The cost of multiple sclerosis drugs in the US and the pharmaceutical industry: Too big to fail?

Daniel M Hartung, Dennis N Bourdette, Sharia M Ahmed, Ruth H Whitham, Daniel M Hartung, Dennis N Bourdette, Sharia M Ahmed, Ruth H Whitham

Abstract

Objective: To examine the pricing trajectories in the United States of disease-modifying therapies (DMT) for multiple sclerosis (MS) over the last 20 years and assess the influences on rising prices.

Methods: We estimated the trend in annual drug costs for 9 DMTs using published drug pricing data from 1993 to 2013. We compared changes in DMT costs to general and prescription drug inflation during the same period. We also compared the cost trajectories for first-generation MS DMTs interferon (IFN)-β-1b, IFN-β-1a IM, and glatiramer acetate with contemporaneously approved biologic tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors.

Results: First-generation DMTs, originally costing $8,000 to $11,000, now cost about $60,000 per year. Costs for these agents have increased annually at rates 5 to 7 times higher than prescription drug inflation. Newer DMTs commonly entered the market with a cost 25%-60% higher than existing DMTs. Significant increases in the cost trajectory of the first-generation DMTs occurred following the Food and Drug Administration approvals of IFN-β-1a SC (2002) and natalizumab (reintroduced 2006) and remained high following introduction of fingolimod (2010). Similar changes did not occur with TNF inhibitor biologics during these time intervals. DMT costs in the United States currently are 2 to 3 times higher than in other comparable countries.

Conclusions: MS DMT costs have accelerated at rates well beyond inflation and substantially above rates observed for drugs in a similar biologic class. There is an urgent need for clinicians, payers, and manufacturers in the United States to confront the soaring costs of DMTs.

© 2015 American Academy of Neurology.

Figures

Figure 1. Estimated annual costs of multiple…
Figure 1. Estimated annual costs of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies in the United States from 1993 to 2013
Annual costs estimated from average wholesale prices (AWP), or wholesale acquisition costs if AWP not reported, and discounted 12%. IFN = interferon.
Figure 2. Segmented time series of median…
Figure 2. Segmented time series of median annual cost in the United States for first-generation multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies relative to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors
Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are interferon (IFN)–β-1b, IFN-β-1a IM, and glatiramer acetate and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors are etanercept and adalimumab. Trends are % change in median annual cost per quarter. With the exception of the first (baseline) period, p values reflect changes in trend from one period to the next. Complete model results are reported in appendix e-1.

References

    1. IMS Health. Top Therapeutic Classes by Non-discounted Spending (U.S.). Available at: . Accessed April 9, 2014.
    1. Kobelt G, Berg J, Atherly D, Hadjimichael O. Costs and quality of life in multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional study in the United States. Neurology 2006;66:1696–1702.
    1. FDB MedKnowledge™. San Francisco, CA: First Databank; 2014.
    1. Pollack DA. Supreme Court to hear appeal of generic drug case. New York Times. April 1, 2014:B3.
    1. Hauser SL, Johnston SC. Multiple sclerosis drugs: sticker shock. Ann Neurol 2012;71:A5–A6.
    1. Bourdette D, Whitham R. Immunotherapy and multiple sclerosis: the devil is in the details. Neurology 2010;74:1410–1411.
    1. Goodin DS, Arnason BG, Coyle PK, Frohman EM, Paty DW. The use of mitoxantrone (Novantrone) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2003;61:1332–1338.
    1. AMCP guide to pharmaceutical payment methods, 2009 update (version 2.0). J Manag Care Pharm 2009;15:S3–S57, quiz S58–61.
    1. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General. Medicaid Drug Price Comparison: Average Sales Price to Average Wholesale Price. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General; 2005.
    1. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Consumer Price Index Databases [online]. Available at: . Accessed November 11, 2013.
    1. Wagner AK, Soumerai SB, Zhang F, Ross-Degnan D. Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use research. J Clin Pharm Ther 2002;27:299–309.
    1. Wooldridge JM. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning; 2009.
    1. British Medical Association and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. British National Formulary, 66th ed London: BMJ Publishing Group; 2013–2014.
    1. Drug Benefit Prices (DBPs) for Products Reimbursed Under the Exceptional Access Program [online]. Available at: . Accessed November 7, 2013.
    1. Australian Department of Health. Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). Available at: . Accessed March 15, 2015.
    1. Pharmacy Benefits Management Services [online]. Available at: . Accessed August 11, 2014.
    1. Medicaid Drug Price Comparisons: Average Manufacturer Price to Published Prices. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services; 2005.
    1. States' Collection of Rebates for Drugs Paid Through Medicaid Managed Care Organizations. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services; 2012.
    1. Donohue JM. The impact and evolution of Medicare Part D. N Engl J Med 2014;371:693–695.
    1. The price of drugs for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a reflection of the unsustainable prices of cancer drugs: from the perspective of a large group of CML experts. Blood 2013;121:4439–4442.
    1. Rogoff EG, Guirguis HS, Lipton RA, et al. The upward spiral of drug costs: a time series analysis of drugs used in the treatment of hemophilia. Thromb Haemost 2002;88:545–553.
    1. Guirguis HS, Rogoff EG. Strategies and impacts of new drug introduction: hemophilia treatment. J Health Care Finance 2004;31:1–12.
    1. Guo J, Kelton CL, Pasquale M, et al. Price and market-share competition of anti-ulcer gastric medications in the Ohio Medicaid market. Int J Pharm Med 2004;18:271–282.
    1. Lu ZJ, Comanor WS. Strategic pricing of new pharmaceuticals. Rev Econ Stat 1998;80:108–118.
    1. Congressional Budget Office. How Increased Competition from Generic Drugs Has Affected Prices and Returns in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1998.
    1. Kohl H, Shrank WH. Increasing generic drug use in Medicare Part D: the role of government. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007;55:1106–1109.
    1. Grabowski HG, Guha R, Salgado M. Regulatory and cost barriers are likely to limit biosimilar development and expected savings in the near future. Health Aff 2014;33:1048–1057.
    1. Relman AS, Angell M. America's other drug problem: how the drug industry distorts medicine and politics. New Repub 2002;227:27–41.
    1. Kendall B. Teva Asks Supreme Court To Delay Possible Release of Generic Copaxone. Wall Street Journal. April 7, 2014. Available at: . Accessed April 15, 2015.
    1. Kesselheim AS, Avorn J. Biomedical patents and the public's health: is there a role for eminent domain? JAMA 2006;295:434–437.
    1. Downing NS, Ross JS, Jackevicius CA, Krumholz HM. Avoidance of generic competition by Abbott Laboratories' fenofibrate franchise. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:724–730.
    1. Miller RM, Happe LE, Meyer KL, Spear RJ. Approaches to the management of agents used for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: consensus statements from a panel of U.S. managed care pharmacists and physicians. J Manag Care Pharm 2012;18:54–62.
    1. Owens GM. Managed care aspects of managing multiple sclerosis. Am J Manag Care 2013;19:s307–312.
    1. Brennan T, Shrank W. New expensive treatments for hepatitis C infection. JAMA 2014;312:593–594.
    1. Bach PB. Limits on Medicare's ability to control rising spending on cancer drugs. N Engl J Med 2009;360:626–633.
    1. O'Sullivan BP, Orenstein DM, Milla CE. Pricing for orphan drugs: will the market bear what society cannot? JAMA 2013;310:1343–1344.
    1. Yamamoto D, Campbell JD. Cost-effectiveness of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies: a systematic review of the literature. Autoimmune Dis 2012;2012:784364.
    1. Noyes K, Bajorska A, Chappel A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying therapy for multiple sclerosis: a population-based study. Neurology 2011;77:355–363.
    1. Braithwaite RS, Meltzer DO, King JT, Jr, Leslie D, Roberts MS. What does the value of modern medicine say about the $50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year decision rule? Med Care 2008;46:349–356.
    1. Goldberg LD, Edwards NC, Fincher C, Doan QV, Al-Sabbagh A, Meletiche DM. Comparing the cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying drugs for the first-line treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J Manag Care Pharm 2009;15:543–555.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj