Updated Overall Survival of Ribociclib plus Endocrine Therapy versus Endocrine Therapy Alone in Pre- and Perimenopausal Patients with HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer in MONALEESA-7: A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial

Yen-Shen Lu, Seock-Ah Im, Marco Colleoni, Fabio Franke, Aditya Bardia, Fatima Cardoso, Nadia Harbeck, Sara Hurvitz, Louis Chow, Joohyuk Sohn, Keun Seok Lee, Saul Campos-Gomez, Rafael Villanueva Vazquez, Kyung Hae Jung, K Govind Babu, Paul Wheatley-Price, Michelino De Laurentiis, Young-Hyuck Im, Sherko Kuemmel, Nagi El-Saghir, Ruth O'Regan, Claudia Gasch, Nadia Solovieff, Craig Wang, Yongyu Wang, Arunava Chakravartty, Yan Ji, Debu Tripathy, Yen-Shen Lu, Seock-Ah Im, Marco Colleoni, Fabio Franke, Aditya Bardia, Fatima Cardoso, Nadia Harbeck, Sara Hurvitz, Louis Chow, Joohyuk Sohn, Keun Seok Lee, Saul Campos-Gomez, Rafael Villanueva Vazquez, Kyung Hae Jung, K Govind Babu, Paul Wheatley-Price, Michelino De Laurentiis, Young-Hyuck Im, Sherko Kuemmel, Nagi El-Saghir, Ruth O'Regan, Claudia Gasch, Nadia Solovieff, Craig Wang, Yongyu Wang, Arunava Chakravartty, Yan Ji, Debu Tripathy

Abstract

Purpose: Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) demonstrated a statistically significant progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) benefit in the phase III MONALEESA-7 trial of pre-/perimenopausal patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). The median OS was not reached in the ribociclib arm in the protocol-specified final analysis; we hence performed an exploratory OS and additional outcomes analysis with an extended follow-up (median, 53.5 months).

Patients and methods: Patients were randomized to receive ET [goserelin plus nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) or tamoxifen] with ribociclib or placebo. OS was evaluated with a stratified Cox proportional hazard model and summarized with Kaplan-Meier methods.

Results: The intent-to-treat population included 672 patients. Median OS was 58.7 months with ribociclib versus 48.0 months with placebo [hazard ratio = 0.76; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.61-0.96]. Kaplan-Meier estimated OS at 48 months was 60% and 50% with ribociclib and placebo, respectively. Subgroup analyses were generally consistent with the OS benefit, including patients who received NSAI and patients aged less than 40 years. Subsequent antineoplastic therapies following discontinuation were balanced between the ribociclib (77%) and placebo (78%) groups. Use of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors after discontinuation was higher with placebo (26%) versus ribociclib (13%). Time to first chemotherapy was significantly delayed with ribociclib versus placebo. No drug-drug interactions were observed between ribociclib and either NSAI.

Conclusions: Ribociclib plus ET continued to show significantly longer OS than ET alone in pre-/perimenopausal patients, including patients aged less than 40 years, with HR+/HER2- ABC with 53.5 months of median follow-up (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02278120).

©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
OS. A, All patients. B, Patients who received an NSAI. C, Patients who received tamoxifen. mo, months; PBO, placebo; RIB, ribociclib.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Exploratory analyses of OS in subgroups. ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; ER, estrogen receptor; mOS, median overall survival; NR, not reached; PGR, progesterone receptor; mo, months. aER and PGR receptor status ++ means that patients were positive for both estrogen and progesterone receptors. bPatients who relapsed within the first 2 years of (neo)adjuvant ET. cPatients who received prior ET and did not experience relapse within the first 2 years of (neo)adjuvant ET.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Time to first subsequent chemotherapy and chemotherapy-free survival. A, Time to first subsequent chemotherapy. B, Chemotherapy-free survival. CFS, chemotherapy-free survival; mo, months; PBO, placebo; RIB, ribociclib; TTC, time to chemotherapy.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
PFS2, progression-free survival following receipt of subsequent therapy. mo, months; PBO, placebo.

References

    1. Tripathy D, Im S-A, Colleoni M, Franke F, Bardia A, Harbeck N, et al. . Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer (MONALEESA-7): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2018;19:904–15.
    1. Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, Yap Y-S, Sonke GS, Paluch-Shimon S, et al. . Ribociclib as first-line therapy for HR-positive, advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2016;375:1738–48.
    1. Slamon DJ, Neven P, Chia S, Fasching PA, De Laurentiis M, Im S-A, et al. . Phase III randomized study of ribociclib and fulvestrant in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: MONALEESA-3. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:2465–72.
    1. Tripathy D, Bardia A, Sellers WR. Ribociclib (LEE011): mechanism of action and clinical impact of this selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor in various solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2017;23:3251–62.
    1. Im S-A, Lu Y-S, Bardia A, Harbeck N, Colleoni M, Franke F, et al. . Overall survival with ribociclib plus endocrine therapy in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2019;381:307–16.
    1. Azim HA Jr, Partridge AH. Biology of breast cancer in young women. Breast Cancer Res 2014;16:427.
    1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. . New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009;45:228–47.
    1. Robins JM, Tsiatis AA. Correcting for non-compliance in randomized trials using rank preserving structural failure time models. Commun Stat Theory Methods 1991;20:2609–31.
    1. Infante JR, Cassier PA, Gerecitano JF, Witteveen PO, Chugh R, Ribrag V, et al. . A phase I study of the cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor ribociclib (LEE011) in patients with advanced solid tumors and lymphomas. Clin Cancer Res 2016;22:5696–705.
    1. Slamon DJ, Neven P, Chia S, Fasching PA, De Laurentiis M, Im S-A, et al. . Overall survival with ribociclib plus fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2020;382:514–24.
    1. Sledge GW Jr, Toi M, Neven P, Sohn J, Inoue K, Pivot X, et al. . The effect of abemaciclib plus fulvestrant on overall survival in hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative breast cancer that progressed on endocrine therapy-MONARCH 2: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2020;6:116–24.
    1. Bardia A, Hurvitz S. Targeted therapy for premenopausal women with HR(+), HER2(-) advanced breast cancer: focus on special considerations and latest advances. Clin Cancer Res 2018;24:5206–18.
    1. Tripathy DK, Campos-Gomez S, Lu Y-S, Franke F, Bardia A, Wheatley-Price P, et al. . Ribociclib with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor and goserelin in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: MONALEESA-7 age subgroup analysis. Cancer Res 79:P6–18–04, 2019.
    1. Prat A, Brase JC, Cheng Y, Nuciforo P, Paré L, Pascual T, et al. . Everolimus plus exemestane for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: a PAM50 intrinsic subtype analysis of BOLERO-2. Oncologist 2019;24:893–900.
    1. Prat A, Cheang MCU, Galván P, Nuciforo P, Paré L, Adamo B, et al. . Prognostic value of intrinsic subtypes in hormone receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer treated with letrozole with or without lapatinib. JAMA Oncol 2016;2:1287–94.
    1. Prat A, Chaudhury A, Solovieff N, Paré L, Martinez D, Chic N, et al. . Correlative biomarker analysis of intrinsic subtypes and efficacy across the MONALEESA phase III studies. J Clin Oncol 2021;39:1458–67.
    1. Harbeck N, Franke F, Villanueva-Vazquez R, Lu Y-S, Tripathy D, Chow L, et al. . Health-related quality of life in premenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer treated with ribociclib plus endocrine therapy: results from a phase III randomized clinical trial (MONALEESA-7). Ther Adv Med Oncol 2020;12:1758835920943065.
    1. Cardoso F, Spence D, Mertz S, Corneliussen-James D, Sabelko K, Gralow J, et al. . Global analysis of advanced/metastatic breast cancer: decade report (2005–2015). Breast 2018;39:131–8.
    1. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Miller D, Brest A, Yu M, et al. . SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2013. Based on November 2015 SEER Data Submission. National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD: NCI; 2016.Available from: .

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj