Lymphoedema functioning, disability and health questionnaire Turkish version: translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation

Alis Kostanoglu, Zeynep Hosbay, Ela Tarakci, Alis Kostanoglu, Zeynep Hosbay, Ela Tarakci

Abstract

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to adapt the Lymphoedema Functioning, Disability and Health Questionnaire into the Turkish language, and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Turkish version in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema. [Subjects and Methods] After the translation, inter-rater and test-retest reliability were assessed between patients and physiotherapists using the intra-class correlation coefficient. Thirty patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema were asked to fill out the Turkish version of the Lymphoedema Functioning, Disability and Health Questionnaire two times, one week apart. Internal consistency was tested using Cronbach's alpha, and the test-retest reliability was assessed by calculating the intra-class correlation coefficient. Construct validity was investigated by comparing the results of the Lymphoedema Functioning, Disability and Health and Short Form-36 questionnaires. [Results] The test-retest reliability and inter-tester reliability of the Lymphedema Functioning, Disability and Health Questionnaire total score, physical function score, mental function score, household activities score, mobility activities score, life and social activities score were excellent. [Conclusion] The Turkish version of the Lymphoedema Functioning, Disability and Health Questionnaire was found to be valid and reliable for patients with breast cancer related lymphedema.

Keywords: Lymphoedema Functioning Disability and Health Questionnaire; Turkish; Validation.

References

    1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al. : GLOBOCAN 2008 v1.2, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 10 [Internet]. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2010.
    1. DiSipio T, Rye S, Newman B, et al. : Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol, 2013, 14: 500–515.
    1. International Society of Lymphology: The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema. 2009 Concensus Document of the International Society of Lymphology. Lymphology, 2009, 42: 51–60.
    1. Fu MR, Axelrod D, Cleland CM, et al. : Symptom report in detecting breast cancer-related lymphedema. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) 2015, 7: 345–352.
    1. Karadibak D, Yavuzsen T: Evaluation of kinesthetic sense and hand function in women with breast cancer-related lymphedema. J Phys Ther Sci, 2015, 27: 1671–1675.
    1. Morgan PA, Franks PJ, Moffatt CJ: Health-related quality of life with lymphoedema: a review of the literature. Int Wound J, 2005, 2: 47–62.
    1. Buragadda S, Alhusaini AA, Melam GR, et al. : Effect of complete decongestive therapy and a home program for patients with post mastectomy lymphedema. J Phys Ther Sci, 2015, 27: 2743–2748.
    1. Kostanjsek N: Use of The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a conceptual framework and common language for disability statistics and health information systems. BMC Public Health, 2011, 11: S3.
    1. Cieza A, Stucki G: Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Qual Life Res, 2005, 14: 1225–1237.
    1. Nascimento de Carvalho F, Bergmann A, Koifman RJ: Functionality in women with breast cancer: the use of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in clinical practice. J Phys Ther Sci, 2014, 26: 721–730.
    1. Devoogdt N, Van Kampen M, Geraerts I, et al. : Lymphoedema Functioning, Disability and Health questionnaire (Lymph-ICF): reliability and validity. Phys Ther, 2011, 91: 944–957.
    1. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. : Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 2000, 25: 3186–3191.
    1. Marx RG, Menezes A, Horovitz L, et al. : A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments. J Clin Epidemiol, 2003, 56: 730–735.
    1. Pinar R: Reliability and construct validity of the SF-36 in Turkish cancer patients. Qual Life Res, 2005, 14: 259–264.
    1. Klernäs P, Johnsson A, Horstmann V, et al. : Lymphedema Quality of Life Inventory (LyQLI)-Development and investigation of validity and reliability. Qual Life Res, 2015, 24: 427–439.
    1. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. : Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol, 2007, 60: 34–42.
    1. Viehoff PB, van Genderen FR, Wittink H: Upper limb lymphedema 27 (ULL27): Dutch translation and validation of an illness-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire for patients with upper limb lymphedema. Lymphology, 2008, 41: 131–138.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj