Prevalence and clinical features of lumbar zygapophysial joint pain: a study in an Australian population with chronic low back pain

A C Schwarzer, S C Wang, N Bogduk, P J McNaught, R Laurent, A C Schwarzer, S C Wang, N Bogduk, P J McNaught, R Laurent

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the prevalence of pain arising from the zygapophysial joint in patients with chronic low back pain and to determine whether any clinical features could distinguish patients with and without such pain.

Methods: Sixty three patients with chronic low back pain were studied prospectively. All patients underwent a detailed history and physical examination as well as a series of intra-articular zygapophysial joint injections of 0.5% bupivacaine starting at the symptomatic level to a maximum of three levels or until the pain was abolished. They also received injections of normal saline into paraspinal muscles to act as controls.

Results: All patients proceeded with the injections. Twenty (32%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 20 to 44%) obtained greater than 50% relief of their pain following the administration of saline. Fifty seven patients completed the study; 23 of them (40%; 95% CI 27 to 53%) failed to obtain relief following the injection of saline but obtained relief following one or more intra-articular injections of local anaesthetic. None of the historical features or clinical tests could discriminate those patients with and those without zygapophysial joint pain.

Conclusion: Pain originating from the zygapophysial joint is not uncommon, but this study failed to find any clinical predictors in patients with such pain.

References

    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Jun;(279):8-20
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Jun;(279):110-21
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992 Sep;73(9):824-8
    1. Clin J Pain. 1993 Jun;9(2):124-30
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Nov;18(15):2153-62
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 May 15;19(10):1132-7
    1. Pain. 1994 Aug;58(2):195-200
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 1966 Jan;25(1):1-24
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976 Mar-Apr;(115):149-56
    1. Pain. 1975 Sep;1(3):277-99
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1979 Sep-Oct;4(5):441-6
    1. Radiology. 1980 Dec;137(3):665-7
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1981 Nov-Dec;6(6):598-605
    1. J Anat. 1982 Mar;134(Pt 2):383-97
    1. Radiology. 1982 Nov;145(2):321-5
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983 Apr;8(3):286-93
    1. Radiology. 1984 May;151(2):333-6
    1. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging. 1984;21(2):85-104
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1984 Sep;9(6):549-51
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1984 Oct;9(7):746-50
    1. Med J Aust. 1985 Dec 9-23;143(12-13):563-5
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 Dec;(213):216-22
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987 Jan;69(1):3-7
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988 Jan;13(1):61-4
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988 Jun;13(6):686-9
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988 Sep;13(9):966-71
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988 Dec;13(12):1407-10
    1. Med J Aust. 1989 Apr 3;150(7):384-7
    1. Med J Aust. 1989 Aug 21;151(4):210-2, 215-7
    1. Pain. 1989 Oct;39(1):37-40
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990 Mar;72(2):275-6
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Aug;15(8):780-2
    1. N Engl J Med. 1991 Oct 3;325(14):1002-7
    1. N Engl J Med. 1991 Oct 3;325(14):1039-40
    1. Theor Med. 1991 Sep;12(3):247-70
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1992 Mar 1;135(5):571-8
    1. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1991 Oct;2(4):807-16

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj