Why do families still not receive the child support grant in South Africa? A longitudinal analysis of a cohort of families across South Africa

Wanga Zembe-Mkabile, Tanya Doherty, David Sanders, Debra Jackson, Mickey Chopra, Sonja Swanevelder, Carl Lombard, Rebecca Surender, Wanga Zembe-Mkabile, Tanya Doherty, David Sanders, Debra Jackson, Mickey Chopra, Sonja Swanevelder, Carl Lombard, Rebecca Surender

Abstract

Background: Child cash transfers are increasingly recognised for their potential to reduce poverty and improve health outcomes. South Africa's child support grant (CSG) constitutes the largest cash transfer in the continent. No studies have been conducted to look at factors associated with successful receipt of the CSG. This paper reports findings on factors associated with CSG receipt in three settings in South Africa (Paarl in the Western Cape Province, and Umlazi and Rietvlei in KwaZulu-Natal).

Methods: This study used longitudinal data from a community-based cluster-randomized trial (PROMISE EBF) promoting exclusive breastfeeding by peer-counsellors in South Africa (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00397150). 1148 mother-infant pairs were enrolled in the study and data on the CSG were collected at infant age 6, 12, 24 weeks and 18-24 months. A stratified cox proportional hazards regression model was fitted to the data to investigate factors associated with CSG receipt.

Results: Uptake of the CSG amongst eligible children at a median age of 22 months was 62% in Paarl, 64% in Rietvlei and 60% in Umlazi. Possessing a birth certificate was found to be the strongest predictor of CSG receipt (HR 3.1, 95% CI: 2.4 -4.1). Other factors also found to be independently associated with CSG receipt were an HIV-positive mother (HR 1.2, 95% CI: 1.0-1.4) and a household income below R1100 (HR1.7, 95% CI: 1.1 -2.6).

Conclusion: Receipt of the CSG was sub optimal amongst eligible children showing administrative requirements such as possessing a birth certificate to be a serious barrier to access. In the spirit of promoting and protecting children's rights, more efforts are needed to improve and ease access to this cash transfer program.

References

    1. Barrientos A, Dejong J. Reducing child poverty with cash transfers: a sure thing? Development Policy Review. 2006;24(5):537–552. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7679.2006.00346.x.
    1. Henlon J, Barrientos A, Hulme D. Just Give Money to the Poor: The Development Revolution from the Global South. US: Kumarian Press; 2010.
    1. Ortega C. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. From Protection to Production. 1983. .
    1. Basset L. Can Conditional Cash Transfer Programs Play a Greater Role in Reducing Child Undernutrition? Social Protection and Labor: The World Bank 2008. .
    1. Freeland N. ‘Superfluous, pernicious, atrocious and abominable? the case against conditional cash transfers’. IDS Bulletin. 2007;38(No. 3):75–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2007.tb00382.x. Institute of Development Studies.
    1. Fernald LC, Gertler PJ, Neufeld LM. Role of cash in conditional cash programmes for child health, growth and development: an analysis of Mexico’s oportunidades. Lancet. 2008;371:828–837. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60382-7.
    1. Gertler P. Mexico’s Progresa: Using a Conditional Cash Transfer to Invest in Human Capital. A World Bank Presentation 2003. .
    1. Pacheco Santos LM, Paes-Sousa R, Miazagi E, Falca Silva T, Mederios da Fonseca A. The Brazilian experience with conditional cash transfers: a successful way to reduce inequity and to improve health. Rio De Janeiro Brazil: WHO World Conference on Social Determinants of Health; 2011. .
    1. Department of Social Development. Presentation on the regulations under the Social Assistance Act, 2004 (act no. 13 of 2004) 2010. .
    1. Madonsela V. South Africa’s Basic Social Protection Floor. United Nations HQ: South-South Cooperation; 2010.
    1. Chopra M, Sogaula N, Jackson D, Sanders D, Karaolis N, Ashworth A, McCoy D. Poverty wipes out health care gains. Children First vol. 6, No. 40. 2001. pp. 16–18.
    1. Case A, Hosegood V, Lund F. The reach and impact of the child support grant: evidence from KwaZulu-Natal. Development Southern Africa. 2005;22(4):467–482. doi: 10.1080/03768350500322925.
    1. Kakwani N, Soares F, Son H. Conditional Cash Transfers in African Countries. United Nations Development Programme: International Poverty Centre. 2005. .
    1. Delany A, Ismail Z, Graham L, Ramkissoon Y. The Child Support Grant: Uses, Implementation and Obstacles. A report prepared by the Community Agency for Social Enquiry (CASE) for UNICEF, Department of Social Development (DSD) and the South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) 2008. .
    1. DSD, SASSA, and UNICEF. The South African Child Support Grant Impact Assessment: Evidence from a survey of children, adolescents and their households. Pretoria: UNICEF South Africa; 2011. .
    1. Aguero JM, Carter MR, Woolard I. The Impact of Unconditional Cash Transfers on Nutrition: the South African Child Support Grant. Centre for Global Development. 2006. .
    1. Noble M, Wright G, Barnes H, Noble S, Ntshongwana P, Gutierrez-Romere R, Mclennan D, Avenell D. The Child Support Grant: a sub-provincial analysis of eligibility and take up in January 2005. Republic of South Africa: Department of Social Development; 2005. .
    1. Samson M. Quantitative Analysis of the Impact of the of the Child Support Grant. UNICEF; 2008. .
    1. Tylleskar T, Jackson D, Meda N, Engebretsen IM, Chopra M, Diallo AH, Doherty T, Ekstrom EC, Fadnes LT, Goga A. et al.Exclusive breastfeeding promotion by peer counsellors in sub-Saharan Africa (PROMISE-EBF): a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. 2011;378:420–427. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60738-1.
    1. Jolliffe IT. Principal Component Analysis, Series: Springer Series in Statistics. 2. NY: Springer; 2002. p. 28. XXIX, 487.
    1. Pelletier DL, Frongillo EA Jr, Schroeder DG. The effects of malnutrition on child mortality in developing countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1995;73:443–448.
    1. Paes-Sousa R, Pacheco Santos LM, Miazaki E. Effects of a conditional cash transfer programme on child nutrition in Brazil. Bulletin World Health Organ. 2011;89:496–503. doi: 10.2471/BLT.10.084202.
    1. Geber H, Bona M. Community Development Workers Program: mentoring for social transformation in the public service in post-apartheid South Africa. International Journal of Learning and Change. 2008;3(2):177–195. doi: 10.1504/IJLC.2008.023182.
    1. Frye I. Poverty, social security and civil society in South Africa: triangulating transformation. Basic social security case study for South Africa for Brot fuer die Welt. 2008. .

Source: PubMed

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

3
Subskrybuj