Clinical Efficacy and Dosing of Vibrotactile Coordinated Reset Stimulation in Motor and Non-motor Symptoms of Parkinson's Disease: A Study Protocol

Kristina J Pfeifer, Alex J Cook, Jessica K Yankulova, Bruce J P Mortimer, Elizabeth Erickson-DiRenzo, Rohit Dhall, Leila Montaser-Kouhsari, Peter A Tass, Kristina J Pfeifer, Alex J Cook, Jessica K Yankulova, Bruce J P Mortimer, Elizabeth Erickson-DiRenzo, Rohit Dhall, Leila Montaser-Kouhsari, Peter A Tass

Abstract

Enhanced neuronal synchronization of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is commonly found in PD patients and corresponds to decreased motor ability. Coordinated reset (CR) was developed to decouple synchronized states causing long lasting desynchronization of neural networks. Vibrotactile CR stimulation (vCR) was developed as non-invasive therapeutic that delivers gentle vibrations to the fingertips. A previous study has shown that vCR can desynchronize abnormal brain rhythms within the sensorimotor cortex of PD patients, corresponding to sustained motor relief after 3 months of daily treatment. To further develop vCR, we created a protocol that has two phases. Study 1, a double blinded randomized sham-controlled study, is designed to address motor and non-motor symptoms, sensorimotor integration, and potential calibration methods. Study 2 examines dosing effects of vCR using a remote study design. In Study 1, we will perform a 7-month double-blind sham-controlled study including 30 PD patients randomly placed into an active vCR or inactive (sham) vCR condition. Patients will receive stimulation for 4 h a day in 2-h blocks for 6 months followed by a 1-month pause in stimulation to assess long lasting effects. Our primary outcome measure is the Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part III off medication after 6 months of treatment. Secondary measures include a freezing of gait (FOG) questionnaire, objective motor evaluations, sensorimotor electroencephalography (EEG) results, a vibratory temporal discrimination task (VTDT), non-motor symptom evaluations/tests such as sleep, smell, speech, quality of life measurements and Levodopa Equivalent Daily Dose (LEDD). Patients will be evaluated at baseline, 3, 6, and 7 months. In the second, unblinded study phase (Study 2), all patients will be given the option to receive active vCR stimulation at a reduced dose for an additional 6 months remotely. The remote MDS-UPDRS part III off medication will be our primary outcome measure. Secondary measures include sleep, quality of life, objective motor evaluations, FOG and LEDD. Patients will be evaluated in the same time periods as the first study. Results from this study will provide clinical efficacy of vCR and help validate our investigational vibrotactile device for the purpose of obtaining FDA clearance. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04877015.

Keywords: Parkinson's disease; coordinated reset; non-invasive stimulation; non-motor symptoms; sensorimotor; study protocol; vibrotactile stimulation.

Conflict of interest statement

RD has served as a clinical trials investigator for Impax Pharmaceuticals, Pharma2B, CALA Health, Axovant and Neurocrine Biosciences. PT works as consultant for Boston Scientific Neuromodulation and Gretap AG and is inventor on a number of patents for non-invasive neuromodulation. BM is employed by Engineering Acoustics who manufacture vibrotactile systems. This study received funding from Synergic Medical Technologies, Inc., The Parkinson Alliance and John A. Blume Foundation. Synergic Medical Technologies, Inc. was not involved in the collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication. We discussed the study design with Synergic Medical Technologies, Inc. and adjusted some aspects of the study design for compliance with the FDA approval process. The Parkinson Alliance and John A. Blume Foundation were not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication. No further disclosures. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2021 Pfeifer, Cook, Yankulova, Mortimer, Erickson-DiRenzo, Dhall, Montaser-Kouhsari and Tass.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic illustration of the vCR stimulation using a three cycles ON: two cycles OFF pattern (17). Single vibratory bursts (highlighted by red bars) are delivered at periodic times subjected to a jitter that is uniformly distributed within the range of ±23.5% the inter-stimulus intervals. A vCR sequence comprises four subsequent vibratory bursts, delivered (on average) within one vCR cycle. Within one vCR sequence each fingertip (two through five) is activated exactly once. The CR frequency fCR, i.e., the rate at which the CR sequences are delivered, is 1.5 Hz. Hence, the length of a CR cycle is 667 ms. Bilateral noisy vCR is administered in a mirrored manner to both hands, coincidently activating right and left fingers (two through five). Schematic shows the vCR pattern coincidently delivered to left and right hand. Vibration frequency is 250 Hz and duration of vibration bursts is 100 ms. The duration of a single vCR session is 2 h.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Displays the vibrotactile wearable stimulator. (A) Displays the tactors and gloves that can be adjusted via Velcro straps for the finger pad or length of finger. (B) Depicts the controller being worn and fastened by a belt. (C) Displays the part of the controller in which the tactor ends plug into. (D) Displays the LCD screen which shows battery life and time remaining of stimulation. A push button turns on, pauses, and turns off the controller. (E) Displays the charging port of the controller which is charged with a micro-USB.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Depicts study 1 procedures for the double-blind, sham-controlled vCR study. Patients will receive a General Health Survey which includes our inclusion/exclusion questionnaire and our dopamine dysregulation syndrome questionnaire developed for the purpose of our study via email 8–1 weeks prior to the screening visit. During the screening visit (8–4 weeks prior to baseline) patients will be consented and will arrive at Stanford off medication, to complete their physical/neurological examination and report their PD medical history. Patients will perform the MDS-UPDRS III off medication with the study's main movement disorders evaluator and then receive Parcopa (dopamine medication). Patients will then repeat the MDS-UPDRS III after 1 hour of taking medication. Patients will complete a vibratory intensity discrimination task to confirm that they do not have severe vibratory sensory abnormalities. The study's treating movement disorders neurologist will track patients for 4 weeks prior to their first clinical study visit (baseline) to confirm that their medication is stable. One to two weeks prior to every clinical study visit, patients will receive the following questionnaires/tests: MDS-UPDRS IB, II, UPSIT, PDSS, FOG, PDQ-39, and the usability/tolerability questionnaire of the vCR device. During the clinical study visits (baseline, 3, 6, and 7 months), patients will arrive to Stanford off medication and undergo the physical/ neurological examination, PD medical history, MDS-UPDRS III, EEG, VTDT, APDM, Kinesia ONE, and speech assessments. Patients are administered Parcopa and after 1 h perform the MDS-UPDRS III, IA, IV, Kinesia ONE, and APDM. After the 6-month visit, patients undergo a 1-month pause in stimulation to measure long term effects of vCR at the 7-month follow-up. During the entire length of the trial, patients will report their daily LEDD amount and starting from baseline will perform the Kinesia ONE motor evaluation at home one to three times a week for motor monitoring. *The Usability/Tolerability questionnaire is performed 1 week after the start of therapy and then 1-2 weeks before every study visit. **vCR glove administration occurs at baseline only.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Depicts study 2 remote procedures that detail vCR dosing techniques and clinical data obtained. At the 7-month in-person visit, patients will be reconsented and will be sent home with active vCR. Patients will be instructed to stimulate between 2 h a day (maximum) to 2 h three times a week (minimum) from months 7 to 13, report their LEDD amount and perform the Kinesia ONE motor assessment one to three times a week to monitor motor ability throughout the entire trial. One to two weeks before every remote study visit, patients take the following questionnaires: MDS-UPDRS IB, II, PDSS, FOG, PDQ-39, and the Usability/Tolerability vCR device questionnaire. Remote study visits occur at 10, 13 months, and after a 1 month (14th month) pause in stimulation to assess long-lasting effects. During these remote study visits, patients are off medication and the study's treating neurologist gathers medical history and the study's main movement disorders evaluator assesses the remote MDS-UPDRS III, IA, and IV. *The Usability/Tolerability questionnaire is performed 1 week after the start of therapy and then 1–2 weeks before every study visit.

References

    1. Rocca WA. The burden of Parkinson's disease: a worldwide perspective. Lancet Neurol. (2018) 17:928–9. 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30355-7
    1. Rai SN, Singh P. Advancement in the modelling and therapeutics of Parkinson's disease. J Chem Neuroanat. (2020) 104:101752. 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2020.101752
    1. Rascol O, Payoux P, Ory F, Ferreira JJ, Brefel-Courbon C, Montastruc JL. Limitations of current Parkinson's disease therapy. Ann Neurol. (2003) 53(Suppl. 3):S3–S15. 10.1002/ana.10513
    1. Rai SN, Singh P, Varshney R, Chaturvedi VK, Vamanu E, Singh MP, et al. . Promising drug targets and associated therapeutic interventions in Parkinson's disease. Neural Regen Res. (2021) 16:1730–9. 10.4103/1673-5374.306066
    1. Bodagh IY, Robertson DR. A risk-benefit assessment of drugs used in the management of Parkinson's disease. Drug Saf. (1994) 11:94–103. 10.2165/00002018-199411020-00004
    1. Factor SA, Molho ES, Podskalny GD, Brown D. Parkinson's disease: drug-induced psychiatric states. Adv Neurol. (1995) 65:115–38.
    1. Deuschl G, Schade-Brittinger C, Krack P, Volkmann J, Schäfer H, Bötzel K, et al. . A randomized trial of deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. N Engl J Med. (2006) 355:896–908. 10.1056/NEJMoa060281
    1. Binder DK, Rau GM, Starr PA. Risk factors for hemorrhage during microelectrode-guided deep brain stimulator implantation for movement disorders. Neurosurgery. (2005) 56:722–32. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000156473.57196.7E
    1. Baizabal-Carvallo JF, Jankovic J. Movement disorders induced by deep brain stimulation. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. (2016) 25:1–9. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.01.014
    1. Collomb-Clerc A, Welter ML. Effects of deep brain stimulation on balance and gait in patients with Parkinson's disease: a systematic neurophysiological review. Neurophysiol Clin. (2015) 45:371–88. 10.1016/j.neucli.2015.07.001
    1. Klostermann F, Ehlen F, Vesper J, Nubel K, Gross M, Marzinzik F, et al. . Effects of subthalamic deep brain stimulation on dysarthrophonia in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2008) 79:522–9. 10.1136/jnnp.2007.123323
    1. Temperli P, Ghika J, Villemure JG, Burkhard PR, Bogousslavsky J, Vingerhoets FJ. How do parkinsonian signs return after discontinuation of subthalamic DBS? Neurology. (2003) 60:78–81. 10.1212/WNL.60.1.78
    1. Tass PA. Vibrotactile coordinated reset stimulation for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Neural Regen Res. (2021) 7.
    1. Levy R, Ashby P, Hutchison WD, Lang AE, Lozano AM, Dostrovsky JO. Dependence of subthalamic nucleus oscillations on movement and dopamine in Parkinson's disease. Brain. (2002) 125(Pt 6):1196–209. 10.1093/brain/awf128
    1. Brown P, Oliviero A, Mazzone P, Insola A, Tonali P, Di Lazzaro V. Dopamine dependency of oscillations between subthalamic nucleus and pallidum in Parkinson's disease. J Neurosci. (2001) 21:1033–8. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-03-01033.2001
    1. Tass PA. Vibrotactile coordinated reset stimulation for the treatment of neurological diseases: concepts and device specifications. Cureus. (2017) 9:e1535. 10.7759/cureus.1535
    1. Pfeifer KJ, Kromer JA, Cook AJ, Hornbeck T, Lim EA, Mortimer B, et al. . Coordinated reset vibrotactile stimulation induces sustained cumulative benefits in Parkinson's disease. Front Physiol. (2021) 12:624317. 10.3389/fphys.2021.624317
    1. Tass PA, Majtanik M. Long-term anti-kindling effects of desynchronizing brain stimulation: a theoretical study. Biol Cybern. (2006) 94:58–66. 10.1007/s00422-005-0028-6
    1. Popovych OV, Tass PA. Desynchronizing electrical and sensory coordinated reset neuromodulation. Front Hum Neurosci. (2012) 6:58. 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00058
    1. Tass PA. A model of desynchronizing deep brain stimulation with a demand-controlled coordinated reset of neural subpopulations. Biol Cybern. (2003) 89:81–8. 10.1007/s00422-003-0425-7
    1. Kromer JA, Tass PA. Long-lasting desynchronization by decoupling stimulation. Phys Rev Res. (2020) 2:033101. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033101
    1. Abbott LF, Nelson SB. Synaptic plasticity: taming the beast. Nat Neurosci. (2000) 3:1178–83. 10.1038/81453
    1. Tass PA, Qin L, Hauptmann C, Dovero S, Bezard E, Boraud T, et al. . Coordinated reset has sustained aftereffects in Parkinsonian monkeys. Ann Neurol. (2012) 72:816–20. 10.1002/ana.23663
    1. Adamchic I, Hauptmann C, Barnikol UB, Pawelczyk N, Popovych O, Barnikol TT, et al. . Coordinated reset neuromodulation for Parkinson's disease: proof-of-concept study. Mov Disord. (2014) 29:1679–84. 10.1002/mds.25923
    1. Syrkin-Nikolau J, Neuville R, O'Day J, Anidi C, Miller Koop M, Martin T, et al. . Coordinated reset vibrotactile stimulation shows prolonged improvement in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. (2018) 33:179–80. 10.1002/mds.27223
    1. Rosenkranz K, Rothwell JC. Differential effect of muscle vibration on intracortical inhibitory circuits in humans. J Physiol. (2003) 551:649–60. 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.043752
    1. Seo NJ, Lakshminarayanan K, Lauer AW, Ramakrishnan V, Schmit BD, Hanlon CA, et al. . Use of imperceptible wrist vibration to modulate sensorimotor cortical activity. Exp Brain Res. (2019) 237:805–16. 10.1007/s00221-018-05465-z
    1. Neuper C, Pfurtscheller G. Event-related dynamics of cortical rhythms: frequency-specific features and functional correlates. Int J Psychophysiol. (2001) 43:41–58. 10.1016/S0167-8760(01)00178-7
    1. Goetz CG, Tilley BC, Shaftman SR, Stebbins GT, Fahn S, Martinez-Martin P, et al. . Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Mov Disord. (2008) 23:2129–70. 10.1002/mds.22340
    1. Hoops S, Nazem S, Siderowf AD, Duda JE, Xie SX, Stern MB, et al. . Validity of the MoCA and MMSE in the detection of MCI and dementia in Parkinson disease. Neurology. (2009) 73:1738–45. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c34b47
    1. Isella V, Mapelli C, Morielli N, Siri C, De Gaspari D, Pezzoli G, et al. . Diagnosis of possible mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease: validity of the SCOPA-Cog. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. (2013) 19:1160–3. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2013.08.008
    1. Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R, Peto V, Greenhall R, Hyman N. The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39): development and validation of a Parkinson's disease summary index score. Age Ageing. (1997) 26:353–7. 10.1093/ageing/26.5.353
    1. Trenkwalder C, Kohnen R, Högl B, Metta V, Sixel-Döring F, Frauscher B, et al. . Parkinson's disease sleep scale–validation of the revised version PDSS-2. Mov Disord. (2011) 26:644–52. 10.1002/mds.23476
    1. Doty RL, Shaman P, Kimmelman CP, Dann MS. University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test: a rapid quantitative olfactory function test for the clinic. Laryngoscope. (1984) 94(2 Pt 1):176–8. 10.1288/00005537-198402000-00004
    1. Yorkston KM, Beukelman DR, Traynor C. Assessment of Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech. Austin, TX: Pro-ed (1984).
    1. Baylor C, Yorkston K, Eadie T, Kim J, Chung H, Amtmann D. The Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB): item bank calibration and development of a disorder-generic short form. J Speech Lang Hear Res. (2013) 56:1190–208. 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0140)
    1. Rosen CA, Lee AS, Osborne J, Zullo T, Murry T. Development and validation of the voice handicap index-10. Laryngoscope. (2004) 114:1549–56. 10.1097/00005537-200409000-00009
    1. Stillerova T, Liddle J, Gustafsson L, Lamont R, Silburn P. Remotely assessing symptoms of Parkinson's disease using videoconferencing: a feasibility study. Neurol Res Int. (2016) 2016:4802570. 10.1155/2016/4802570
    1. Doty RL, Deems DA, Stellar S. Olfactory dysfunction in parkinsonism: a general deficit unrelated to neurologic signs, disease stage, or disease duration. Neurology. (1988) 38:1237–44. 10.1212/WNL.38.8.1237
    1. Haehner A, Boesveldt S, Berendse HW, Mackay-Sim A, Fleischmann J, Silburn PA, et al. . Prevalence of smell loss in Parkinson's disease–a multicenter study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. (2009) 15:490–4. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2008.12.005
    1. Sobel N, Prabhakaran V, Desmond JE, Glover GH, Goode RL, Sullivan EV, et al. . Sniffing and smelling: separate subsystems in the human olfactory cortex. Nature. (1998) 392:282–6. 10.1038/32654
    1. Xu Z, Anderson KN, Saffari SE, Lawson RA, Chaudhuri KR, Brooks D, et al. . Progression of sleep disturbances in Parkinson's disease: a 5-year longitudinal study. J Neurol. (2021) 268:312–20. 10.1007/s00415-020-10140-x
    1. Adler CH, Thorpy MJ. Sleep issues in Parkinson's disease. Neurology. (2005) 64(12 Suppl. 3), S12–S20. 10.1212/WNL.64.12_suppl_3.S12
    1. Benke T, Hohenstein C, Poewe W, Butterworth B. Repetitive speech phenomena in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2000) 69:319–24. 10.1136/jnnp.69.3.319
    1. Goberman AM, Blomgren M, Metzger E. Characteristics of speech disfluency in Parkinson's disease. J Neurolinguistics. (2010) 23:470–8. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.11.001
    1. Tykalová T, Rusz J, Cmejla R, Klempír J, RuŽičková H, Roth J, et al. . Effect of dopaminergic medication on speech dysfluency in Parkinson's disease: a longitudinal study. J Neural Trans. (2015) 122:1135–42. 10.1007/s00702-015-1363-y
    1. Schulz GM, Grant MK. Effects of speech therapy and pharmacologic and surgical treatments on voice and speech in Parkinson's disease: a review of the literature. J Commun Disord. (2000) 33:59–88. 10.1016/S0021-9924(99)00025-8
    1. Klockgether T, Borutta M, Rapp H, Spieker S, Dichgans J. A defect of kinesthesia in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. (1995) 10:460–5. 10.1002/mds.870100410
    1. Schneider JS, Diamond SG, Markham CH. Deficits in orofacial sensorimotor function in Parkinson's disease. Ann Neurol. (1986) 19:275–82. 10.1002/ana.410190309
    1. Jobst EE, Melnick ME, Byl NN, Dowling GA, Aminoff MJ. Sensory perception in Parkinson's disease. Arch Neurol. (1997) 54:450–4. 10.1001/archneur.1997.00550160080020
    1. Conte A, Modugno N, Lena F, Dispenza S, Gandolfi B, Iezzi E, et al. . Subthalamic nucleus stimulation and somatosensory temporal discrimination in Parkinson's disease. Brain. (2010) 133:2656–63. 10.1093/brain/awq191
    1. Conte A, Khan N, Defazio G, Rothwell JC, Berardelli A. Pathophysiology of somatosensory abnormalities in Parkinson's disease. Nat Rev Neurol. (2013) 9:687–97. 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.224
    1. Lysyansky B, Popovych OV, Tass PA. Desynchronizing anti-resonance effect of m: n ON-OFF coordinated reset stimulation. J Neural Eng. (2011) 8:036019. 10.1088/1741-2560/8/3/036019
    1. Abbruzzese G, Berardelli A. Sensorimotor integration in movement disorders. Mov Disord. (2003) 18:231–40. 10.1002/mds.10327
    1. Kaji R, Urushihara R, Murase N, Shimazu H, Goto S. Abnormal sensory gating in basal ganglia disorders. J Neurol. (2005) 252:iv13–6. 10.1007/s00415-005-4004-9
    1. Lewis GN, Byblow WD. Altered sensorimotor integration in Parkinson's disease. Brain. (2002) 125(Pt 9):2089–99. 10.1093/brain/awf200
    1. Boulay CB, Sarnacki WA, Wolpaw JR, McFarland DJ. Trained modulation of sensorimotor rhythms can affect reaction time. Clin Neurophysiol. (2011) 122:1820–6. 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.02.016
    1. Shibasaki H, Hallett M. What is the Bereitschaftspotential?. Clin Neurophysiol. (2006) 117:2341–56. 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.04.025
    1. Brunia CHM, van Boxtel GJM, Böcker KBE. Negative slow waves as indices of anticipation: the Bereitschaftspotential, the Contingent Negative Variation, and the Stimulus-Preceding Negativity. In: Kappenman ES, Luck SJ. editors. The Oxford Handbook of Event-Related Potential Components. Oxford: Oxford University Press; (2012). p. 189–207.
    1. Jenkins IH, Fernandez W, Playford ED, Lees AJ, Frackowiak RS, Passingham RE, et al. . Impaired activation of the supplementary motor area in Parkinson's disease is reversed when akinesia is treated with apomorphine. Ann Neurol. (1992) 32:749–57. 10.1002/ana.410320608
    1. Rascol O, Sabatini U, Chollet F, Fabre N, Senard JM, Montastruc JL, et al. . Normal activation of the supplementary motor area in patients with Parkinson's disease undergoing long-term treatment with levodopa. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (1994) 57:567–71. 10.1136/jnnp.57.5.567
    1. Dick JP, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Cantello R, Buruma O, Gioux M, et al. . The Bereitschaftspotential is abnormal in Parkinson's disease. Brain. (1989) 112 (Pt 1):233–44. 10.1093/brain/112.1.233
    1. Jahanshahi M, Jenkins IH, Brown RG, Marsden CD, Passingham RE, Brooks DJ. Self-initiated versus externally triggered movements. I. An investigation using measurement of regional cerebral blood flow with PET and movement-related potentials in normal and Parkinson's disease subjects. Brain. (1995) 118 (Pt 4):913–33. 10.1093/brain/118.4.913
    1. Mota IA, Coriolano M, Lins OG. Bereitschaftspotential preceding eyelid blinks in Parkinson's disease. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. (2017) 75:539–45. 10.1590/0004-282x20170109
    1. Oishi M, Mochizuki Y, Du C, Takasu T. Contingent negative variation and movement-related cortical potentials in parkinsonism. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. (1995) 95:346–9. 10.1016/0013-4694(95)00084-C
    1. McCallum WC, Walter WG. The effects of attention and distraction on the contingent negative variation in normal and neurotic subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. (1968) 25:319–29. 10.1016/0013-4694(68)90172-7
    1. Walter WG, Cooper R, Aldridge VJ, McCallum WC, Winter AL. Contingent negative variation: an electric sign of sensori-motor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature. (1964) 203:380–4. 10.1038/203380a0
    1. Pulvermüller F, Lutzenberger W, Müller V, Mohr B, Dichgans J, Birbaumer N. P3 and contingent negative variation in Parkinson's disease. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. (1996) 98:456–67. 10.1016/0013-4694(96)95537-6
    1. Popovych OV, Xenakis MN, Tass PA. The spacing principle for unlearning abnormal neuronal synchrony. PLoS One. (2015) 10:e0117205. 10.1371/journal.pone.0117205
    1. Friedman LM, Furberg CD, DeMets DL, Reboussin DM, Granger CB. Fundamentals of Clinical Trials, 5th ed. New York, NY: Springer; (2015).

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj