Is targeted fortification of human breast milk an optimal nutrition strategy for preterm infants? An interventional study

Laura Morlacchi, Domenica Mallardi, Maria Lorella Giannì, Paola Roggero, Orsola Amato, Pasqua Piemontese, Dario Consonni, Fabio Mosca, Laura Morlacchi, Domenica Mallardi, Maria Lorella Giannì, Paola Roggero, Orsola Amato, Pasqua Piemontese, Dario Consonni, Fabio Mosca

Abstract

Background: Fortifying human milk contributes to the prevention of postnatal growth failure in preterm infants. Because of the natural variability of human milk, targeted fortification of human milk has been advocated. However, data regarding the efficacy and safety of prolonged targeted fortification are scarce. We aimed to assess the safety of targeted fortification of human milk in preterm infants compared with standard fortification, as well as the effects on infant growth.

Methods: We conducted an interventional study during hospital stay in healthy very low birth weight preterm infants who were exclusively fed human milk. Pools of human milk collected for 24 h were analysed using mid-infrared transmission spectroscopy. Targeted fortification of human milk was performed by adding macronutrients to native human milk to obtain optimal ratios of fat (4.4 g), carbohydrates (8.8 g), and protein (3 g) per 100 ml. The intervention period lasted 4-7 weeks. Weekly weight and daily growth rates were compared with those of a standardized fortification group of very low birth weight preterm infants who received standard fortified human milk (n = 10). The osmolality as well as the metabolic and gastrointestinal tolerance were monitored. Intergroup differences were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U-test.

Results: A total of 10 preterm infants (birth weight 1223 ± 195 g; gestational age 29.1 ± 1.03 weeks) were enrolled and 118 samples of pooled milk were analysed. On average, 1.4 ± 0.1 g of protein, 2.3 ± 0.5 g of carbohydrate, and 0.3 ± 0.1 g of fat per 100 ml were added to the milk. Osmolality values after target fortification were within recommended limits (376 ± 66 mOsml/kg). Weekly weight gain (205.5 g; 95 % CI 177-233 vs 155 g; 95 % CI 132-178; p = 0.025) and daily growth rates (15.7 g/kg/day; 95 % CI 14.5-16.9 vs 12.3 g/kg/day; 95 % CI 10.7-13.9; p = 0.005) were higher in infants receiving target fortification than in infants receiving standardized fortification. The infants receiving targeted fortified milk consumed similar volumes as infants in the standardized fortification group (148 ± 4.5 vs 146 ± 4 ml/kg/day). No signs of either gastrointestinal or metabolic intolerance were observed.

Conclusions: Target fortification appears to promote growth in very low birth weight preterm infants without any detrimental effects. Trial registration NCT02716337.

Keywords: Growth rate; Human milk target fortification; Osmolality; Preterm infants.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of the study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean protein (p) content (g/100 ml) of native breast milk of each enrolled subject (S)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean fat (f) content (g/100 ml) of native breast milk of each enrolled subject (S)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean carbohydrate (c) content (g/100 ml) of native breast milk of each enrolled subject (S)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Average protein (a), fat (b) and carbohydrate (c) content (g/100 ml) in native breast milk (A) and targeted breast milk (B)

References

    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition. Nutritional needs of low-birth-weight infants. Pediatrics.1985;76:976–86.
    1. Horbar JD, Ehrenkranz RA, Badger GJ, Edwards EM, Morrow KA, Soll RF, et al. Weight growth velocity and postnatal growth failure in infants 501 to 1500 grams: 2000–2013. Pediatrics. 2015;136:e84–e92. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0129.
    1. Ehrenkranz RA, Dusick AM, Vohr BR, Wright LL, Wrage LA, Poole WK. Growth in the neonatal intensive care unit influences neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2006;117:1253–1261. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1368.
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Breastfeeding: Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2012;129:e827–41.
    1. Human Simmer K, Fortification Milk. Nestlé Nutrition Institute Workshop Ser. 2015;81:111–121.
    1. Bauer J, Gerss J. Longitudinal analysis of macronutrients and minerals in human milk produced by mothers of preterm infants. Clin Nutr. 2011;30:215–220. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.08.003.
    1. Weber A, Loui A, Jochum F, Bührer C, Obladen M. Breast milk from mothers of very low birthweight infants: variability in fat and protein content. Acta Paediatr. 2001;90:772–775. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2001.tb02803.x.
    1. Rochow N, Jochum F, Redlich A, Korinekova Z, Linnemann K, Weitmann K, et al. Fortification of breast milk in VLBW infants: metabolic acidosis is linked to the composition of fortifiers and alters weight gain and bone mineralization. Clin Nutr. 2010;30:99–105. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.07.016.
    1. Pearson F, Johnson MJ, Leaf AA. Milk osmolality: does it matter? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal. 2013;98:F166–F169. doi: 10.1136/adc.2011.300492.
    1. Kreissl A, Zwiauer V, Repa A, Binder C, Haninger N, Jilma B, et al. Effect of fortifiers and additional protein on the osmolarity of human milk: is it still safe for the premature infant? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;57:432–437. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182a208c7.
    1. Rochow N, Landau-Crangle E, Fusch C. Challenges in breast milk fortification for preterm infants. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2015;18:276–284. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000167.
    1. Arslanoglu S, Moro GE, Ziegler EE. Adjustable fortification of human milk fed to preterm infants: does it make a difference? J Perinatol. 2006;26:614–621. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211571.
    1. De Halleux V, Rigo J. Variability in human milk composition: benefit of individualized fortification in very-low-birth-weight infants. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98:529S–535S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.042689.
    1. Rochow N, Fusch G, Choi A, Chessell L, Elliott L, McDonald K, et al. Target fortification of breast milk with fat, protein, and carbohydrates for preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2013;163:1001–1007. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.04.052.
    1. Reali A, Greco F, Fanaro S, Atzei A, Puddu M, Moi M, et al. Fortification of maternal milk for very low birth weight (VLBW) pre-term neonates. Early Hum Dev. 2010;86(Suppl 1):33–36. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.01.006.
    1. Fenton TR, Kim JH. A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:59. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-59.
    1. Bancalari E, Claure N. Definitions and diagnostic criteria for bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Semin Perinatol. 2006;30:164–170. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.05.002.
    1. Roggero P, Giannì ML, Orsi A, Amato O, Piemontese P, Liotto N, et al. Implementation of nutritional strategies decreases postnatal growth restriction in preterm infants. PLoS One. 2012;7:e51166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051166.
    1. Casadio YS, Williams TM, Lai CT, Olsson SE, Hepworth AR, Hartmann PE. Evaluation of a mid-infrared analyzer for the determination of the macronutrient composition of human milk. J Hum Lact. 2010;26:376–383. doi: 10.1177/0890334410376948.
    1. Rochow N, Fusch G, Zapanta B, Ali A, Barui S, Fusch C. Target fortification of breast milk: how often should milk analysis be done? Nutrients. 2015;7:2297–2310. doi: 10.3390/nu7042297.
    1. Agostoni C, Buonocore G, Carnielli VP, De Curtis M, Darmaun D, Decsi T, et al. ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition. Enteral Nutrient Supply for Preterm Infants: commentary From the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Committee on Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010;50:85–91. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181adaee0.
    1. Agostoni C, Grandi F, Giannì ML, Silano M, Torcoletti M, Giovannini M, et al. Growth patterns of breast fed and formula fed infants in the first 12 months of life: an Italian study. Arch Dis Child. 1999;81:395–399. doi: 10.1136/adc.81.5.395.
    1. Patel AL, Engstrom JL, Meier PP, Jegier BJ, Kimura RE. Calculating postnatal growth velocity in very low birth weight (VLBW) premature infants. J Perinatol. 2009;29:618–622. doi: 10.1038/jp.2009.55.
    1. Corvaglia L, Aceti A, Paoletti V, Mariani E, Patrono D, Ancora G, et al. Standard fortification of preterm human milk fails to meet recommended protein intake: bedside evaluation by near-infrared-reflectance-analysis. Early Hum Dev. 2010;86(4):237–240. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.04.001.
    1. Henriksen C, Westerberg AC, Rønnestad A, Nakstad B, Veierød MB, Drevon CA, et al. Growth and nutrient intake among very-low-birth-weight infants fed fortified human milk during hospitalisation. Br J Nutr. 2009;102(8):1179–1186. doi: 10.1017/S0007114509371755.
    1. Reali A, Greco F, Marongiu G, Deidda F, Atzeni S, Campus R, et al. Individualized fortification of breast milk in 41 extremely low birth weight (ELBW) preterm infants. Clin Chim Acta. 2015
    1. McLeod G, Sherriff J, Hartmann PE, Nathan E, Geddes D, Simmer K. Comparing different methods of human breast milk fortification using measured v. assumed macronutrient composition to target reference growth: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Nutr. 2016;115:431–439. doi: 10.1017/S0007114515004614.
    1. Davanzo R, Monasta L, Ronfani L, Brovedani P, Demarini S. Breastfeeding in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Study Group. Breastfeeding at NICU discharge: a multicenter Italian study. J Hum Lact. 2013;29:374–380. doi: 10.1177/0890334412451055.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

3
Subskrybuj