Effectiveness and safety of prolotherapy injections for management of lower limb tendinopathy and fasciopathy: a systematic review

Lane M Sanderson, Alan Bryant, Lane M Sanderson, Alan Bryant

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this review was to identify and evaluate existing research to determine the clinical effectiveness and safety of prolotherapy injections for treatment of lower limb tendinopathy and fasciopathy.

Review: Nine databases were searched (Medline, Science Direct, AMED, Australian Medical Index, APAIS-Health, ATSIhealth, EMBASE, Web of Science, OneSearch) without language, publication or data restrictions for all relevant articles between January 1960 and September 2014. All prospective randomised and non-randomised trials, cohort studies, case-series, cross-sectional studies and controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of one or more prolotherapy injections for tendinopathy or fasciopathy at or below the superior aspect of the tibia/fibula were included. Methodological quality of studies was determined using a modified evaluation tool developed by the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Injuries Group. Data analysis was carried out to determine the mean change of outcome measure scores from baseline to final follow-up for trials with no comparative group, and for randomised controlled trials, standardised mean differences between intervention groups were calculated. Pooled SMD data were calculated where possible to determine the statistical heterogeneity and overall effect for short-, intermediate- and long-term data. Adverse events were also reported. Two hundred and three studies were identified, eight of which met the inclusion criteria. These were then grouped according to tendinopathy or fasciopathy being treated with prolotherapy injections: Achilles tendinopathy, plantar fasciopathy and Osgood-Schlatter disease. The methodological quality of the eight included studies was generally poor, particularly in regards to allocation concealment, intention to treat analysis and blinding procedures. Results of the analysis provide limited support for the hypothesis that prolotherapy is effective in both reducing pain and improving function for lower limb tendinopathy and fasciopathy, with no study reporting a mean negative or non-significant outcome following prolotherapy injection. The analysis also suggests prolotherapy injections provide equal or superior short-, intermediate- and long-term results to alternative treatment modalities, including eccentric loading exercises forAchilles tendinopathy, platelet-rich plasma for plantar fasciopathy and usual care or lignocaine injections for Osgood-Schlatter disease. No adverse events following prolotherapy injections were reported in any study in this review.

Conclusions: The conclusions of this review were derived from the best available scientific evidence. It is intended that the results of this study will assist clinical decision-making by practitioners. The results of this review found limited evidence that prolotherapy injections are a safe and effective treatment for Achilles tendinopathy, plantar fasciopathy and Osgood-Schlatter disease, however more robust research using large, methodologically-sound randomised controlled trials is required to substantiate these findings.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Quorum flowchart of the reviewing process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Posterior photograph of right lower leg showing injection points most commonly used by Yelland et al. [34] for management of Achilles tendinopathy. The ‘X’ markings represent the anteromedial, posterior midline and anterolateral margins of the tendon, with orange lines demarking the Achilles tendon
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Plantar photograph of left foot illustrating the injection site used by Kim et al. [35] for management of plantar faciopathy. The ‘X’ marking represents the medial heel site used for the ultrasound-guided platelet-rich-plasma and prolotherapy injections, with the orange lines demarking the medial band of the plantar fascia
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Anteroposterior photograph of knee illustrating injection points marked ‘X’ starting over the most distal area of pain on the tibial tuberosity and moving proximally in 1-cm increments to the most proximal painful point with pressure as described by Topol et al. [37]. The orange lines represent the attachment of the patellar tendon from the patella to the tuberosity or its fragments
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Standardised mean differences (SMD) for improved pain after prolotherapy vs comparator intervention for plantar fasciopathy, Osgood Schlatter disease and Achilles tendinopathy

References

    1. Thomas M, Roddy E, Zhang W, Menz H, Hannan M, Peat G. The population prevalence of foot and ankle pain in middle and old age: a systematic review. Pain. 2011;152:2870–2880. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.09.019.
    1. Distel L, Best T. Prolotherapy: a clinical review of its role in treating chronic musculoskeletal pain. PM R. 2011;3:78–81. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.04.003.
    1. Chadwick J. Hippocratic writings. 2. New York: Penguin Book Publishing; 1978.
    1. Taylor ME. Prolotherapy for peripheral joints. Aust Musculoskelet Med. 2004;9(1):38-41..
    1. O’Brien M. Functional anatomy & physiology of tendons. Clin Sports Med. 1992;11:505–520.
    1. Ross MH, Romrell LJ. Histology: a text and atlas. 2. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1989. Connective tissue; pp. 85–116.
    1. Provenzano PP, Lakes RS, Keenan TM, Vanderby R., Jr Non-linear ligament viscoelasticity. Ann Biomed Eng. 2001;29(10):908–914. doi: 10.1114/1.1408926.
    1. Kannus P. Tendon pathology: basic sciences and clinical applications. Sports Exerc Inj. 1997;3:62.
    1. Diegelmann RF, Evans MC. Wound healing and overview of acute, fibrotic and delayed healing. Front Biosci. 2004;9:283–289. doi: 10.2741/1184.
    1. Ongley MJ, Dorman TA, Eek BC, Lundgren D, Klein RG. Ligament instability of knees: a new approach to treatment. Manual Medicine. 1998;3:152–154.
    1. Harvey M. Prolotherapy for podiatrists–part 1, understanding dense connective tissue [Internet]. Chiropody Review. 2011 (accessed September 4 2014). Available from: .
    1. Freeman J, Empson Y, Ekwueme E, Paynter D, Bsolinson P. Effect of prolotherapy on cellular proliferation and collagen deposition in MC3T3-E1 and patellar tendon fibroblast populations. Transitional Research. 2011;158:132–139. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2011.02.008.
    1. Martins C, Bertuzzi R, Tisot R, Michelin A, doPrado J, Stroher A, Burigo M. Dextrose prolotherapy and corticosteroid injection into rat Achilles tendon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(10):1895–1900. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1789-1.
    1. DeChellis D, Cortazzo M. Regenerative medicine in the field of pain medicine: prolotherapy, platelet rich plasma therapy and stem cell therapy – theory and evidence. Tech Reg Anesth Pain Manag. 2011;15:74–80. doi: 10.1053/j.trap.2011.05.002.
    1. Rabago D, Best T, Beamsley M, Patterson J. A systematic review of prolotherapy for chronic musculoskeletal pain. Clin Sports Med. 2005;15(5):376–380. doi: 10.1097/01.jsm.0000173268.05318.a4.
    1. Rabago D, Best T, Zgierska A, Zeisig E, Ryan M, Crane D. A systematic review of four injection therapies for lateral epicondylosis: prolotherapy, polidocanol, whole blood and platelet rich plasma. Br J Sports Med. 2012;43:471–481. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.052761.
    1. NHMRC . A guide to the development, implementation and evaluation of clinical practice guidelines. Canberra, ACT: National Health and Medical Research Council, Commonwealth of Australia; 1999.
    1. Reeves KD, Hassanein KM. Randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled double-blind study of dextrose prolotherapy for osteoarthritic thumb and finger (DIP, PIP, and trapeziometacarpal) joints: evidence of clinical efficacy. J Altern Complement Med. 2000;6(4):311–320. doi: 10.1089/10755530050120673.
    1. Reeves KD, Hassanein KM. Randomized prospective double-blind placebo-controlled study of dextrose prolotherapy for knee osteoarthritis with or without ACL laxity. Altern Ther Health Med. 2000;6(2):68–74.
    1. Scarpone M, Rabago DP, Zgierska A, Arbogast G, Snell E. The efficacy of prolotherapy for lateral epicondylosis: a pilot study. Clin Sports Med. 2008;18(3):248–254. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e318170fc87.
    1. Kim WM, Lee HG, Won Jeong C, Kim CM, Yoon MH. A randomized controlled trial of intraarticular prolotherapy versus steroid injection for sacroiliac joint pain. J Altern Complement Med. 2010;16(12):1285–1290. doi: 10.1089/acm.2010.0031.
    1. Reeves KD, Hassanein KM. Long-term effects of dextrose prolotherapy for anterior cruciate ligament laxity. Altern Ther Health Med. 2003;9(3):58–62.
    1. Khan SA, Kumar A, Varshney MK, Trikha V, Yadav CS. Dextrose prolotherapy for recalcitrant coccygodynia. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2008;16(1):27–29.
    1. Topol GA, Reeves KD. Regenerative injection of elite athletes with career-altering chronic groin pain who fail conservative treatment: a consecutive case series. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;87(11):890–902. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31818377b6.
    1. Dagenais S, Yelland M, DelMar C, Schoene M. Prolotherapy injection for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2007, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD004059. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004059.pub3.
    1. Linetsky F, Machikanti L. Regenerative injection therapy for axial pain. Tech Reg Anesth Pain Manag. 2005;9:40–49. doi: 10.1053/j.trap.2005.01.004.
    1. Hauser R, Hauser M, Cukla J. Dextrose prolotherapy injection for chronic ankle pain. Pract Pain Manag. 2010;10(1):70–76.
    1. Hauser R, Hauser M, Cukla J. A retrospective observational study on Hackett-Hemwell dextrose prolotherapy for unresolved foot and toe pain at an outpatient charity clinic in rural Illinois. Journal of Prolotherapy. 2011;3(1):543–551.
    1. Hauser R, Feister W. Dextrose Prolotherapy with human growth hormone to treat chronic first metatarsophalangeal joint pain. The Foot and Ankle Online Journal. 2012;5(9):1–11.
    1. Lyftogt J. Prolotherapy and Achilles tendinopathy: a prospective pilot study of an old treatment. Australasian Musculoskeletal Medicine. 2005;16–19.
    1. Lyftogt J. Subcutaneous prolotherapy for Achilles tendinopathy: the best solution? Australasian Musculoskeletal Medicine. 2007;107–109.
    1. Maxwell NK, Ryan M, Taunton J, Gillies JH, Wong A. Sonographically guided intratendinous injection of hyperosmolar dextrose of the Achilles tendon: a pilot study. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189(4):W215–W220. doi: 10.2214/AJR.06.1158.
    1. Ryan M, Wong A, Taunton J. Favourable Outcomes after sonographically guided inratendinous injection of hyperosmolar dextrose for chronic insertional and midportion Achilles tendinosis. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:1047–1053. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3255.
    1. Yelland M, Sweeting K, Lyftogt J, Ng SK, Scuffham P, Evans K. Prolotherapy injections and eccentric loading exercises for painful Achilles tendinosis: a randomised trial. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45:421–428. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.057968.
    1. Kim E, Lee J. Autologous platelet rich plasma versus dextrose prolotherapy for the treatment of chronic recalcitrant plantar fasciitis. Phys Med Rehabil Int. 2014;6:152–158.
    1. Ryan M, Wong A, Gillies J, Wong J, Taunton J. Sonographically guided intratendinous injections of hyperosmolar dextrose/lidocaine: a pilot study for the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43:303–306. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.050021.
    1. Topol GA, Podesta LA, Reeves KD, Raya MF, Fullerton BD, Yeh H. Hyperosmolar dextrose injection for recalcitrant Osgood-Schlatter Disease. Pediatrics. 2011;128(5):e1121–e1128. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1931.
    1. Dorman T. Prolotherapy: A survey. Journal of Orthopaedic Medicine. 1993; 15.
    1. Schneider RC, Iliss L. Fatality after injection of sclerosing agent to precipitate fibro-osseous proliferation. J Am Med Assoc. 1959;170:1768–1772. doi: 10.1001/jama.1959.03010150012003.
    1. Higgins JPT, Green SE. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.1. Cochrane Collaboration. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 2008.
    1. Glasziou PP, Irwig L, Bain CJ, Colditz GA. How to review the evidence: systematic identification and review of the scientific literature. National Health & Medical Research Council: Canberra; 1999.
    1. DMDI system (2010). “ISTPB+ISTP/ISSHP (II05, II01, II98, II78)” (Overview of this index). German Institute of Medical Documentation and Information (DMDI). Retrieved 2014-06-09.
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7) doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj