gp100 peptide vaccine and interleukin-2 in patients with advanced melanoma

Douglas J Schwartzentruber, David H Lawson, Jon M Richards, Robert M Conry, Donald M Miller, Jonathan Treisman, Fawaz Gailani, Lee Riley, Kevin Conlon, Barbara Pockaj, Kari L Kendra, Richard L White, Rene Gonzalez, Timothy M Kuzel, Brendan Curti, Phillip D Leming, Eric D Whitman, Jai Balkissoon, Douglas S Reintgen, Howard Kaufman, Francesco M Marincola, Maria J Merino, Steven A Rosenberg, Peter Choyke, Don Vena, Patrick Hwu, Douglas J Schwartzentruber, David H Lawson, Jon M Richards, Robert M Conry, Donald M Miller, Jonathan Treisman, Fawaz Gailani, Lee Riley, Kevin Conlon, Barbara Pockaj, Kari L Kendra, Richard L White, Rene Gonzalez, Timothy M Kuzel, Brendan Curti, Phillip D Leming, Eric D Whitman, Jai Balkissoon, Douglas S Reintgen, Howard Kaufman, Francesco M Marincola, Maria J Merino, Steven A Rosenberg, Peter Choyke, Don Vena, Patrick Hwu

Abstract

Background: Stimulating an immune response against cancer with the use of vaccines remains a challenge. We hypothesized that combining a melanoma vaccine with interleukin-2, an immune activating agent, could improve outcomes. In a previous phase 2 study, patients with metastatic melanoma receiving high-dose interleukin-2 plus the gp100:209-217(210M) peptide vaccine had a higher rate of response than the rate that is expected among patients who are treated with interleukin-2 alone.

Methods: We conducted a randomized, phase 3 trial involving 185 patients at 21 centers. Eligibility criteria included stage IV or locally advanced stage III cutaneous melanoma, expression of HLA*A0201, an absence of brain metastases, and suitability for high-dose interleukin-2 therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive interleukin-2 alone (720,000 IU per kilogram of body weight per dose) or gp100:209-217(210M) plus incomplete Freund's adjuvant (Montanide ISA-51) once per cycle, followed by interleukin-2. The primary end point was clinical response. Secondary end points included toxic effects and progression-free survival.

Results: The treatment groups were well balanced with respect to baseline characteristics and received a similar amount of interleukin-2 per cycle. The toxic effects were consistent with those expected with interleukin-2 therapy. The vaccine-interleukin-2 group, as compared with the interleukin-2-only group, had a significant improvement in centrally verified overall clinical response (16% vs. 6%, P=0.03), as well as longer progression-free survival (2.2 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 3.9 vs. 1.6 months; 95% CI, 1.5 to 1.8; P=0.008). The median overall survival was also longer in the vaccine-interleukin-2 group than in the interleukin-2-only group (17.8 months; 95% CI, 11.9 to 25.8 vs. 11.1 months; 95% CI, 8.7 to 16.3; P=0.06).

Conclusions: In patients with advanced melanoma, the response rate was higher and progression-free survival longer with vaccine and interleukin-2 than with interleukin-2 alone. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00019682.).

Figures

Figure 1. Progression-free and Overall Survival
Figure 1. Progression-free and Overall Survival
Progression-free survival (Panel A) was longer among patients receiving vaccine and interleukin-2 than among those receiving interleukin-2 alone. The median progression-free survival among patients who received the vaccine was 2.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 3.9), as compared with 1.6 months (95% CI, 1.5 to 1.8) among patients who did not receive the vaccine. There was a trend toward longer overall survival (Panel B) among patients receiving vaccine and interleukin-2 than among those receiving interleukin-2 alone. The median survival among patients who received the vaccine was 17.8 months (95% CI, 11.9 to 25.8), as compared with 11.1 months (95% CI, 8.7 to 16.3) among patients who did not receive the vaccine.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj