Assessment of Arsenic Trioxide and All-trans Retinoic Acid for the Treatment of Pediatric Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group AAML1331 Trial

Matthew A Kutny, Todd A Alonzo, Oussama Abla, Madhvi Rajpurkar, Robert B Gerbing, Yi-Cheng Wang, Betsy A Hirsch, Susana Raimondi, Samir Kahwash, Kristina K Hardy, Steven Hardy, Soheil Meshinchi, Alan S Gamis, Edward A Kolb, James H Feusner, John Gregory Jr, Matthew A Kutny, Todd A Alonzo, Oussama Abla, Madhvi Rajpurkar, Robert B Gerbing, Yi-Cheng Wang, Betsy A Hirsch, Susana Raimondi, Samir Kahwash, Kristina K Hardy, Steven Hardy, Soheil Meshinchi, Alan S Gamis, Edward A Kolb, James H Feusner, John Gregory Jr

Abstract

Importance: All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide therapy without the use of maintenance therapy has been found to be beneficial for the treatment of adults with standard-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). However, it is unclear whether similar regimens are safe and beneficial for the treatment of high-risk APL or pediatric patients with standard-risk APL.

Objective: To assess whether treatment with an ATRA and arsenic trioxide-based regimen is safe and allows for the elimination or substantial reduction of chemotherapy use among pediatric patients with standard-risk or high-risk APL, respectively.

Design, setting, and participants: The Children's Oncology Group AAML1331 study is a nonrandomized, noninferiority trial that examined survival outcomes among 154 pediatric patients with APL compared with a historical control group of patients with APL from the AAML0631 study. Patients aged 1 to 21 years were enrolled at 85 pediatric oncology centers (members of the Children's Oncology Group) in Australia, Canada, and the US from June 29, 2015, to May 7, 2019, with follow-up until October 31, 2020. All patients had newly diagnosed APL and were stratified into standard-risk APL (white blood cell count <10 000/μL) and high-risk APL (white blood cell count ≥10 000/μL) cohorts.

Interventions: All patients received ATRA and arsenic trioxide continuously during induction therapy and intermittently during 4 consolidation cycles. Patients with high-risk APL received 4 doses of idarubicin during induction therapy only. The duration of therapy was approximately 9 months, and no maintenance therapy was administered.

Main outcomes and measures: Event-free survival (EFS) at 2 years after diagnosis.

Results: Among 154 patients (median age, 14.4 years [range, 1.1-21.7 years]; 81 male participants [52.6%]) included in the analysis, 98 patients (63.6%) had standard-risk APL, and 56 patients (36.4%) had high-risk APL. The median follow-up duration was 24.7 months (range, 0-49.5 months) for patients with standard-risk APL and 22.8 months (range, 0-47.7 months) for patients with high-risk APL. Patients with standard-risk APL had a 2-year EFS rate of 98.0% and an overall survival rate of 99.0%; adverse events included 1 early death during induction therapy and 1 relapse. Patients with high-risk APL had a 2-year EFS rate of 96.4% and an overall survival rate of 100%; adverse events included 2 relapses and 0 deaths. These outcomes met predefined noninferiority criteria (noninferiority margin of 10% among those with standard-risk APL and 14.5% among those with high-risk APL).

Conclusions and relevance: In this nonrandomized, noninferiority trial, pediatric patients with standard-risk APL who received treatment with a chemotherapy-free ATRA and arsenic trioxide regimen experienced positive outcomes. Patients with high-risk APL also had positive outcomes when treated with a novel ATRA and arsenic trioxide-based regimen that included 4 doses of idarubicin during induction therapy only and no maintenance therapy. The 2-year EFS estimates were noninferior to the historical comparator group, and advantages of the regimen included shorter treatment duration, lower exposure to anthracycline and intrathecal chemotherapy, and fewer days hospitalized.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02339740.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Drs Kutny and Hirsch reported receiving grants from the Children’s Oncology Group during the conduct of the study. Dr Rajpurkar reported receiving personal fees from Novo Nordisk outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.. Participant Enrollment, Treatment, and Follow-up
Figure 1.. Participant Enrollment, Treatment, and Follow-up
APL indicates acute promyelocytic leukemia; PML-RARα, promyelocytic leukemia–retinoic acid receptor α; and RT-qPCR, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. aStandard-risk APL was defined as a white blood cell count of less than 10 000/μL. bHigh-risk APL was defined as a white blood cell count of 10 000/μL or greater.
Figure 2.. Overall and Event-Free Survival Among…
Figure 2.. Overall and Event-Free Survival Among Patients in the Children’s Oncology Group AAML1331 and AAML0631 Studies by Risk Group
The AAML0631 study included 66 patients with standard-risk APL and 35 patients with high-risk APL. The AAML1331 study included 98 patients with standard-risk APL and 56 patients with high-risk APL. APL indicates acute promyelocytic leukemia; EFS, event-free survival; and OS, overall survival.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj