Research gaps related to the environmental impacts of electronic cigarettes

Hoshing Chang, Hoshing Chang

Abstract

Objective: To consider the research gaps related to the environmental impacts of electronic cigarettes due to their manufacture, use and disposal.

Methods: Literature searches were conducted through December 2013. Studies were included in this review if they related to the environmental impacts of e-cigarettes.

Results: Scientific information on the environmental impacts of e-cigarette manufacturing, use and disposal is very limited. No studies formally evaluated the environmental impacts of the manufacturing process or disposal of components, including batteries. Four studies evaluated potential exposure to secondhand e-cigarette aerosol, an indication of impacts on indoor air quality. A 2010 survey of six e-cigarette models found that none of the products provided disposal instructions for spent cartridges containing nicotine. Notably, some e-cigarette manufacturers claim their e-cigarettes are 'eco-friendly' or 'green', despite the lack of any supporting data or environmental impact studies. Some authors argue that such advertising may boost sales and increase e-cigarette appeal, especially among adolescents.

Conclusions: Little is known about the environmental impacts of e-cigarettes, and a number of topics could be further elucidated by additional investigation. These topics include potential environmental impacts related to manufacturing, use and disposal. The environmental impacts of e-cigarette manufacturing will depend upon factory size and the nicotine extracting method used. The environmental impacts of e-cigarette use will include chemical and aerosol exposure in the indoor environment. The environmental impacts of disposal of e-cigarette cartridges (which contain residual nicotine) and disposal of e-cigarettes (which contain batteries) represent yet another environmental concern.

Keywords: disposal; electronic cigarettes; environment; indoor air quality; manufacture.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Potential environmental impacts associated with e-cigarettes.

References

    1. Trtchounian A, Talbot P. Electronic nicotine delivery systems: is there a need for regulation? Tob Control 2011;20:47–52
    1. MyVaporStoreTM. (acessed 26 Nov 2013)
    1. US Environmental Protection Agency. Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Program. 24 October 2013. (accessed 27 Nov 2013)
    1. de Luca A, Cañizares P, Garcia MA, et al. Recovery of nicotine from aqueous extracts of tobacco wastes by an H+-form strong-acid ion exchanger. Ind Eng Chem Res 1998;37:4783–91
    1. Hughes L, inventor; Rohm and Haas Company, applicant. Anhydrous Purification of Nicotine Using an Ion Exchange Resin. European Patent EP1176143 A1. 30 January 2002. (accessed 26 Nov 2013)
    1. O'Connell T, inventor; Global Vapor Trademarks, Inc., assignee. Method for Preparing Tobacco Extract for Electronic Smoking Devices. United States Patent US 20120145170 A1. 14 January 2012. (accessed 26 Nov 2013)
    1. Divi MKP, Padakandla GR, Rao MSN, et al. , inventors; Divi's Laboratories Limited, assignee. Process for the Preparation of (R,S)-Nicotine. United States Patent US20120209006 A1. 16 August 2012. (accessed 24 Oct 2013)
    1. Wall Street Journal Market Watch. Universal Corporation Announces Joint Venture to Produce Liquid Nicotine. Press release. 6 August 2013. (accessed 24 Oct 2013)
    1. World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. 2013. (accessed 26 Nov 2013)
    1. Schripp T, Markewitz D, Uhde E, et al. Does e-cigarette consumption cause passive vaping? Indoor Air 2013;23:25–31
    1. McAuley TR, Hopke PK, Zhao J, et al. Comparison of the effects of e-cigarette vapor and cigarette smoke on indoor air quality. Inhal Toxicol 2010; 24:850–7
    1. Burstyn I. Peering through the mist: what does the chemistry of contaminants in electronic cigarettes tell us about health risk? Philadelphia, PA: Drexel University School of Public Health, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, 2013. (accessed 23 Oct 2013)
    1. Czogala J, Goniewicz ML, Fidelus B, et al. Secondhand exposure to vapors from electronic cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res. Published Online First: 11 Dec 2013. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntt203
    1. Schober W, Szendrei K, Matzen W, et al. Use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) impairs indoor air quality and increases FeNO levels of e-cigarette consumers. J Hyg Environ Health. Published Online First: 6 Dec 2013. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.11.003
    1. Goniewicz ML, Hajek P, McRobbie H. Nicotine content of electronic cigarettes, its release in vapour and its consistency across batches: regulatory implications. Addiction 2014;109:500–7
    1. State of Washington. Pharmaceutical waste. Specific waste: nicotine. Olympia, WA: State of Washington Department of Ecology, 2013. (accessed 23 Oct 2013)
    1. PR Newswire. ProSmoke Electronic Cigarettes Now the First and Only Company in the Industry with Green America Certification. 29 October 2012. (accessed 27 Nov 2013)
    1. PR Newswire. Only One Electronic Cigarette Company Approved for Green Certification. 19 April 2013. (accessed 27 Nov 2013)
    1. Green Business Bureau. 2011. (accessed 26 Nov 2013)
    1. Roman E. Study shows green business practices lead to higher sales. Phoenix Business Journal. 11 January 2013. (accessed 26 Nov 2013)
    1. Yamin CK, Bitton A, Bates DW. E-cigarettes: a rapidly growing internet phenomenon. Ann Intern Med 2010;153:607–9

Source: PubMed

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

3
Subskrybuj