Effects of two different mobilization techniques on pain, range of motion and functional disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis: a comparative study

Surabhi Agarwal, Shahid Raza, Jamal Ali Moiz, Shahnawaz Anwer, Ahmad H Alghadir, Surabhi Agarwal, Shahid Raza, Jamal Ali Moiz, Shahnawaz Anwer, Ahmad H Alghadir

Abstract

[Purpose] This study aimed to compare the effects of two different mobilization techniques in the management of patients with adhesive capsulitis. [Subjects and Methods] Thirty non-diabetic men and women with adhesive capsulitis were randomly allocated to the reverse distraction group (n=15) or Kaltenborn group (n=15). The reverse distraction technique and Kaltenborn's caudal and posterior glides (grades III and IV) were applied 10-15 times along with conventional physical therapy for 18 treatment sessions in 6 weeks. Pain was measured with a visual analog scale, abduction and external rotation range of motion with goniometry, hand behind back reach with inch tape, and functional disability with the Flexilevel scale of shoulder function before and after the treatment. [Results] Although all the variables improved significantly in both groups after 18 intervention sessions, reverse distraction was significantly better than Kaltenborn's caudal and posterior glides in decreasing pain and improving abduction range of motion and functional scores. [Conclusion] This study supports the clinical use of reverse distraction as an alternative to conventional mobilization techniques to decrease pain and improve range of motion and functional scores in patients with adhesive capsulitis.

Keywords: Adhesive capsulitis; Kaltenborn’s glide; Reverse distraction technique.

References

    1. Neviaser TJ: Intra-articular inflammatory diseases of the shoulder. Instr Course Lect, 1989, 38: 199–204.
    1. Aydeniz A, Gursoy S, Guney E: Which musculoskeletal complications are most frequently seen in type 2 diabetes mellitus? J Int Med Res, 2008, 36: 505–511.
    1. Bridgman JF: Periarthritis of the shoulder and diabetes mellitus. Ann Rheum Dis, 1972, 31: 69–71.
    1. Lundberg J: The frozen shoulder. Clinical and radiographical observations. The effect of manipulation under general anesthesia. Structure and glycosaminoglycan content of the joint capsule. Local bone metabolism. Acta Orthop Scand, 1969, 40: 119, 1–59.
    1. Pal B, Anderson J, Dick WC, et al. : Limitation of joint mobility and shoulder capsulitis in insulin- and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Br J Rheumatol, 1986, 25: 147–151.
    1. Mao CY, Jaw WC, Cheng HC: Frozen shoulder: correlation between the response to physical therapy and follow-up shoulder arthrography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1997, 78: 857–859.
    1. Balci N, Balci MK, Tüzüner S: Shoulder adhesive capsulitis and shoulder range of motion in type II diabetes mellitus: association with diabetic complications. J Diabetes Complications, 1999, 13: 135–140.
    1. Castellarin G, Ricci M, Vedovi E, et al. : Manipulation and arthroscopy under general anesthesia and early rehabilitative treatment for frozen shoulders. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2004, 85: 1236–1240.
    1. Fitzpatrick MJ, Powell SE, Tibone JE, et al. : The anatomy, pathology, and definitive treatment of rotator interval lesions: current concepts. Arthroscopy, 2003, 19: 70–79.
    1. Neviaser JS: Arthrography of the shoulder joint: study of the findings in adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. Study of the findings in adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1962, 44-A: 1321–1359.
    1. Ozaki J, Nakagawa Y, Sakurai G, et al. : Recalcitrant chronic adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. Role of contracture of the coracohumeral ligament and rotator interval in pathogenesis and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1989, 71: 1511–1515.
    1. Bulgen DY, Binder AI, Hazleman BL, et al. : Frozen shoulder: prospective clinical study with an evaluation of three treatment regimens. Ann Rheum Dis, 1984, 43: 353–360.
    1. Siegel LB, Cohen NJ, Gall EP: Adhesive capsulitis: a sticky issue. Am Fam Physician, 1999, 59: 1843–1852.
    1. Cyriax J: Textbook of Orthopedic Medicine, 8th ed. London: Baillère Tindall, 1982.
    1. Shaffer B, Tibone JE, Kerlan RK: Frozen shoulder. A long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1992, 74: 738–746.
    1. Nicholson GG: The effects of passive joint mobilization on pain and hypomobility associated with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 1985, 6: 238–246.
    1. Stenvers JD: De Primaire Frozen Shoulder [doctoral thesis]. University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands, 1994.
    1. Do Moon G, Lim JY, Kim Y, et al. : Comparison of Maitland and Kaltenborn mobilization techniques for improving shoulder pain and range of motion in frozen shoulders. J Phys Ther Sci, 2015, 27: 1391–1395.
    1. Harryman DT, 2nd, Sidles JA, Clark JM, et al. : Translation of the humeral head on the glenoid with passive glenohumeral motion. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1990, 72: 1334–1343.
    1. Roubal PJ, Dobritt D, Placzek JD: Glenohumeral gliding manipulation following interscalene brachial plexus block in patients with adhesive capsulitis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 1996, 24: 66–77.
    1. Placzek JD, Roubal PJ, Freeman DC, et al. : Long-term effectiveness of translational manipulation for adhesive capsulitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1998, (356): 181–191.
    1. Johnson AJ, Godges JJ, Zimmerman GJ, et al. : The effect of anterior versus posterior glide joint mobilization on external rotation range of motion in patients with shoulder adhesive capsulitis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2007, 37: 88–99.
    1. Sarkari E, Dhakshinamoorthy P, Multani NK: Comparison of caudal and antero-posterior glide mobilisation for the improvement of abduction range of motion. J Exerc Sci Physiother, 2006, 2: 59.
    1. Vermeulen HM, Obermann WR, Burger BJ, et al. : End-range mobilization techniques in adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder joint: a multiple-subject case report. Phys Ther, 2000, 80: 1204–1213.
    1. Vermeulen HM, Rozing PM, Obermann WR, et al. : Comparison of high-grade and low-grade mobilization techniques in the management of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther, 2006, 86: 355–368.
    1. Ferraz MB, Quaresma MR, Aquino LR, et al. : Reliability of pain scales in the assessment of literate and illiterate patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol, 1990, 17: 1022–1024.
    1. Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, et al. : Measures of adult pain: visual analog scale for pain (vas pain), numeric rating scale for pain (nrs pain), mcgill pain questionnaire (mpq), short-form mcgill pain questionnaire (sf-mpq), chronic pain grade scale (cpgs), short form-36 bodily pain scale (sf-36 bps), and measure of intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (icoap). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 2011, 63: S240–S252.
    1. Burrows H: Joint motion: method of measuring and recording. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1965.
    1. Riddle DL, Rothstein JM, Lamb RL: Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting. Shoulder measurements. Phys Ther, 1987, 67: 668–673.
    1. Surenkok O, Aytar A, Baltaci G: Acute effects of scapular mobilization in shoulder dysfunction: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Sport Rehabil, 2009, 18: 493–501.
    1. Sharma SP, Bærheim A, KvÅle A: Passive range of motion in patients with adhesive shoulder capsulitis, an intertester reliability study over eight weeks. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2015, 16: 37.
    1. Yang JL, Jan MH, Chang CW, et al. : Effectiveness of the end-range mobilization and scapular mobilization approach in a subgroup of subjects with frozen shoulder syndrome: a randomized control trial. Man Ther, 2012, 17: 47–52.
    1. Cook KF, Roddey TS, Gartsman GM, et al. : Development and psychometric evaluation of the Flexilevel Scale of Shoulder Function. Med Care, 2003, 41: 823–835.
    1. Kaltenborn FM: Manual therapy of the extremity joints. Oslo: Olaf Norlis, Bokhandel, 1973.
    1. Codman EA: The shoulder: rupture of the supraspinatus tendon and other lesions in or about the subacromial bursa. Boston: Thomas Todd, 1934.
    1. Griggs SM, Ahn A, Green A: Idiopathic adhesive capsulitis. A prospective functional outcome study of nonoperative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2000, 82-A: 1398–1407.
    1. Kelley MJ, McClure PW, Leggin BG: Frozen shoulder: evidence and a proposed model guiding rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2009, 39: 135–148.
    1. Mangus BC, Hoffman LA, Hoffman MA, et al. : Basic principles of extremity joint mobilization using a Kaltenborn approach. J Sport Rehabil, 2002, 11: 235–250.
    1. Lundberg A, Malmgren K, Schomburg ED: Role of joint afferents in motor control exemplified by effects on reflex pathways from Ib afferents. J Physiol, 1978, 284: 327–343.
    1. Zusman M: Spinal manipulative therapy: review of some proposed mechanisms, and a new hypothesis. Aust J Physiother, 1986, 32: 89–99.
    1. Frank C, Akeson WH, Woo SL, et al. : Physiology and therapeutic value of passive joint motion. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1984, (185): 113–125.
    1. Noël G, Verbruggen LA, Barbaix E, et al. : Adding compression to mobilization in a rehabilitation program after knee surgery. A preliminary clinical observational study. Man Ther, 2000, 5: 102–107.
    1. Cirstea MC, Levin MF: Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain, 2000, 123: 940–953.
    1. Roby-Brami A, Feydy A, Combeaud M, et al. : Motor compensation and recovery for reaching in stroke patients. Acta Neurol Scand, 2003, 107: 369–381.
    1. Fayad F, Roby-Brami A, Yazbeck C, et al. : Three-dimensional scapular kinematics and scapulohumeral rhythm in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis or frozen shoulder. J Biomech, 2008, 41: 326–332.
    1. Vermeulen HM, Stokdijk M, Eilers PH, et al. : Measurement of three dimensional shoulder movement patterns with an electromagnetic tracking device in patients with a frozen shoulder. Ann Rheum Dis, 2002, 61: 115–120.
    1. Lin JJ, Wu YT, Wang SF, et al. : Trapezius muscle imbalance in individuals suffering from frozen shoulder syndrome. Clin Rheumatol, 2005, 24: 569–575.
    1. Thomas SJ, McDougall C, Brown ID, et al. : Prevalence of symptoms and signs of shoulder problems in people with diabetes mellitus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2007, 16: 748–751.
    1. DePalma AF: The classic. Loss of scapulohumeral motion (frozen shoulder). Ann Surg. 1952; 135: 193–204. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2008, 466: 552–560.
    1. Hallaceli H, Cımbız A, Cavlak U, et al. : Ranges of scapular elevation and depression in healthy male subjects. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi, 2006, 17: 85–88.
    1. Teys P, Bisset L, Vicenzino B: The initial effects of a Mulligan’s mobilization with movement technique on range of movement and pressure pain threshold in pain-limited shoulders. Man Ther, 2008, 13: 37–42.
    1. Kibler WB, McMullen J: Scapular dyskinesis and its relation to shoulder pain. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2003, 11: 142–151.
    1. Yang JL, Chang CW, Chen SY, et al. : Mobilization techniques in subjects with frozen shoulder syndrome: randomized multiple-treatment trial. Phys Ther, 2007, 87: 1307–1315.
    1. Han SH, Oh KS, Han KJ, et al. : Accuracy of measuring tape and vertebral-level methods to determine shoulder internal rotation. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2012, 470: 562–566.
    1. Green S, Buchbinder R, Forbes A, et al. : A standardized protocol for measurement of range of movement of the shoulder using the Plurimeter-V inclinometer and assessment of its intrarater and interrater reliability. Arthritis Care Res, 1998, 11: 43–52.
    1. Ginn KA, Cohen ML, Herbert RD: Does hand-behind-back range of motion accurately reflect shoulder internal rotation? J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2006, 15: 311–314.
    1. Wakabayashi I, Itoi E, Minagawa H, et al. : Does reaching the back reflect the actual internal rotation of the shoulder? J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2006, 15: 306–310.
    1. Bekkering WP, ten Cate R, van Suijlekom-Smit LW, et al. : The relationship between impairments in joint function and disabilities in independent function in children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol, 2001, 28: 1099–1105.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj