Efficacy and safety of avapritinib in previously treated patients with advanced systemic mastocytosis

Andreas Reiter, Juliana Schwaab, Daniel J DeAngelo, Jason Gotlib, Michael W Deininger, Kristen M Pettit, Iván Alvarez-Twose, Alessandro M Vannucchi, Jens Panse, Uwe Platzbecker, Olivier Hermine, Ingunn Dybedal, Hui-Min Lin, Svetlana N Rylova, Katrin Ehlert, Saša Dimitrijević, Deepti H Radia, Andreas Reiter, Juliana Schwaab, Daniel J DeAngelo, Jason Gotlib, Michael W Deininger, Kristen M Pettit, Iván Alvarez-Twose, Alessandro M Vannucchi, Jens Panse, Uwe Platzbecker, Olivier Hermine, Ingunn Dybedal, Hui-Min Lin, Svetlana N Rylova, Katrin Ehlert, Saša Dimitrijević, Deepti H Radia

Abstract

Advanced systemic mastocytosis (AdvSM) is a rare myeloid neoplasm, driven by the KIT D816V mutation in >90% of patients. Avapritinib, a potent, highly selective D816V-mutant KIT inhibitor, is approved for treatment of adults with AdvSM by the US Food and Drug Administration, regardless of prior therapy, and the European Medicines Agency for patients with prior systemic therapy, based on EXPLORER (#NCT02561988; clinicaltrials.gov) and PATHFINDER (#NCT03580655; clinicaltrials.gov) clinical studies. We present latest pooled efficacy and safety analyses from patients who received ≥1 systemic therapy prior to avapritinib in EXPLORER/PATHFINDER. Overall response rate in response-evaluable patients (n = 31) was 71% (95% confidence interval: 52% to 86%; 22/31), including 19% (6/31) with complete remission (CR)/CR with partial recovery of peripheral blood counts (CRh). Median time to response was 2.3 months, median time to CR/CRh was 7.4 months, and median duration of response (DOR) was not reached. Reductions ≥50% in bone marrow mast cell infiltration (89%), KIT D816V variant allele fraction (66%), serum tryptase (89%), and reductions ≥35% in spleen size (70%) occurred in most patients. Median OS was not reached (median follow-up 17.7 months). Avapritinib was effective in all AdvSM subtypes, regardless of number/type of prior therapies or poor prognostic somatic mutations. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed in 94% of patients, most commonly grade 1/2; 57% had TRAEs of at least grade 3; 81% remained on treatment at 6 months. Avapritinib in adults with AdvSM who received prior systemic therapy was generally well tolerated, with high response rates regardless of prior systemic therapy.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: A.R. has received advisory board fees, speaking fees, and travel support from AbbVie, AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, Blueprint Medicines Corporation, BMS-Celgene, Deciphera, GSK, Incyte Corporation, and Novartis and received research support from Blueprint Medicines Corporation and Novartis. J.S. has received advisory board fees from Blueprint and Novartis. D.J.D. has served as a consultant for Amgen, Agios, Autolus, Blueprint Medicines Corporation, Forty-Seven, Incyte Corporation, Jazz, Novartis, Pfizer, Shire, and Takeda and has received research funding from AbbVie, GlycoMimetics, and Novartis. J.G. is Chair of the Response Adjudication Committee for the EXPLORER study and cochair of the Study Steering Committee for the PATHFINDER study and has received research funding and honoraria for these roles; has received research funding, served on advisory boards, and received honoraria and funding to cover travel expenses from Blueprint Medicines Corporation; has received research funding and serves on advisory boards for Deciphera; serves as the Chair for the Eligibility and Central Response Review Committee for Cogent Biosciences; and receives funding and honoraria for a study of bezuclastinib in patients with advanced SM. M.W.D. has received honoraria fees from Blueprint Medicines Corporation, Incyte Corporation, Medscape, Sangamo, and Takeda; has received consultancy fees from Blueprint Medicines Corporation, DisperSol, Fusion Pharma, Novartis, and Sangamo; has received research funding from Blueprint Medicines Corporation, Incyte Corporation, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, Novartis, Pfizer, SPARC, and Takeda; is part of a study management committee for Blueprint Medicines Corporation and Takeda; and is a case author for Medscape. K.M.P. has participated in advisory boards for AbbVie, CTI Biopharma, PharmaEssentia, and Kura Oncology. I.A.-T. has served on advisory boards for and received honoraria from Blueprint Medicines Corporation and has participated in educational events for Novartis. A.M.V. has participated in speakers’ bureau for AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, BMS-Celgene, Novartis, and Shire and in advisory boards for Abbvie, BMS-Celgene, CTI, Incyte, and Novartis. J.P. has received honorarium fees from Alexion, Apellis, Blueprint Medicines Corporation, BMS, MSD, Novartis, and F. Hoffmann-La Roche and served on the speaker’s bureau of Alexion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Neopharm Israel, and Sobi. U.P. has received research funding from BMS, Amgen, Novartis, Curis, and BerGenBio. O.H. has received research funding from AB Science, BMS-Celgene, Alexion, Novartis, and Inatherys; consulted for AB Science; and is a shareholder for AB Science. I.D. has received advisory board fees from Novartis. H.-M.L., S.N.R., K.E., and S.D. are employees of and equity holders in Blueprint Medicines Corporation. D.H.R. has been a clinical advisory board/study steering committee member (EXPLORER and PATHFINDER studies) for Blueprint Medicines Corporation, was a Cogent Biosciences steering committee member for the APEX trial, and was involved with educational events and advisory boards for Novartis.

A full list of EXPLORER and PATHFINDER study investigators appears in “Appendix.”

© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient disposition from EXPLORER and PATHFINDER studies.aEighty-six patients in EXPLORER include 16 non-AdvSM and 1 with CMML by central diagnosis. bSmPC population included in supplemental Appendix. cOne patient enrolled who initiated 200 mg QD in EXPLORER with a local diagnosis of AdvSM was centrally adjudicated to have indolent SM. SmPC, summary of medicinal product characteristics.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Percentage reduction from baseline in clinicopathological measures of response (prior systemic therapy pooled safety population, patients with baseline assessment data available). (A) Bone marrow mast cell infiltrates (median percent). (B) Serum tryptase (ng/mL). (C) KIT D816V VAF (median percent). (D) Spleen volume (mL).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
OS in different populations and according to baseline mutations and risk scores. OS shown in (A) all patients in the prior systemic therapy pooled efficacy population and prior systemic therapy pooled safety population; (B) S/A/R− (0 mutations at baseline) and S/A/R+ (≥1 mutation at baseline) patients in the prior systemic therapy pooled safety population; and (C) low, intermediate, and high MARS categories in prior systemic therapy pooled safety population.

References

    1. Akin C, Metcalfe DD. Systemic mastocytosis. Annu Rev Med. 2004;55(1):419–432.
    1. Hermine O, Lortholary O, Leventhal PS, et al. Case-control cohort study of patients’ perceptions of disability in mastocytosis. PLoS One. 2008;3(5)
    1. Lim K-H, Tefferi A, Lasho TL, et al. Systemic mastocytosis in 342 consecutive adults: survival studies and prognostic factors. Blood. 2009;113(23):5727–5736.
    1. Pardanani A. Systemic mastocytosis in adults: 2021 Update on diagnosis, risk stratification and management. Am J Hematol. 2021;96(4):508–525.
    1. Valent P, Akin C, Metcalfe DD. Mastocytosis: 2016 updated WHO classification and novel emerging treatment concepts. Blood. 2017;129(11):1420–1427.
    1. Valent P, Horny HP, Escribano L, et al. Diagnostic criteria and classification of mastocytosis: a consensus proposal. Leuk Res. 2001;25(7):603–625.
    1. Chatterjee A, Ghosh J, Kapur R. Mastocytosis: a mutated KIT receptor induced myeloproliferative disorder. Oncotarget. 2015;6(21):18250–18264.
    1. Garcia-Montero AC, Jara-Acevedo M, Teodosio C, et al. KIT mutation in mast cells and other bone marrow hematopoietic cell lineages in systemic mast cell disorders: a prospective study of the Spanish Network on Mastocytosis (REMA) in a series of 113 patients. Blood. 2006;108(7):2366–2372.
    1. Kristensen T, Vestergaard H, Møller MB. Improved detection of the KIT D816V mutation in patients with systemic mastocytosis using a quantitative and highly sensitive real-time qPCR assay. J Mol Diagn. 2011;13(2):180–188.
    1. Erben P, Schwaab J, Metzgeroth G, et al. The KIT D816V expressed allele burden for diagnosis and disease monitoring of systemic mastocytosis. Ann Hematol. 2014;93(1):81–88.
    1. Reiter A, George TI, Gotlib J. New developments in diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment of advanced systemic mastocytosis. Blood. 2020;135(16):1365–1376.
    1. Gülen T, Hägglund H, Dahlén B, Nilsson G. Mastocytosis: the puzzling clinical spectrum and challenging diagnostic aspects of an enigmatic disease. J Intern Med. 2016;279(3):211–228.
    1. Gilreath JA, Tchertanov L, Deininger MW. Novel approaches to treating advanced systemic mastocytosis. Clin Pharmacol. 2019;11:77–92.
    1. Gotlib J, Kluin-Nelemans HC, George TI, et al. Efficacy and safety of midostaurin in advanced systemic mastocytosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(26):2530–2541.
    1. Jawhar M, Schwaab J, Meggendorfer M, et al. The clinical and molecular diversity of mast cell leukemia with or without associated hematologic neoplasm. Haematologica. 2017;102(6):1035–1043.
    1. Sperr WR, Kundi M, Alvarez-Twose I, et al. International prognostic scoring system for mastocytosis (IPSM): a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Haematol. 2019;6(12):e638–e649.
    1. Jawhar M, Schwaab J, Naumann N, et al. Response and progression on midostaurin in advanced systemic mastocytosis: KIT D816V and other molecular markers. Blood. 2017;130(2):137–145.
    1. Lübke J, Schwaab J, Naumann N, et al. Superior efficacy of midostaurin over cladribine in advanced systemic mastocytosis: a registry-based analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16):1783–1794.
    1. Wilson TM, Maric I, Simakova O, et al. Clonal analysis of NRAS activating mutations in KIT-D816V systemic mastocytosis. Haematologica. 2011;96(3):459–463.
    1. Soucie E, Hanssens K, Mercher T, et al. In aggressive forms of mastocytosis, TET2 loss cooperates with c-KITD816V to transform mast cells. Blood. 2012;120(24):4846–4849.
    1. Traina F, Visconte V, Jankowska AM, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphism array lesions, TET2, DNMT3A, ASXL1 and CBL mutations are present in systemic mastocytosis. PLoS One. 2012;7(8)
    1. Schwaab J, Schnittger S, Sotlar K, et al. Comprehensive mutational profiling in advanced systemic mastocytosis. Blood. 2013;122(14):2460–2466.
    1. Muñoz-González JI, Jara-Acevedo M, Alvarez-Twose I, et al. Impact of somatic and germline mutations on the outcome of systemic mastocytosis. Blood Adv. 2018;2(21):2814–2828.
    1. Jawhar M, Schwaab J, Schnittger S, et al. Additional mutations in SRSF2, ASXL1 and/or RUNX1 identify a high-risk group of patients with KIT D816V(+) advanced systemic mastocytosis. Leukemia. 2016;30(1):136–143.
    1. Jawhar M, Schwaab J, Álvarez-Twose I, et al. MARS: Mutation-Adjusted Risk Score for advanced systemic mastocytosis. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(31):2846–2856.
    1. Novartis Europharm Limited Summary of Product Characteristics.
    1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation Prescribing Information.
    1. Gleixner KV, Valent P, Sperr WR. Treatment of patients with aggressive systemic mastocytosis, mast cell leukemia and mast cell sarcoma: a single center experience. Blood. 2018;132(suppl 1):1769.
    1. Ustun C, Arock M, Kluin-Nelemans HC, et al. Advanced systemic mastocytosis: from molecular and genetic progress to clinical practice. Haematologica. 2016;101(10):1133–1143.
    1. Ustun C, Gotlib J, Popat U, et al. Consensus opinion on allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in advanced systemic mastocytosis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016;22(8):1348–1356.
    1. Evans EK, Gardino AK, Kim JL, et al. A precision therapy against cancers driven by KIT/PDGFRA mutations. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9(414)
    1. DeAngelo DJ, Quiery AT, Radia D, et al. American Society of Hematology 59th Annual Meeting and Exposition; Atlanta, GA: 2017. Clinical activity in a phase 1 study of Blu-285, a potent, highly-selective inhibitor of KIT D816V in advanced systemic mastocytosis (AdvSM)
    1. DeAngelo DJ, Radia DH, George TI, et al. Safety and efficacy of avapritinib in advanced systemic mastocytosis: the phase 1 EXPLORER trial. Nat Med. 2021;27(12):2183–2191.
    1. Gotlib J, Reiter A, Radia DH, et al. Efficacy and safety of avapritinib in advanced systemic mastocytosis: interim analysis of the phase 2 PATHFINDER trial. Nat Med. 2021;27(12):2192–2199.
    1. Blueprint Medicines Corporation AYVAKIT Prescribing Information.
    1. BioSpace. Blueprint Medicines' AYVAKYT (avapritinib) Receives European Commission Approval for the Treatment of Adults with Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis.
    1. Gotlib J, Pardanani A, Akin C, et al. International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) & European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (ECNM) consensus response criteria in advanced systemic mastocytosis. Blood. 2013;121(13):2393–2401.
    1. Greenberg PL, Tuechler H, Schanz J, et al. Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2012;120(12):2454–2465.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj