Feasibility and tolerability of measuring translaryngeal pressure during exercise

Zoe Fretheim-Kelly, Thomas Halvorsen, John-Helge Heimdal, Eric Strand, Maria Vollsaeter, Hege Clemm, Ola Roksund, Zoe Fretheim-Kelly, Thomas Halvorsen, John-Helge Heimdal, Eric Strand, Maria Vollsaeter, Hege Clemm, Ola Roksund

Abstract

Objectives/hypothesis: To determine if simultaneous tracheal and supraglottic pressure measurement performed during a continuous laryngoscopy exercise (CLE) test is possible, tolerable, and feasible, and if so, whether measurements can be used to determined airflow resistance over the larynx, thus providing an objective outcome measure for the CLE test, the gold standard for diagnosing exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction.

Study design: Explorative descriptive clinical study.

Methods: A CLE test was performed with the addition of two pressure sensors (Mikro-Cath 825-0101; Millar, Houston, TX) placed at the epiglottic tip and at the fifth tracheal ring. To place sensors, laryngeal anesthesia and a channel scope were required. Tolerability and feasibility was determined by a Likert score and subjective indication from subjects and operators. Adjustments to the technique were made to increase tolerability. The pressure data were continuously collected and analyzed for artifacts, drifts, frequency response, and used with flow data to calculate translaryngeal resistance.

Results: All subjects (n = 7) completed all procedures. Two main areas of concern were identified regarding tolerability: application of topical anesthesia to the larynx and nasal discomfort due to the added diameter of the laryngoscope. Protocol adjustments improved both. Pressure data were obtained from all procedures in all subjects, were consistent, and followed physiological trends.

Conclusions: Continuous measurement of the translaryngeal pressure gradient during a CLE test is possible, feasible, and tolerable. A CLE test with direct measurement of the translaryngeal pressure gradient might become a valuable tool in the objective assessment of respiratory function, and normal values should be established in health and disease.

Level of evidence: NA Laryngoscope, 129:2748-2753, 2019.

Keywords: Translaryngeal resistance; exercise test; exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction; exertional dyspnea.

© 2019 The Authors. The Laryngoscope published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of pressure tracing from the end of a continuous laryngoscopy exercise test, with the blue line depicting the epiglottic and the red line the tracheal pressure readings. At 40 Hz, maximum and minimum data are recorded, as seen by the even consecutive peaks. There is minimal background interference as seen by tracings with minimal secondary displacements. The epiglottic and tracheal tracings are temporally aligned, indicating that the tracings are well correlated. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at http://www.laryngoscope.com.]
Figure 2
Figure 2
Two separate tracings during the same time period from two different continuous laryngoscopy exercise tests, from the same individual, illustrating the similarities. The blue lines depict the epiglottic and the red lines the tracheal pressure readings. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at http://www.laryngoscope.com.]

References

    1. Parsons JP, Hallstrand TS, Mastronarde JG, et al. An official American Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline: exercise‐induced bronchoconstriction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;187:1016–1027.
    1. Christensen PM, Heimdal JH, Christopher KL, et al. ERS/ELS/ACCP 2013 international consensus conference nomenclature on inducible laryngeal obstructions. Eur Respir Rev 2015;24:445–450.
    1. Johansson H, Norlander K, Berglund L, et al. Prevalence of exercise‐induced bronchoconstriction and exercise‐induced laryngeal obstruction in a general adolescent population. Thorax 2015;70:57–63.
    1. Christensen PM, Thomsen SF, Rasmussen N, Backer V. Exercise‐induced laryngeal obstructions: prevalence and symptoms in the general public. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011;268:1313–1319.
    1. Nielsen EW, Hull JH, Backer V. High prevalence of exercise‐induced laryngeal obstruction in athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2013;45:2030–2035.
    1. Morris MJ, Oleszewski RT, Sterner JB, Allan PF. Vocal cord dysfunction related to combat deployment. Mil Med 2013;178:1208–1212.
    1. Halvorsen T, Walsted ES, Bucca C, et al. Inducible laryngeal obstruction: an official joint European Respiratory Society and European Laryngological Society statement. Eur Respir J 2017;50(3).
    1. Heimdal JH, Roksund OD, Halvorsen T, Skadberg BT, Olofsson J. Continuous laryngoscopy exercise test: a method for visualizing laryngeal dysfunction during exercise. Laryngoscope 2006;116:52–57.
    1. Walsted ES, Hull JH, Hvedstrup J, Maat RC, Backer V. Validity and reliability of grade scoring in the diagnosis of exercise‐induced laryngeal obstruction. ERJ Open Res 2017;3(3).
    1. Buchvald F, Phillipsen LD, Hjuler T, Nielsen KG. Exercise‐induced inspiratory symptoms in school children. Pediatr Pulmonol 2016;51:1200–1205.
    1. Bardin PG, Low K, Ruane L, Lau KK. Controversies and conundrums in vocal cord dysfunction. Lancet Respir Med 2017;5:546–548.
    1. Beard W. Upper respiratory causes of exercise intolerance. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1996;12:435–455.
    1. Nielan GJ, Rehder RS, Ducharme NG, Hackett RP. Measurement of tracheal static pressure in exercising horses. Vet Surg 1992;21:423–428.
    1. Williams JW, Pascoe JR, Meagher DM, Hornof WJ. Effects of left recurrent laryngeal neurectomy, prosthetic laryngoplasty, and subtotal arytenoidectomy on upper airway pressure during maximal exertion. Vet Surg 1990;19:136–141.
    1. Rehder RS, Ducharme NG, Hackett RP, Nielan GJ. Measurement of upper airway pressures in exercising horses with dorsal displacement of the soft palate. Am J Vet Res 1995;56:269–274.
    1. Baier H, Wanner A, Zarzecki S, Sackner MA. Relationships among glottis opening, respiratory flow, and upper airway resistance in humans. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol 1977;43:603–611.
    1. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J 2005;26:319–338.
    1. Doyle DJ. Airway anesthesia: theory and practice. Anesthesiol Clin 2015;33:291–304.
    1. Bowdle TA, Knutsen LJS, Williams M. Local and adjunct anesthesia In: Taylor JB, Triggle DJ, eds. Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry II. Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier; 2007:351–367.
    1. Sulica L, Blitzer A. Anesthesia for laryngeal surgery in the office. Laryngoscope 2000;110:1777–1779.
    1. Vasu BK, Rajan S, Paul J, Kumar L. Efficacy of atomised local anaesthetic versus transtracheal topical anaesthesia for awake fibreoptic intubation. Indian J Anaesth 2017;61:661–666.
    1. Holcombe SJ, Derksen FJ, Berney C, Becker AC, Horner NT. Effect of topical anesthesia of the laryngeal mucosa on upper airway mechanics in exercising horses. Am J Vet Res 2001;62:1706–1710.
    1. Cotes JE, Chinn DJ, Miller MR. Physiology of exercise and changes resulting from lung disease In: Cotes JE, Chinn DJ., Miller MR, eds. Lung Function. 6th ed. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing; 2009.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj