Determining Severity Strata for Three Atopic Dermatitis Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaires: Defining Severity Score Ranges for the Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale and the Atopic Dermatitis Symptom and Impact Scales (ADerm-SS and ADerm-IS)

Jonathan I Silverberg, Eric L Simpson, Brian M Calimlim, Leighann Litcher-Kelly, Xiaoran Li, Xiaowu Sun, Yael A Leshem, Jonathan I Silverberg, Eric L Simpson, Brian M Calimlim, Leighann Litcher-Kelly, Xiaoran Li, Xiaowu Sun, Yael A Leshem

Abstract

Introduction: Three patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires-Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (WP-NRS), Atopic Dermatitis Symptom Scale (ADerm-SS), and Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale (ADerm-IS)-were developed to assess the symptoms and impacts of atopic dermatitis (AD). Severity strata for these PROs are needed to aid in their interpretation.

Methods: Using data from a global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial (NCT03568318) of patients with moderate-severe AD (age ≥ 12 years), equipercentile linking analyses were conducted to define severity strata applying the Patient Global Impression of Severity as an anchor. Analyses were conducted separately for adults and adolescents, and then harmonized between the two age groups.

Results: The sample included 769 adults and 113 adolescents. For the WP-NRS, 0 was associated with absent, 1-2 with minimal, 3 with mild, 4-7 with moderate, and 8-10 with severe. For the ADerm-SS Skin Pain, 0 was associated with absent, 1 with minimal, 2 with mild, 3-6 with moderate, and 7-10 with severe. For ADerm-SS 7-Item Total Symptom Score (TSS-7), 0-1 was associated with absent, 2-11 with minimal, 12-22 with mild, 23-47 with moderate, and 48-70 with severe. For ADerm-IS Sleep, 0 was associated with absent, 1-3 with minimal, 4-6 with mild, 7-20 with moderate, and 21-30 with severe. For ADerm-IS Daily Activities, 0 was associated with absent, 1-2 with minimal, 3-7 with mild, 8-25 with moderate, and 26-40 with severe. For ADerm-IS Emotional State, 0 was associated with absent, 1-2 with minimal, 3-8 with mild, 9-22 with moderate, and 23-30 with severe.

Conclusions: These severity strata provide score interpretations of the WP-NRS, ADerm-SS, and ADerm-IS, translating these scores to simple and intuitive outcomes, which can inform clinical studies and clinical practice.

Trial registration number: NCT03568318.

Keywords: ADerm-IS; ADerm-SS; Atopic dermatitis; Patient-reported outcomes; Pruritus; Severity strata; Skin pain; Sleep.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Target questionnaires and scores. aQuestionnaire items use a 0–10 numerical rating scale. bItem completed daily. cTo avoid repeated measurement of concepts potentially assessed by other instruments in clinical trials, the ADerm-SS TSS-7 was developed by summing items that assess concepts not measured by clinician-reported questionnaires. ADerm IS Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale, ADerm-SS Atopic Dermatitis Symptom Scale, TSS-7 7-Item Total Symptom Score, WP-NRS Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Patient Global Impression of Severity categories used for defining severity strata. PGIS Patient Global Impression of Severity. Absent, light peach with grey text; Minimal, peach with grey text; Mild, orange with white text; Moderate, light red with white text; Severe, dark red with white text
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Severity strata anchored to collapsed Patient Global Impression of Severity categories (adults and adolescents and pooled). Severity strata are based on the collapsed PGIS. Absent, light peach with grey text; Minimal, peach with grey text; Mild, orange with white text; Moderate, light red with white text; Severe, dark red with white text. The Moderate stratum corresponds to PGIS of Moderate and Moderately severe; the Severe stratum corresponds to PGIS of Severe and Very severe. ADerm IS Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale, ADerm-SS Atopic Dermatitis Symptom Scale, PGIS Patient Global Impression of Severity, TSS-7 7-Item Total Symptom Score, WP-NRS Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale

References

    1. Nutten S. Atopic dermatitis: global epidemiology and risk factors. Ann Nutr Metab. 2015;66(Suppl 1):8–16. doi: 10.1159/000370220.
    1. National Eczema Association. Atopic dermatitis 2016 [7 Sep 2021]. . Accessed 27 Oct 2022.
    1. Chopra R, Vakharia PP, Sacotte R, Patel N, Immaneni S, White T, et al. Relationship between EASI and SCORAD severity assessments for atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;140(6):1708–10.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.04.052.
    1. Vakharia PP, Chopra R, Sacotte R, Patel KR, Singam V, Patel N, et al. Burden of skin pain in atopic dermatitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017;119(6):548–52.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.09.076.
    1. Foley C, Tundia N, Simpson E, Teixeira HD, Litcher-Kelly L, Bodhani A. Development and content validity of new patient-reported outcome questionnaires to assess the signs and symptoms and impact of atopic dermatitis: the Atopic Dermatitis Symptom Scale (ADerm-SS) and the Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale (ADerm-IS) Curr Med Res Opin. 2019;35(7):1139–1148. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1560222.
    1. Gerbens LA, Prinsen CA, Chalmers JR, Drucker AM, von Kobyletzki LB, Limpens J, et al. Evaluation of the measurement properties of symptom measurement instruments for atopic eczema: a systematic review. Allergy. 2017;72(1):146–163. doi: 10.1111/all.12959.
    1. Heinl D, Prinsen CA, Deckert S, Chalmers JR, Drucker AM, Ofenloch R, et al. Measurement properties of adult quality-of-life measurement instruments for eczema: a systematic review. Allergy. 2016;71(3):358–370. doi: 10.1111/all.12806.
    1. Silverberg JI, DeLozier A, Sun L, Thyssen JP, Kim B, Yosipovitch G, et al. Psychometric properties of the itch numeric rating scale, skin pain numeric rating scale, and atopic dermatitis sleep scale in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021;19(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01877-8.
    1. Taieb A, Boralevi F, Seneschal J, Merhand S, Georgescu V, Taieb C, et al. Atopic dermatitis burden scale for adults: development and validation of a new assessment tool. Acta Derm Venereol. 2015;95(6):700–705. doi: 10.2340/00015555-1945.
    1. Taieb A, Boralevi F, Seneschal J, Merhand S, Georgescu V, Taieb C, et al. Atopic dermatitis burden scale for adults: development and validation of a new assessment tool. Acta Derm Venereol. 2015;95(6):700–705. doi: 10.2340/00015555-1945.
    1. Chalmers JR, Simpson E, Apfelbacher CJ, Thomas KS, von Kobyletzki L, Schmitt J, et al. Report from the fourth international consensus meeting to harmonize core outcome measures for atopic eczema/dermatitis clinical trials (HOME initiative) Br J Dermatol. 2016;175(1):69–79. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14773.
    1. Spuls PI, Gerbens LAA, Simpson E, Apfelbacher CJ, Chalmers JR, Thomas KS, et al. Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), a core instrument to measure symptoms in clinical trials: a Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) statement. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176(4):979–984. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15179.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Center for Devices and Radiological Health . Guidance for industry patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Silver Spring: Office of Communications, Division of Drug Information; 2009.
    1. Patrick DL, Burke LB, Gwaltney CJ, Leidy NK, Martin ML, Molsen E, et al. Content validity-establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report: Part 1-Eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. Value Health. 2011;14(8):967–977. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.014.
    1. Patrick DL, Burke LB, Gwaltney CJ, Leidy NK, Martin ML, Molsen E, et al. Content validity-establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report: Part 2-Assessing respondent understanding. Value Health. 2011;14(8):978–988. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.013.
    1. Silverberg JI, Simpson EL, McLafferty M, Medrano P, Su S, Calimlim BM, et al. Content validity of the Atopic Dermatitis Symptom Scale (ADerm-SS) and Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale (ADerm-IS) in adolescents to assess the symptoms and impacts of atopic dermatitis. In: Revolutionizing Atopic Dermatitis (RAD) Congress; 13–14 Dec 2020; Virtual.
    1. Silverberg JI, Simpson EL, Litcher-Kelly L, McDonald J, Calimlim BM, Leshem YA. Psychometric evaluation of three patient-reported outcome questionnaires assessing the symptoms and impacts of atopic dermatitis in adults and adolescents. In: Revolutionizing Atopic Dermatitis (RAD) Congress; 13–14 Dec 2020; Virtual.
    1. Chopra R, Vakharia PP, Sacotte R, Patel N, Immaneni S, White T, et al. Severity strata for Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), modified EASI, Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), objective SCORAD, Atopic Dermatitis Severity Index and body surface area in adolescents and adults with atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177(5):1316–1321. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15641.
    1. Leshem YA, Hajar T, Hanifin JM, Simpson EL. What the Eczema Area and Severity Index score tells us about the severity of atopic dermatitis: an interpretability study. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(5):1353–1357. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13662.
    1. Silverberg JI, Gelfand JM, Margolis DJ, Fonacier L, Boguniewicz M, Schwartz LB, et al. Severity strata for POEM, PO-SCORAD, and DLQI in US adults with atopic dermatitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018;121(4):464–8.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2018.07.004.
    1. Reich K, Teixeira HD, de Bruin-Weller M, Bieber T, Soong W, Kabashima K, et al. Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in combination with topical corticosteroids in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD Up): results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10290):2169–2181. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00589-4.
    1. US Food & Drug Administration. Patient-Focused Drug Development Guidance Public Workshop: Incorporating Clinical Outcome Assessments into Endpoints for Regulatory Decision-Making 12/06/2019 [04/27/2022]. . Accessed 27 Oct 2022.
    1. Kolen MJ, Brennan RL. Testing equating, scaling, and linking: methods and practices. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2014.
    1. Linn RL. Linking results of distinct assessments. Appl Meas Educ. 1993;6(1):83–102. doi: 10.1207/s15324818ame0601_5.
    1. Leucht S, Kane JM, Etschel E, Kissling W, Hamann J, Engel RR. Linking the PANSS, BPRS, and CGI: clinical implications. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2006;31(10):2318–2325. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301147.
    1. McGee S. Evidence-based physical diagnosis e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2021.
    1. Grant L, Seiding Larsen L, Trennery C, Silverberg JI, Abramovits W, Simpson EL, et al. Conceptual model to illustrate the symptom experience and humanistic burden associated with atopic dermatitis in adults and adolescents. Dermatitis. 2019;30(4):247–254. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000486.
    1. McCleary K. Understanding the lived experience of eczema: the "Voice of the Patient" Report on the eczema patient-focused drug development meeting: More Than Skin Deep; 03/2020 [05/19/2022]. . Accessed 27 Oct 2022.
    1. Charman CR, Venn AJ, Ravenscroft JC, Williams HC. Translating Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) scores into clinical practice by suggesting severity strata derived using anchor-based methods. Br J Dermatol. 2013;169(6):1326–1332. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12590.
    1. Silverberg JI. Validity and reliability of a novel numeric rating scale to measure skin-pain in adults with atopic dermatitis. Arch Dermatol Res. 2021;313(10):855–861. doi: 10.1007/s00403-021-02185-3.
    1. Vakharia PP, Chopra R, Sacotte R, Patel N, Immaneni S, White T, et al. Severity strata for five patient-reported outcomes in adults with atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2018;178(4):925–930. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16078.
    1. Bjorner JB. Solving the Tower of Babel problem for patient-reported outcome measures: comments on: linking scores with patient-reported health outcome instruments: a validation study and comparison of three linking methods. Psychometrika. 2021;86(3):747–753. doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09778-x.
    1. Schalet BD, Lim S, Cella D, Choi SW. Linking scores with patient-reported health outcome instruments: a validation study and comparison of three linking methods. Psychometrika. 2021;86(3):717–746. doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09776-z.
    1. Price L, Lurie A, Wilkins C. EQUIPERCENT: a SAS program for calculating equivalent scores using the equipercentile method. Appl Psychol Meas. 2001;25:332. doi: 10.1177/01466210122032172.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj