Estimating the clinical effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy in the clinic: evaluation of a CBT informed pain management programme

Stephen Morley, Amanda Williams, Sumerra Hussain, Stephen Morley, Amanda Williams, Sumerra Hussain

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses provide evidence for the efficacy of cognitive-behaviourally informed treatment (CBT) programmes for chronic pain. The current study aims to provide practice-based evidence for the effectiveness of CBT in routine clinical settings. Over a 10-year period 1013 pain patients were accepted into a 4 week in-patient pain management programme. Data from more than 800 patients was available at pre-treatment and at one month post-treatment and for around 600 patients at pre-treatment and at 9 months follow-up. Measures reported in this analysis were pain experience and interference, psychological distress (depression and anxiety), self-efficacy, catastrophizing, and walking. Change from pre-treatment to post-treatment and follow-up was assessed with conventional statistical tests, the computation of effect sizes and by the reliable change index (RCI) and clinically significant change (CSC) methodology. These analyses provide evidence of statistical improvement at post-treatment and follow-up and the RCI/CSC methodology suggested that between 1 in 3 and 1 in 7 (depending on the outcome measure) achieved clinically significant gains. There was also evidence that a small percentage of patients (1-2%) reliably deteriorated during the period of treatment. The limitations in the inferences that can be drawn from this study and of the methodology are discussed. A case is made for the application of benchmarking methods using data from RCTs in order to more fully evaluate practice and to generate better quality practice based evidence.

References

    1. Asghari A, Nicholas MK. Pain self-efficacy beliefs and pain behaviour. A prospective study. Pain. 2001;94:85-100.
    1. Atkins DC, Bedics JD, McGlinchey JB, Beauchaine TP. Assessing clinical significance: does it matter which method we use? J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005;73:982-989.
    1. Barkham M, Mellor-Clark J. Bridging evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence: developing a rigorous and relevant knowledge for the psychological therapies. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2003;10:319-327.
    1. Beck AT, Steer RA, Garbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck depression inventory: twenty five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev. 1988;8:77-100.
    1. Burns JW, Kubilus A, Bruehl S, Harden RN, Lofland K. Do changes in cognitive factors influence outcome following multidisciplinary treatment for chronic pain? A cross-lagged panel analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003;71:81-91.
    1. Cepeda MS, Africano JM, Polo R, Alcala R, Carr DB. Agreement between percentage pain reductions calculated from numeric rating scores of pain intensity and those reported by patients with acute or cancer pain. Pain. 2003;106:439-442.
    1. Cepeda MS, Africano JM, Polo R, Alcala R, Carr DB. What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain? Pain. 2003;105:151-157.
    1. Cucchiaro G, Farrar JT, Guite JW, Li Y. What postoperative outcomes matter to pediatric patients? Anesth Analg. 2006;102:1376-1382.
    1. Dixon D, Pollard B, Johnston M. What does the chronic pain grade questionnaire measure? Pain. 2007;130:249-253.
    1. Dixon KE, Keefe FJ, Scipio CD, Perri LM, Abernethy AP. Psychological interventions for arthritis pain management in adults: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2007;26:241-250.
    1. Dunlap WP, Cortina JM, Vaslow JB, Burke MJ. Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychol Methods. 1996;1:170-177.
    1. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, et al. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2005;113:9-19.
    1. Eccleston C, Morley S, Williams A.C.d.e.C, Yorke L, Mastroyannopoulou K. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of psychological therapy for chronic pain in children and adolescents. Pain. 2002;99:157-165.
    1. Farrar JT. What is clinically meaningful: outcome measures in pain clinical trials. Clin J Pain. 2000;16:S106-S112.
    1. Farrar JT, Berlin JA, Strom BL. Clinically important changes in acute pain outcome measures: a validation study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003;25:406-411.
    1. Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001;94:149-158.
    1. Geisser ME, Roth RS, Robinson ME. Assessing depression among persons with chronic pain using the center for epidemiological studies-depression scale and the beck depression inventory: a comparative analysis. Clin J Pain. 1997;13:163-170.
    1. Gibson L, Strong J. The reliability and validity of a measure of perceived functional capacity for work in chronic back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 1996;6:159-175.
    1. Hageman WJJM, Arrindell WA. A further refinement of the reliable change (RC) index by improving the pre–post difference score: introducing RCID. Behav Res Ther. 1993;31:693-700.
    1. Hanley MA, Jensen MP, Ehde DM, Robinson LR, Cardenas DD, Turner JA, et al. Clinically significant change in pain intensity ratings in persons with spinal cord injury or amputation. Clin J Pain. 2006;22:25-31.
    1. Harding VR, Williams A.C. de C, Richardson PH, Nicholas MK, Jackson JL, Richardson IH, et al. The development of a battery of measures for assessing physical functioning of chronic pain patients. Pain. 1994;58:367-375.
    1. Hoffman BM, Papas RK, Chatkoff DK, Kerns RD. Meta-analysis of psychological interventions for chronic low back pain. Health Psychol. 2007;26:1-9.
    1. Hsu LM. Reliable changes in psychotherapy: taking into account regression toward the mean. Behav Assess. 1989;11:459-467.
    1. Jacobson NS, Roberts LJ, Berns SB, McGlinchey JB. Methods for defining and determining the clinical significance of treatment effects: description, application, and alternatives. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999;67:300-307.
    1. Jacobson NS, Truax P. Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991;59:12-19.
    1. Jensen MP. Questionnaire validation: a brief guide for readers of the research literature. Clin J Pain. 2003;19:345-352.
    1. Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986;27:117-126.
    1. Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM. Changes in beliefs, catastrophizing, and coping are associated with improvement in multidisciplinary pain treatment. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001;69:655-662.
    1. Kazdin AE. The meanings and measurement of clinical significance. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999;67:332-339.
    1. Keefe FJ, Brown GK, Wallston KA, Caldwell DS. Coping with rheumatoid arthritis pain: catastrophizing as a maladaptive strategy. Pain. 1989;37:51-56.
    1. Lackner JM, Morley S, Dowzer C, Mesmer C, Hamilton S. Psychological treatments for irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004;72:1100-1113.
    1. Lowe B, Spitzer RL, Grafe K, Kroenke K, Quenter A, Zipfel S, et al. Comparative validity of three screening questionnaires for DSM-IV depressive disorders and physicians’ diagnoses. J Affect Disord. 2004;78:131-140.
    1. Minami T, Wampold BE, Serlin RC, Kircher JC, Brown GS. Benchmarks for psychotherapy efficacy in adult major depression. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007;75:232-243.
    1. Mohr DC. Negative outcome in psychotherapy: a critical review. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 1995;2:1-27.
    1. Morley S, Eccleston C, Williams A.C.de.C. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive behaviour therapy and behaviour therapy for chronic pain in adults, excluding headache. Pain. 1999;80:1-13.
    1. Nicholas MK, Asghari A, Blyth FM. What do the numbers mean? Normative data in chronic pain measures. Pain. 2008;134:51-58.
    1. Robinson ME, Brown JL, George SZ, Edwards PS, Atchison JW, Hirsh AT, et al. Multidimensional success criteria and expectations for treatment of chronic pain: the patient perspective. Pain Med. 2005;6:336-345.
    1. Rosensteil AK, Keefe FJ. The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain. Pain. 1983;17:33-44.
    1. Sullivan MJL, Thorn BE, Haythornthwaite JA, Keefe FJ, Martin M, Bradley LA, et al. Theoretical perspectives on the relationship between catastrophizing and pain. Clin J Pain. 2001;17:52-64.
    1. Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Brandenburg N, Carr DB, et al. Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2003;106:337-345.
    1. Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Revicki D, Harding G, Burke LB, Cella D, et al. Identifying important outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: an IMMPACT survey of people with pain. Pain. 2006;125:208-215.
    1. Turner JA, Holtzman S, Mancl L. Mediators, moderators, and predictors of therapeutic change in cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain. Pain. 2007;127:276-286.
    1. Westen D, Novotny CM, Thompson-Brenner H. The empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: assumptions, findings, and reporting in controlled clinical trials. Psychol Bull. 2004;130:631-663.
    1. Williams A.C. de C, Richardson PH, Nicholas MK, Pither CE, Harding VR, Ridout KL, Ralphs JA, Richardson IH, Justins DM, Chamberlain JH. Inpatient vs. outpatient pain management: results of a randomised controlled trial. Pain. 1996;66:13-22.
    1. Williams A.C. de C, Nicholas MK, Richardson PH, Pither CE, Fernandes J. Generalizing from a controlled trial: the effects of patient preference versus randomization on the outcome of inpatient versus outpatient chronic pain management. Pain. 1999;83:57-65.
    1. Zautra AJ, Johnson LM, Davis MC. Positive affect as a source of resilience for women in chronic pain. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005;73:212-220.
    1. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361-370.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

3
Subskrybuj