Irinotecan combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a single-arm, three-centre, prospective study

Keke Nie, Ling Zhang, Yunhong You, Hongmei Li, Xiuhui Guo, Zhongfa Zhang, Chunling Zhang, Youxin Ji, Keke Nie, Ling Zhang, Yunhong You, Hongmei Li, Xiuhui Guo, Zhongfa Zhang, Chunling Zhang, Youxin Ji

Abstract

Objective: To study the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Patients and methods: Previously untreated patients with cytologically or histologically confirmed metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma underwent a treatment regimen consisting of an intravenous infusion of irinotecan 165 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1, and oral S-1 40 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14, repeating the regimen every 21 days until one of the following occurred: disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or patient death. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), response rate, toxicity, and quality of life. This ongoing study had been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03726021.

Results: A total of 41 patients were enrolled in this study, 18 men and 23 women. The median PFS was 4.33 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.83-5.88] and the median OS was 11.00 months (95% CI: 9.16-12.84). There were no instances of a complete response; the partial response, stable disease, and disease progression rates were 39.02% (16/41), 29.27% (12/41), and 31.71% (13/41), respectively.The most common adverse side effects were mild to moderate nausea, vomiting, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 29.27% (12/41) and 12.20% (5/41) of the patients, respectively. No treatment-related death was observed.

Conclusion: Irinotecan combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 is a safe and effective treatment for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and any toxicities are mild to moderate and tolerable. A larger study population is needed for further evaluation.

Keywords: FOLFIRINOX; chemotherapy; overall survival; pancreatic adenocarcinoma; prospective.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

© The Author(s), 2020.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Screening, group assignment, and outcomes. The cut-off date was 30 April 2019, and the last follow-up date was 28 October 2019. BSC, best supportive care; GI, gastrointestinal.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan–Meier analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Of the enrolled 41 patients, the median PFS (A) was 4.33 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.83–5.88] and median OS (B) was 11.00 months (95% CI: 9.16–12.84).

References

    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2007; 57: 43–66.
    1. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China. CA Cancer J Clin 2015; 66: 115–132.
    1. Feng M, Xiong G, Cao Z, et al. PD-1/PD-L1 and immunotherapy for pancreatic cancer. Cancer Lett 2017; 407: 57–65.
    1. Henriksen A, Dyhl-polk A, Chen I, et al. Checkpoint inhibitors in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2019; 78: 17–30.
    1. Neoptolemos JP, Palmer DH, Ghaneh P, et al. Comparison of adjuvant gemcitabine and capecitabine with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer (ESPAC-4): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2017; 389: 1011–1024.
    1. Springfeld C, Jäger D, Büchler MW, et al. Quarterly medical review chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer. Presse Med 2019; 48: e159–e174.
    1. Burris HA, III, Moore MJ, Andersen J, et al. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first- line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 2403–2413.
    1. Borazanci E, Von Hoff DD. Nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine for the treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 8: 739–747.
    1. Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 1817–1825.
    1. Lee J, Woo SM, Shin DW J, et al. Comparison of FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer using Korean pancreatic cancer (K-PaC) registry. Am J Clin Oncol. Epub ahead of print 26 June 2020. DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000730.
    1. Vogl UM, Andalibi H, Klaus A, et al. Nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine or FOLFIRINOX as first-line treatment in patients with unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: does sequence matter? BMC Cancer 2019; 19: 28.
    1. Sakata Y, Ohtsu A, Horikoshi N, et al. Late phase II study of novel oral fluoropyrimidine anticancer drug S-1 (1 M tegafur-0.4 M gimestat-1 M otastat potassium) in advanced gastric cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 1998; 34: 1715–1720.
    1. Uesaka K, Boku N, Fukutomi A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 versus gemcitabine for resected pancreatic cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial (JASPAC 01). Lancet 2016; 388: 248–257.
    1. Takeuchi T, Mizuno S, Murata Y, et al. Comparative study between gemcitabine-based and gemcitabine plus S1-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy for localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, with special attention to initially locally advanced unresectable tumor. Pancreas 2019; 48: 281–291.
    1. Kim HS, Ryu MH, Zang DY, et al. Phase II study of oxaliplatin, irinotecan and S-1 therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: the Korean cancer study group ST14-11. Gastric Cancer 2018; 21: 802–810.
    1. Kim SY, Hong YS, Shim EK, et al. S-1 plus irinotecan and oxaliplatin for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a prospective phase II study and pharmacogenetic analysis. Br J Cancer 2013; 109: 1420–1427.
    1. Balsano R, Tommasi C, Garajova I. State of the art for metastatic pancreatic cancer treatment: where are we now? Anticancer Res 2019; 39: 3405–3412.
    1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline; (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2008; 45: 228–247.
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), (2017, accessed 28 July 2020).
    1. Von Hoff DD, Ramanathan RK, Borad MJ, et al. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel is an active regimen in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase I/II trial. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 4548–4554.
    1. Jarlier M, Bourgade SG, Conroy T. Response to FOLFIRINOX by gender in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: results from the PRODIGE 4/ACCORD 11 randomized trial, PLoS One 2017; 12: e01832881–11.
    1. Cheng SH, Cheng YJ, Jin ZY, et al. Unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: role of CT quantitative imaging biomarkers for predicting outcomes of patients treated with chemotherapy. Eur J Radiol 2019; 113: 188–197.
    1. Wang ZQ, Zhang F, Deng T, et al. The efficacy and safety of modified FOLFIRINOX as first ‑ line chemotherapy for Chinese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2019; 39: 26.
    1. Yoo C, Han B, Kim HS, et al. Multicenter phase II study of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and S-1 as first-line treatment for patients with recurrent or metastatic biliary tract cancer. Cancer Res Treat 2018; 50: 1324–1330.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj