Impact of the Multi-Gene ThyroSeq Next-Generation Sequencing Assay on Cancer Diagnosis in Thyroid Nodules with Atypia of Undetermined Significance/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance Cytology

Yuri E Nikiforov, Sally E Carty, Simon I Chiosea, Christopher Coyne, Umamaheswar Duvvuri, Robert L Ferris, William E Gooding, Shane O LeBeau, N Paul Ohori, Raja R Seethala, Mitchell E Tublin, Linwah Yip, Marina N Nikiforova, Yuri E Nikiforov, Sally E Carty, Simon I Chiosea, Christopher Coyne, Umamaheswar Duvvuri, Robert L Ferris, William E Gooding, Shane O LeBeau, N Paul Ohori, Raja R Seethala, Mitchell E Tublin, Linwah Yip, Marina N Nikiforova

Abstract

Background: Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is a common approach to evaluate thyroid nodules. It offers definitive diagnosis of a benign or malignant nodule in the majority of cases. However, 10-25% of nodules yield one of three indeterminate cytologic diagnoses, leading to suboptimal management of these patients. Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undermined significance (AUS/FLUS) is a common indeterminate diagnosis, with the cancer risk ranging from 6% to 48%. This study assessed whether a multi-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay can offer significant improvement in diagnosis in AUS/FLUS nodules.

Methods: From May 2014 to March 2015, 465 consecutive FNA samples with the cytologic diagnosis of AUS/FLUS underwent prospective molecular testing using the ThyroSeq v2.1 panel. The panel included 14 genes analyzed for point mutations and 42 types of gene fusions occurring in thyroid cancer. In addition, eight genes were assessed for expression in order to evaluate the cell composition of FNA samples. Ninety-eight (21%) of these nodules had definitive surgical (n = 96) or nonsurgical (n = 2) follow-up and were used to determine the assay performance.

Results: Among 465 AUS/FLUS nodules, three were found to be composed of parathyroid cells and 462 of thyroid follicular cells. Of the latter, 31 (6.7%) were positive for mutations. The most frequently mutated genes were NRAS and HRAS, and overall point mutations in seven different genes and five types of gene fusions were identified in these nodules. Among 98 nodules with known outcome, histologic analysis revealed 22 (22.5%) cancers. ThyroSeq v2.1 was able to classify 20/22 cancers correctly, showing a sensitivity of 90.9% [confidence interval (CI) 78.8-100], specificity of 92.1% [CI 86.0-98.2], positive predictive value of 76.9% [CI 60.7-93.1], and negative predictive value of 97.2% [CI 78.8-100], with an overall accuracy of 91.8% [CI 86.4-97.3].

Conclusions: The results of the study demonstrate that the ThyroSeq v2.1 multi-gene NGS panel of molecular markers provides both high sensitivity and high specificity for cancer detection in thyroid nodules with AUS/FLUS cytology, which should allow improved management for these patients.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Schematic representation of the study flow and main findings.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Microscopic appearance of one of the NRAS-positive nodules histopathologically diagnosed as a hyperplastic nodule. (A) Low-power view showing a moderately thick capsule (arrow) and a nodule (top) composed predominantly of large follicles with abundant colloid intermixed with small follicles (hematoxylin and eosin [H&E], 40×). (B) In focal areas, small follicles are lined by cells with nuclear enlargement, irregular nuclear contours, and some chromatin clearing (arrows) (H&E, 200×). (C) Small follicular structures are focally positive for HBME-1 by immunohistochemistry (arrows), whereas most of the adjacent large follicles are negative (HBME-1 immunostain, 100×). Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/thy
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Negative predictive value (NPV; red line) and positive predictive value (PPV; blue line) of ThyroSeq v2.1 in thyroid nodules with atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undermined significance cytology found in this cohort with a cancer prevalence of 22.5% (black dotted line) and expected in a range of cancer prevalence rates between 6% and 48% (yellow dotted lines). Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/thy
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
Predicted NPV and PPV of ThyroSeq v2.1 compared to the Afirma gene expression classifier test in AUS/FLUS nodules based on the sensitivity and specificity of ThyroSeq (solid lines) identified in this study and of Afirma (dashed lines) reported by Alexander et al. (14). Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/thy

References

    1. Gharib H, Goellner JR. 1993. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid: an appraisal. Ann Intern Med 118:282–289
    1. Ohori NP, Schoedel KE. 2011. Variability in the atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance diagnosis in the bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: sources and recommendations. Acta Cytol 55:492–498
    1. Bongiovanni M, Spitale A, Faquin WC, Mazzucchelli L, Baloch ZW. 2012. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: a meta-analysis. Acta Cytol 56:333–339
    1. Ali SZ, Cibas ES. 2010. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Springer, New York
    1. Baloch ZW, LiVolsi VA, Asa SL, Rosai J, Merino MJ, Randolph G, Vielh P, DeMay RM, Sidawy MK, Frable WJ. 2008. Diagnostic terminology and morphologic criteria for cytologic diagnosis of thyroid lesions: a synopsis of the National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference. Diagn Cytopathol 36:425–437
    1. Sosa JA, Hanna JW, Lanman RB, Robinson KA, Ladenson PW. 2013. Increases in thyroid nodule fine-needle aspirations, surgeries, and diagnoses of thyroid cancer in the United States. In American Association of Endocrine Surgeons 34th Annual Meeting Chicago, IL: (abstract)
    1. Baloch Z, LiVolsi VA, Jain P, Jain R, Aljada I, Mandel S, Langer JE, Gupta PK. 2003. Role of repeat fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in the management of thyroid nodules. Diagn Cytopathol 29:203–206
    1. Yang J, Schnadig V, Logrono R, Wasserman PG. 2007. Fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules: a study of 4703 patients with histologic and clinical correlations. Cancer 111:306–315
    1. Nayar R, Ivanovic M. 2009. The indeterminate thyroid fine-needle aspiration: experience from an academic center using terminology similar to that proposed in the 2007 National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference. Cancer 117:195–202
    1. VanderLaan PA, Marqusee E, Krane JF. 2011. Clinical outcome for atypia of undetermined significance in thyroid fine-needle aspirations: should repeated fna be the preferred initial approach? Am J Clin Pathol :770–775
    1. Adeniran AJ, Hui P, Chhieng DC, Prasad ML, Schofield K, Theoharis C. 2011. BRAF mutation testing of thyroid fine-needle aspiration specimens enhances the predictability of malignancy in thyroid follicular lesions of undetermined significance. Acta Cytol 55:570–575
    1. Kim SK, Hwang TS, Yoo YB, Han HS, Kim DL, Song KH, Lim SD, Kim WS, Paik NS. 2011. Surgical results of thyroid nodules according to a management guideline based on the BRAF(V600E) mutation status. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:658–664
    1. Nikiforov YE, Ohori NP, Hodak SP, Carty SE, LeBeau SO, Ferris RL, Yip L, Seethala RR, Tublin ME, Stang MT, Coyne C, Johnson JT, Stewart AF, Nikiforova MN. 2011. Impact of mutational testing on the diagnosis and management of patients with cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules: a prospective analysis of 1056 FNA samples. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:3390–3397
    1. Alexander EK, Kennedy GC, Baloch ZW, Cibas ES, Chudova D, Diggans J, Friedman L, Kloos RT, LiVolsi VA, Mandel SJ, Raab SS, Rosai J, Steward DL, Walsh PS, Wilde JI, Zeiger MA, Lanman RB, Haugen BR. 2012. Preoperative diagnosis of benign thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology. N Engl J Med 367:705–715
    1. 2013. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidlines in Oncology: Thyroid Carcinoma. National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Fort Washington, PA
    1. McIver B, Castro MR, Morris JC, Bernet V, Smallridge R, Henry M, Kosok L, Reddi H. 2014. An independent study of a gene expression classifier (Afirma) in the evaluation of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99:4069–4077
    1. Nikiforov YE, Carty SE, Chiosea SI, Coyne C, Duvvuri U, Ferris RL, Gooding WE, Hodak SP, LeBeau SO, Ohori NP, Seethala RR, Tublin ME, Yip L, Nikiforova MN. 2014. Highly accurate diagnosis of cancer in thyroid nodules with follicular neoplasm/suspicious for a follicular neoplasm cytology by ThyroSeq v2 next-generation sequencing assay. Cancer 120:3627–3644
    1. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network 2014. Integrated genomic characterization of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cell 159:676–690
    1. Nikiforova MN, Lynch RA, Biddinger PW, Alexander EK, Dorn GW, 2nd, Tallini G, Kroll TG, Nikiforov YE. 2003. RAS point mutations and PAX8-PPAR gamma rearrangement in thyroid tumors: evidence for distinct molecular pathways in thyroid follicular carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:2318–2326
    1. Ferris RL, Baloch ZW, Bernet V, Chen A, Fahey T, 3rd, Ganly I, Hodak S, Kebebew E, Patel KN, Shaha ARM, Steward D, Tufano RP, Wiseman S, Carty SE. 2015. American Thyroid Association statement on surgical application of molecular profiling for thyroid nodules: current impact on perioperative decision making. Thyroid 25:760–768
    1. Vitagliano D, Portella G, Troncone G, Francione A, Rossi C, Bruno A, Giorgini A, Coluzzi S, Nappi TC, Rothstein JL, Pasquinelli R, Chiappetta G, Terracciano D, Macchia V, Melillo RM, Fusco A, Santoro M. 2006. Thyroid targeting of the N-ras(Gln61Lys) oncogene in transgenic mice results in follicular tumors that progress to poorly differentiated carcinomas. Oncogene 25:5467–5474
    1. Kwak JY, Kim EK, Moon HJ, Kim MJ, Ahn SS, Son EJ, Sohn YM. 2009. Parathyroid incidentalomas detected on routine ultrasound-directed fine-needle aspiration biopsy in patients referred for thyroid nodules and the role of parathyroid hormone analysis in the samples. Thyroid 19:743–748

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj