a novel class of immunologic adjuvants. Journal of Immunology. 2005;174(4):7725–7731.
    1. El Shikh MEM, Pitzalis C. Follicular dendritic cells in health and disease. Frontiers in Immunology. 2012;3(article 292)
    1. Batista FD, Harwood NE. The who, how and where of antigen presentation to B cells. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2009;9(1):15–27.
    1. Shi C, Pamer EG. Monocyte recruitment during infection and inflammation. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2011;11(11):762–774.
    1. Gordon S, Taylor PR. Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2005;5(12):953–964.
    1. Asgari E, Le Friec G, Yamamoto H, et al. C3a modulates IL-1beta secretion in human monocytes by regulating ATP efflux and subsequent NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Blood. 2013;122:3473–3481.
    1. Caillou B, Talbot M, Weyemi U, et al. Tumor-Associated macrophages (TAMs) form an interconnected cellular supportive network in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(7)e22567
    1. Eugenín EA, Brañes MC, Berman JW, Sáez JC. TNF-α plus IFN-γ induce connexin43 expression and formation of gap junctions between human monocytes/macrophages that enhance physiological responses. The Journal of Immunology. 2003;170(3):1320–1328.
    1. Jara PI, Boric MP, Sáez JC. Leukocytes express connexin 43 after activation with lipopolysaccharide and appear to form gap junctions with endothelial cells after ischemia- reperfusion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1995;92(15):7011–7015.
    1. Véliz LP, González FG, Duling BR, Sáez JC, Boric MP. Functional role of gap junctions in cytokine-induced leukocyte adhesion to endothelium in vivo. The American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 2008;295(3):H1056–H1066.
    1. Wasseff SK, Scherer SS. Activated microglia do not form functional gap junctions in vivo. Journal of Neuroimmunology. 2014;269(1-2):90–93.
    1. Westphalen K, Gusarova GA, Islam MN, et al. Sessile alveolar macrophages communicate with alveolar epithelium to modulate immunity. Nature. 2014;506:503–506.
    1. Bermudez-Fajardo A, Ylihärsilä M, Evans WH, Newby AC, Oviedo-Orta E. CD4+ T lymphocyte subsets express connexin 43 and establish gap junction channel communication with macrophages in vitro. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2007;82(3):608–612.
    1. Yuan D, Wang Q, Wu D, et al. Monocyte-endothelial adhesion is modulated by Cx43-stimulated ATP release from monocytes. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2012;420(3):536–541.
    1. Wong CW, Christen T, Roth I, et al. Connexin37 protects against atherosclerosis by regulating monocyte adhesion. Nature Medicine. 2006;12(8):950–954.
    1. Gu BJ, Zhang WY, Bendall LJ, Chessell IP, Buell GN, Wiley JS. Expression of P2X(7) purinoceptors on human lymphocytes and monocytes: evidence for nonfunctional P2X7 receptors. American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology. 2000;279(4):C1189–C1197.
    1. Ali SR, Timmer AM, Bilgrami S, et al. Anthrax toxin induces macrophage death by p38 MAPK inhibition but leads to inflammasome activation via ATP leakage. Immunity. 2011;35(1):34–44.
    1. Anand RJ, Dai S, Gribar SC, et al. A role for connexin43 in macrophage phagocytosis and host survival after bacterial peritoneal infection. Journal of Immunology. 2008;181(12):8534–8543.
    1. Beyer EC, Steinberg TH. Evidence that the gap junction protein connexin-43 is the ATP-induced pore of mouse macrophages. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1991;266(13):7971–7974.
    1. Fortes FSA, Pecora IL, Persechini PM, et al. Modulation of intercellular communication in macrophages: possible interactions between GAP junctions and P2 receptors. Journal of Cell Science. 2004;117(20):4717–4726.
    1. Glass AM, Wolf BJ, Schneider KM, Princiotta MF, Taffet SM. Connexin43 is dispensable for phagocytosis. Journal of Immunology. 2013;190(9):4830–4835.
    1. Monick MM, Carter AB, Robeff PK, Flaherty DM, Peterson MW, Hunninghake GW. Lipopolysaccharide activates Akt in human alveolar macrophages resulting in nuclear accumulation and transcriptional activity of β-catenin. The Journal of Immunology. 2001;166(7):4713–4720.
    1. Polacek D, Lal R, Volin MV, Davies PF. Gap junctional communication between vascular cells: induction of connexin43 messenger RNA in macrophage foam cells of atherosclerotic lesions. The American Journal of Pathology. 1993;142(2):593–606.
    1. Ayna G, Krysko DV, Kaczmarek A, Petrovski G, Vandenabeele P, Fésüs L. ATP release from dying autophagic cells and their phagocytosis are crucial for inflammasome activation in macrophages. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(6)e40069
    1. Figueroa XF, Lillo MA, Gaete PS, Riquelme MA, Sáez JC. Diffusion of nitric oxide across cell membranes of the vascular wall requires specific connexin-based channels. Neuropharmacology. 2013;75:471–478.
    1. Anand RJ, Dai S, Rippel C, et al. Activated macrophages inhibit enterocyte gap junctions via the release of nitric oxide. American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 2008;294(1):G109–G119.
    1. Pelegrin P, Surprenant A. Pannexin-1 couples to maitotoxin- and nigericin-induced interleukin-1β release through a dye uptake-independent pathway. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2007;282(4):2386–2394.
    1. Lopez-Castejón G, Baroja-Mazo A, Pelegrín P. Novel macrophage polarization model: from gene expression to identification of new anti-inflammatory molecules. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2011;68(18):3095–3107.
    1. Martínez FO, Gordon S. The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: time for reassessment. F1000Prime Reports. 2014;6, article 13
    1. Kiel MJ, Morrison SJ. Uncertainty in the niches that maintain haematopoietic stem cells. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2008;8(4):290–301.
    1. Thomson AW, Knolle PA. Antigen-presenting cell function in the tolerogenic liver environment. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2010;10(11):753–766.
    1. Pulford K, Souhami RL. Cell division and giant cell formation in Kupffer cell cultures. Clinical and Experimental Immunology. 1980;42(1):67–76.
    1. Ishibashi H, Nakamura M, Komori A, Migita K, Shimoda S. Liver architecture, cell function, and disease. Seminars in Immunopathology. 2009;31(3):399–409.
    1. Beattie L, Peltan A, Maroof A, et al. Dynamic imaging of experimental Leishmania donovani-induced hepatic granulomas detects kupffer cell-restricted antigen presentation to antigen-specific CD8 T cells. PLoS Pathogens. 2010;6(3)e1000805
    1. Knolle PA, Gerken G. Local control of the immune response in the liver. Immunological Reviews. 2000;174:21–34.
    1. Eugenín EA, González HE, Sanchez HA, Brañes MC, Sáez JC. Inflammatory conditions induce gap junctional communication between rat Kupffer cells both in vivo and in vitro. Cellular Immunology. 2007;247:103–110.
    1. González HE, Eugenín EA, Garcés G. Regulation of hepatic connexins in cholestasis: possible involvement of Kupffer cells and inflammatory mediators. American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 2002;282:G991–G1001.
    1. Takayanagi H. Osteoimmunology: shared mechanisms and crosstalk between the immune and bone systems. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2007;7(4):292–304.
    1. Buchwald ZS, Aurora R. Osteoclasts and CD8 T cells form a negative feedback loop that contributes to homeostasis of both the skeletal and immune systems. Clinical and Developmental Immunology. 2013;2013:9 pages.429373
    1. Batra N, Kar R, Jiang JX. Gap junctions and hemichannels in signal transmission, function and development of bone. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta: Biomembranes. 2012;1818(8):1909–1918.
    1. Watkins M, Grimston SK, Norris JY, et al. Osteoblast connexin43 modulates skeletal architecture by regulating both arms of bone remodeling. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 2011;22(8):1240–1251.
    1. Tsuchida S, Arai Y, Kishida T, et al. Silencing the expression of connexin 43 decreases inflammation and joint destruction in experimental arthritis. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2013;31(4):525–530.
    1. Zhang Y, Paul EM, Sathyendra V, et al. Enhanced osteoclastic resorption and responsiveness to mechanical load in gap junction deficient bone. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(8)e23516
    1. Schilling AF, Filke S, Lange T, et al. Gap junctional communication in human osteoclasts in vitro and in vivo . Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 2008;12(6A):2497–2504.
    1. Herde K, Hartmann S, Brehm R, et al. Connexin 43 expression of foreign body giant cells after implantation of nanoparticulate hydroxyapatite. Biomaterials. 2007;28(33):4912–4921.
    1. Matemba SF, Lie A, Ransjö M. Regulation of osteoclastogenesis by gap junction communication. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. 2006;99(2):528–537.
    1. Ransjö M, Sahli J, Lie A. Expression of connexin 43 mRNA in microisolated murine osteoclasts and regulation of bone resorption in vitro by gap junction inhibitors. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2003;303(4):1179–1185.
    1. Ilvesaro J, Tavi P, Tuukkanen J. Connexin-mimetic peptide Gap 27 decreases osteoclastic activity. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2001;2, article 10
    1. Ilvesaro J, Väänänen K, Tuukkanen J. Bone-resorbing osteoclasts contain gap-junctional connexin-43. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2000;15(5):919–926.
    1. Jones SJ, Gray C, Sakamaki H, et al. The incidence and size of gap junctions between the bone cells in rat calvaria. Anatomy and Embryology. 1993;187(4):343–352.
    1. Lemaire I, Falzoni S, Zhang B, Pellegatti P, di Virgilio F. The P2X7 receptor and pannexin-1 are both required for the promotion of multinucleated macrophages by the inflammatory cytokine GM-CSF. Journal of Immunology. 2011;187(7):3878–3887.
    1. Hanisch U. Microglia as a source and target of cytokines. GLIA. 2002;40(2):140–155.
    1. Ransohoff RM, Perry VH. Microglial physiology: unique stimuli, specialized responses. Annual Review of Immunology. 2009;27:119–145.
    1. Kettenmann H, Hanisch UK, Noda M, Verkhratsky A. Physiology of microglia. Physiological Reviews. 2011;91(2):461–553.
    1. Takeuchi H, Jin S, Wang J, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-α induces neurotoxicity via glutamate release from hemichannels of activated microglia in an autocrine manner. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2006;281(30):21362–21368.
    1. Samuels SE, Lipitz JB, Wang J, Dahl G, Muller KJ. Arachidonic acid closes innexin/pannexin channels and thereby inhibits microglia cell movement to a nerve injury. Developmental Neurobiology. 2013;73(8):621–631.
    1. Orellana JA, Shoji KF, Abudara V, et al. Amyloid β-induced death in neurons involves glial and neuronal hemichannels. Journal of Neuroscience. 2011;31(13):4962–4977.
    1. Fontainhas AM, Wang M, Liang KJ, et al. Microglial morphology and dynamic behavior is regulated by ionotropic glutamatergic and GABAergic neurotransmission. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(1)e15973
    1. Davalos D, Grutzendler J, Yang G, et al. ATP mediates rapid microglial response to local brain injury in vivo . Nature Neuroscience. 2005;8(6):752–758.
    1. Shaikh SB, Uy B, Perera A, Nicholson LFB. AGEs-RAGE mediated up-regulation of connexin43 in activated human microglial CHME-5 cells. Neurochemistry International. 2012;60(6):640–651.
    1. Garg S, Syed MM, Kielian T. Staphylococcus aureus-derived peptidoglycan induces Cx43 expression and functional gap junction intercellular communication in microglia. Journal of Neurochemistry. 2005;95(2):475–483.
    1. Dobrenis K, Chang H-Y, Pina-Benabou MH, et al. Human and mouse microglia express connexin36, and functional gap junctions are formed between rodent microglia and neurons. Journal of Neuroscience Research. 2005;82(3):306–315.
    1. Martínez AD, Eugenín EA, Brañes MC, Bennett MV, Sáez JC. Identification of second messengers that induce expression of functional gap junctions in microglia cultured from newborn rats. Brain Research. 2002;943:191–201.
    1. Eugenín EA, Eckardt D, Theis M, Willecke K, Bennett MVL, Sáez JC. Microglia at brain stab wounds express connexin 43 and in vitro form functional gap junctions after treatment with interferon-γ and tumor necrosis factor-α. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2001;98(7):4190–4195.
    1. Nagy JI, Li W, Hertzberg EL, Marotta CA. Elevated connexin43 immunoreactivity at sites of amyloid plaques in Alzheimer's disease. Brain Research. 1996;717(1-2):173–178.
    1. Ásgeirsson KS, Ólafsdóttir K, Jónasson JG, Ógmundsdóttir HM. The effects of IL-6 on cell adhesion and E-cadherin expression in breast cancer. Cytokine. 1998;10(9):720–728.
    1. Cao F, Eckert R, Elfgang C, et al. A quantitative analysis of connexin-specific permeability differences of gap junctions expressed in HeLa transfectants and Xenopus oocytes. Journal of Cell Science. 1998;111(1):31–43.
    1. Elfgang C, Eckert R, Lichtenberg-Frate H, et al. Specific permeability and selective formation of gap junction channels in connexin-transfected HeLa cells. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1995;129(3):805–817.
    1. Kanaporis G, Brink PR, Valiunas V. Gap junction permeability: selectivity for anionic and cationic probes. The American Journal of Physiology—Cell Physiology. 2011;300(3):C600–C609.
    1. Talaveron R, Matarredona ER, de la Cruz RR, Macias D, Galvez V, Pastor AM. Implanted neural progenitor cells regulate glial reaction to brain injury and establish gap junctions with host glial cells. Glia. 2014;62(4):623–638.
    1. Takeuchi H, Jin S, Suzuki H, et al. Blockade of microglial glutamate release protects against ischemic brain injury. Experimental Neurology. 2008;214(1):144–146.
    1. Takeuchi H, Mizoguchi H, Doi Y, et al. Blockade of gap junction hemichannel suppresses disease progression in mouse models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Alzheimer's disease. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(6)e21108
    1. Imura Y, Morizawa Y, Komatsu R, et al. Microglia release ATP by exocytosis. GLIA. 2013;61(8):1320–1330.
    1. Rigato C, Swinnen N, Buckinx R, et al. Microglia proliferation is controlled by P2X7 receptors in a pannexin-1-independent manner during early embryonic spinal cord invasion. Journal of Neuroscience. 2012;32(34):11559–11573.
    1. Shijie J, Takeuchi H, Yawata I, et al. Blockade of glutamate release from microglia attenuates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in mice. The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2009;217(2):87–92.
    1. Xiong J, Burkovetskaya M, Karpuk N, Kielian T. IL-1RI (interleukin-1 receptor type I) signalling is essential for host defence and hemichannel activity during acute central nervous system bacterial infection. ASN Neuro. 2012;4(3):175–185.
    1. Yawata I, Takeuchi H, Doi Y, Liang J, Mizuno T, Suzumura A. Macrophage-induced neurotoxicity is mediated by glutamate and attenuated by glutaminase inhibitors and gap junction inhibitors. Life Sciences. 2008;82(21-22):1111–1116.
    1. Endong L, Shijie J, Sonobe Y, et al. The Gap-junction inhibitor Carbenoxolone suppresses the differentiation of Th17 cells through inhibition of IL-23 expression in antigen presenting cells. Journal of Neuroimmunology. 2011;240-241:58–64.
    1. Cerutti A, Cols M, Puga I. Marginal zone B cells: virtues of innate-like antibody-producing lymphocytes. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2013;13(2):118–132.
    1. Mantovani A, Cassatella MA, Costantini C, Jaillon S. Neutrophils in the activation and regulation of innate and adaptive immunity. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2011;11(8):519–531.
    1. Sandilands GP, McCrae J, Hill K, Perry M, Baxter D. Major histocompatibility complex class II (DR) antigen and costimulatory molecules on in vitro and in vivo activated human polymorphonuclear neutrophils. Immunology. 2006;119(4):562–571.
    1. Müller I, Munder M, Kropf P, Hänsch GM. Polymorphonuclear neutrophils and T lymphocytes: strange bedfellows or brothers in arms? Trends in Immunology. 2009;30(11):522–530.
    1. Beauvillain C, Delneste Y, Scotet M, et al. Neutrophils efficiently cross-prime naive T cells in vivo. Blood. 2007;110(8):2965–2973.
    1. Abdallah DSA, Egan CE, Butcher BA, Denkers EY. Mouse neutrophils are professional antigen-presenting cells programmed to instruct Th1 and Th17 T-cell differentiation. International Immunology. 2011;23(5):317–326.
    1. Brañes MC, Contreras JE, Sáez JC. Activation of human polymorphonuclear cells induces formation of functional gap junctions and expression of connexins. Medical Science Monitor. 2002;8:R313–R323.
    1. Eltzschig HK, Eckle T, Mager A, et al. ATP release from activated neutrophils occurs via connexin 43 and modulates adenosine-dependent endothelial cell function. Circulation Research. 2006;99(10):1100–1108.
    1. Zahler S, Hoffmann A, Gloe T, Pohl U. Gap-junctional coupling between neutrophils and endothelial cells: a novel modulator of transendothelial migration. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2003;73(1):118–126.
    1. Sarieddine MZR, Scheckenbach KEL, Foglia B, et al. Connexin43 modulates neutrophil recruitment to the lung. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 2009;13(11-12):4560–4570.
    1. Scerri I, Tabary O, Dudez T, et al. Gap junctional communication does not contribute to the interaction between neutrophils and airway epithelial cells. Cell Communication & Adhesion. 2006;13(1-2):1–12.
    1. Coutinho P, Qiu C, Frank S, et al. Limiting burn extension by transient inhibition of Connexin43 expression at the site of injury. The British Journal of Plastic Surgery. 2005;58(5):658–667.
    1. Cronin M, Anderson PN, Cook JE, Green CR, Becker DL. Blocking connexin43 expression reduces inflammation and improves functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience. 2008;39(2):152–160.
    1. Qiu C, Coutinho P, Frank S, et al. Targeting connexin43 expression accelerates the rate of wound repair. Current Biology. 2003;13(19):1697–1703.
    1. Rignault S, Haefliger J, Waeber B, Liaudet L, Feihl F. Acute inflammation decreases the expression of connexin 40 in mouse lung. Shock. 2007;28(1):78–85.
    1. Bao Y, Chen Y, Ledderose C, Li L, Junger WG. Pannexin 1 channels link chemoattractant receptor signaling to local excitation and global inhibition responses at the front and back of polarized neutrophils. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2013;288(31):22650–22657.
    1. Chen Y, Yao Y, Sumi Y, et al. Purinergic signaling: a fundamental mechanism in neutrophil activation. Science Signaling. 2010;3(125):p. ra45.
    1. Thaunat O, Granja AG, Barral P, et al. Asymmetric segregation of polarized antigen on B cell division shapes presentation capacity. Science. 2012;335(6067):475–479.
    1. Yuseff M-I, Pierobon P, Reversat A, Lennon-Duménil A-M. How B cells capture, process and present antigens: a crucial role for cell polarity. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2013;13(7):475–486.
    1. Machtaler S, Dang-Lawson M, Choi K, Jang C, Naus CC, Matsuuchi L. The gap junction protein Cx43 regulates B-lymphocyte spreading and adhesion. Journal of Cell Science. 2011;124(15):2611–2621.
    1. Oviedo-Orta E, Hoy T, Evans WH. Intercellular communication in the immune system: differential expression of connexin40 and 43, and perturbation of gap junction channel functions in peripheral blood and tonsil human lymphocyte subpopulations. Immunology. 2000;99(4):578–590.
    1. Falk L, Dang-Lawson M, Vega JL, et al. Mutations of Cx43 that affect B cell spreading in response to BCR signaling. Biology Open. 2014;3:185–194.
    1. Machtaler S, Choi K, Dang-Lawson M, et al. The role of the gap junction protein connexin43 in B lymphocyte motility and migration. FEBS Letters. 2014;588(8):1249–1258.
    1. Théry C, Ostrowski M, Segura E. Membrane vesicles as conveyors of immune responses. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2009;9(8):581–593.
    1. Watkins SC, Salter RD. Functional connectivity between immune cells mediated by tunneling nanotubules. Immunity. 2005;23(3):309–318.
    1. Oviedo-Orta E, Evans WH. Gap junctions and connexins: potential contributors to the immunological synapse. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2002;72(4):636–642.
    1. Moreau HD, Bousso P. Visualizing how T cells collect activation signals in vivo. Current Opinion in Immunology. 2014;26:56–62.
    1. Moreau HD, Lemaître F, Terriac E, et al. Dynamic in situ cytometry uncovers T cell receptor signaling during immunological synapses and kinapses in vivo. Immunity. 2012;37(2):351–363.
    1. Wang CM, Ploia C, Anselmi F, Sarukhan A, Viola A. Adenosine triphosphate acts as a paracrine signaling molecule to reduce the motility of T cells. The EMBO Journal. 2014;33(12):1354–1364.
    1. Benlalam H, Carré T, Jalil A, et al. Regulation of gap junctions in melanoma and their impact on Melan-A/MART-1-specific CD8+ T lymphocyte emergence. Journal of Molecular Medicine. 2013;91(10):1207–1220.
    1. Kuczma M, Lee JR, Kraj P. Connexin 43 signaling enhances the generation of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. Journal of Immunology. 2011;187(1):248–257.
    1. Oviedo-Orta E, Perreau M, Evans WH, Potolicchio I. Control of the proliferation of activated CD4+ T cells by connexins. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2010;88(1):79–86.
    1. Schenk U, Westendorf AM, Radaelli E, et al. Purinergic control of T cell activation by ATP released through pannexin-1 hemichannels. Science Signaling. 2008;1(39):p. ra6.
    1. Shoji KF, Sáez PJ, Harcha P, Aguila HL, Sáez JC. Pannexin1 channels act downstream of P2X receptors in ATP-induced murine T-cell death. Channels. 2014;8(2):142–156.
    1. Woehrle T, Yip L, Elkhal A, et al. Pannexin-1 hemichannel-mediated ATP release together with P2X1 and P2X4 receptors regulate T-cell activation at the immune synapse. Blood. 2010;116(18):3475–3484.
    1. Woehrle T, Yip L, Manohar M, et al. Hypertonic stress regulates T cell function via pannexin-1 hemichannels and P2X receptors. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2010;88(6):1181–1189.
    1. Oviedo-Orta E, Gasque P, Evans WH. Immunoglobulin and cytokine expression in mixed lymphocyte cultures is reduced by disruption of gap junction intercellular communication. FASEB Journal. 2001;15(3):768–774.
    1. Oviedo-Orta E, Errington RJ, Evans WH. Gap junction intercellular communication during lymphocyte transendothelial migration. Cell Biology International. 2002;26(3):253–263.
    1. Luckey U, Schmidt T, Pfender N, et al. Crosstalk of regulatory T cells and tolerogenic dendritic cells prevents contact allergy in subjects with low zone tolerance. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2012;130(3):781.e11–797.e11.
    1. Moreno-Fernandez ME, Rueda CM, Rusie LK, Chougnet CA. Regulatory T cells control HIV replication in activated T cells through a cAMP-dependent mechanism. Blood. 2011;117(20):5372–5380.
    1. Nguyen TD, Taffet SM. A model system to study Connexin 43 in the immune system. Molecular Immunology. 2009;46(15):2938–2946.
    1. Dahl G. Gap junction-mimetic peptides do work, but in unexpected ways. Cell Communication and Adhesion. 2007;14(6):259–264.
    1. Siller-Jackson AJ, Burra S, Gu S, et al. Adaptation of connexin 43-hemichannel prostaglandin release to mechanical loading. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2008;283(39):26374–26382.
    1. Riquelme MA, Kar R, Gu S, Jiang JX. Antibodies targeting extracellular domain of connexins for studies of hemichannels. Neuropharmacology. 2013;75:525–532.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj