Sustained responses to lasmiditan: Results from post-hoc analyses of two Phase 3 randomized clinical trials for acute treatment of migraine

Erin Gautier Doty, John H Krege, Leah Jin, Joel Raskin, Rashmi B Halker Singh, Kavita Kalidas, Erin Gautier Doty, John H Krege, Leah Jin, Joel Raskin, Rashmi B Halker Singh, Kavita Kalidas

Abstract

Background: Sustained pain freedom is an important attribute of acute migraine therapies for patients and physicians. Here we report efficacy of the centrally penetrant, highly selective, 5-HT1F agonist lasmiditan on sustained pain freedom and other outcomes at 24 and 48 hours post-dose.

Study design and methods: Data from the similarly designed, Phase 3, double-blind studies SAMURAI (NCT02439320) and SPARTAN (NCT02605174) were pooled to more precisely estimate efficacy effects in these post-hoc analyses. In both studies, inclusion criteria were 3-8 migraine attacks per month and Migraine Disability Assessment Score of ≥ 11 (at least moderate disability). Patients were randomized equally to lasmiditan 200 mg, 100 mg, 50 mg (50 mg only in SPARTAN), or to placebo. The study drug was to be taken within 4 hours of onset of pain for non-improving headache of at least moderate severity. Sustained pain freedom was defined as being pain free at 2 hours and at the given time point (24 or 48 hours) post-dose without use of additional study drug or migraine medications. Sustained responses were assessed similarly for most bothersome symptom-free, total migraine-free, and disability-free outcomes. For comparisons with previously published data on other acute medications, an additional endpoint of modified sustained pain freedom at 24 hours was defined as being pain free at 2 hours and no moderate-to-severe headache at 24 hours post-dose without use of additional study drug or migraine medications.

Results: Significantly higher proportions of patients treated with lasmiditan versus placebo achieved headache pain freedom at 2 hours post-dose: 200 mg: 35.6%; 100 mg: 29.9%; 50 mg: 28.6%; placebo: 18.3% (all p < 0.001). Sustained pain freedom was significantly higher in patients treated with lasmiditan versus placebo at 24 hours: 200 mg: 21.2%; 100 mg: 16.9%; 50 mg: 17.4%; placebo: 10.3% (all p < 0.01); and at 48 hours: 200 mg: 18.4%; 100 mg: 15.2%; 50 mg: 14.9%; placebo: 9.6% (all p < 0.05). Similar sustained benefits of lasmiditan versus placebo at 24 and 48 hours were noted for most bothersome symptom-free, total migraine-free and disability-free responses. Modified sustained pain freedom at 24 hours was also observed in significantly higher proportions of lasmiditan-treated patients versus placebo: 200 mg: 27.0%; 100 mg: 21.7%; 50 mg: 21.7%; placebo: 12.9% (all p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Sustained responses at 24 and 48 hours were noted in significantly more patients treated with lasmiditan versus placebo for several efficacy outcomes including pain freedom, most bothersome symptom-free, total migraine-free and disability-free responses.

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier numbers: SAMURAI: NCT02439320; SPARTAN: NCT02605174.

Keywords: Lasmiditan; migraine; pain freedom; pain relief; sustained response.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Proportions of patients in mITT population experiencing sustained pain freedom at 24 and 48 hours, following the first dose of placebo, lasmiditan 50 mg, 100 mg or 200 mg. from post-hoc analyses of SAMURAI and SPARTAN studies. Denominators for calculating percentages are the counts of patients experiencing mild, moderate or severe headache pain at baseline: Placebo: n = 1063; LTN 50 mg: n = 556; LTN 100 mg: n = 1035; LTN 200 mg: n = 1046. Patients in SAMURAI did not take LTN 50 mg. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001, for comparisons versus placebo. Confidence interval ranges are provided for odds ratio within parentheses. LTN: lasmiditan; OR: odds ratio.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Proportions of patients in mITT population experiencing sustained most bothersome symptom freedom at 24 and 48 hours, following the first dose of lasmiditan 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg or placebo. From a post-hoc analyses of SAMURAI and SPARTAN studies. Denominators for calculating percentages are the counts of patients who recorded their most bothersome symptom at baseline: Placebo: n = 1002; LTN 50 mg: n = 512; LTN 100 mg: n = 969; LTN 200 mg: n = 964. Patients in SAMURAI did not take LTN 50 mg. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001, for comparisons versus placebo. Confidence interval ranges are provided for odds ratio within parentheses. LTN: lasmiditan; MBS: most bothersome symptom; OR: odds ratio.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Side-by-side comparison of modified sustained pain freedom at 24 hours (ITT population) and sustained pain freedom at 24 hours (mITT population) from post-hoc analyses of SAMURAI and SPARTAN studies. For modified sustained pain-free response, patients had to be pain free at 2 hours, have no/mild pain at 24 hours and should not have used acute medications in between; patients with missing data at 24 hours were excluded from analysis. For the sustained pain-free response, patients had to be pain free at 2 and 24 hours, and should not have used acute medications in between; patients with missing data at 24 hours were assumed to not be pain free at 24 hours. Denominators (n) for calculating percentages in both analyses are counts of patients experiencing pain of any severity at baseline. ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, for comparisons versus placebo. Confidence interval ranges are provided for odds ratio within parentheses. LTN: lasmiditan; OR: odds ratio.

References

    1. The GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017; 390: 1211–1259.
    1. Buse DC, Rupnow MF, Lipton RB. Assessing and managing all aspects of migraine: Migraine attacks, migraine-related functional impairment, common comorbidities, and quality of life. Mayo Clin Proc 2009; 84: 422–435.
    1. Lipton RB, Buse DC, Serrano D, et al. Examination of unmet treatment needs among persons with episodic migraine: Results of the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) Study. Headache 2013; 53: 1300–1311.
    1. Lipton RB, Silberstein SD. Episodic and chronic migraine headache: Breaking down barriers to optimal treatment and prevention. Headache 2015; 55: S103–S122. quiz, 23–26.
    1. Lipton RB, Serrano D, Nicholson RA, et al. Impact of NSAID and triptan use on developing chronic migraine: Results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) study. Headache 2013; 53: 1548–1563.
    1. Cameron C, Kelly S, Hsieh SC, et al. Triptans in the acute treatment of migraine: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Headache 2015; 55: S221–S235.
    1. GlaxoSmithKline. Imitrex (sumatriptan succinate) tablets, for oral use (prescribing information), (December 2017, accessed 14 December 2018).
    1. Gilmore B, Michael M. Treatment of acute migraine headache. Am Fam Physician 2011; 83: 271–280.
    1. Dodick D, Lipton RB, Martin V, et al. Consensus statement: Cardiovascular safety profile of triptans (5-HT agonists) in the acute treatment of migraine. Headache 2004; 44: 414–425.
    1. Adelborg K, Szepligeti SK, Holland-Bill L, et al. Migraine and risk of cardiovascular diseases: Danish population based matched cohort study. BMJ 2018; 360: k96–k96.
    1. Buse DC, Reed ML, Fanning KM, et al. Cardiovascular events, conditions, and procedures among people with episodic migraine in the US population: Results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) Study. Headache 2017; 57: 31–44.
    1. Lipton RB, Reed ML, Kurth T, et al. Framingham-based cardiovascular risk estimates among people with episodic migraine in the US population: Results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) Study. Headache 2017; 57: 1507–1521.
    1. Farkkila M, Diener HC, Geraud G, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of lasmiditan, an oral 5-HT(1F) receptor agonist, for the acute treatment of migraine: A phase 2 randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-ranging study. Lancet Neurol 2012; 11: 405–413.
    1. Nelson DL, Phebus LA, Johnson KW, et al. Preclinical pharmacological profile of the selective 5-HT1F receptor agonist lasmiditan. Cephalalgia 2010; 30: 1159–1169.
    1. Vila-Pueyo M. Targeted 5-HT1F therapies for migraine. Neurotherapeutics 2018; 15: 291–303.
    1. Wietecha LA, Kuca B, Asafu-Adjei J, et al. Phase 3 Studies (SAMURAI, SPARTAN) of lasmiditan compared to placebo for acute treatment of migraine. Neurology 2018; 90. Supplement, for papers presented at the American Academy of Neurology 70th Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, NV, USA, 21–27 April 2018.
    1. Kuca B, Silberstein SD, Wietecha L, et al. Lasmiditan is an effective acute treatment for migraine: A phase 3 randomized study. COL MIG-301 Study Group. Neurology 2018; 91: e2222–e2232.
    1. Oswald JC, Schuster NM. Lasmiditan for the treatment of acute migraine: A review and potential role in clinical practice. J Pain Res 2018; 11: 2221–2227.
    1. Ferrari MD, Goadsby PJ, Roon KI, et al. Triptans (serotonin, 5-HT1B/1D agonists) in migraine: Detailed results and methods of a meta-analysis of 53 trials. Cephalalgia 2002; 22: 633–658.
    1. Ferrari MD, Roon KI, Lipton RB, et al. Oral triptans (serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) agonists) in acute migraine treatment: A meta-analysis of 53 trials. Lancet 2001; 358: 1668–1675.
    1. Lipton RB, Hamelsky SW, Dayno JM. What do patients with migraine want from acute migraine treatment? Headache 2002; 42: S3–S9.
    1. Tfelt-Hansen P, Pascual J, Ramadan N, et al. Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: Third edition. A guide for investigators. Cephalalgia 2012; 32: 6–38.
    1. Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia 2004; 24: 9–160.
    1. Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Kolodner K, et al. Reliability of the migraine disability assessment score in a population-based sample of headache sufferers. Cephalalgia 1999; 19: 107–114. discussion 74.
    1. Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Whyte J, et al. An international study to assess reliability of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score. Neurology 1999; 53: 988–994.
    1. Diener HC, Tassorelli C, Dodick DW, et al. Guidelines of the International Headache Society for controlled trials of acute treatment of migraine attacks in adults: Fourth edition. Cephalalgia 2019; 39: 687–710.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj