Effect of glutamine on methotrexate efficacy and toxicity

I T Rubio, Y Cao, L F Hutchins, K C Westbrook, V S Klimberg, I T Rubio, Y Cao, L F Hutchins, K C Westbrook, V S Klimberg

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effect of oral glutamine (GLN) on the efficacy and toxicity of methotrexate (MTX).

Summary background data: The use of high-dose chemotherapy regimens is limited by the severity of their toxicities. Oral GLN has been shown to decrease the gut toxicity seen with MTX treatment while enhancing its tumoricidal effect.

Methods and results: Studies were done in laboratory rats and in breast cancer outpatients. Fischer 344 rats were randomized to 48 hours of prefeeding with GLN (1 g/kg/day) or an isonitrogenous amount of glycine. Rats were killed 24 hours after receiving a 20-mg/kg intraperitoneal dose of MTX. In the GLN group, there was a threefold increase in total MTX in the tumor as compared with the control group, and this increase was in both the diglutamated and pentaglutamated MTX. Inversely, there was a significant decrease in the total polyglutamated MTX in the gut in the GLN group. Given the results of this preclinical study, the authors performed a phase I trial. Nine patients diagnosed with inflammatory breast cancer received GLN (0.5 g/kg/day) during MTX neoadjuvant therapy, escalating from doses of 40 mg/m2 to 100 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks, followed by a doxorubicin-based regimen. No toxicity of oral GLN was detected. No patient showed any sign of chemotherapy-related toxicity. One patient had a grade I mucositis. Except for one, all patients responded to the chemotherapy regimen. Median survival was 35 months.

Conclusions: These studies suggest that GLN supplementation is safe in its administration to the tumor-bearing host receiving MTX. By preferentially increasing tumor retention of MTX over that of normal host tissue, GLN may serve to increase the therapeutic window of this chemotherapeutic age.

References

    1. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1990 Jul-Aug;14(4 Suppl):137S-146S
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1987 Dec;5(12):2017-31
    1. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265-75
    1. J Lab Clin Med. 1996 Feb;127(2):223-8
    1. Surg Clin North Am. 1996 Apr;76(2):411-29
    1. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1994 Nov-Dec;18(6):471-6
    1. Ann Surg. 1995 Apr;221(4):420-6
    1. World J Surg. 1994 Jan-Feb;18(1):87-92
    1. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1993 Sep-Oct;17(5):407-13
    1. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1992 Nov-Dec;16(6 Suppl):83S-87S
    1. Arch Surg. 1992 Nov;127(11):1317-20
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1992 May 15;116(10):821-8
    1. Ann Surg. 1992 Feb;215(2):107-13
    1. J Surg Res. 1990 Apr;48(4):319-23
    1. Cancer Treat Rep. 1977 Aug;61(5):779-83
    1. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1977 Aug;182(2):506-17
    1. Cancer Treat Rep. 1979 May;63(5):757-61
    1. Biochem Pharmacol. 1981 Jun 1;30(11):1387-90
    1. Cancer Treat Rep. 1982 May;66(5):1223-5
    1. Am J Med. 1982 Sep;73(3):413-9
    1. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1982 Dec 10;397:184-92
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1983 May;98(5 Pt 1):611-2
    1. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1983;163:215-34
    1. Q J Exp Physiol. 1985 Oct;70(4):473-89
    1. Semin Oncol. 1987 Mar;14(1):65-74
    1. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1988 Jul-Aug;12(4):325-31

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj