Live birth after additional tubal flushing with oil-based contrast versus no additional flushing: a randomised, multicentre, parallel-group pragmatic trial in infertile women with at least one patent tube at hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HYFOIL study)

Diane De Neubourg, Lara Janssens, Iris Verhaegen, Elke Smits, Ben W Mol, Ella Roelant, Diane De Neubourg, Lara Janssens, Iris Verhaegen, Elke Smits, Ben W Mol, Ella Roelant

Abstract

Introduction: Tubal patency testing is an essential part in the fertility workup of many subfertile women. Hysterosalpingography (HSG) has long been the test of choice in many clinics. There is evidence from a large randomised multicentre trial and from a recent meta-analysis that women who had HSG using oil soluble contrast medium (OSCM) had higher rates of ongoing pregnancy compared with women who underwent this procedure using water contrast. However, the field is moving away from HSG and nowadays hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (Hyfosy) using ultrasound guidance is considered as the first line office tubal patency test. Therefore, a large multicentre randomised clinical trial (RCT) will be initiated to evaluate if flushing the fallopian tubes with OSCM after a normal Hyfosy showing at least one patent fallopian tube will increase the live birth rate as compared with no flushing.

Methods and analysis: We plan a multicentre two arm, 1:1 randomised, open-label pragmatic comparative trial in 12 Belgian centres. After informed consent, we will randomise infertile women between 18 and 40 years of age, undergoing Hyfosy as part of the fertility workup to Hyfosy with additional tubal flushing with OSCM versus Hyfosy without additional flushing. Infertility is defined as lack of conception despite 12 months of unprotected intercourse, or three cycles of donor insemination without pregnancy or three ovulatory ovulation induction cycles without pregnancy, all three in combination with at least one patent tube on Hyfosy. Primary endpoint will be live birth with conception within 6 months after randomisation.

Ethics and dissemination: Approval on 11 May 2021 by the Ethics Committee from ZNA Hospital Antwerp who was the central Ethics Committee for the Clinical Trial Regulation Pilot (Pilot 412) in the 12 centres. The findings from this RCT will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications and presentations at scientific international meetings.

Trial registration numbers: EudraCT number: 2020-002135-30 and NCT04379973.

Keywords: health economics; reproductive medicine; subfertility.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: BWM is supported by an NHMRC Investigator grant (GNT1176437). BWM reports consultancy for ObsEva. BMW has received research funding from Ferring and Merck.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. Evers JLH. Female subfertility. The Lancet 2002;360:151–9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09417-5
    1. Weir WC, Weir DR. Therapeutic value of salpingograms in infertility. Fertil Steril 1951;2:514–22. 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)30725-7
    1. Gillespie HW. The therapeutic aspect of hysterosalpingography. Br J Radiol 1965;38:301–2. 10.1259/0007-1285-38-448-301
    1. Mohiyiddeen L, Hardiman A, Fitzgerald C, et al. . Tubal flushing for subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;5:CD003718. 10.1002/14651858.CD003718.pub4
    1. Wang R, van Welie N, van Rijswijk J, et al. . Effectiveness on fertility outcome of tubal flushing with different contrast media: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019;54:172–81. 10.1002/uog.20238
    1. Dreyer K, van Rijswijk J, Mijatovic V, et al. . Oil-Based or water-based contrast for hysterosalpingography in infertile women. N Engl J Med 2017;376:2043–52. 10.1056/NEJMoa1612337
    1. Fang F, Bai Y, Zhang Y, et al. . Oil-Based versus water-based contrast for hysterosalpingography in infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril 2018;110:153–60. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.03.021
    1. Reis MM, Soares SR, Cancado ML, et al. . Hysterosalpingo contrast sonography (HyCoSy) with SH U 454 (Echovist) for the assessment of tubal patency. Hum Reprod 1998;13:3049–52. 10.1093/humrep/13.11.3049
    1. Dijkman AB, Mol BW, van der Veen F, et al. . Can hysterosalpingocontrast-sonography replace hysterosalpingography in the assessment of tubal subfertility? Eur J Radiol 2000;35:44–8. 10.1016/S0720-048X(99)00127-8
    1. Dreyer K, Out R, Hompes PGA, et al. . Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography, a less painful procedure for tubal patency testing during fertility workup compared with (serial) hysterosalpingography: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2014;102:821–5. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.042
    1. Van Schoubroeck D, Van den Bosch T, Ameye L, et al. . Pain during Fallopian-tube patency testing by hysterosalpingo-foam sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;45:346–50. 10.1002/uog.14646
    1. Van Schoubroeck D, den Bosch TV, Van Tornout K, et al. . OC24.01: spontaneous conception after hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;46:51–3. 10.1002/uog.15100
    1. Tanaka K, Chua J, Cincotta R, et al. . Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy): tolerability, safety and the occurrence of pregnancy post-procedure. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2018;58:114–8. 10.1111/ajo.12716
    1. Exacoustos C, Tiberio F, Szabolcs B, et al. . Can tubal flushing with Hysterosalpingo-Foam sonography (HyFoSy) media increase women's chances of pregnancy? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015;22:S238. 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.836
    1. So S, Yamaguchi W, Tajima H, et al. . The effect of oil and water-soluble contrast medium in hysterosalpingography on thyroid function. Gynecol Endocrinol 2017;33:682–5. 10.1080/09513590.2017.1307960
    1. Kaneshige T, Arata N, Harada S, et al. . Changes in serum iodine concentration, urinary iodine excretion and thyroid function after hysterosalpingography using an oil-soluble iodinated contrast medium (lipiodol). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015;100:E469–72. 10.1210/jc.2014-2731
    1. Satoh M, Aso K, Katagiri Y. Thyroid dysfunction in neonates born to mothers who have undergone hysterosalpingography involving an oil-soluble iodinated contrast medium. Horm Res Paediatr 2015;84:370–5. 10.1159/000439381
    1. van Welie N, Roest I, Portela M, et al. . Thyroid function in neonates conceived after hysterosalpingography with iodinated contrast. Hum Reprod 2020;35:1159–67. 10.1093/humrep/deaa049
    1. Boivin J, Takefman J, Braverman A. Development and preliminary validation of the fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) tool. Hum Reprod 2011;26:2084–91.
    1. Boivin J, Takefman J, Braverman A. The fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) tool: development and general psychometric properties. Fertil Steril 2011;96:409–15. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.046

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj